[99s-extend] [erlang-questions] [ANN] Cowboy 1.0

Tue Aug 5 22:33:17 CEST 2014

Hi, Federico.
+
+Check this out for the "why" regarding your question:
+https://github.com/ninenines/cowboy/issues/715
+
+It's one of the reasons (I haven't detected others yet) stopping me from
+moving to 1.0, unfortunately (I have some projects depending on these
+status codes already), but as soon as I have some time and look at all the
+_major_ differences between 0.9.0 and 1.0 I think I'll make the move. For
+the time being, I have found no issues with the REST part of cowboy (the
+one I use).
+
+Thank you, Loïc et all for the effort and for keeping it open source.
+
+Regards.
+
+- Paulo F. Oliveira
+
+
+On 5 August 2014 15:18, Federico Carrone <federico.carrone at gmail.com> wrote:
+
+> Congratulations Loic. I really love cowboy.
+>
+> I got only one question: Why did you change the reply with 400 instead of
+> 422 in cowboy_rest for unprocessable entities?
+>
+> Regards,
+> Federico.
+>
+>
+>
+> On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 10:33 AM, Max Lapshin <max.lapshin at gmail.com>
+> wrote:
+>
+>> Loic, it is very cool!
+>>
+>> Thanks.
+>>
+>> _______________________________________________
+>> erlang-questions mailing list
+>> erlang-questions at erlang.org
+>> http://erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-questions
+>>
+>>
+>
+>
+> --
+> http://federicocarrone.com/
+>
+> _______________________________________________
+> erlang-questions mailing list
+> erlang-questions at erlang.org
+> http://erlang.org/mailman/listinfo/erlang-questions
+>
+>
+-------------- next part --------------
+An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
+URL: <http://lists.ninenines.eu/archives/extend/attachments/20140805/f3705f7b/attachment.html>
+