aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/lib
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorStavros Aronis <[email protected]>2011-01-03 15:07:55 +0200
committerNiclas Axelsson <[email protected]>2011-01-18 15:50:09 +0100
commit02e0f98ab537b002f2ccb1092d9e7310d9e15c58 (patch)
tree5b79d80f20e1965d50c1f189449fee4e76a9c151 /lib
parent326ec4e6a86e7ddb7b49f2465ad43adf86399aac (diff)
downloadotp-02e0f98ab537b002f2ccb1092d9e7310d9e15c58.tar.gz
otp-02e0f98ab537b002f2ccb1092d9e7310d9e15c58.tar.bz2
otp-02e0f98ab537b002f2ccb1092d9e7310d9e15c58.zip
Fix errors in the handling of 'and'/'or' guards
Apart from the obvious bug in the negative evaluation of an 'and' guard, Dialyzer handled dont_know cases rather single-mindedly towards the positive branch. This patch allows for negative results as well and does some clever guesses to narrow them down. It was constructed similarly to the handling of the 'not' guard.
Diffstat (limited to 'lib')
-rw-r--r--lib/dialyzer/src/dialyzer_dataflow.erl47
1 files changed, 32 insertions, 15 deletions
diff --git a/lib/dialyzer/src/dialyzer_dataflow.erl b/lib/dialyzer/src/dialyzer_dataflow.erl
index 0e51ce059c..1723380c8c 100644
--- a/lib/dialyzer/src/dialyzer_dataflow.erl
+++ b/lib/dialyzer/src/dialyzer_dataflow.erl
@@ -2250,24 +2250,30 @@ handle_guard_and(Guard, Map, Env, Eval, State) ->
catch throw:{fail, _} -> bind_guard(Arg2, Map, Env, pos, State)
end,
{Map2, Type2} =
- try bind_guard(Arg1, Map, Env, neg, State)
- catch throw:{fail, _} -> bind_guard(Arg2, Map, Env, pos, State)
+ try bind_guard(Arg2, Map, Env, neg, State)
+ catch throw:{fail, _} -> bind_guard(Arg1, Map, Env, pos, State)
end,
case t_is_atom(false, Type1) orelse t_is_atom(false, Type2) of
true -> {join_maps([Map1, Map2], Map), t_atom(false)};
false -> throw({fail, none})
end;
dont_know ->
- True = t_atom(true),
{Map1, Type1} = bind_guard(Arg1, Map, Env, dont_know, State),
- case t_is_none(t_inf(Type1, t_boolean())) of
- true -> throw({fail, none});
+ {Map2, Type2} = bind_guard(Arg2, Map, Env, dont_know, State),
+ Bool1 = t_inf(Type1, t_boolean()),
+ Bool2 = t_inf(Type2, t_boolean()),
+ case t_is_none(Bool1) orelse t_is_none(Bool2) of
+ true -> throw({fatal_fail, none});
false ->
- {Map2, Type2} = bind_guard(Arg2, Map1, Env, Eval, State),
- case t_is_none(t_inf(Type2, t_boolean())) of
- true -> throw({fail, none});
- false -> {Map2, True}
- end
+ NewMap = join_maps([Map1, Map2], Map),
+ NewType =
+ case {t_atom_vals(Bool1), t_atom_vals(Bool2)} of
+ {['true'] , ['true'] } -> t_atom(true);
+ {['false'], _ } -> t_atom(false);
+ {_ , ['false']} -> t_atom(false);
+ {_ , _ } -> t_boolean()
+ end,
+ {NewMap, NewType}
end
end.
@@ -2303,11 +2309,22 @@ handle_guard_or(Guard, Map, Env, Eval, State) ->
end
end;
dont_know ->
- {Map1, Bool1} = bind_guard(Arg1, Map, Env, dont_know, State),
- {Map2, Bool2} = bind_guard(Arg2, Map, Env, dont_know, State),
- case t_is_boolean(Bool1) andalso t_is_boolean(Bool2) of
- true -> {join_maps([Map1, Map2], Map), t_sup(Bool1, Bool2)};
- false -> throw({fail, none})
+ {Map1, Type1} = bind_guard(Arg1, Map, Env, dont_know, State),
+ {Map2, Type2} = bind_guard(Arg2, Map, Env, dont_know, State),
+ Bool1 = t_inf(Type1, t_boolean()),
+ Bool2 = t_inf(Type2, t_boolean()),
+ case t_is_none(Bool1) orelse t_is_none(Bool2) of
+ true -> throw({fatal_fail, none});
+ false ->
+ NewMap = join_maps([Map1, Map2], Map),
+ NewType =
+ case {t_atom_vals(Bool1), t_atom_vals(Bool2)} of
+ {['false'], ['false']} -> t_atom(false);
+ {['true'] , _ } -> t_atom(true);
+ {_ , ['true'] } -> t_atom(true);
+ {_ , _ } -> t_boolean()
+ end,
+ {NewMap, NewType}
end
end.