From 35f083ecf32729afa2cdc8c1081dbe01477cb11e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Tuncer Ayaz <tuncer.ayaz@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2014 22:52:59 +0100
Subject: Fix minor eprof and fprof doc issues

---
 lib/tools/doc/src/eprof.xml | 2 +-
 lib/tools/doc/src/fprof.xml | 2 +-
 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/lib/tools/doc/src/eprof.xml b/lib/tools/doc/src/eprof.xml
index 3ebacf5546..73fd563fbd 100644
--- a/lib/tools/doc/src/eprof.xml
+++ b/lib/tools/doc/src/eprof.xml
@@ -35,7 +35,7 @@
       used. The profiling is done using the Erlang trace BIFs. Tracing of
       local function calls for a specified set of processes is enabled when
       profiling is begun, and disabled when profiling is stopped.</p>
-    <p>When using Eprof expect a slowdown in program execution.</p>
+    <p>When using Eprof, expect a slowdown in program execution.</p>
   </description>
   <funcs>
     <func>
diff --git a/lib/tools/doc/src/fprof.xml b/lib/tools/doc/src/fprof.xml
index ef8b82c9fa..f83c049fcd 100644
--- a/lib/tools/doc/src/fprof.xml
+++ b/lib/tools/doc/src/fprof.xml
@@ -789,7 +789,7 @@ create_file_slow(FD, M, N) ->
       function was first unsuspended and then garbage
       collected. Otherwise the printout would show
       <c>garbage_collect</c> being called from <c>suspend</c> but not
-      not which function that might have caused the garbage
+      which function that might have caused the garbage
       collection. 
       </p>
     <p>Let us now get back to the test code:</p>
-- 
cgit v1.2.3