From 9b5c49fd0c06459f2b2f8becc60a0fb70eb9d3ea Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Magnus Henoch <magnus.henoch@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2017 16:58:53 +0100
Subject: Mnesia: note first, next, prev and last vs fragmented tables

In the Table Fragmentation documentation section, note that the
functions first/1, next/2, prev/2 and last/1 return elements in an
undefined order for fragmented tables.

Also remove superfluous "the".
---
 lib/mnesia/doc/src/Mnesia_chap5.xmlsrc | 6 ++++--
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/lib/mnesia/doc/src/Mnesia_chap5.xmlsrc b/lib/mnesia/doc/src/Mnesia_chap5.xmlsrc
index 62759c624b..0265e0efa0 100644
--- a/lib/mnesia/doc/src/Mnesia_chap5.xmlsrc
+++ b/lib/mnesia/doc/src/Mnesia_chap5.xmlsrc
@@ -226,8 +226,10 @@
         not known beforehand, all fragments are searched for
         matching records.</p>
       <p>Notice that in <c>ordered_set</c> tables, the records
-        are ordered per fragment, and the the order is undefined in
-        results returned by <c>select</c> and <c>match_object</c>.</p>
+        are ordered per fragment, and the order is undefined in
+        results returned by <c>select</c> and <c>match_object</c>,
+        as well as <c>first</c>, <c>next</c>, <c>prev</c> and
+        <c>last</c>.</p>
       <p>The following code illustrates how a <c>Mnesia</c> table is
         converted to be a fragmented table and how more fragments
         are added later:</p>
-- 
cgit v1.2.3