From f265dc315485734adda7e7a8a88f6b4c02211477 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "Brian L. Troutwine" Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2013 09:31:38 -0800 Subject: Clean up some awkward wording around the +spp flag. This issue was pointed out by lpgauth in #erlounge. While the intention is clear, the original wording was a bit dodgy. I'm no grammarian--though I am a native speaker--so it's quite possible the new wording I've introduced is not impeachable. Should be idiomatic, though. Signed-off-by: Brian L. Troutwine --- erts/doc/src/erlang.xml | 8 ++++---- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) (limited to 'erts/doc/src/erlang.xml') diff --git a/erts/doc/src/erlang.xml b/erts/doc/src/erlang.xml index a498fc24df..13665f3e7c 100644 --- a/erts/doc/src/erlang.xml +++ b/erts/doc/src/erlang.xml @@ -2886,11 +2886,11 @@ os_prompt% {parallelism, Boolean}

Set scheduler hint for port parallelism. If set to true, - the VM will schedule port tasks when it by this can improve the + the VM will schedule port tasks when doing so will improve parallelism in the system. If set to false, the VM will - try to perform port tasks immediately and by this improving the - latency at the expense of parallelism. The default can be set on - system startup by passing the + try to perform port tasks immediately, improving latency at the + expense of parallelism. The default can be set on system startup + by passing the +spp command line argument to erl(1).

-- cgit v1.2.3