From 719f789cebec004b350153e1f001303d6713f4a6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Bj=C3=B6rn=20Gustavsson?= <bjorn@erlang.org>
Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2013 15:22:49 +0200
Subject: Fix complicated union of INTEGER constraints

A constraint that was an union of integer ranges:

   Type ::= INTEGER (lb1..ub1 | ... | lbN..ubN)

would sometimes (depending on the values) not all always be properly
combined to a single effective range, but would become:

   Type ::= INTEGER (lb2..ub2) (lb3..ub3)

If that type was used in a SEQUENCE:

   S ::= SEQUENCE {
           v Type
         }

the constraint would be simplified, taking the intersection of the
ranges.
---
 lib/asn1/test/asn1_SUITE_data/Constraints.py | 40 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 40 insertions(+)

(limited to 'lib/asn1/test/asn1_SUITE_data/Constraints.py')

diff --git a/lib/asn1/test/asn1_SUITE_data/Constraints.py b/lib/asn1/test/asn1_SUITE_data/Constraints.py
index e4bc987e4c..fcc8e4da31 100644
--- a/lib/asn1/test/asn1_SUITE_data/Constraints.py
+++ b/lib/asn1/test/asn1_SUITE_data/Constraints.py
@@ -94,4 +94,44 @@ pdf OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= {1,2,3,4,5}
 
 ShorterExt ::= IA5String (SIZE (5, ...))
 
+SeqOverlapping ::= SEQUENCE {
+    v Overlapping
+}
+
+SeqNonOverlapping ::= SEQUENCE {
+    v NonOverlapping
+}
+
+Overlapping ::= INTEGER (7280..7560 |
+7580..7680 |
+7910..8210 |
+8600..8940 |
+9250..9600 |
+14759..15109 |
+15250..15590 |
+18050..18800 |
+19300..19950 |
+21100..21700 |
+26200..26900 |
+18500..19900 |
+20100..20250 |
+21100..21700 |
+23000..24000 |
+24960..26900)
+
+-- The same intervals, but merged and sorted --
+NonOverlapping ::= INTEGER (7280..7560 |
+7580..7680 |
+7910..8210 |
+8600..8940 |
+9250..9600 |
+14759..15109 |
+15250..15590 |
+18050..19950 |
+20100..20250 |
+21100..21700 |
+23000..24000 |
+24960..26900)
+
+
 END
-- 
cgit v1.2.3