From 5f9b6873499882d32280883edaa97d7d0f526035 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?Bj=C3=B6rn=20Gustavsson?= Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2019 15:19:07 +0100 Subject: Eliminate bogus warning when using tuple calls There would be a bogus warning when compiling the following function with the `tuple_calls` option: dispatch(X) -> (list_to_atom("prefix_" ++ atom_to_list(suffix))):doit(X). The warning would look like this: no_file: this expression will fail with a 'badarg' exception https://bugs.erlang.org/browse/ERL-838 --- lib/compiler/test/warnings_SUITE.erl | 19 +++++++++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) (limited to 'lib/compiler/test/warnings_SUITE.erl') diff --git a/lib/compiler/test/warnings_SUITE.erl b/lib/compiler/test/warnings_SUITE.erl index 33d55996ad..1c23eba06d 100644 --- a/lib/compiler/test/warnings_SUITE.erl +++ b/lib/compiler/test/warnings_SUITE.erl @@ -42,7 +42,7 @@ comprehensions/1,maps/1,maps_bin_opt_info/1, redundant_boolean_clauses/1, latin1_fallback/1,underscore/1,no_warnings/1, - bit_syntax/1,inlining/1]). + bit_syntax/1,inlining/1,tuple_calls/1]). init_per_testcase(_Case, Config) -> Config. @@ -64,7 +64,8 @@ groups() -> bin_opt_info,bin_construction,comprehensions,maps, maps_bin_opt_info, redundant_boolean_clauses,latin1_fallback, - underscore,no_warnings,bit_syntax,inlining]}]. + underscore,no_warnings,bit_syntax,inlining, + tuple_calls]}]. init_per_suite(Config) -> test_lib:recompile(?MODULE), @@ -952,6 +953,20 @@ inlining(Config) -> run(Config, Ts), ok. +tuple_calls(Config) -> + %% Make sure that no spurious warnings are generated. + Ts = [{inlining_1, + <<"-compile(tuple_calls). + dispatch(X) -> + (list_to_atom(\"prefix_\" ++ + atom_to_list(suffix))):doit(X). + ">>, + [], + []} + ], + run(Config, Ts), + ok. + %%% %%% End of test cases. %%% -- cgit v1.2.3