From 84adefa331c4159d432d22840663c38f155cd4c1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Erlang/OTP Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 14:54:40 +0000 Subject: The R13B03 release. --- lib/dialyzer/doc/warnings.txt | 114 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 114 insertions(+) create mode 100644 lib/dialyzer/doc/warnings.txt (limited to 'lib/dialyzer/doc/warnings.txt') diff --git a/lib/dialyzer/doc/warnings.txt b/lib/dialyzer/doc/warnings.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000000..fd8cc0dc60 --- /dev/null +++ b/lib/dialyzer/doc/warnings.txt @@ -0,0 +1,114 @@ +##---------------------------------------------------------------------------- +## File: doc/warnings.txt +## Author(s): Tobias Lindahl +## Kostis Sagonas +## +## $Id$ +##---------------------------------------------------------------------------- + + +The discrepancies currently identified by Dialyzer can be classified +in the following categories: + +TYPE ERRORS +=========== + +* Match failure + - Warnings: + "The clause matching on X will never match; argument is of type T" + "The clause matching on tuple with arity N will never match; " + " argument is of type T!" + - Description: + The function or case clause will never match since the calling + argument has a different type than the expected one. + Note that due to pattern-matching compilation the X above may be + an argument enclosed in some structured term (tuple or list). + +* Function call with wrong arguments + - Warning: + "Call to function X with signature S will fail since the arguments are of type T!" + - Description: + The arguments which the function is called with are + not what the function implicitly expects. + +* Closure of wrong type + - Warnings: + "Fun application using type T instead of a fun!" + "Trying to use fun with type T with arguments AT" + - Description: + The variable that is used in the fun application is either not + a closure (fun entry) or a closure with the wrong domain. + +* Improper list construction + - Warnings: + "Cons will produce a non-proper list since its 2nd arg is of type T!" + "Call to '++'/2 will produce a non-proper list since its 2nd arg is of type T!" + - Description: + This is a place where an improper list (i.e., a list whose last + element is not the empty list []) is constructed. Strictly, these + are not discrepancies in Erlang, but we strongly recommend that + you fix these; there is ABSOLUTELY NO reason to create improper lists. + +* Function of no return + - Warning: + "Function will never return a proper value!" + - Description: + This is a function that never returns. Strictly speaking, this + is not a function and the code is OK only if this is used as a + point where an exception is thrown when handling an error. + +REDUNDANT OR UNREACHABLE CODE +============================= + +* Unreachable case clause + - Warning: + "Type guard X will always fail since variable is of type T!" + - Description: + The case clause is redundant since the input argument is of a + different type. + +* Unreachable function clause + - Warning: + "The guard X will always fail since the arguments are of type T!" + - Description: + The clause is made redundant due to one of its guards always failing. + +* Term comparison failure + - Warnings: + "=:= between T1 and T2 will always fail!" + "=/= between T1 and T2 will always fail!" + - Description: + The term comparison will always fail making the test always return + 'false' or, in a guard context, making the clause redundant. + +* Unused function + - Warning: + "Function will never be called!" + - Description: + The function is unused; no need to have it uncommented in the code. + + +CODE RELICS +=========== + +* Tuple used as fun + - Warnings: + "Unsafe use of tuple as a fun in call to X" + "Tuple used as fun will fail in native compiled code" + - Description: + A 2-tuple is used as a function closure. The modern way of + calling higher-order code in Erlang is by using proper funs. + The code should be rewritten using a proper 'fun' rather than + a 2-tuple since among other things makes the code cleaner and + is safer for execution in native code. + +* Unsafe BEAM code + - Warning: + "Unsafe BEAM code! Please recompile with a newer BEAM compiler." + - Description: + The analysis has encountered BEAM bytecode which will fail in a + really bad way (even with a seg-fault) if used in an impoper way. + Such code was produced by the BEAM compiler of R9C-0 (and prior) + for some record expressions. The recommended action is to + generate a new .beam file using a newer version of the BEAM + compiler. -- cgit v1.2.3