From a202c2e0fa1f7810fb19c5a051369ce8b308ebc1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Hans Bolinder Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2016 16:03:18 +0100 Subject: dialyzer: Improve a warning message Messages like "Invalid type specification for function para3:exp_adt/0. The success typing is () -> 3" now look like "The specification for para3:exp_adt/0 has an opaque subtype para3_adt:exp1(para3_adt:exp2()) which is violated by the success typing () -> 3". The old message did not give any clue as to what invalidated the contract, namely the opaque subtype. --- lib/dialyzer/src/dialyzer.erl | 4 +++ lib/dialyzer/src/dialyzer_contracts.erl | 35 ++++++++++++++++++---- lib/dialyzer/test/opaque_SUITE_data/results/para | 2 +- lib/dialyzer/test/opaque_SUITE_data/results/simple | 4 +-- 4 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-) (limited to 'lib/dialyzer') diff --git a/lib/dialyzer/src/dialyzer.erl b/lib/dialyzer/src/dialyzer.erl index 7f86520c06..aaa2f358d6 100644 --- a/lib/dialyzer/src/dialyzer.erl +++ b/lib/dialyzer/src/dialyzer.erl @@ -407,6 +407,10 @@ message_to_string({contract_range, [Contract, M, F, ArgStrings, Line, CRet]}) -> message_to_string({invalid_contract, [M, F, A, Sig]}) -> io_lib:format("Invalid type specification for function ~w:~w/~w." " The success typing is ~s\n", [M, F, A, Sig]); +message_to_string({contract_with_opaque, [M, F, A, OpaqueType, SigType]}) -> + io_lib:format("The specification for ~w:~w/~w" + " has an opaque subtype ~s which is violated by the" + " success typing ~s\n", [M, F, A, OpaqueType, SigType]); message_to_string({extra_range, [M, F, A, ExtraRanges, SigRange]}) -> io_lib:format("The specification for ~w:~w/~w states that the function" " might also return ~s but the inferred return is ~s\n", diff --git a/lib/dialyzer/src/dialyzer_contracts.erl b/lib/dialyzer/src/dialyzer_contracts.erl index a72368f9f8..73b04b305b 100644 --- a/lib/dialyzer/src/dialyzer_contracts.erl +++ b/lib/dialyzer/src/dialyzer_contracts.erl @@ -232,7 +232,7 @@ check_contract(#contract{contracts = Contracts}, SuccType, Opaques) -> error -> {error, {overlapping_contract, []}}; ok -> - InfList = [erl_types:t_inf(Contract, SuccType, Opaques) + InfList = [{Contract, erl_types:t_inf(Contract, SuccType, Opaques)} || Contract <- Contracts2], case check_contract_inf_list(InfList, SuccType, Opaques) of {error, _} = Invalid -> Invalid; @@ -256,10 +256,21 @@ check_domains([Dom|Doms]) -> %% Allow a contract if one of the overloaded contracts is possible. %% We used to be more strict, e.g., all overloaded contracts had to be %% possible. -check_contract_inf_list([FunType|Left], SuccType, Opaques) -> +check_contract_inf_list(List, SuccType, Opaques) -> + case check_contract_inf_list(List, SuccType, Opaques, []) of + ok -> ok; + {error, []} -> {error, invalid_contract}; + {error, [{SigRange, ContrRange}|_]} -> + case erl_types:t_find_opaque_mismatch(SigRange, ContrRange, Opaques) of + error -> {error, invalid_contract}; + {ok, _T1, T2} -> {error, {opaque_mismatch, T2}} + end + end. + +check_contract_inf_list([{Contract, FunType}|Left], SuccType, Opaques, OM) -> FunArgs = erl_types:t_fun_args(FunType), case lists:any(fun erl_types:t_is_none_or_unit/1, FunArgs) of - true -> check_contract_inf_list(Left, SuccType, Opaques); + true -> check_contract_inf_list(Left, SuccType, Opaques, OM); false -> STRange = erl_types:t_fun_range(SuccType), case erl_types:t_is_none_or_unit(STRange) of @@ -267,13 +278,16 @@ check_contract_inf_list([FunType|Left], SuccType, Opaques) -> false -> Range = erl_types:t_fun_range(FunType), case erl_types:t_is_none(erl_types:t_inf(STRange, Range)) of - true -> check_contract_inf_list(Left, SuccType, Opaques); + true -> + CR = erl_types:t_fun_range(Contract), + NewOM = [{STRange, CR}|OM], + check_contract_inf_list(Left, SuccType, Opaques, NewOM); false -> ok end end end; -check_contract_inf_list([], _SuccType, _Opaques) -> - {error, invalid_contract}. +check_contract_inf_list([], _SuccType, _Opaques, OM) -> + {error, OM}. check_extraneous([], _SuccType) -> ok; check_extraneous([C|Cs], SuccType) -> @@ -687,6 +701,9 @@ get_invalid_contract_warnings_funs([{MFA, {FileLine, Contract, _Xtra}}|Left], case check_contract(Contract, Sig, Opaques) of {error, invalid_contract} -> [invalid_contract_warning(MFA, WarningInfo, Sig, RecDict)|Acc]; + {error, {opaque_mismatch, T2}} -> + W = contract_opaque_warning(MFA, WarningInfo, T2, Sig, RecDict), + [W|Acc]; {error, {overlapping_contract, []}} -> [overlapping_contract_warning(MFA, WarningInfo)|Acc]; {error, {extra_range, ExtraRanges, STRange}} -> @@ -740,6 +757,12 @@ invalid_contract_warning({M, F, A}, WarningInfo, SuccType, RecDict) -> SuccTypeStr = dialyzer_utils:format_sig(SuccType, RecDict), {?WARN_CONTRACT_TYPES, WarningInfo, {invalid_contract, [M, F, A, SuccTypeStr]}}. +contract_opaque_warning({M, F, A}, WarningInfo, OpType, SuccType, RecDict) -> + OpaqueStr = erl_types:t_to_string(OpType), + SuccTypeStr = dialyzer_utils:format_sig(SuccType, RecDict), + {?WARN_CONTRACT_TYPES, WarningInfo, + {contract_with_opaque, [M, F, A, OpaqueStr, SuccTypeStr]}}. + overlapping_contract_warning({M, F, A}, WarningInfo) -> {?WARN_CONTRACT_TYPES, WarningInfo, {overlapping_contract, [M, F, A]}}. diff --git a/lib/dialyzer/test/opaque_SUITE_data/results/para b/lib/dialyzer/test/opaque_SUITE_data/results/para index b23d0cae3a..a490de2d43 100644 --- a/lib/dialyzer/test/opaque_SUITE_data/results/para +++ b/lib/dialyzer/test/opaque_SUITE_data/results/para @@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ para3.erl:36: The pattern {{{17}}} can never match the type {{{{{{_,_,_,_,_}}}}} para3.erl:55: Invalid type specification for function para3:t2/0. The success typing is () -> 'foo' para3.erl:65: The attempt to match a term of type {{{{{para3_adt:ot1(_,_,_,_,_)}}}}} against the pattern {{{{{17}}}}} breaks the opaqueness of para3_adt:ot1(_,_,_,_,_) para3.erl:68: The pattern {{{{17}}}} can never match the type {{{{{para3_adt:ot1(_,_,_,_,_)}}}}} -para3.erl:74: Invalid type specification for function para3:exp_adt/0. The success typing is () -> 3 +para3.erl:74: The specification for para3:exp_adt/0 has an opaque subtype para3_adt:exp1(para3_adt:exp2()) which is violated by the success typing () -> 3 para4.erl:21: Invalid type specification for function para4:a/1. The success typing is (para4:d_all() | para4:d_atom()) -> [{atom() | integer(),atom() | integer()}] para4.erl:26: Invalid type specification for function para4:i/1. The success typing is (para4:d_all() | para4:d_integer()) -> [{atom() | integer(),atom() | integer()}] para4.erl:31: Invalid type specification for function para4:t/1. The success typing is (para4:d_all() | para4:d_tuple()) -> [{atom() | integer(),atom() | integer()}] diff --git a/lib/dialyzer/test/opaque_SUITE_data/results/simple b/lib/dialyzer/test/opaque_SUITE_data/results/simple index 5a7f006d8c..0fdf07d1fe 100644 --- a/lib/dialyzer/test/opaque_SUITE_data/results/simple +++ b/lib/dialyzer/test/opaque_SUITE_data/results/simple @@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ rec_api.erl:24: Record construction #r1{f1::10} violates the declared type of fi rec_api.erl:29: Matching of pattern {'r1', 10} tagged with a record name violates the declared type of #r1{f1::10} rec_api.erl:33: The attempt to match a term of type rec_adt:r1() against the pattern {'r1', 'a'} breaks the opaqueness of the term rec_api.erl:35: Invalid type specification for function rec_api:adt_t1/1. The success typing is (#r1{f1::'a'}) -> #r1{f1::'a'} -rec_api.erl:40: Invalid type specification for function rec_api:adt_r1/0. The success typing is () -> #r1{f1::'a'} +rec_api.erl:40: The specification for rec_api:adt_r1/0 has an opaque subtype rec_adt:r1() which is violated by the success typing () -> #r1{f1::'a'} rec_api.erl:85: The attempt to match a term of type rec_adt:f() against the record field 'f' declared to be of type rec_api:f() breaks the opaqueness of the term rec_api.erl:99: Record construction #r2{f1::10} violates the declared type of field f1::rec_api:a() simple1_api.erl:113: The test simple1_api:d1() =:= simple1_api:d2() can never evaluate to 'true' @@ -79,7 +79,7 @@ simple1_api.erl:538: Guard test A::simple1_adt:d1() =:= 3 contains an opaque ter simple1_api.erl:548: The call erlang:'<'(A::simple1_adt:d1(),3) contains an opaque term as 1st argument when terms of different types are expected in these positions simple1_api.erl:558: The call erlang:'=<'(A::simple1_adt:d1(),B::simple1_adt:d2()) contains opaque terms as 1st and 2nd arguments when terms of different types are expected in these positions simple1_api.erl:565: Guard test {digraph:graph(),3} > {digraph:graph(),atom() | ets:tid()} contains an opaque term as 2nd argument -simple1_api.erl:91: Invalid type specification for function simple1_api:tup/0. The success typing is () -> {'a','b'} +simple1_api.erl:91: The specification for simple1_api:tup/0 has an opaque subtype simple1_adt:tuple1() which is violated by the success typing () -> {'a','b'} simple2_api.erl:100: The call lists:flatten(A::simple1_adt:tuple1()) contains an opaque term as 1st argument when a structured term of type [any()] is expected simple2_api.erl:116: The call lists:flatten({simple1_adt:tuple1()}) will never return since it differs in the 1st argument from the success typing arguments: ([any()]) simple2_api.erl:121: Guard test {simple1_adt:d1(),3} > {simple1_adt:d1(),simple1_adt:tuple1()} contains an opaque term as 2nd argument -- cgit v1.2.3