From ddb8dd58b6e08cdc375621c33d3712eee506100d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Hans Bolinder
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2015 11:59:44 +0200
Subject: stdlib: Correct orddict(3)
fold() and map() handle elements in a well-defined order.
Thanks to Rabbe Fogelholm for pointing out the bug.
---
lib/stdlib/doc/src/orddict.xml | 8 +++-----
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
(limited to 'lib/stdlib/doc/src/orddict.xml')
diff --git a/lib/stdlib/doc/src/orddict.xml b/lib/stdlib/doc/src/orddict.xml
index 6d1702bc59..ec1e43f29c 100644
--- a/lib/stdlib/doc/src/orddict.xml
+++ b/lib/stdlib/doc/src/orddict.xml
@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
- 20002013
+ 20002015
Ericsson AB. All Rights Reserved.
@@ -125,8 +125,7 @@
Orddict together with an extra argument Acc
(short for accumulator). Fun must return a new
accumulator which is passed to the next call. Acc0 is
- returned if the list is empty. The evaluation order is
- undefined.
+ returned if the list is empty.
@@ -150,8 +149,7 @@
Map a function over a dictionary
map calls Fun on successive keys and values
- of Orddict1 to return a new value for each key.
- The evaluation order is undefined.
+ of Orddict1 to return a new value for each key.
--
cgit v1.2.3