From ddb8dd58b6e08cdc375621c33d3712eee506100d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Hans Bolinder Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2015 11:59:44 +0200 Subject: stdlib: Correct orddict(3) fold() and map() handle elements in a well-defined order. Thanks to Rabbe Fogelholm for pointing out the bug. --- lib/stdlib/doc/src/orddict.xml | 8 +++----- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) (limited to 'lib/stdlib/doc/src/orddict.xml') diff --git a/lib/stdlib/doc/src/orddict.xml b/lib/stdlib/doc/src/orddict.xml index 6d1702bc59..ec1e43f29c 100644 --- a/lib/stdlib/doc/src/orddict.xml +++ b/lib/stdlib/doc/src/orddict.xml @@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
- 20002013 + 20002015 Ericsson AB. All Rights Reserved. @@ -125,8 +125,7 @@ Orddict together with an extra argument Acc (short for accumulator). Fun must return a new accumulator which is passed to the next call. Acc0 is - returned if the list is empty. The evaluation order is - undefined.

+ returned if the list is empty.

@@ -150,8 +149,7 @@ Map a function over a dictionary

map calls Fun on successive keys and values - of Orddict1 to return a new value for each key. - The evaluation order is undefined.

+ of Orddict1 to return a new value for each key.

-- cgit v1.2.3