From 5a662ce8fa95ab467e77a654088df43e5528a584 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Bj=C3=B6rn=20Gustavsson?= <bjorn@erlang.org>
Date: Sun, 28 Feb 2010 09:41:40 +0100
Subject: Efficiency Guide: Recommend external funs over tuple funs

---
 system/doc/efficiency_guide/functions.xml | 4 +++-
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

(limited to 'system/doc/efficiency_guide/functions.xml')

diff --git a/system/doc/efficiency_guide/functions.xml b/system/doc/efficiency_guide/functions.xml
index d55b60e39c..0d2e756900 100644
--- a/system/doc/efficiency_guide/functions.xml
+++ b/system/doc/efficiency_guide/functions.xml
@@ -179,7 +179,9 @@ explicit_map_pairs(Map, Xs0, Ys0) ->
        A "tuple fun", <c>{Module,Function}</c>, is not a fun.
        The cost for calling a "tuple fun" is similar to that
        of <c>apply/3</c> or worse. Using "tuple funs" is <em>strongly discouraged</em>,
-       as they may not be supported in a future release.</p></warning>
+       as they may not be supported in a future release,
+       and because there exists a superior alternative since the R10B
+       release, namely the <c>fun Module:Function/Arity</c> syntax.</p></warning>
 
        <p><c>apply/3</c> must look up the code for the function to execute
        in a hash table. Therefore, it will always be slower than a
-- 
cgit v1.2.3