From 2daff33c1cee100e7e8851cef463bda7c0237310 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Bj=C3=B6rn=20Gustavsson?= <bjorn@erlang.org>
Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2015 11:50:34 +0100
Subject: Remove an historical note about fun representation before R6B

It is hardly useful to mention that funs used to be represented
as tuples in ancient releases.
---
 system/doc/programming_examples/funs.xmlsrc | 4 ----
 1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)

(limited to 'system/doc/programming_examples')

diff --git a/system/doc/programming_examples/funs.xmlsrc b/system/doc/programming_examples/funs.xmlsrc
index 7bcf2e6171..57b90ccf7c 100644
--- a/system/doc/programming_examples/funs.xmlsrc
+++ b/system/doc/programming_examples/funs.xmlsrc
@@ -149,10 +149,6 @@ f(N, _) when is_integer(N) ->
       <c>erlang:fun_to_list/1</c> returns a textual representation of a fun.
       The <c>check_process_code/2</c> BIF returns <c>true</c> if the process
       contains funs that depend on the old version of a module.</p>
-    <note>
-      <p>In OTP R5 and earlier releases, funs were represented using
-        tuples.</p>
-    </note>
   </section>
 
   <section>
-- 
cgit v1.2.3