From 2daff33c1cee100e7e8851cef463bda7c0237310 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?Bj=C3=B6rn=20Gustavsson?= Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2015 11:50:34 +0100 Subject: Remove an historical note about fun representation before R6B It is hardly useful to mention that funs used to be represented as tuples in ancient releases. --- system/doc/programming_examples/funs.xmlsrc | 4 ---- 1 file changed, 4 deletions(-) (limited to 'system') diff --git a/system/doc/programming_examples/funs.xmlsrc b/system/doc/programming_examples/funs.xmlsrc index 7bcf2e6171..57b90ccf7c 100644 --- a/system/doc/programming_examples/funs.xmlsrc +++ b/system/doc/programming_examples/funs.xmlsrc @@ -149,10 +149,6 @@ f(N, _) when is_integer(N) -> erlang:fun_to_list/1 returns a textual representation of a fun. The check_process_code/2 BIF returns true if the process contains funs that depend on the old version of a module.

- -

In OTP R5 and earlier releases, funs were represented using - tuples.

-
-- cgit v1.2.3