%% %% %CopyrightBegin% %% %% Copyright Ericsson AB 2008-2010. All Rights Reserved. %% %% The contents of this file are subject to the Erlang Public License, %% Version 1.1, (the "License"); you may not use this file except in %% compliance with the License. You should have received a copy of the %% Erlang Public License along with this software. If not, it can be %% retrieved online at http://www.erlang.org/. %% %% Software distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" %% basis, WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, either express or implied. See %% the License for the specific language governing rights and limitations %% under the License. %% %% %CopyrightEnd% %% %% Se specification here: %% http://csrc.nist.gov/groups/ST/crypto_apps_infra/pki/pkitesting.html -module(pkits_SUITE). -compile(export_all). %%-include_lib("public_key/include/public_key.hrl"). -include("public_key.hrl"). -define(error(Format,Args), error(Format,Args,?FILE,?LINE)). -define(warning(Format,Args), warning(Format,Args,?FILE,?LINE)). -define(CERTS, "pkits/certs"). -define(MIME, "pkits/smime"). -define(CONV, "pkits/smime-pem"). -define(NIST1, "2.16.840.1.101.3.2.1.48.1"). -define(NIST2, "2.16.840.1.101.3.2.1.48.2"). -define(NIST3, "2.16.840.1.101.3.2.1.48.3"). -define(NIST4, "2.16.840.1.101.3.2.1.48.4"). -define(NIST5, "2.16.840.1.101.3.2.1.48.5"). -define(NIST6, "2.16.840.1.101.3.2.1.48.6"). %% all(doc) -> ["PKITS tests for RFC3280 compliance"]; all(suite) -> [signature_verification, validity_periods, verifying_name_chaining, %% basic_certificate_revocation_tests, verifying_paths_with_self_issued_certificates, verifying_basic_constraints, key_usage, %% certificate_policies, %% require_explicit_policy, %% policy_mappings, %% inhibit_policy_mapping, %% inhibit_any_policy, name_constraints, %% distribution_points, %% delta_crls, private_certificate_extensions]. signature_verification(doc) -> [""]; signature_verification(suite) -> []; signature_verification(Config) when is_list(Config) -> run(signature_verification()). validity_periods(doc) -> [""]; validity_periods(suite) -> []; validity_periods(Config) when is_list(Config) -> run(validity_periods()). verifying_name_chaining(doc) -> [""]; verifying_name_chaining(suite) -> []; verifying_name_chaining(Config) when is_list(Config) -> run(verifying_name_chaining()). basic_certificate_revocation_tests(doc) -> [""]; basic_certificate_revocation_tests(suite) -> []; basic_certificate_revocation_tests(Config) when is_list(Config) -> run(basic_certificate_revocation_tests()). verifying_paths_with_self_issued_certificates(doc) -> [""]; verifying_paths_with_self_issued_certificates(suite) -> []; verifying_paths_with_self_issued_certificates(Config) when is_list(Config) -> run(verifying_paths_with_self_issued_certificates()). verifying_basic_constraints(doc) -> [""]; verifying_basic_constraints(suite) -> []; verifying_basic_constraints(Config) when is_list(Config) -> run(verifying_basic_constraints()). key_usage(doc) -> [""]; key_usage(suite) -> []; key_usage(Config) when is_list(Config) -> run(key_usage()). certificate_policies(doc) -> [""]; certificate_policies(suite) -> []; certificate_policies(Config) when is_list(Config) -> run(certificate_policies()). require_explicit_policy(doc) -> [""]; require_explicit_policy(suite) -> []; require_explicit_policy(Config) when is_list(Config) -> run(require_explicit_policy()). policy_mappings(doc) -> [""]; policy_mappings(suite) -> []; policy_mappings(Config) when is_list(Config) -> run(policy_mappings()). inhibit_policy_mapping(doc) -> [""]; inhibit_policy_mapping(suite) -> []; inhibit_policy_mapping(Config) when is_list(Config) -> run(inhibit_policy_mapping()). inhibit_any_policy(doc) -> [""]; inhibit_any_policy(suite) -> []; inhibit_any_policy(Config) when is_list(Config) -> run(inhibit_any_policy()). name_constraints(doc) -> [""]; name_constraints(suite) -> []; name_constraints(Config) when is_list(Config) -> run(name_constraints()). distribution_points(doc) -> [""]; distribution_points(suite) -> []; distribution_points(Config) when is_list(Config) -> run(distribution_points()). delta_crls(doc) -> [""]; delta_crls(suite) -> []; delta_crls(Config) when is_list(Config) -> run(delta_crls()). private_certificate_extensions(doc) -> [""]; private_certificate_extensions(suite) -> []; private_certificate_extensions(Config) when is_list(Config) -> run(private_certificate_extensions()). run() -> catch crypto:start(), Tests = [signature_verification(), validity_periods(), verifying_name_chaining(), %%basic_certificate_revocation_tests(), verifying_paths_with_self_issued_certificates(), verifying_basic_constraints(), key_usage(), %%certificate_policies(), %%require_explicit_policy(), %%policy_mappings(), %%inhibit_policy_mapping(), %%inhibit_any_policy(), name_constraints(), %distribution_points(), %delta_crls(), private_certificate_extensions() ], run(lists:append(Tests)). run(Tests) -> File = file(?CERTS,"TrustAnchorRootCertificate.crt"), {ok, TA} = file:read_file(File), run(Tests, TA). run({Chap, Test, Result}, TA) -> CertChain = sort_chain(read_certs(Test),TA, [], false), try public_key:pkix_path_validation(TA, CertChain, []) of {Result, _} -> ok; {error,Result} when Result =/= ok -> ok; {error,Error} when is_integer(Result) -> ?warning(" ~p~n Got ~p expected ~p~n",[Test, Error, Result]); {error,Error} when Result =/= ok -> ?error(" minor ~p~n Got ~p expected ~p~n",[Test, Error, Result]); {error, Error} -> ?error(" ~p ~p~n Expected ~p got ~p ~n", [Chap, Test, Result, Error]), fail; {ok, _} when Result =/= ok -> ?error(" ~p ~p~n Expected ~p got ~p ~n", [Chap, Test, Result, ok]), fail catch Type:Reason -> Stack = erlang:get_stacktrace(), io:format("Crash ~p:~p in ~p~n",[Type,Reason,Stack]), io:format(" ~p ~p Expected ~p ~n", [Chap, Test, Result]), exit(crash) end; run([Test|Rest],TA) -> run(Test,TA), run(Rest,TA); run([],_) -> ok. read_certs(Test) -> File = test_file(Test), %% io:format("Read ~p ",[File]), Ders = erl_make_certs:pem_to_der(File), %% io:format("Ders ~p ~n",[length(Ders)]), [Cert || {'Certificate', Cert, not_encrypted} <- Ders]. test_file(Test) -> file(?CONV, lists:append(string:tokens(Test, " -")) ++ ".pem"). file(Sub,File) -> TestDir = case get(datadir) of undefined -> "./pkits_SUITE_data"; Dir when is_list(Dir) -> Dir end, AbsFile = filename:join([TestDir,Sub,File]), case filelib:is_file(AbsFile) of true -> ok; false -> ?error("Couldn't read data from ~p ~n",[AbsFile]) end, AbsFile. sort_chain([First|Certs], TA, Try, Found) -> case public_key:pkix_is_issuer(First,TA) of true -> [First|sort_chain(Certs,First,Try,true)]; false -> sort_chain(Certs,TA,[First|Try],Found) end; sort_chain([], _, [],_) -> []; sort_chain([], Valid, Check, true) -> sort_chain(lists:reverse(Check), Valid, [], false); sort_chain([], _Valid, Check, false) -> Check. signature_verification() -> %% "4.1", "Signature Verification" , [{ "4.1.1", "Valid Signatures Test1", ok}, { "4.1.2", "Invalid CA Signature Test2", {bad_cert,invalid_signature}}, { "4.1.3", "Invalid EE Signature Test3", {bad_cert,invalid_signature}}, { "4.1.4", "Valid DSA Signatures Test4", ok}, { "4.1.5", "Valid DSA Parameter Inheritance Test5", ok}, { "4.1.6", "Invalid DSA Signature Test6", {bad_cert,invalid_signature}}]. validity_periods() -> %% { "4.2", "Validity Periods" }, [{ "4.2.1", "Invalid CA notBefore Date Test1", {bad_cert, cert_expired}}, { "4.2.2", "Invalid EE notBefore Date Test2", {bad_cert, cert_expired}}, { "4.2.3", "Valid pre2000 UTC notBefore Date Test3", ok}, { "4.2.4", "Valid GeneralizedTime notBefore Date Test4", ok}, { "4.2.5", "Invalid CA notAfter Date Test5", {bad_cert, cert_expired}}, { "4.2.6", "Invalid EE notAfter Date Test6", {bad_cert, cert_expired}}, { "4.2.7", "Invalid pre2000 UTC EE notAfter Date Test7", {bad_cert, cert_expired}}, { "4.2.8", "Valid GeneralizedTime notAfter Date Test8", ok}]. verifying_name_chaining() -> %%{ "4.3", "Verifying Name Chaining" }, [{ "4.3.1", "Invalid Name Chaining EE Test1", {bad_cert, invalid_issuer}}, { "4.3.2", "Invalid Name Chaining Order Test2", {bad_cert, invalid_issuer}}, { "4.3.3", "Valid Name Chaining Whitespace Test3", ok}, { "4.3.4", "Valid Name Chaining Whitespace Test4", ok}, { "4.3.5", "Valid Name Chaining Capitalization Test5", ok}, { "4.3.6", "Valid Name Chaining UIDs Test6", ok}, { "4.3.7", "Valid RFC3280 Mandatory Attribute Types Test7", ok}, { "4.3.8", "Valid RFC3280 Optional Attribute Types Test8", ok}, { "4.3.9", "Valid UTF8String Encoded Names Test9", ok}, { "4.3.10", "Valid Rollover from PrintableString to UTF8String Test10", ok}, { "4.3.11", "Valid UTF8String Case Insensitive Match Test11", ok}]. basic_certificate_revocation_tests() -> %%{ "4.4", "Basic Certificate Revocation Tests" }, [{ "4.4.1", "Missing CRL Test1", 3 }, { "4.4.2", "Invalid Revoked CA Test2", 23 }, { "4.4.3", "Invalid Revoked EE Test3", 23 }, { "4.4.4", "Invalid Bad CRL Signature Test4", 8 }, { "4.4.5", "Invalid Bad CRL Issuer Name Test5", 3 }, { "4.4.6", "Invalid Wrong CRL Test6", 3 }, { "4.4.7", "Valid Two CRLs Test7", ok}, %% The test document suggests these should return certificate revoked... %% Subsquent discussion has concluded they should not due to unhandle %% critical CRL extensions. { "4.4.8", "Invalid Unknown CRL Entry Extension Test8", 36 }, { "4.4.9", "Invalid Unknown CRL Extension Test9", 36 }, { "4.4.10", "Invalid Unknown CRL Extension Test10", 36 }, { "4.4.11", "Invalid Old CRL nextUpdate Test11", 12 }, { "4.4.12", "Invalid pre2000 CRL nextUpdate Test12", 12 }, { "4.4.13", "Valid GeneralizedTime CRL nextUpdate Test13", ok}, { "4.4.14", "Valid Negative Serial Number Test14", ok}, { "4.4.15", "Invalid Negative Serial Number Test15", 23 }, { "4.4.16", "Valid Long Serial Number Test16", ok}, { "4.4.17", "Valid Long Serial Number Test17", ok}, { "4.4.18", "Invalid Long Serial Number Test18", 23 }, { "4.4.19", "Valid Separate Certificate and CRL Keys Test19", ok}, { "4.4.20", "Invalid Separate Certificate and CRL Keys Test20", 23 }, %% CRL path is revoked so get a CRL path validation error { "4.4.21", "Invalid Separate Certificate and CRL Keys Test21", 54 }]. verifying_paths_with_self_issued_certificates() -> %%{ "4.5", "Verifying Paths with Self-Issued Certificates" }, [{ "4.5.1", "Valid Basic Self-Issued Old With New Test1", ok}, %%{ "4.5.2", "Invalid Basic Self-Issued Old With New Test2", 23 }, %%{ "4.5.3", "Valid Basic Self-Issued New With Old Test3", ok}, %%{ "4.5.4", "Valid Basic Self-Issued New With Old Test4", ok}, { "4.5.5", "Invalid Basic Self-Issued New With Old Test5", 23 }, %%{ "4.5.6", "Valid Basic Self-Issued CRL Signing Key Test6", ok}, { "4.5.7", "Invalid Basic Self-Issued CRL Signing Key Test7", 23 }, { "4.5.8", "Invalid Basic Self-Issued CRL Signing Key Test8", {bad_cert,invalid_key_usage} }]. verifying_basic_constraints() -> [%%{ "4.6", "Verifying Basic Constraints" }, { "4.6.1", "Invalid Missing basicConstraints Test1", {bad_cert, missing_basic_constraint} }, { "4.6.2", "Invalid cA False Test2", {bad_cert, missing_basic_constraint}}, { "4.6.3", "Invalid cA False Test3", {bad_cert, missing_basic_constraint}}, { "4.6.4", "Valid basicConstraints Not Critical Test4", ok}, { "4.6.5", "Invalid pathLenConstraint Test5", {bad_cert, max_path_length_reached}}, { "4.6.6", "Invalid pathLenConstraint Test6", {bad_cert, max_path_length_reached}}, { "4.6.7", "Valid pathLenConstraint Test7", ok}, { "4.6.8", "Valid pathLenConstraint Test8", ok}, { "4.6.9", "Invalid pathLenConstraint Test9", {bad_cert, max_path_length_reached}}, { "4.6.10", "Invalid pathLenConstraint Test10", {bad_cert, max_path_length_reached}}, { "4.6.11", "Invalid pathLenConstraint Test11", {bad_cert, max_path_length_reached}}, { "4.6.12", "Invalid pathLenConstraint Test12", {bad_cert, max_path_length_reached}}, { "4.6.13", "Valid pathLenConstraint Test13", ok}, { "4.6.14", "Valid pathLenConstraint Test14", ok}, { "4.6.15", "Valid Self-Issued pathLenConstraint Test15", ok}, { "4.6.16", "Invalid Self-Issued pathLenConstraint Test16", {bad_cert, max_path_length_reached}}, { "4.6.17", "Valid Self-Issued pathLenConstraint Test17", ok}]. key_usage() -> %%{ "4.7", "Key Usage" }, [{ "4.7.1", "Invalid keyUsage Critical keyCertSign False Test1", {bad_cert,invalid_key_usage} }, { "4.7.2", "Invalid keyUsage Not Critical keyCertSign False Test2", {bad_cert,invalid_key_usage} }, { "4.7.3", "Valid keyUsage Not Critical Test3", ok} %%,{ "4.7.4", "Invalid keyUsage Critical cRLSign False Test4", 35 } %%,{ "4.7.5", "Invalid keyUsage Not Critical cRLSign False Test5", 35 } ]. %% Certificate policy tests need special handling. They can have several %% sub tests and we need to check the outputs are correct. certificate_policies() -> %%{ "4.8", "Certificate Policies" }, [{"4.8.1.1", "All Certificates Same Policy Test1", "-policy anyPolicy -explicit_policy", "True", ?NIST1, ?NIST1, 0}, {"4.8.1.2", "All Certificates Same Policy Test1", "-policy ?NIST1 -explicit_policy", "True", ?NIST1, ?NIST1, 0}, {"4.8.1.3", "All Certificates Same Policy Test1", "-policy ?NIST2 -explicit_policy", "True", ?NIST1, "", 43}, {"4.8.1.4", "All Certificates Same Policy Test1", "-policy ?NIST1 -policy ?NIST2 -explicit_policy", "True", ?NIST1, ?NIST1, 0}, {"4.8.2.1", "All Certificates No Policies Test2", "-policy anyPolicy", "False", "", "", 0}, {"4.8.2.2", "All Certificates No Policies Test2", "-policy anyPolicy -explicit_policy", "True", "", "", 43}, {"4.8.3.1", "Different Policies Test3", "-policy anyPolicy", "False", "", "", 0}, {"4.8.3.2", "Different Policies Test3", "-policy anyPolicy -explicit_policy", "True", "", "", 43}, {"4.8.3.3", "Different Policies Test3", "-policy ?NIST1 -policy ?NIST2 -explicit_policy", "True", "", "", 43}, {"4.8.4", "Different Policies Test4", "-policy anyPolicy", "True", "", "", 43}, {"4.8.5", "Different Policies Test5", "-policy anyPolicy", "True", "", "", 43}, {"4.8.6.1", "Overlapping Policies Test6", "-policy anyPolicy", "True", ?NIST1, ?NIST1, 0}, {"4.8.6.2", "Overlapping Policies Test6", "-policy ?NIST1", "True", ?NIST1, ?NIST1, 0}, {"4.8.6.3", "Overlapping Policies Test6", "-policy ?NIST2", "True", ?NIST1, "", 43}, {"4.8.7", "Different Policies Test7", "-policy anyPolicy", "True", "", "", 43}, {"4.8.8", "Different Policies Test8", "-policy anyPolicy", "True", "", "", 43}, {"4.8.9", "Different Policies Test9", "-policy anyPolicy", "True", "", "", 43}, {"4.8.10.1", "All Certificates Same Policies Test10", "-policy ?NIST1", "True", "?NIST1:?NIST2", "?NIST1", 0}, {"4.8.10.2", "All Certificates Same Policies Test10", "-policy ?NIST2", "True", "?NIST1:?NIST2", "?NIST2", 0}, {"4.8.10.3", "All Certificates Same Policies Test10", "-policy anyPolicy", "True", "?NIST1:?NIST2", "?NIST1:?NIST2", 0}, {"4.8.11.1", "All Certificates AnyPolicy Test11", "-policy anyPolicy", "True", "$apolicy", "$apolicy", 0}, {"4.8.11.2", "All Certificates AnyPolicy Test11", "-policy ?NIST1", "True", "$apolicy", "?NIST1", 0}, {"4.8.12", "Different Policies Test12", "-policy anyPolicy", "True", "", "", 43}, {"4.8.13.1", "All Certificates Same Policies Test13", "-policy ?NIST1", "True", "?NIST1:?NIST2:?NIST3", "?NIST1", 0}, {"4.8.13.2", "All Certificates Same Policies Test13", "-policy ?NIST2", "True", "?NIST1:?NIST2:?NIST3", "?NIST2", 0}, {"4.8.13.3", "All Certificates Same Policies Test13", "-policy ?NIST3", "True", "?NIST1:?NIST2:?NIST3", "?NIST3", 0}, {"4.8.14.1", "AnyPolicy Test14", "-policy ?NIST1", "True", "?NIST1", "?NIST1", 0}, {"4.8.14.2", "AnyPolicy Test14", "-policy ?NIST2", "True", "?NIST1", "", 43}, {"4.8.15", "User Notice Qualifier Test15", "-policy anyPolicy", "False", "?NIST1", "?NIST1", 0}, {"4.8.16", "User Notice Qualifier Test16", "-policy anyPolicy", "False", "?NIST1", "?NIST1", 0}, {"4.8.17", "User Notice Qualifier Test17", "-policy anyPolicy", "False", "?NIST1", "?NIST1", 0}, {"4.8.18.1", "User Notice Qualifier Test18", "-policy ?NIST1", "True", "?NIST1:?NIST2", "?NIST1", 0}, {"4.8.18.2", "User Notice Qualifier Test18", "-policy ?NIST2", "True", "?NIST1:?NIST2", "?NIST2", 0}, {"4.8.19", "User Notice Qualifier Test19", "-policy anyPolicy", "False", "?NIST1", "?NIST1", 0}, {"4.8.20", "CPS Pointer Qualifier Test20", "-policy anyPolicy -explicit_policy", "True", "?NIST1", "?NIST1", 0}]. require_explicit_policy() -> %%{ "4.9", "Require Explicit Policy" }, [{"4.9.1", "Valid RequireExplicitPolicy Test1", "-policy anyPolicy", "False", "", "", 0}, {"4.9.2", "Valid RequireExplicitPolicy Test2", "-policy anyPolicy", "False", "", "", 0}, {"4.9.3", "Invalid RequireExplicitPolicy Test3", "-policy anyPolicy", "True", "", "", 43}, {"4.9.4", "Valid RequireExplicitPolicy Test4", "-policy anyPolicy", "True", "?NIST1", "?NIST1", 0}, {"4.9.5", "Invalid RequireExplicitPolicy Test5", "-policy anyPolicy", "True", "", "", 43}, {"4.9.6", "Valid Self-Issued requireExplicitPolicy Test6", "-policy anyPolicy", "False", "", "", 0}, {"4.9.7", "Invalid Self-Issued requireExplicitPolicy Test7", "-policy anyPolicy", "True", "", "", 43}, {"4.9.8", "Invalid Self-Issued requireExplicitPolicy Test8", "-policy anyPolicy", "True", "", "", 43}]. policy_mappings() -> %%{ "4.10", "Policy Mappings" }, [{"4.10.1.1", "Valid Policy Mapping Test1", "-policy ?NIST1", "True", "?NIST1", "?NIST1", 0}, {"4.10.1.2", "Valid Policy Mapping Test1", "-policy ?NIST2", "True", "?NIST1", "", 43}, {"4.10.1.3", "Valid Policy Mapping Test1", "-policy anyPolicy -inhibit_map", "True", "", "", 43}, {"4.10.2.1", "Invalid Policy Mapping Test2", "-policy anyPolicy", "True", "", "", 43}, {"4.10.2.2", "Invalid Policy Mapping Test2", "-policy anyPolicy -inhibit_map", "True", "", "", 43}, {"4.10.3.1", "Valid Policy Mapping Test3", "-policy ?NIST1", "True", "?NIST2", "", 43}, {"4.10.3.2", "Valid Policy Mapping Test3", "-policy ?NIST2", "True", "?NIST2", "?NIST2", 0}, {"4.10.4", "Invalid Policy Mapping Test4", "-policy anyPolicy", "True", "", "", 43}, {"4.10.5.1", "Valid Policy Mapping Test5", "-policy ?NIST1", "True", "?NIST1", "?NIST1", 0}, {"4.10.5.2", "Valid Policy Mapping Test5", "-policy ?NIST6", "True", "?NIST1", "", 43}, {"4.10.6.1", "Valid Policy Mapping Test6", "-policy ?NIST1", "True", "?NIST1", "?NIST1", 0}, {"4.10.6.2", "Valid Policy Mapping Test6", "-policy ?NIST6", "True", "?NIST1", "", 43}, { "4.10.7", "Invalid Mapping From anyPolicy Test7", 42 }, { "4.10.8", "Invalid Mapping To anyPolicy Test8", 42 }, {"4.10.9", "Valid Policy Mapping Test9", "-policy anyPolicy", "True", "?NIST1", "?NIST1", 0}, {"4.10.10", "Invalid Policy Mapping Test10", "-policy anyPolicy", "True", "", "", 43}, {"4.10.11", "Valid Policy Mapping Test11", "-policy anyPolicy", "True", "?NIST1", "?NIST1", 0}, %% TODO: check notice display {"4.10.12.1", "Valid Policy Mapping Test12", "-policy ?NIST1", "True", "?NIST1:?NIST2", "?NIST1", 0}, %% TODO: check notice display {"4.10.12.2", "Valid Policy Mapping Test12", "-policy ?NIST2", "True", "?NIST1:?NIST2", "?NIST2", 0}, {"4.10.13", "Valid Policy Mapping Test13", "-policy anyPolicy", "True", "?NIST1", "?NIST1", 0}, %% TODO: check notice display {"4.10.14", "Valid Policy Mapping Test14", "-policy anyPolicy", "True", "?NIST1", "?NIST1", 0}]. inhibit_policy_mapping() -> %%{ "4.11", "Inhibit Policy Mapping" }, [{"4.11.1", "Invalid inhibitPolicyMapping Test1", "-policy anyPolicy", "True", "", "", 43}, {"4.11.2", "Valid inhibitPolicyMapping Test2", "-policy anyPolicy", "True", "?NIST1", "?NIST1", 0}, {"4.11.3", "Invalid inhibitPolicyMapping Test3", "-policy anyPolicy", "True", "", "", 43}, {"4.11.4", "Valid inhibitPolicyMapping Test4", "-policy anyPolicy", "True", "?NIST2", "?NIST2", 0}, {"4.11.5", "Invalid inhibitPolicyMapping Test5", "-policy anyPolicy", "True", "", "", 43}, {"4.11.6", "Invalid inhibitPolicyMapping Test6", "-policy anyPolicy", "True", "", "", 43}, {"4.11.7", "Valid Self-Issued inhibitPolicyMapping Test7", "-policy anyPolicy", "True", "?NIST1", "?NIST1", 0}, {"4.11.8", "Invalid Self-Issued inhibitPolicyMapping Test8", "-policy anyPolicy", "True", "", "", 43}, {"4.11.9", "Invalid Self-Issued inhibitPolicyMapping Test9", "-policy anyPolicy", "True", "", "", 43}, {"4.11.10", "Invalid Self-Issued inhibitPolicyMapping Test10", "-policy anyPolicy", "True", "", "", 43}, {"4.11.11", "Invalid Self-Issued inhibitPolicyMapping Test11", "-policy anyPolicy", "True", "", "", 43}]. inhibit_any_policy() -> %%{ "4.12", "Inhibit Any Policy" }, [{"4.12.1", "Invalid inhibitAnyPolicy Test1", "-policy anyPolicy", "True", "", "", 43}, {"4.12.2", "Valid inhibitAnyPolicy Test2", "-policy anyPolicy", "True", "?NIST1", "?NIST1", 0}, {"4.12.3.1", "inhibitAnyPolicy Test3", "-policy anyPolicy", "True", "?NIST1", "?NIST1", 0}, {"4.12.3.2", "inhibitAnyPolicy Test3", "-policy anyPolicy -inhibit_any", "True", "", "", 43}, {"4.12.4", "Invalid inhibitAnyPolicy Test4", "-policy anyPolicy", "True", "", "", 43}, {"4.12.5", "Invalid inhibitAnyPolicy Test5", "-policy anyPolicy", "True", "", "", 43}, {"4.12.6", "Invalid inhibitAnyPolicy Test6", "-policy anyPolicy", "True", "", "", 43}, {"4.12.7", "Valid Self-Issued inhibitAnyPolicy Test7", ok}, {"4.12.8", "Invalid Self-Issued inhibitAnyPolicy Test8", 43 }, {"4.12.9", "Valid Self-Issued inhibitAnyPolicy Test9", ok}, {"4.12.10", "Invalid Self-Issued inhibitAnyPolicy Test10", 43 }]. name_constraints() -> %%{ "4.13", "Name Constraints" }, [{ "4.13.1", "Valid DN nameConstraints Test1", ok}, { "4.13.2", "Invalid DN nameConstraints Test2", {bad_cert, name_not_permitted}}, { "4.13.3", "Invalid DN nameConstraints Test3", {bad_cert, name_not_permitted}}, { "4.13.4", "Valid DN nameConstraints Test4", ok}, { "4.13.5", "Valid DN nameConstraints Test5", ok}, { "4.13.6", "Valid DN nameConstraints Test6", ok}, { "4.13.7", "Invalid DN nameConstraints Test7", {bad_cert, name_not_permitted}}, { "4.13.8", "Invalid DN nameConstraints Test8", {bad_cert, name_not_permitted}}, { "4.13.9", "Invalid DN nameConstraints Test9", {bad_cert, name_not_permitted}}, { "4.13.10", "Invalid DN nameConstraints Test10", {bad_cert, name_not_permitted}}, { "4.13.11", "Valid DN nameConstraints Test11", ok}, { "4.13.12", "Invalid DN nameConstraints Test12", {bad_cert, name_not_permitted}}, { "4.13.13", "Invalid DN nameConstraints Test13", {bad_cert, name_not_permitted}}, { "4.13.14", "Valid DN nameConstraints Test14", ok}, { "4.13.15", "Invalid DN nameConstraints Test15", {bad_cert, name_not_permitted}}, { "4.13.16", "Invalid DN nameConstraints Test16", {bad_cert, name_not_permitted}}, { "4.13.17", "Invalid DN nameConstraints Test17", {bad_cert, name_not_permitted}}, { "4.13.18", "Valid DN nameConstraints Test18", ok}, { "4.13.19", "Valid Self-Issued DN nameConstraints Test19", ok}, { "4.13.20", "Invalid Self-Issued DN nameConstraints Test20", {bad_cert, name_not_permitted} }, { "4.13.21", "Valid RFC822 nameConstraints Test21", ok}, { "4.13.22", "Invalid RFC822 nameConstraints Test22", {bad_cert, name_not_permitted} }, { "4.13.23", "Valid RFC822 nameConstraints Test23", ok}, { "4.13.24", "Invalid RFC822 nameConstraints Test24", {bad_cert, name_not_permitted} }, { "4.13.25", "Valid RFC822 nameConstraints Test25", ok}, { "4.13.26", "Invalid RFC822 nameConstraints Test26", {bad_cert, name_not_permitted}}, { "4.13.27", "Valid DN and RFC822 nameConstraints Test27", ok}, { "4.13.28", "Invalid DN and RFC822 nameConstraints Test28", {bad_cert, name_not_permitted} }, { "4.13.29", "Invalid DN and RFC822 nameConstraints Test29", {bad_cert, name_not_permitted} }, { "4.13.30", "Valid DNS nameConstraints Test30", ok}, { "4.13.31", "Invalid DNS nameConstraints Test31", {bad_cert, name_not_permitted} }, { "4.13.32", "Valid DNS nameConstraints Test32", ok}, { "4.13.33", "Invalid DNS nameConstraints Test33", {bad_cert, name_not_permitted}}, { "4.13.34", "Valid URI nameConstraints Test34", ok}, { "4.13.35", "Invalid URI nameConstraints Test35", {bad_cert, name_not_permitted} }, { "4.13.36", "Valid URI nameConstraints Test36", ok}, { "4.13.37", "Invalid URI nameConstraints Test37", {bad_cert, name_not_permitted}}, { "4.13.38", "Invalid DNS nameConstraints Test38", {bad_cert, name_not_permitted} }]. distribution_points() -> %%{ "4.14", "Distribution Points" }, [{ "4.14.1", "Valid distributionPoint Test1", ok}, { "4.14.2", "Invalid distributionPoint Test2", 23 }, { "4.14.3", "Invalid distributionPoint Test3", 44 }, { "4.14.4", "Valid distributionPoint Test4", ok}, { "4.14.5", "Valid distributionPoint Test5", ok}, { "4.14.6", "Invalid distributionPoint Test6", 23 }, { "4.14.7", "Valid distributionPoint Test7", ok}, { "4.14.8", "Invalid distributionPoint Test8", 44 }, { "4.14.9", "Invalid distributionPoint Test9", 44 }, { "4.14.10", "Valid No issuingDistributionPoint Test10", ok}, { "4.14.11", "Invalid onlyContainsUserCerts CRL Test11", 44 }, { "4.14.12", "Invalid onlyContainsCACerts CRL Test12", 44 }, { "4.14.13", "Valid onlyContainsCACerts CRL Test13", ok}, { "4.14.14", "Invalid onlyContainsAttributeCerts Test14", 44 }, { "4.14.15", "Invalid onlySomeReasons Test15", 23 }, { "4.14.16", "Invalid onlySomeReasons Test16", 23 }, { "4.14.17", "Invalid onlySomeReasons Test17", 3 }, { "4.14.18", "Valid onlySomeReasons Test18", ok}, { "4.14.19", "Valid onlySomeReasons Test19", ok}, { "4.14.20", "Invalid onlySomeReasons Test20", 23 }, { "4.14.21", "Invalid onlySomeReasons Test21", 23 }, { "4.14.22", "Valid IDP with indirectCRL Test22", ok}, { "4.14.23", "Invalid IDP with indirectCRL Test23", 23 }, { "4.14.24", "Valid IDP with indirectCRL Test24", ok}, { "4.14.25", "Valid IDP with indirectCRL Test25", ok}, { "4.14.26", "Invalid IDP with indirectCRL Test26", 44 }, { "4.14.27", "Invalid cRLIssuer Test27", 3 }, { "4.14.28", "Valid cRLIssuer Test28", ok}, { "4.14.29", "Valid cRLIssuer Test29", ok}, %% Although this test is valid it has a circular dependency. As a result %% an attempt is made to reursively checks a CRL path and rejected due to %% a CRL path validation error. PKITS notes suggest this test does not %% need to be run due to this issue. { "4.14.30", "Valid cRLIssuer Test30", 54 }, { "4.14.31", "Invalid cRLIssuer Test31", 23 }, { "4.14.32", "Invalid cRLIssuer Test32", 23 }, { "4.14.33", "Valid cRLIssuer Test33", ok}, { "4.14.34", "Invalid cRLIssuer Test34", 23 }, { "4.14.35", "Invalid cRLIssuer Test35", 44 }]. delta_crls() -> %%{ "4.15", "Delta-CRLs" }, [{ "4.15.1", "Invalid deltaCRLIndicator No Base Test1", 3 }, { "4.15.2", "Valid delta-CRL Test2", ok}, { "4.15.3", "Invalid delta-CRL Test3", 23 }, { "4.15.4", "Invalid delta-CRL Test4", 23 }, { "4.15.5", "Valid delta-CRL Test5", ok}, { "4.15.6", "Invalid delta-CRL Test6", 23 }, { "4.15.7", "Valid delta-CRL Test7", ok}, { "4.15.8", "Valid delta-CRL Test8", ok}, { "4.15.9", "Invalid delta-CRL Test9", 23 }, { "4.15.10", "Invalid delta-CRL Test10", 12 }]. private_certificate_extensions() -> %%{ "4.16", "Private Certificate Extensions" }, [{ "4.16.1", "Valid Unknown Not Critical Certificate Extension Test1", ok}, { "4.16.2", "Invalid Unknown Critical Certificate Extension Test2", {bad_cert,unknown_critical_extension}}]. convert() -> Tests = [signature_verification(), validity_periods(), verifying_name_chaining(), basic_certificate_revocation_tests(), verifying_paths_with_self_issued_certificates(), verifying_basic_constraints(), key_usage(), certificate_policies(), require_explicit_policy(), policy_mappings(), inhibit_policy_mapping(), inhibit_any_policy(), name_constraints(), distribution_points(), delta_crls(), private_certificate_extensions()], [convert(Test) || Test <- lists:flatten(Tests)]. convert({_,Test,_}) -> convert1(Test); convert({_,Test,_,_,_,_,_}) -> convert1(Test). convert1(Test) -> FName = lists:append(string:tokens(Test, " -")), File = filename:join(?MIME, "Signed" ++ FName ++ ".eml"), io:format("Convert ~p~n",[File]), {ok, Mail} = file:read_file(File), Base64 = skip_lines(Mail), %%io:format("~s",[Base64]), Tmp = base64:mime_decode(Base64), file:write_file("pkits/smime-pem/tmp-pkcs7.der", Tmp), Cmd = "openssl pkcs7 -inform der -in pkits/smime-pem/tmp-pkcs7.der" " -print_certs -out pkits/smime-pem/" ++ FName ++ ".pem", case os:cmd(Cmd) of "" -> ok; Err -> io:format("~s",[Err]), erlang:error(bad_cmd) end. skip_lines(<<"\r\n\r\n", Rest/binary>>) -> Rest; skip_lines(<<"\n\n", Rest/binary>>) -> Rest; skip_lines(<<_:8, Rest/binary>>) -> skip_lines(Rest). init_per_testcase(_Func, Config) -> Datadir = proplists:get_value(data_dir, Config), put(datadir, Datadir), Config. fin_per_testcase(_Func, Config) -> %% Nodes = select_nodes(all, Config, ?FILE, ?LINE), %% rpc:multicall(Nodes, mnesia, lkill, []), Config. init_per_suite(Config) -> crypto:start(), Config. end_per_suite(_Config) -> crypto:stop(). error(Format, Args, File0, Line) -> File = filename:basename(File0), Pid = group_leader(), Pid ! {failed, File, Line}, io:format(Pid, "~s(~p): ERROR"++Format, [File,Line|Args]). warning(Format, Args, File0, Line) -> File = filename:basename(File0), io:format("~s(~p): Warning "++Format, [File,Line|Args]).