-*- html -*- wx Documentation @author Dan Gudmundsson @copyright 2008-2009 Ericsson AB @title wx the erlang binding of wxWidgets @doc The wx application is an erlang binding of wxWidgets. This document describes the erlang mapping to wxWidgets and it's implementation. It is not a complete users guide to wxWidgets. If you need that, you will have to read the wxWidgets documentation instead. wx tries to keep a one-to-one mapping with the original api so that the original documentation and examples shall be as easy as possible to use. wxErlang examples and test suite can be found in the erlang src release. They can also provide some help on how to use the api. This is currently a very brief introduction to wx. The application is still under development, which means the interface may change, and the test suite currently have a poor coverage ratio. == Contents ==
  1. {@section Introduction}
  2. {@section Multiple processes and memory handling}
  3. {@section Event Handling}
  4. {@section Acknowledgments}
== Introduction == The original wxWidgets is an object-oriented (C++) api and that is reflected in the erlang mapping. In most cases each class in wxWidgets is represented as a module in erlang. This gives the wx application a huge interface, spread over several modules, and it all starts with the wx module. The wx module contains functions to create and destroy the gui, i.e. wx:new/0,wx:destroy/0, and some other useful functions. Objects or object references in wx should be seen as erlang processes rather then erlang terms. When you operate on them they can change state, e.g. they are not functional objects as erlang terms are. Each object has a type or rather a class, which is manipulated with the corresponding module or by sub-classes of that object. Type checking is done so that a module only operates on it's objects or inherited classes. An object is created with new and destroyed with destroy. Most functions in the classes are named the same as their C++ counterpart, except that for convenience, in erlang they start with a lowercase letter and the first argument is the object reference. Optional arguments are last and expressed as tagged tuples in any order. For example the wxWindow C++ class is implemented in the wxWindow erlang module and the member wxWindow::CenterOnParent is thus wxWindow:centerOnParent. The following C++ code: 
  wxWindow MyWin = new wxWindo();
  MyWin.CenterOnParent(wxVERTICAL);
  ...
  delete MyWin;
would in erlang look like: 
  MyWin = wxWindow:new(),
  wxWindow:centerOnParent(MyWin, [{dir,?wxVERTICAL}]),
  ...
  wxWindow:destroy(MyWin),
When you are reading wxWidgets documentation or the examples, you will notice that some of the most basic classes are missing in wx, they are directly mapped to corresponding erlang terms:
wxPoint is represented by {Xcoord,Ycoord}
wxSize is represented by {Width,Height}
wxRect is represented by {Xcoord,Ycoord,Width,Height}
wxColour is represented by {Red,Green,Blue[,Alpha]}
wxPoint is represented by {Xcoord,Ycoord}
wxString is represented by {@link //stdlib/unicode:charlist()}
wxGBPosition is represented by {Row,Column}
wxGBSpan is represented by {RowSpan,ColumnSPan}
wxGridCellCoords is represented by {Row,Column}
In the places where the erlang api differs from the original one it should be obvious from the erlang documentation which representation has been used. E.g. the C++ arrays and/or lists are sometimes represented as erlang lists and sometimes as tuples. Colours are represented with {Red,Green,Blue[,Alpha]}, the Alpha value is optional when used as an argument to functions, but it will always be returned from wx functions. Defines, enumerations and global variables exists in wx.hrl as defines. Most of these defines are constants but not all. Some are platform dependent and therefore the global variables must be instantiated during runtime. These will be acquired from the driver with a call, so not all defines can be used in matching statements. Class local enumerations will be prefixed with the class name and a underscore as in ClassName_Enum. Additionally some global functions, i.e. non-class functions, exist in the wx_misc module. wxErlang is implemented as a (threaded) driver and a rather direct interface to the C++ api, with the drawback that if the erlang programmer does an error, it might crash the emulator. Since the driver is threaded it requires a smp enabled emulator, that provides a thread safe interface to the driver. == Multiple processes and memory handling == The intention is that each erlang application calls wx:new() once to setup it's gui which creates an environment and a memory mapping. To be able to use wx from several processes in your application, you must share the environment. You can get the active environment with wx:get_env/0 and set it in the new processes with wx:set_env/1. Two processes or applications which have both called wx:new() will not be able use each others objects. 
  wx:new(), 
  MyWin = wxFrame:new(wx:null(), 42, "Example", []),
  Env = wx:get_env(),
  spawn(fun() -> 
           wx:set_env(Env),
           %% Here you can do wx calls from your helper process.
           ...
        end),
  ...
When wx:destroy/0 is invoked or when all processes in the application have died, the memory is deleted and all windows created by that application are closed. The wx application never cleans or garbage collects memory as long as the user application is alive. Most of the objects are deleted when a window is closed, or at least all the objects which have a parent argument that is non null. By using wxCLASS:destroy/1 when possible you can avoid an increasing memory usage. This is especially important when wxWidgets assumes or recommends that you (or rather the C++ programmer) have allocated the object on the stack since that will never be done in the erlang binding. For example wxDC class or its sub-classes or wxSizerFlags. Currently the dialogs show modal function freezes wxWidgets until the dialog is closed. That is intended but in erlang where you can have several gui applications running at the same time it causes trouble. This will hopefully be fixed in future wxWidgets releases. == Event Handling == Event handling in wx differs most the from the original api. You must specify every event you want to handle in wxWidgets, that is the same in the erlang binding but can you choose to receive the events as messages or handle them with callback funs. Otherwise the event subscription is handled as wxWidgets dynamic event-handler connection. You subscribe to events of a certain type from objects with an ID or within a range of ID:s. The callback fun is optional, if not supplied the event will be sent to the process that called connect/2. Thus, a handler is a callback fun or a process which will receive an event message. Events are handled in order from bottom to top, in the widgets hierarchy, by the last subscribed handler first. Depending on if wxEvent:skip() is called the event will be handled by the other handler(s) afterwards. Most of the events have default event handler(s) installed. Message events looks like {@link wxEvtHandler:wx(). #wx{id=integer(), obj=wx:wxObject(), userData=term(), event=Rec} }. The id is the identifier of the object that received the event. The obj field contains the object that you used connect on. The userData field contains a user supplied term, this is an option to connect. And the event field contains a record with event type dependent information. The first element in the event record is always the type you subscribed to. For example if you subscribed to key_up events you will receive the #wx{event=Event} where Event will be a wxKey event record where Event#wxKey.type = key_up. In wxWidgets the developer have to call wxEvent:skip() if he wants the event to be processed by other handlers. You can do the same in wx if you use callbacks. If you want the event as messages you just don't supply a callback and you can set the skip option in connect call to true or false, the default it is false. True means that you get the message but let the subsequent handlers also handle the event. If you want to change this behavior dynamically you must use callbacks and call wxEvent:skip(). Callback event handling is done by using the optional callback fun/2 when attaching the handler. The fun(#wx{},wxObject() must take two arguments where the first is the same as with message events described above and the second is an object reference to the actual event object. With the event object you can call wxEvent:skip() and access all the data. When using callbacks you must call wxEvent:skip() by yourself if you want any of the events to be forwarded to the following handlers. The actual event objects are deleted after the fun returns. The callbacks are always invoked by another process and have exclusive usage of the gui when invoked. This means that a callback fun can not use the process dictionary and should not make calls to other processes. Calls to another process inside a callback fun may cause a deadlock if the other process is waiting on completion of his call to the gui. == Acknowledgments == Mats-Ola Persson wrote the initial wxWidgets binding as part of his master thesis. The current version is a total re-write but many ideas have been reused. The reason for the re-write was mostly due to the limited requirements he had been given by us. Also thanks to the wxWidgets team that develops and supports it so we have something to use.