A record is a data structure for storing a fixed number of
elements. It has named fields and is similar to a struct in C.
Record expressions are translated to tuple expressions during
compilation. Therefore, record expressions are not understood by
the shell unless special actions are taken. See
More record examples can be found in Programming Examples.
A record definition consists of the name of the record,
followed by the field names of the record. Record and field names
must be atoms. Each field can be given an optional default value.
If no default value is supplied,
-record(Name, {Field1 [= Value1], ... FieldN [= ValueN]}).
A record definition can be placed anywhere among the attributes and function declarations of a module, but the definition must come before any usage of the record.
If a record is used in several modules, it is recommended that the record definition is placed in an include file.
The following expression creates a new
#Name{Field1=Expr1,...,FieldK=ExprK}
The fields may be in any order, not necessarily the same order as in the record definition, and fields can be omitted. Omitted fields will get their respective default value instead.
If several fields should be assigned the same value, the following construction can be used:
#Name{Field1=Expr1,...,FieldK=ExprK, _=ExprL}
Omitted fields will then get the value of evaluating
-record(person, {name, phone, address}). ... lookup(Name, Tab) -> ets:match_object(Tab, #person{name=Name, _='_'}).
Expr#Name.Field
Returns the value of the specified field.
The following expression returns the position of the specified field in the tuple representation of the record:
#Name.Field
Example:
-record(person, {name, phone, address}). ... lookup(Name, List) -> lists:keysearch(Name, #person.name, List).
Expr#Name{Field1=Expr1,...,FieldK=ExprK}
Since record expressions are expanded to tuple expressions, creating records and accessing record fields are allowed in guards. However all subexpressions, for example for field initiations, must of course be valid guard expressions as well. Examples:
handle(Msg, State) when Msg==#msg{to=void, no=3} ->
...
handle(Msg, State) when State#state.running==true ->
...
There is also a type test BIF
is_person(P) when is_record(P, person) -> true; is_person(_P) -> false.
A pattern that will match a certain record is created the same way as a record is created:
#Name{Field1=Expr1,...,FieldK=ExprK}
In this case, one or more of
Beginning with R14 parentheses when accessing or updating nested records can be omitted. Assuming we have the following record definitions:
-record(nrec0, {name = "nested0"}). -record(nrec1, {name = "nested1", nrec0=#nrec0{}}). -record(nrec2, {name = "nested2", nrec1=#nrec1{}}). N2 = #nrec2{},
Before R14 you would have needed to use parentheses as following:
"nested0" = ((N2#nrec2.nrec1)#nrec1.nrec0)#nrec0.name, N0n = ((N2#nrec2.nrec1)#nrec1.nrec0)#nrec0{name = "nested0a"},
Since R14 you can also write:
"nested0" = N2#nrec2.nrec1#nrec1.nrec0#nrec0.name, N0n = N2#nrec2.nrec1#nrec1.nrec0#nrec0{name = "nested0a"},
Record expressions are translated to tuple expressions during compilation. A record defined as
-record(Name, {Field1,...,FieldN}).
is internally represented by the tuple
{Name,Value1,...,ValueN}
where each
To each module using records, a pseudo function is added during compilation to obtain information about records:
record_info(fields, Record) -> [Field] record_info(size, Record) -> Size
In addition,