ranch.git, branch 1.8.0 Socket acceptor pool for TCP protocols. Ranch 1.8.0 2021-04-23T17:56:17+00:00 Loïc Hoguin essen@ninenines.eu 2021-04-23T17:56:17+00:00 a692f44567034dacf5efcaa24a24183788594eb7 






Unconditionally run tests that use tracing
2021-04-19T13:57:50+00:00

Loïc Hoguin
essen@ninenines.eu

2021-04-19T12:41:37+00:00

3b9deefd7df04af8becc832c36d83d08138be2c4












Unconditionally run SNI/getstat tests
2021-04-19T10:56:08+00:00

Loïc Hoguin
essen@ninenines.eu

2021-04-19T10:56:08+00:00

a000af5e1b3e956dc4edb4374ea6cb7fde841285












Use ssl:handshake instead of ssl:ssl_accept
2021-04-17T14:32:02+00:00

Loïc Hoguin
essen@ninenines.eu

2019-05-09T08:18:53+00:00

281c409f702c36c79564f0a257308724e7917b39

This makes Ranch require OTP-21+.





This makes Ranch require OTP-21+.







Ranch 1.7.1
2018-11-28T10:35:20+00:00

Loïc Hoguin
essen@ninenines.eu

2018-11-28T10:35:20+00:00

3190aef88aea04d6dce8545fe9b4574288903f44












Use the correct CRC32 algorithm for the PROXY header
2018-11-26T10:52:27+00:00

Loïc Hoguin
essen@ninenines.eu

2018-11-26T10:52:27+00:00

0d9ad0a8445e7ba6e8bf9591257fa4457dda8321

Turns out it wasn't the plain CRC32 algorithm that should have
been used, whoops!

The implementation was adapted from pseudo code from
Thomas Cioppettini.

I've renamed the PROXY header building option value for
checksum from crc32 to crc32c and updated the documentation.
There is no support for plain crc32 checksums.





Turns out it wasn't the plain CRC32 algorithm that should have
been used, whoops!

The implementation was adapted from pseudo code from
Thomas Cioppettini.

I've renamed the PROXY header building option value for
checksum from crc32 to crc32c and updated the documentation.
There is no support for plain crc32 checksums.







Update the migration guide for 1.7
2018-11-14T10:53:27+00:00

Loïc Hoguin
essen@ninenines.eu

2018-11-14T10:53:27+00:00

7423a7bb6dde5edc26283544956ae7387fa69688












Document the PROXY-related functions; prepare 1.7.0
2018-11-14T09:55:23+00:00

Loïc Hoguin
essen@ninenines.eu

2018-11-14T09:55:23+00:00

2f502078fd0f56e3e61e58f1d57ae15f9f736ffe












Always recompile ct_helper in CI
2018-10-23T13:41:04+00:00

Loïc Hoguin
essen@ninenines.eu

2018-10-23T13:41:04+00:00

4d0ae7e8c646d00eb868fdee11756b1770a3b976












Add ranch:recv_proxy_header/2
2018-10-23T10:10:53+00:00

Loïc Hoguin
essen@ninenines.eu

2018-10-23T10:10:53+00:00

d2720842a63dc7bc6ac01d9e2866bfa78cb39aa5

This is the function that should be called regardless of
TCP or TLS being used. The proper usage for this function is:

{ok, ProxyInfo} = ranch:recv_proxy_header(Ref, Timeout),
{ok, Socket} = ranch:handshake(Ref),
...

Ranch takes care of everything else under the hood. Transports
now need to have a Transport:recv_proxy_header/2 function. For
ranch_ssl the function gets the port from the sslsocket() record
and then calls ranch_tcp:recv_proxy_header/2 with it.

This means that two undocumented features are currently used for
this, but the interface is really nice so that's a sacrifice
worth doing. Also worth noting is that OTP 22 should have an
alternative for gen_tcp:unrecv/2 so the only real issue is about
the sslsocket() record at the moment.





This is the function that should be called regardless of
TCP or TLS being used. The proper usage for this function is:

{ok, ProxyInfo} = ranch:recv_proxy_header(Ref, Timeout),
{ok, Socket} = ranch:handshake(Ref),
...

Ranch takes care of everything else under the hood. Transports
now need to have a Transport:recv_proxy_header/2 function. For
ranch_ssl the function gets the port from the sslsocket() record
and then calls ranch_tcp:recv_proxy_header/2 with it.

This means that two undocumented features are currently used for
this, but the interface is really nice so that's a sacrifice
worth doing. Also worth noting is that OTP 22 should have an
alternative for gen_tcp:unrecv/2 so the only real issue is about
the sslsocket() record at the moment.