<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<!DOCTYPE chapter SYSTEM "chapter.dtd">
<chapter>
<header>
<copyright>
<year>2003</year><year>2015</year>
<holder>Ericsson AB. All Rights Reserved.</holder>
</copyright>
<legalnotice>
Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");
you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
You may obtain a copy of the License at
http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
limitations under the License.
</legalnotice>
<title>Expressions</title>
<prepared></prepared>
<docno></docno>
<date></date>
<rev></rev>
<file>expressions.xml</file>
</header>
<p>In this section, all valid Erlang expressions are listed.
When writing Erlang programs, it is also allowed to use macro-
and record expressions. However, these expressions are expanded
during compilation and are in that sense not true Erlang
expressions. Macro- and record expressions are covered in
separate sections:
</p>
<list type="bulleted">
<item><p><seealso marker="macros">Preprocessor</seealso></p></item>
<item><p><seealso marker="records">Records</seealso></p></item>
</list>
<section>
<title>Expression Evaluation</title>
<p>All subexpressions are evaluated before an expression itself is
evaluated, unless explicitly stated otherwise. For example,
consider the expression:</p>
<code type="none">
Expr1 + Expr2</code>
<p><c>Expr1</c> and <c>Expr2</c>, which are also expressions, are
evaluated first - in any order - before the addition is
performed.</p>
<p>Many of the operators can only be applied to arguments of a
certain type. For example, arithmetic operators can only be
applied to numbers. An argument of the wrong type causes
a <c>badarg</c> runtime error.</p>
</section>
<section>
<marker id="term"></marker>
<title>Terms</title>
<p>The simplest form of expression is a term, that is an integer,
float, atom, string, list, map, or tuple.
The return value is the term itself.</p>
</section>
<section>
<title>Variables</title>
<p>A variable is an expression. If a variable is bound to a value,
the return value is this value. Unbound variables are only
allowed in patterns.</p>
<p>Variables start with an uppercase letter or underscore (_).
Variables can contain alphanumeric characters, underscore and <c>@</c>.
</p>
<p><em>Examples:</em></p>
<pre>
X
Name1
PhoneNumber
Phone_number
_
_Height</pre>
<p>Variables are bound to values using
<seealso marker="patterns">pattern matching</seealso>. Erlang
uses <em>single assignment</em>, that is, a variable can only be bound
once.</p>
<p>The <em>anonymous variable</em> is denoted by underscore (_) and
can be used when a variable is required but its value can be
ignored.</p>
<p><em>Example:</em></p>
<pre>
[H|_] = [1,2,3]</pre>
<p>Variables starting with underscore (_), for example,
<c>_Height</c>, are normal variables, not anonymous. They are
however ignored by the compiler in the sense that they do not
generate any warnings for unused variables.</p>
<p><em>Example:</em></p>
<p>The following code:</p>
<pre>
member(_, []) ->
[].</pre>
<p>can be rewritten to be more readable:</p>
<pre>
member(Elem, []) ->
[].</pre>
<p>This causes a warning for an unused variable,
<c>Elem</c>, if the code is compiled with the flag
<c>warn_unused_vars</c> set. Instead, the code can be rewritten
to:</p>
<pre>
member(_Elem, []) ->
[].</pre>
<p>Notice that since variables starting with an underscore are
not anonymous, this matches:</p>
<pre>
{_,_} = {1,2}</pre>
<p>But this fails:</p>
<pre>
{_N,_N} = {1,2}</pre>
<p>The scope for a variable is its function clause.
Variables bound in a branch of an <c>if</c>, <c>case</c>,
or <c>receive</c> expression must be bound in all branches
to have a value outside the expression. Otherwise they
are regarded as 'unsafe' outside the expression.</p>
<p>For the <c>try</c> expression introduced in
Erlang 5.4/OTP R10B, variable scoping is limited so that
variables bound in the expression are always 'unsafe' outside
the expression. This is to be improved.</p>
</section>
<section>
<marker id="pattern"></marker>
<title>Patterns</title>
<p>A pattern has the same structure as a term but can contain
unbound variables.</p>
<p><em>Example:</em></p>
<pre>
Name1
[H|T]
{error,Reason}</pre>
<p>Patterns are allowed in clause heads, <c>case</c> and
<c>receive</c> expressions, and match expressions.</p>
<section>
<title>Match Operator = in Patterns</title>
<p>If <c>Pattern1</c> and <c>Pattern2</c> are valid patterns,
the following is also a valid pattern:</p>
<pre>
Pattern1 = Pattern2</pre>
<p>When matched against a term, both <c>Pattern1</c> and
<c>Pattern2</c> are matched against the term. The idea
behind this feature is to avoid reconstruction of terms.</p>
<p><em>Example:</em></p>
<pre>
f({connect,From,To,Number,Options}, To) ->
Signal = {connect,From,To,Number,Options},
...;
f(Signal, To) ->
ignore.</pre>
<p>can instead be written as</p>
<pre>
f({connect,_,To,_,_} = Signal, To) ->
...;
f(Signal, To) ->
ignore.</pre>
</section>
<section>
<title>String Prefix in Patterns</title>
<p>When matching strings, the following is a valid pattern:</p>
<pre>
f("prefix" ++ Str) -> ...</pre>
<p>This is syntactic sugar for the equivalent, but harder to
read:</p>
<pre>
f([$p,$r,$e,$f,$i,$x | Str]) -> ...</pre>
</section>
<section>
<title>Expressions in Patterns</title>
<p>An arithmetic expression can be used within a pattern if
it meets both of the following two conditions:</p>
<list type="bulleted">
<item>It uses only numeric or bitwise operators.</item>
<item>Its value can be evaluated to a constant when complied.</item>
</list>
<p><em>Example:</em></p>
<pre>
case {Value, Result} of
{?THRESHOLD+1, ok} -> ...</pre>
<p>This feature was added in Erlang 5.0/OTP R7.</p>
</section>
</section>
<section>
<title>Match</title>
<p>The following matches <c>Expr1</c>, a pattern, against
<c>Expr2</c>:</p>
<pre>
Expr1 = Expr2</pre>
<p>If the matching succeeds, any unbound variable in the pattern
becomes bound and the value of <c>Expr2</c> is returned.</p>
<p>If the matching fails, a <c>badmatch</c> run-time error occurs.</p>
<p><em>Examples:</em></p>
<pre>
1> <input>{A, B} = {answer, 42}.</input>
{answer,42}
2> <input>A.</input>
answer
3> <input>{C, D} = [1, 2].</input>
** exception error: no match of right-hand side value [1,2]</pre>
</section>
<section>
<marker id="calls"></marker>
<title>Function Calls</title>
<pre>
ExprF(Expr1,...,ExprN)
ExprM:ExprF(Expr1,...,ExprN)</pre>
<p>In the first form of function calls,
<c>ExprM:ExprF(Expr1,...,ExprN)</c>, each of <c>ExprM</c> and
<c>ExprF</c> must be an atom or an expression that evaluates to
an atom. The function is said to be called by using the
<em>fully qualified function name</em>. This is often referred
to as a <em>remote</em> or <em>external function call</em>.</p>
<p><em>Example:</em></p>
<code type="none">
lists:keysearch(Name, 1, List)</code>
<p>In the second form of function calls,
<c>ExprF(Expr1,...,ExprN)</c>, <c>ExprF</c> must be an atom or
evaluate to a fun.</p>
<p>If <c>ExprF</c> is an atom, the function is said to be called by
using the <em>implicitly qualified function name</em>. If the
function <c>ExprF</c> is locally defined, it is called.
Alternatively, if <c>ExprF</c> is explicitly imported from the
<c>M</c> module, <c>M:ExprF(Expr1,...,ExprN)</c> is called. If
<c>ExprF</c> is neither declared locally nor explicitly
imported, <c>ExprF</c> must be the name of an automatically
imported BIF. </p>
<p><em>Examples:</em></p>
<code type="none">
handle(Msg, State)
spawn(m, init, [])</code>
<p><em>Examples</em> where <c>ExprF</c> is a fun:</p>
<pre>
1> <input>Fun1 = fun(X) -> X+1 end,</input>
<input>Fun1(3).</input>
4
2> <input>fun lists:append/2([1,2], [3,4]).</input>
[1,2,3,4]
3> </pre>
<p>Notice that when calling a local function, there is a difference
between using the implicitly or fully qualified function name.
The latter always refers to the latest version of the module.
See <seealso marker="code_loading">Compilation and Code Loading
</seealso> and <seealso marker="functions#eval">
Function Evaluation</seealso>.</p>
<section>
<title>Local Function Names Clashing With Auto-Imported BIFs</title>
<p>If a local function has the same name as an auto-imported BIF,
the semantics is that implicitly qualified function calls are
directed to the locally defined function, not to the BIF. To avoid
confusion, there is a compiler directive available,
<c>-compile({no_auto_import,[F/A]})</c>, that makes a BIF not
being auto-imported. In certain situations, such a compile-directive
is mandatory.</p>
<warning><p>Before OTP R14A (ERTS version 5.8), an implicitly
qualified function call to a function having the same name as an
auto-imported BIF always resulted in the BIF being called. In
newer versions of the compiler, the local function is called instead.
This is to avoid that future additions to the
set of auto-imported BIFs do not silently change the behavior
of old code.</p>
<p>However, to avoid that old (pre R14) code changed its
behavior when compiled with OTP version R14A or later, the
following restriction applies: If you override the name of a BIF
that was auto-imported in OTP versions prior to R14A (ERTS version
5.8) and have an implicitly qualified call to that function in
your code, you either need to explicitly remove the auto-import
using a compiler directive, or replace the call with a fully
qualified function call. Otherwise you get a compilation
error. See the following example:</p> </warning>
<code type="none">
-export([length/1,f/1]).
-compile({no_auto_import,[length/1]}). % erlang:length/1 no longer autoimported
length([]) ->
0;
length([H|T]) ->
1 + length(T). %% Calls the local function length/1
f(X) when erlang:length(X) > 3 -> %% Calls erlang:length/1,
%% which is allowed in guards
long.</code>
<p>The same logic applies to explicitly imported functions from
other modules, as to locally defined functions.
It is not allowed to both import a
function from another module and have the function declared in the
module at the same time:</p>
<code type="none">
-export([f/1]).
-compile({no_auto_import,[length/1]}). % erlang:length/1 no longer autoimported
-import(mod,[length/1]).
f(X) when erlang:length(X) > 33 -> %% Calls erlang:length/1,
%% which is allowed in guards
erlang:length(X); %% Explicit call to erlang:length in body
f(X) ->
length(X). %% mod:length/1 is called</code>
<p>For auto-imported BIFs added in Erlang/OTP R14A and thereafter,
overriding the name with a local function or explicit import is always
allowed. However, if the <c>-compile({no_auto_import,[F/A])</c>
directive is not used, the compiler issues a warning whenever
the function is called in the module using the implicitly qualified
function name.</p>
</section>
</section>
<section>
<title>If</title>
<pre>
if
GuardSeq1 ->
Body1;
...;
GuardSeqN ->
BodyN
end</pre>
<p>The branches of an <c>if</c>-expression are scanned sequentially
until a guard sequence <c>GuardSeq</c> that evaluates to true is
found. Then the corresponding <c>Body</c> (sequence of expressions
separated by ',') is evaluated.</p>
<p>The return value of <c>Body</c> is the return value of
the <c>if</c> expression.</p>
<p>If no guard sequence is evaluated as true,
an <c>if_clause</c> run-time error
occurs. If necessary, the guard expression <c>true</c> can be
used in the last branch, as that guard sequence is always true.</p>
<p><em>Example:</em></p>
<pre>
is_greater_than(X, Y) ->
if
X>Y ->
true;
true -> % works as an 'else' branch
false
end</pre>
</section>
<section>
<marker id="case"></marker>
<title>Case</title>
<pre>
case Expr of
Pattern1 [when GuardSeq1] ->
Body1;
...;
PatternN [when GuardSeqN] ->
BodyN
end</pre>
<p>The expression <c>Expr</c> is evaluated and the patterns
<c>Pattern</c> are sequentially matched against the result. If a
match succeeds and the optional guard sequence <c>GuardSeq</c> is
true, the corresponding <c>Body</c> is evaluated.</p>
<p>The return value of <c>Body</c> is the return value of
the <c>case</c> expression.</p>
<p>If there is no matching pattern with a true guard sequence,
a <c>case_clause</c> run-time error occurs.</p>
<p><em>Example:</em></p>
<pre>
is_valid_signal(Signal) ->
case Signal of
{signal, _What, _From, _To} ->
true;
{signal, _What, _To} ->
true;
_Else ->
false
end.</pre>
</section>
<section>
<marker id="send"></marker>
<title>Send</title>
<pre>
Expr1 ! Expr2</pre>
<p>Sends the value of <c>Expr2</c> as a message to the process
specified by <c>Expr1</c>. The value of <c>Expr2</c> is also
the return value of the expression.</p>
<p><c>Expr1</c> must evaluate to a pid, a registered name (atom), or
a tuple <c>{Name,Node}</c>. <c>Name</c> is an atom and
<c>Node</c> is a node name, also an atom.</p>
<list type="bulleted">
<item>If <c>Expr1</c> evaluates to a name, but this name is not
registered, a <c>badarg</c> run-time error occurs.</item>
<item>Sending a message to a pid never fails, even if the pid
identifies a non-existing process.</item>
<item>Distributed message sending, that is, if <c>Expr1</c>
evaluates to a tuple <c>{Name,Node}</c> (or a pid located at
another node), also never fails.</item>
</list>
</section>
<section>
<marker id="receive"></marker>
<title>Receive</title>
<pre>
receive
Pattern1 [when GuardSeq1] ->
Body1;
...;
PatternN [when GuardSeqN] ->
BodyN
end</pre>
<p>Receives messages sent to the process using the send operator
(!). The patterns <c>Pattern</c> are sequentially matched
against the first message in time order in the mailbox, then
the second, and so on. If a match succeeds and the optional
guard sequence <c>GuardSeq</c> is true, the corresponding
<c>Body</c> is evaluated. The matching message is consumed, that
is, removed from the mailbox, while any other messages in
the mailbox remain unchanged.</p>
<p>The return value of <c>Body</c> is the return value of
the <c>receive</c> expression.</p>
<p><c>receive</c> never fails. The execution is suspended, possibly
indefinitely, until a message arrives that matches one of
the patterns and with a true guard sequence. </p>
<p><em>Example:</em></p>
<pre>
wait_for_onhook() ->
receive
onhook ->
disconnect(),
idle();
{connect, B} ->
B ! {busy, self()},
wait_for_onhook()
end.</pre>
<p>The <c>receive</c> expression can be augmented with a
timeout:</p>
<pre>
receive
Pattern1 [when GuardSeq1] ->
Body1;
...;
PatternN [when GuardSeqN] ->
BodyN
after
ExprT ->
BodyT
end</pre>
<p><c>ExprT</c> is to evaluate to an integer. The highest allowed
value is 16#FFFFFFFF, that is, the value must fit in 32 bits.
<c>receive..after</c> works exactly as <c>receive</c>, except
that if no matching message has arrived within <c>ExprT</c>
milliseconds, then <c>BodyT</c> is evaluated instead. The
return value of <c>BodyT</c> then becomes the return value
of the <c>receive..after</c> expression.</p>
<p><em>Example:</em></p>
<pre>
wait_for_onhook() ->
receive
onhook ->
disconnect(),
idle();
{connect, B} ->
B ! {busy, self()},
wait_for_onhook()
after
60000 ->
disconnect(),
error()
end.</pre>
<p>It is legal to use a <c>receive..after</c> expression with no
branches:</p>
<pre>
receive
after
ExprT ->
BodyT
end</pre>
<p>This construction does not consume any messages, only suspends
execution in the process for <c>ExprT</c> milliseconds. This can be
used to implement simple timers.</p>
<p><em>Example:</em></p>
<pre>
timer() ->
spawn(m, timer, [self()]).
timer(Pid) ->
receive
after
5000 ->
Pid ! timeout
end.</pre>
<p>There are two special cases for the timeout value <c>ExprT</c>:</p>
<taglist>
<tag><c>infinity</c></tag>
<item>The process is to wait indefinitely for a matching message;
this is the same as not using a timeout. This can be
useful for timeout values that are calculated at runtime.</item>
<tag>0</tag>
<item>If there is no matching message in the mailbox, the timeout
occurs immediately.</item>
</taglist>
</section>
<section>
<title>Term Comparisons</title>
<pre>
Expr1 <input>op</input> Expr2</pre>
<table>
<row>
<cell align="left" valign="middle"><em>op</em></cell>
<cell align="left" valign="middle"><em>Description</em></cell>
</row>
<row>
<cell align="left" valign="middle">==</cell>
<cell align="left" valign="middle">Equal to</cell>
</row>
<row>
<cell align="left" valign="middle">/=</cell>
<cell align="left" valign="middle">Not equal to</cell>
</row>
<row>
<cell align="left" valign="middle">=<</cell>
<cell align="left" valign="middle">Less than or equal to</cell>
</row>
<row>
<cell align="left" valign="middle"><</cell>
<cell align="left" valign="middle">Less than</cell>
</row>
<row>
<cell align="left" valign="middle">>=</cell>
<cell align="left" valign="middle">Greater than or equal to</cell>
</row>
<row>
<cell align="left" valign="middle">></cell>
<cell align="left" valign="middle">Greater than</cell>
</row>
<row>
<cell align="left" valign="middle">=:=</cell>
<cell align="left" valign="middle">Exactly equal to</cell>
</row>
<row>
<cell align="left" valign="middle">=/=</cell>
<cell align="left" valign="middle">Exactly not equal to</cell>
</row>
<tcaption>Term Comparison Operators.</tcaption>
</table>
<p>The arguments can be of different data types. The following
order is defined:</p>
<pre>
number < atom < reference < fun < port < pid < tuple < map < nil < list < bit string</pre>
<p>Lists are compared element by element. Tuples are ordered by
size, two tuples with the same size are compared element by
element.</p>
<p>Maps are ordered by size, two maps with the same size are compared by keys in
ascending term order and then by values in key order.
In maps key order integers types are considered less than floats types.
</p>
<p>When comparing an integer to a float, the term with the lesser
precision is converted into the type of the other term, unless the
operator is one of <c>=:=</c> or <c>=/=</c>. A float is more precise than
an integer until all significant figures of the float are to the left of
the decimal point. This happens when the float is larger/smaller than
+/-9007199254740992.0. The conversion strategy is changed
depending on the size of the float because otherwise comparison of large
floats and integers would lose their transitivity.</p>
<p>Term comparison operators return the Boolean value of the
expression, <c>true</c> or <c>false</c>.</p>
<p><em>Examples:</em></p>
<pre>
1> <input>1==1.0.</input>
true
2> <input>1=:=1.0.</input>
false
3> <input>1 > a.</input>
false
4> <input>#{c => 3} > #{a => 1, b => 2}.</input>
false
4> <input>#{a => 1, b => 2} == #{a => 1.0, b => 2.0}.</input>
true</pre>
</section>
<section>
<title>Arithmetic Expressions</title>
<pre>
<input>op</input> Expr
Expr1 <input>op</input> Expr2</pre>
<table>
<row>
<cell align="left" valign="middle"><em>Operator</em></cell>
<cell align="left" valign="middle"><em>Description</em></cell>
<cell align="left" valign="middle"><em>Argument Type</em></cell>
</row>
<row>
<cell align="left" valign="middle">+</cell>
<cell align="left" valign="middle">Unary +</cell>
<cell align="left" valign="middle">Number</cell>
</row>
<row>
<cell align="left" valign="middle">-</cell>
<cell align="left" valign="middle">Unary -</cell>
<cell align="left" valign="middle">Number</cell>
</row>
<row>
<cell align="left" valign="middle">+</cell>
<cell align="left" valign="middle"> </cell>
<cell align="left" valign="middle">number</cell>
</row>
<row>
<cell align="left" valign="middle">-</cell>
<cell align="left" valign="middle"> </cell>
<cell align="left" valign="middle">Number</cell>
</row>
<row>
<cell align="left" valign="middle">*</cell>
<cell align="left" valign="middle"> </cell>
<cell align="left" valign="middle">Number</cell>
</row>
<row>
<cell align="left" valign="middle">/</cell>
<cell align="left" valign="middle">Floating point division</cell>
<cell align="left" valign="middle">Number</cell>
</row>
<row>
<cell align="left" valign="middle">bnot</cell>
<cell align="left" valign="middle">Unary bitwise NOT</cell>
<cell align="left" valign="middle">Integer</cell>
</row>
<row>
<cell align="left" valign="middle">div</cell>
<cell align="left" valign="middle">Integer division</cell>
<cell align="left" valign="middle">Integer</cell>
</row>
<row>
<cell align="left" valign="middle">rem</cell>
<cell align="left" valign="middle">Integer remainder of X/Y</cell>
<cell align="left" valign="middle">Integer</cell>
</row>
<row>
<cell align="left" valign="middle">band</cell>
<cell align="left" valign="middle">Bitwise AND</cell>
<cell align="left" valign="middle">Integer</cell>
</row>
<row>
<cell align="left" valign="middle">bor</cell>
<cell align="left" valign="middle">Bitwise OR</cell>
<cell align="left" valign="middle">Integer</cell>
</row>
<row>
<cell align="left" valign="middle">bxor</cell>
<cell align="left" valign="middle">Arithmetic bitwise XOR</cell>
<cell align="left" valign="middle">Integer</cell>
</row>
<row>
<cell align="left" valign="middle">bsl</cell>
<cell align="left" valign="middle">Arithmetic bitshift left</cell>
<cell align="left" valign="middle">Integer</cell>
</row>
<row>
<cell align="left" valign="middle">bsr</cell>
<cell align="left" valign="middle">Bitshift right</cell>
<cell align="left" valign="middle">Integer</cell>
</row>
<tcaption>Arithmetic Operators.</tcaption>
</table>
<p><em>Examples:</em></p>
<pre>
1> <input>+1.</input>
1
2> <input>-1.</input>
-1
3> <input>1+1.</input>
2
4> <input>4/2.</input>
2.0
5> <input>5 div 2.</input>
2
6> <input>5 rem 2.</input>
1
7> <input>2#10 band 2#01.</input>
0
8> <input>2#10 bor 2#01.</input>
3
9> <input>a + 10.</input>
** exception error: an error occurred when evaluating an arithmetic expression
in operator +/2
called as a + 10
10> <input>1 bsl (1 bsl 64).</input>
** exception error: a system limit has been reached
in operator bsl/2
called as 1 bsl 18446744073709551616</pre>
</section>
<section>
<title>Boolean Expressions</title>
<pre>
<input>op</input> Expr
Expr1 <input>op</input> Expr2</pre>
<table>
<row>
<cell align="left" valign="middle"><em>Operator</em></cell>
<cell align="left" valign="middle"><em>Description</em></cell>
</row>
<row>
<cell align="left" valign="middle">not</cell>
<cell align="left" valign="middle">Unary logical NOT</cell>
</row>
<row>
<cell align="left" valign="middle">and</cell>
<cell align="left" valign="middle">Logical AND</cell>
</row>
<row>
<cell align="left" valign="middle">or</cell>
<cell align="left" valign="middle">Logical OR</cell>
</row>
<row>
<cell align="left" valign="middle">xor</cell>
<cell align="left" valign="middle">Logical XOR</cell>
</row>
<tcaption>Logical Operators.</tcaption>
</table>
<p><em>Examples:</em></p>
<pre>
1> <input>not true.</input>
false
2> <input>true and false.</input>
false
3> <input>true xor false.</input>
true
4> <input>true or garbage.</input>
** exception error: bad argument
in operator or/2
called as true or garbage</pre>
</section>
<section>
<title>Short-Circuit Expressions</title>
<pre>
Expr1 orelse Expr2
Expr1 andalso Expr2</pre>
<p><c>Expr2</c> is evaluated only if
necessary. That is, <c>Expr2</c> is evaluated only if:</p>
<list type="bulleted">
<item><p><c>Expr1</c> evaluates to <c>false</c> in an
<c>orelse</c> expression.</p>
</item>
</list>
<p>or</p>
<list type="bulleted">
<item><p><c>Expr1</c> evaluates to <c>true</c> in an
<c>andalso</c> expression.</p>
</item>
</list>
<p>Returns either the value of <c>Expr1</c> (that is,
<c>true</c> or <c>false</c>) or the value of <c>Expr2</c>
(if <c>Expr2</c> is evaluated).</p>
<p><em>Example 1:</em></p>
<pre>
case A >= -1.0 andalso math:sqrt(A+1) > B of</pre>
<p>This works even if <c>A</c> is less than <c>-1.0</c>,
since in that case, <c>math:sqrt/1</c> is never evaluated.</p>
<p><em>Example 2:</em></p>
<pre>
OnlyOne = is_atom(L) orelse
(is_list(L) andalso length(L) == 1),</pre>
<p>From Erlang/OTP R13A, <c>Expr2</c> is no longer required to evaluate to a
Boolean value. As a consequence, <c>andalso</c> and <c>orelse</c>
are now tail-recursive. For instance, the following function is
tail-recursive in Erlang/OTP R13A and later:</p>
<pre>
all(Pred, [Hd|Tail]) ->
Pred(Hd) andalso all(Pred, Tail);
all(_, []) ->
true.</pre>
</section>
<section>
<title>List Operations</title>
<pre>
Expr1 ++ Expr2
Expr1 -- Expr2</pre>
<p>The list concatenation operator <c>++</c> appends its second
argument to its first and returns the resulting list.</p>
<p>The list subtraction operator <c>--</c> produces a list that
is a copy of the first argument. The procedure is a follows:
for each element in the second argument, the first
occurrence of this element (if any) is removed.</p>
<p><em>Example:</em></p>
<pre>
1> <input>[1,2,3]++[4,5].</input>
[1,2,3,4,5]
2> <input>[1,2,3,2,1,2]--[2,1,2].</input>
[3,1,2]</pre>
<warning><p>The complexity of <c>A -- B</c> is
proportional to <c>length(A)*length(B)</c>. That is, it
becomes very slow if both <c>A</c> and <c>B</c> are
long lists.</p></warning>
</section>
<section>
<marker id="map_expressions"></marker>
<title>Map Expressions</title>
<section>
<title>Creating Maps</title>
<p>
Constructing a new map is done by letting an expression <c>K</c> be associated with
another expression <c>V</c>:
</p>
<code>#{ K => V }</code>
<p>
New maps can include multiple associations at construction by listing every
association:
</p>
<code>#{ K1 => V1, .., Kn => Vn }</code>
<p>
An empty map is constructed by not associating any terms with each other:
</p>
<code>#{}</code>
<p>
All keys and values in the map are terms. Any expression is first evaluated and
then the resulting terms are used as <em>key</em> and <em>value</em> respectively.
</p>
<p>
Keys and values are separated by the <c>=></c> arrow and associations are
separated by a comma <c>,</c>.
</p>
<p>
<em>Examples:</em>
</p>
<code>
M0 = #{}, % empty map
M1 = #{a => <<"hello">>}, % single association with literals
M2 = #{1 => 2, b => b}, % multiple associations with literals
M3 = #{k => {A,B}}, % single association with variables
M4 = #{{"w", 1} => f()}. % compound key associated with an evaluated expression</code>
<p>
Here, <c>A</c> and <c>B</c> are any expressions and <c>M0</c> through <c>M4</c>
are the resulting map terms.
</p>
<p>
If two matching keys are declared, the latter key takes precedence.
</p>
<p>
<em>Example:</em>
</p>
<pre>
1> <input>#{1 => a, 1 => b}.</input>
#{1 => b }
2> <input>#{1.0 => a, 1 => b}.</input>
#{1 => b, 1.0 => a}
</pre>
<p>
The order in which the expressions constructing the keys (and their
associated values) are evaluated is not defined. The syntactic order of
the key-value pairs in the construction is of no relevance, except in
the recently mentioned case of two matching keys.
</p>
</section>
<section>
<title>Updating Maps</title>
<p>
Updating a map has a similar syntax as constructing it.
</p>
<p>
An expression defining the map to be updated, is put in front of the expression
defining the keys to be updated and their respective values:
</p>
<code>M#{ K => V }</code>
<p>
Here <c>M</c> is a term of type map and <c>K</c> and <c>V</c> are any expression.
</p>
<p>
If key <c>K</c> does not match any existing key in the map, a new association
is created from key <c>K</c> to value <c>V</c>.
</p>
<p> If key <c>K</c> matches an existing key in map <c>M</c>,
its associated value
is replaced by the new value <c>V</c>. In both cases, the evaluated map expression
returns a new map.
</p>
<p>
If <c>M</c> is not of type map, an exception of type <c>badmap</c> is thrown.
</p>
<p>
To only update an existing value, the following syntax is used:
</p>
<code>M#{ K := V } </code>
<p>
Here <c>M</c> is a term of type map, <c>V</c> is an expression and <c>K</c>
is an expression that evaluates to an existing key in <c>M</c>.
</p>
<p>
If key <c>K</c> does not match any existing keys in map <c>M</c>, an exception
of type <c>badarg</c> is triggered at runtime. If a matching key <c>K</c>
is present in map <c>M</c>, its associated value is replaced by the new
value <c>V</c>, and the evaluated map expression returns a new map.
</p>
<p>
If <c>M</c> is not of type map, an exception of type <c>badmap</c> is thrown.
</p>
<p>
<em>Examples:</em>
</p>
<code>
M0 = #{},
M1 = M0#{a => 0},
M2 = M1#{a => 1, b => 2},
M3 = M2#{"function" => fun() -> f() end},
M4 = M3#{a := 2, b := 3}. % 'a' and 'b' was added in `M1` and `M2`.</code>
<p>
Here <c>M0</c> is any map. It follows that <c>M1 .. M4</c> are maps as well.
</p>
<p>
More <em>Examples:</em>
</p>
<pre>
1> <input>M = #{1 => a}.</input>
#{1 => a }
2> <input>M#{1.0 => b}.</input>
#{1 => a, 1.0 => b}.
3> <input>M#{1 := b}.</input>
#{1 => b}
4> <input>M#{1.0 := b}.</input>
** exception error: bad argument
</pre>
<p>
As in construction, the order in which the key and value expressions
are evaluated is not defined. The
syntactic order of the key-value pairs in the update is of no
relevance, except in the case where two keys match.
In that case, the latter value is used.
</p>
</section>
<section>
<title>Maps in Patterns</title>
<p>
Matching of key-value associations from maps is done as follows:
</p>
<code>#{ K := V } = M</code>
<p>
Here <c>M</c> is any map. The key <c>K</c> must be an expression with bound
variables or literals. <c>V</c> can be any pattern with either bound or
unbound variables.
</p>
<p>
If the variable <c>V</c> is unbound, it becomes bound to the value associated
with the key <c>K</c>, which must exist in the map <c>M</c>. If the variable
<c>V</c> is bound, it must match the value associated with <c>K</c> in <c>M</c>.
</p>
<p><em>Example:</em></p>
<pre>
1> <input>M = #{"tuple" => {1,2}}.</input>
#{"tuple" => {1,2}}
2> <input>#{"tuple" := {1,B}} = M.</input>
#{"tuple" => {1,2}}
3> <input>B.</input>
2.</pre>
<p>
This binds variable <c>B</c> to integer <c>2</c>.
</p>
<p>
Similarly, multiple values from the map can be matched:
</p>
<code>#{ K1 := V1, .., Kn := Vn } = M</code>
<p>
Here keys <c>K1 .. Kn</c> are any expressions with literals or bound variables. If all
keys exist in map <c>M</c>, all variables in <c>V1 .. Vn</c> is matched to the
associated values of their respective keys.
</p>
<p>
If the matching conditions are not met, the match fails, either with:
</p>
<list>
<item><p>A <c>badmatch</c> exception.</p>
<p>This is if it is used in the context of the match operator
as in the example.</p>
</item>
<item><p>Or resulting in the next clause being tested in function heads and
case expressions.</p>
</item>
</list>
<p>
Matching in maps only allows for <c>:=</c> as delimiters of associations.
</p>
<p>
The order in which keys are declared in matching has no relevance.
</p>
<p>
Duplicate keys are allowed in matching and match each pattern associated
to the keys:
</p>
<code>#{ K := V1, K := V2 } = M</code>
<p>
Matching an expression against an empty map literal, matches its type but
no variables are bound:
</p>
<code>#{} = Expr</code>
<p>
This expression matches if the expression <c>Expr</c> is of type map, otherwise
it fails with an exception <c>badmatch</c>.
</p>
<section>
<title>Matching Syntax</title>
<p>
Matching of literals as keys are allowed in function heads:
</p>
<code>
%% only start if not_started
handle_call(start, From, #{ state := not_started } = S) ->
...
{reply, ok, S#{ state := start }};
%% only change if started
handle_call(change, From, #{ state := start } = S) ->
...
{reply, ok, S#{ state := changed }};</code>
</section>
</section>
<section>
<title>Maps in Guards</title>
<p>
Maps are allowed in guards as long as all subexpressions are valid guard expressions.
</p>
<p>
Two guard BIFs handle maps:
</p>
<list>
<item>
<seealso marker="erts:erlang#is_map/1">is_map/1</seealso>
in the <c>erlang</c> module
</item>
<item>
<seealso marker="erts:erlang#map_size/1">map_size/1</seealso>
in the <c>erlang</c> module
</item>
</list>
</section>
</section>
<section>
<marker id="bit_syntax"></marker>
<title>Bit Syntax Expressions</title>
<code type="none"><![CDATA[<<>>
<<E1,...,En>>]]></code>
<p>Each element <c>Ei</c> specifies a <em>segment</em> of
the bit string. Each element <c>Ei</c> is a value, followed by an
optional <em>size expression</em> and an optional <em>type specifier list</em>.</p>
<pre>
Ei = Value |
Value:Size |
Value/TypeSpecifierList |
Value:Size/TypeSpecifierList</pre>
<p>Used in a bit string construction, <c>Value</c> is an expression
that is to evaluate to an integer, float, or bit string. If the
expression is not a single literal or variable, it
is to be enclosed in parentheses.</p>
<p>Used in a bit string matching, <c>Value</c> must be a variable,
or an integer, float, or string.</p>
<p>Notice that, for example, using a string literal as in
<c><![CDATA[<<"abc">>]]></c> is syntactic sugar for
<c><![CDATA[<<$a,$b,$c>>]]></c>.</p>
<p>Used in a bit string construction, <c>Size</c> is an expression
that is to evaluate to an integer.</p>
<p>Used in a bit string matching, <c>Size</c> must be an integer, or a
variable bound to an integer.</p>
<p>The value of <c>Size</c> specifies the size of the segment in
units (see below). The default value depends on the type (see
below):</p>
<list type="bulleted">
<item>For <c>integer</c> it is 8.</item>
<item>For <c>float</c> it is 64.</item>
<item>For <c>binary</c> and <c>bitstring</c> it is
the whole binary or bit string.</item>
</list>
<p>In matching, this default value is only
valid for the last element. All other bit string or binary
elements in the matching must have a size specification.</p>
<p>For the <c>utf8</c>, <c>utf16</c>, and <c>utf32</c> types,
<c>Size</c> must not be given. The size of the segment is implicitly
determined by the type and value itself.</p>
<p><c>TypeSpecifierList</c> is a list of type specifiers, in any
order, separated by hyphens (-). Default values are used for any
omitted type specifiers.</p>
<taglist>
<tag><c>Type</c>= <c>integer</c> | <c>float</c> | <c>binary</c> |
<c>bytes</c> | <c>bitstring</c> | <c>bits</c> |
<c>utf8</c> | <c>utf16</c> | <c>utf32</c> </tag>
<item>The default is <c>integer</c>. <c>bytes</c> is a shorthand for
<c>binary</c> and <c>bits</c> is a shorthand for <c>bitstring</c>.
See below for more information about the <c>utf</c> types.
</item>
<tag><c>Signedness</c>= <c>signed</c> | <c>unsigned</c></tag>
<item>Only matters for matching and when the type is <c>integer</c>.
The default is <c>unsigned</c>.</item>
<tag><c>Endianness</c>= <c>big</c> | <c>little</c> | <c>native</c></tag>
<item>Native-endian means that the endianness is resolved at load
time to be either big-endian or little-endian, depending on
what is native for the CPU that the Erlang machine is run on.
Endianness only matters when the Type is either <c>integer</c>,
<c>utf16</c>, <c>utf32</c>, or <c>float</c>. The default is <c>big</c>.
</item>
<tag><c>Unit</c>= <c>unit:IntegerLiteral</c></tag>
<item>The allowed range is 1..256. Defaults to 1 for <c>integer</c>,
<c>float</c>, and <c>bitstring</c>, and to 8 for <c>binary</c>.
No unit specifier must be given for the types
<c>utf8</c>, <c>utf16</c>, and <c>utf32</c>.
</item>
</taglist>
<p>The value of <c>Size</c> multiplied with the unit gives
the number of bits. A segment of type <c>binary</c> must have
a size that is evenly divisible by 8.</p>
<note><p>When constructing binaries, if the size <c>N</c> of an integer
segment is too small to contain the given integer, the most significant
bits of the integer are silently discarded and only the <c>N</c> least
significant bits are put into the binary.</p></note>
<p>The types <c>utf8</c>, <c>utf16</c>, and <c>utf32</c> specifies
encoding/decoding of the <em>Unicode Transformation Format</em>s UTF-8, UTF-16,
and UTF-32, respectively.</p>
<p>When constructing a segment of a <c>utf</c> type, <c>Value</c>
must be an integer in the range 0..16#D7FF or
16#E000....16#10FFFF. Construction
fails with a <c>badarg</c> exception if <c>Value</c> is
outside the allowed ranges. The size of the resulting binary
segment depends on the type or <c>Value</c>, or both:</p>
<list type="bulleted">
<item>For <c>utf8</c>, <c>Value</c> is encoded in 1-4 bytes.</item>
<item>For <c>utf16</c>, <c>Value</c> is encoded in 2 or 4 bytes.</item>
<item>For <c>utf32</c>, <c>Value</c> is always be encoded in 4 bytes.</item>
</list>
<p>When constructing, a literal string can be given followed
by one of the UTF types, for example: <c><![CDATA[<<"abc"/utf8>>]]></c>
which is syntactic sugar for
<c><![CDATA[<<$a/utf8,$b/utf8,$c/utf8>>]]></c>.</p>
<p>A successful match of a segment of a <c>utf</c> type, results
in an integer in the range 0..16#D7FF or 16#E000..16#10FFFF.
The match fails if the returned value falls outside those ranges.</p>
<p>A segment of type <c>utf8</c> matches 1-4 bytes in the binary,
if the binary at the match position contains a valid UTF-8 sequence.
(See RFC-3629 or the Unicode standard.)</p>
<p>A segment of type <c>utf16</c> can match 2 or 4 bytes in the binary.
The match fails if the binary at the match position does not contain
a legal UTF-16 encoding of a Unicode code point. (See RFC-2781 or
the Unicode standard.)</p>
<p>A segment of type <c>utf32</c> can match 4 bytes in the binary in the
same way as an <c>integer</c> segment matches 32 bits.
The match fails if the resulting integer is outside the legal ranges
mentioned above.</p>
<p><em>Examples:</em></p>
<pre>
1> <input>Bin1 = <<1,17,42>>.</input>
<<1,17,42>>
2> <input>Bin2 = <<"abc">>.</input>
<<97,98,99>>
3> <input>Bin3 = <<1,17,42:16>>.</input>
<<1,17,0,42>>
4> <input><<A,B,C:16>> = <<1,17,42:16>>.</input>
<<1,17,0,42>>
5> <input>C.</input>
42
6> <input><<D:16,E,F>> = <<1,17,42:16>>.</input>
<<1,17,0,42>>
7> <input>D.</input>
273
8> <input>F.</input>
42
9> <input><<G,H/binary>> = <<1,17,42:16>>.</input>
<<1,17,0,42>>
10> <input>H.</input>
<<17,0,42>>
11> <input><<G,H/bitstring>> = <<1,17,42:12>>.</input>
<<1,17,1,10:4>>
12> <input>H.</input>
<<17,1,10:4>>
13> <input><<1024/utf8>>.</input>
<<208,128>>
</pre>
<p>Notice that bit string patterns cannot be nested.</p>
<p>Notice also that "<c><![CDATA[B=<<1>>]]></c>" is interpreted as
"<c><![CDATA[B =<<1>>]]></c>" which is a syntax error. The correct way is
to write a space after '=': "<c><![CDATA[B= <<1>>]]></c>.</p>
<p>More examples are provided in
<seealso marker="doc/programming_examples:bit_syntax">
Programming Examples</seealso>.</p>
</section>
<section>
<marker id="funs"></marker>
<title>Fun Expressions</title>
<pre>
fun
[Name](Pattern11,...,Pattern1N) [when GuardSeq1] ->
Body1;
...;
[Name](PatternK1,...,PatternKN) [when GuardSeqK] ->
BodyK
end</pre>
<p>A fun expression begins with the keyword <c>fun</c> and ends
with the keyword <c>end</c>. Between them is to be a function
declaration, similar to a
<seealso marker="functions#syntax">regular function declaration</seealso>,
except that the function name is optional and is to be a variable, if
any.</p>
<p>Variables in a fun head shadow the function name and both shadow
variables in the function clause surrounding the fun expression.
Variables bound in a fun body are local to the fun body.</p>
<p>The return value of the expression is the resulting fun.</p>
<p><em>Examples:</em></p>
<pre>
1> <input>Fun1 = fun (X) -> X+1 end.</input>
#Fun<erl_eval.6.39074546>
2> <input>Fun1(2).</input>
3
3> <input>Fun2 = fun (X) when X>=5 -> gt; (X) -> lt end.</input>
#Fun<erl_eval.6.39074546>
4> <input>Fun2(7).</input>
gt
5> <input>Fun3 = fun Fact(1) -> 1; Fact(X) when X > 1 -> X * Fact(X - 1) end.</input>
#Fun<erl_eval.6.39074546>
6> <input>Fun3(4).</input>
24</pre>
<p>The following fun expressions are also allowed:</p>
<pre>
fun Name/Arity
fun Module:Name/Arity</pre>
<p>In <c>Name/Arity</c>, <c>Name</c> is an atom and <c>Arity</c> is an integer.
<c>Name/Arity</c> must specify an existing local function. The expression is
syntactic sugar for:</p>
<pre>
fun (Arg1,...,ArgN) -> Name(Arg1,...,ArgN) end</pre>
<p>In <c>Module:Name/Arity</c>, <c>Module</c>, and <c>Name</c> are atoms
and <c>Arity</c> is an integer. Starting from Erlang/OTP R15,
<c>Module</c>, <c>Name</c>, and <c>Arity</c> can also be variables.
A fun defined in this way refers to the function <c>Name</c>
with arity <c>Arity</c> in the <em>latest</em> version of module
<c>Module</c>. A fun defined in this way is not dependent on
the code for the module in which it is defined.
</p>
<p>More examples are provided in
<seealso marker="doc/programming_examples:funs">
Programming Examples</seealso>.</p>
</section>
<section>
<marker id="catch"></marker>
<title>Catch and Throw</title>
<code type="none">
catch Expr</code>
<p>Returns the value of <c>Expr</c> unless an exception
occurs during the evaluation. In that case, the exception is
caught.</p>
<p>For exceptions of class <c>error</c>, that is,
run-time errors,
<c>{'EXIT',{Reason,Stack}}</c> is returned.</p>
<p>For exceptions of class <c>exit</c>, that is,
the code called <c>exit(Term)</c>,
<c>{'EXIT',Term}</c> is returned.</p>
<p>For exceptions of class <c>throw</c>, that is
the code called <c>throw(Term)</c>,
<c>Term</c> is returned.</p>
<p><c>Reason</c> depends on the type of error that occurred, and
<c>Stack</c> is the stack of recent function calls, see
<seealso marker="errors#exit_reasons">Exit Reasons</seealso>.</p>
<p><em>Examples:</em></p>
<pre>
1> <input>catch 1+2.</input>
3
2> <input>catch 1+a.</input>
{'EXIT',{badarith,[...]}}</pre>
<p>Notice that <c>catch</c> has low precedence and catch
subexpressions often needs to be enclosed in a block
expression or in parentheses:</p>
<pre>
3> <input>A = catch 1+2.</input>
** 1: syntax error before: 'catch' **
4> <input>A = (catch 1+2).</input>
3</pre>
<p>The BIF <c>throw(Any)</c> can be used for non-local return from
a function. It must be evaluated within a <c>catch</c>, which
returns the value <c>Any</c>.</p>
<p><em>Example:</em></p>
<pre>
5> <input>catch throw(hello).</input>
hello</pre>
<p>If <c>throw/1</c> is not evaluated within a catch, a
<c>nocatch</c> run-time error occurs.</p>
</section>
<section>
<marker id="try"></marker>
<title>Try</title>
<code type="none">
try Exprs
catch
[Class1:]ExceptionPattern1 [when ExceptionGuardSeq1] ->
ExceptionBody1;
[ClassN:]ExceptionPatternN [when ExceptionGuardSeqN] ->
ExceptionBodyN
end</code>
<p>This is an enhancement of
<seealso marker="#catch">catch</seealso> that appeared in
Erlang 5.4/OTP R10B. It gives the possibility to:</p>
<list type="bulleted">
<item>Distinguish between different exception classes.</item>
<item>Choose to handle only the desired ones.</item>
<item>Passing the others on to an enclosing
<c>try</c> or <c>catch</c>, or to default error handling.</item>
</list>
<p>Notice that although the keyword <c>catch</c> is used in
the <c>try</c> expression, there is not a <c>catch</c> expression
within the <c>try</c> expression.</p>
<p>It returns the value of <c>Exprs</c> (a sequence of expressions
<c>Expr1, ..., ExprN</c>) unless an exception occurs during
the evaluation. In that case the exception is caught and
the patterns <c>ExceptionPattern</c> with the right exception
class <c>Class</c> are sequentially matched against the caught
exception. An omitted <c>Class</c> is shorthand for <c>throw</c>.
If a match succeeds and the optional guard sequence
<c>ExceptionGuardSeq</c> is true, the corresponding
<c>ExceptionBody</c> is evaluated to become the return value.</p>
<p>If an exception occurs during evaluation of <c>Exprs</c> but
there is no matching <c>ExceptionPattern</c> of the right
<c>Class</c> with a true guard sequence, the exception is passed
on as if <c>Exprs</c> had not been enclosed in a <c>try</c>
expression.</p>
<p>If an exception occurs during evaluation of <c>ExceptionBody</c>,
it is not caught.</p>
<p>The <c>try</c> expression can have an <c>of</c>
section:
</p>
<code type="none">
try Exprs of
Pattern1 [when GuardSeq1] ->
Body1;
...;
PatternN [when GuardSeqN] ->
BodyN
catch
[Class1:]ExceptionPattern1 [when ExceptionGuardSeq1] ->
ExceptionBody1;
...;
[ClassN:]ExceptionPatternN [when ExceptionGuardSeqN] ->
ExceptionBodyN
end</code>
<p>If the evaluation of <c>Exprs</c> succeeds without an exception,
the patterns <c>Pattern</c> are sequentially matched against
the result in the same way as for a
<seealso marker="#case">case</seealso> expression, except that if
the matching fails, a <c>try_clause</c> run-time error occurs.</p>
<p>An exception occurring during the evaluation of <c>Body</c> is
not caught.</p>
<p>The <c>try</c> expression can also be augmented with an
<c>after</c> section, intended to be used for cleanup with side
effects:</p>
<code type="none">
try Exprs of
Pattern1 [when GuardSeq1] ->
Body1;
...;
PatternN [when GuardSeqN] ->
BodyN
catch
[Class1:]ExceptionPattern1 [when ExceptionGuardSeq1] ->
ExceptionBody1;
...;
[ClassN:]ExceptionPatternN [when ExceptionGuardSeqN] ->
ExceptionBodyN
after
AfterBody
end</code>
<p><c>AfterBody</c> is evaluated after either <c>Body</c> or
<c>ExceptionBody</c>, no matter which one. The evaluated value of
<c>AfterBody</c> is lost; the return value of the <c>try</c>
expression is the same with an <c>after</c> section as without.</p>
<p>Even if an exception occurs during evaluation of <c>Body</c> or
<c>ExceptionBody</c>, <c>AfterBody</c> is evaluated. In this case
the exception is passed on after <c>AfterBody</c> has been
evaluated, so the exception from the <c>try</c> expression is
the same with an <c>after</c> section as without.</p>
<p>If an exception occurs during evaluation of <c>AfterBody</c>
itself, it is not caught. So if <c>AfterBody</c> is evaluated after
an exception in <c>Exprs</c>, <c>Body</c>, or <c>ExceptionBody</c>,
that exception is lost and masked by the exception in
<c>AfterBody</c>.</p>
<p>The <c>of</c>, <c>catch</c>, and <c>after</c> sections are all
optional, as long as there is at least a <c>catch</c> or an
<c>after</c> section. So the following are valid <c>try</c>
expressions:</p>
<code type="none">
try Exprs of
Pattern when GuardSeq ->
Body
after
AfterBody
end
try Exprs
catch
ExpressionPattern ->
ExpressionBody
after
AfterBody
end
try Exprs after AfterBody end</code>
<p>Next is an example of using <c>after</c>. This closes the file,
even in the event of exceptions in <c>file:read/2</c> or in
<c>binary_to_term/1</c>. The exceptions are the same as
without the <c>try</c>...<c>after</c>...<c>end</c> expression:</p>
<code type="none">
termize_file(Name) ->
{ok,F} = file:open(Name, [read,binary]),
try
{ok,Bin} = file:read(F, 1024*1024),
binary_to_term(Bin)
after
file:close(F)
end.</code>
<p>Next is an example of using <c>try</c> to emulate <c>catch Expr</c>:</p>
<code type="none">
try Expr
catch
throw:Term -> Term;
exit:Reason -> {'EXIT',Reason}
error:Reason -> {'EXIT',{Reason,erlang:get_stacktrace()}}
end</code>
</section>
<section>
<title>Parenthesized Expressions</title>
<pre>
(Expr)</pre>
<p>Parenthesized expressions are useful to override
<seealso marker="#prec">operator precedences</seealso>,
for example, in arithmetic expressions:</p>
<pre>
1> <input>1 + 2 * 3.</input>
7
2> <input>(1 + 2) * 3.</input>
9</pre>
</section>
<section>
<title>Block Expressions</title>
<pre>
begin
Expr1,
...,
ExprN
end</pre>
<p>Block expressions provide a way to group a sequence of
expressions, similar to a clause body. The return value is
the value of the last expression <c>ExprN</c>.</p>
</section>
<section>
<marker id="lcs"></marker>
<title>List Comprehensions</title>
<p>List comprehensions is a feature of many modern functional
programming languages. Subject to certain rules, they provide a
succinct notation for generating elements in a list.</p>
<p>List comprehensions are analogous to set comprehensions in
Zermelo-Frankel set theory and are called ZF expressions in
Miranda. They are analogous to the <c>setof</c> and
<c>findall</c> predicates in Prolog.</p>
<p>List comprehensions are written with the following syntax:</p>
<pre>
[Expr || Qualifier1,...,QualifierN]</pre>
<p>Here, <c>Expr</c> is an arbitrary expression, and each
<c>Qualifier</c> is either a generator or a filter.</p>
<list type="bulleted">
<item>A <em>generator</em> is written as: <br></br>
<c><![CDATA[Pattern <- ListExpr]]></c>. <br></br>
<c>ListExpr</c> must be an expression, which evaluates to a
list of terms.</item>
<item>A <em>bit string generator</em> is written as: <br></br>
<c><![CDATA[BitstringPattern <= BitStringExpr]]></c>. <br></br>
<c>BitStringExpr</c> must be an expression, which evaluates to a
bitstring.</item>
<item>A <em>filter</em> is an expression, which evaluates to
<c>true</c> or <c>false</c>.</item>
</list>
<p>The variables in the generator patterns, shadow variables in the function
clause, surrounding the list comprehensions.</p> <p>A list comprehension
returns a list, where the elements are the result of evaluating <c>Expr</c>
for each combination of generator list elements and bit string generator
elements, for which all filters are true.</p>
<p><em>Example:</em></p>
<pre>
1> <input>[X*2 || X <- [1,2,3]].</input>
[2,4,6]</pre>
<p>More examples are provoded in
<seealso marker="doc/programming_examples:list_comprehensions">
Programming Examples.</seealso></p>
</section>
<section>
<title>Bit String Comprehensions</title>
<p>Bit string comprehensions are
analogous to List Comprehensions. They are used to generate bit strings
efficiently and succinctly.</p>
<p>Bit string comprehensions are written with
the following syntax:</p>
<pre>
<< BitString || Qualifier1,...,QualifierN >></pre>
<p>Here, <c>BitString</c> is a bit string expression and each
<c>Qualifier</c> is either a generator, a bit string generator or a filter.</p>
<list type="bulleted">
<item>A <em>generator</em> is written as: <br></br>
<c><![CDATA[Pattern <- ListExpr]]></c>. <br></br>
<c>ListExpr</c> must be an expression that evaluates to a
list of terms.</item>
<item>A <em>bit string generator</em> is written as: <br></br>
<c><![CDATA[BitstringPattern <= BitStringExpr]]></c>. <br></br>
<c>BitStringExpr</c> must be an expression that evaluates to a
bitstring.</item>
<item>A <em>filter</em> is an expression that evaluates to
<c>true</c> or <c>false</c>.</item>
</list>
<p>The variables in the generator patterns, shadow variables in
the function clause, surrounding the bit string comprehensions.</p>
<p>A bit string comprehension returns a bit string, which is
created by concatenating the results of evaluating <c>BitString</c>
for each combination of bit string generator elements, for which all
filters are true.</p>
<p><em>Example:</em></p>
<pre>
1> <input><< << (X*2) >> ||
<<X>> <= << 1,2,3 >> >>.</input>
<<2,4,6>></pre>
<p>More examples are provided in
<seealso marker="doc/programming_examples:bit_syntax">
Programming Examples.</seealso></p>
</section>
<section>
<marker id="guards"></marker>
<title>Guard Sequences</title>
<p>A <em>guard sequence</em> is a sequence of guards, separated
by semicolon (;). The guard sequence is true if at least one of
the guards is true. (The remaining guards, if any, are not
evaluated.)</p>
<p><c>Guard1;...;GuardK</c></p>
<p>A <em>guard</em> is a sequence of guard expressions, separated
by comma (,). The guard is true if all guard expressions
evaluate to <c>true</c>.</p>
<p><c>GuardExpr1,...,GuardExprN</c></p>
<p>The set of valid <em>guard expressions</em> (sometimes called
guard tests) is a subset of the set of valid Erlang expressions.
The reason for restricting the set of valid expressions is that
evaluation of a guard expression must be guaranteed to be free
of side effects. Valid guard expressions are the following:</p>
<list type="bulleted">
<item>The atom <c>true</c></item>
<item>Other constants (terms and bound variables), all regarded
as false</item>
<item>Calls to the BIFs specified in table <c>Type Test BIFs</c></item>
<item>Term comparisons</item>
<item>Arithmetic expressions</item>
<item>Boolean expressions</item>
<item>Short-circuit expressions (<c>andalso</c>/<c>orelse</c>)</item>
</list>
<table>
<row>
<cell align="left" valign="middle"><c>is_atom/1</c></cell>
</row>
<row>
<cell align="left" valign="middle"><c>is_binary/1</c></cell>
</row>
<row>
<cell align="left" valign="middle"><c>is_bitstring/1</c></cell>
</row>
<row>
<cell align="left" valign="middle"><c>is_boolean/1</c></cell>
</row>
<row>
<cell align="left" valign="middle"><c>is_float/1</c></cell>
</row>
<row>
<cell align="left" valign="middle"><c>is_function/1</c></cell>
</row>
<row>
<cell align="left" valign="middle"><c>is_function/2</c></cell>
</row>
<row>
<cell align="left" valign="middle"><c>is_integer/1</c></cell>
</row>
<row>
<cell align="left" valign="middle"><c>is_list/1</c></cell>
</row>
<row>
<cell align="left" valign="middle"><c>is_map/1</c></cell>
</row>
<row>
<cell align="left" valign="middle"><c>is_number/1</c></cell>
</row>
<row>
<cell align="left" valign="middle"><c>is_pid/1</c></cell>
</row>
<row>
<cell align="left" valign="middle"><c>is_port/1</c></cell>
</row>
<row>
<cell align="left" valign="middle"><c>is_record/2</c></cell>
</row>
<row>
<cell align="left" valign="middle"><c>is_record/3</c></cell>
</row>
<row>
<cell align="left" valign="middle"><c>is_reference/1</c></cell>
</row>
<row>
<cell align="left" valign="middle"><c>is_tuple/1</c></cell>
</row>
<tcaption>Type Test BIFs</tcaption>
</table>
<p>Notice that most type test BIFs have older equivalents, without
the <c>is_</c> prefix. These old BIFs are retained for backwards
compatibility only and are not to be used in new code. They are
also only allowed at top level. For example, they are not allowed
in Boolean expressions in guards.</p>
<table>
<row>
<cell align="left" valign="middle"><c>abs(Number)</c></cell>
</row>
<row>
<cell align="left" valign="middle"><c>bit_size(Bitstring)</c></cell>
</row>
<row>
<cell align="left" valign="middle"><c>byte_size(Bitstring)</c></cell>
</row>
<row>
<cell align="left" valign="middle"><c>element(N, Tuple)</c></cell>
</row>
<row>
<cell align="left" valign="middle"><c>float(Term)</c></cell>
</row>
<row>
<cell align="left" valign="middle"><c>hd(List)</c></cell>
</row>
<row>
<cell align="left" valign="middle"><c>length(List)</c></cell>
</row>
<row>
<cell align="left" valign="middle"><c>map_size(Map)</c></cell>
</row>
<row>
<cell align="left" valign="middle"><c>node()</c></cell>
</row>
<row>
<cell align="left" valign="middle"><c>node(Pid|Ref|Port)</c></cell>
</row>
<row>
<cell align="left" valign="middle"><c>round(Number)</c></cell>
</row>
<row>
<cell align="left" valign="middle"><c>self()</c></cell>
</row>
<row>
<cell align="left" valign="middle"><c>size(Tuple|Bitstring)</c></cell>
</row>
<row>
<cell align="left" valign="middle"><c>tl(List)</c></cell>
</row>
<row>
<cell align="left" valign="middle"><c>trunc(Number)</c></cell>
</row>
<row>
<cell align="left" valign="middle"><c>tuple_size(Tuple)</c></cell>
</row>
<tcaption>Other BIFs Allowed in Guard Expressions</tcaption>
</table>
<p>If an arithmetic expression, a Boolean expression, a
short-circuit expression, or a call to a guard BIF fails (because
of invalid arguments), the entire guard fails. If the guard was
part of a guard sequence, the next guard in the sequence (that is,
the guard following the next semicolon) is evaluated.</p>
</section>
<section>
<marker id="prec"></marker>
<title>Operator Precedence</title>
<p>Operator precedence in falling priority:</p>
<table>
<row>
<cell align="left" valign="middle">:</cell>
<cell align="left" valign="middle"> </cell>
</row>
<row>
<cell align="left" valign="middle">#</cell>
<cell align="left" valign="middle"> </cell>
</row>
<row>
<cell align="left" valign="middle">Unary + - bnot not</cell>
<cell align="left" valign="middle"> </cell>
</row>
<row>
<cell align="left" valign="middle">/ * div rem band and</cell>
<cell align="left" valign="middle">Left associative</cell>
</row>
<row>
<cell align="left" valign="middle">+ - bor bxor bsl bsr or xor</cell>
<cell align="left" valign="middle">Left associative</cell>
</row>
<row>
<cell align="left" valign="middle">++ --</cell>
<cell align="left" valign="middle">Right associative</cell>
</row>
<row>
<cell align="left" valign="middle">== /= =< < >= > =:= =/=</cell>
<cell align="left" valign="middle"> </cell>
</row>
<row>
<cell align="left" valign="middle">andalso</cell>
<cell align="left" valign="middle"> </cell>
</row>
<row>
<cell align="left" valign="middle">orelse</cell>
<cell align="left" valign="middle"> </cell>
</row>
<row>
<cell align="left" valign="middle">= !</cell>
<cell align="left" valign="middle">Right associative</cell>
</row>
<row>
<cell align="left" valign="middle">catch</cell>
<cell align="left" valign="middle"> </cell>
</row>
<tcaption>Operator Precedence</tcaption>
</table>
<p>When evaluating an expression, the operator with the highest
priority is evaluated first. Operators with the same priority
are evaluated according to their associativity.</p>
<p><em>Example:</em></p>
<p>The left associative arithmetic operators are evaluated left to
right:</p>
<pre>
<input>6 + 5 * 4 - 3 / 2</input> evaluates to
<input>6 + 20 - 1.5</input> evaluates to
<input>26 - 1.5</input> evaluates to
<input>24.5</input></pre>
</section>
</chapter>