aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorBjörn Gustavsson <[email protected]>2010-01-15 12:26:17 +0100
committerBjörn Gustavsson <[email protected]>2010-01-15 13:40:14 +0100
commit31e231d813d8a15a937ebd5fbb71299ce1faf9c1 (patch)
treefc90dee8d743c38b3072350c16d23ec3f4899044
parentb327123e4da61ee2794aa473d357c37e7168d189 (diff)
downloadotp-31e231d813d8a15a937ebd5fbb71299ce1faf9c1.tar.gz
otp-31e231d813d8a15a937ebd5fbb71299ce1faf9c1.tar.bz2
otp-31e231d813d8a15a937ebd5fbb71299ce1faf9c1.zip
beam_validator: fix incorrect assumptions about GC guard BIFs
The beam_validator pass incorrectly assumes that a GC guard BIF (such as length/1) may first do a garbage collection and then fail. That assumption is not correct (guards BIF only do garbage collection when it is known that the BIF call will succeed), and will cause the compiler to reject valid programs. Modify the beam_validator to assume that if the branch is taken for a gc_bif instruction, all registers are unchanged and no garbage collection has occurred. Also add a comment in the emulator about that assumption.
-rw-r--r--erts/emulator/beam/erl_bif_guard.c4
-rw-r--r--lib/compiler/src/beam_validator.erl6
-rw-r--r--lib/compiler/test/beam_validator_SUITE.erl36
3 files changed, 40 insertions, 6 deletions
diff --git a/erts/emulator/beam/erl_bif_guard.c b/erts/emulator/beam/erl_bif_guard.c
index 8b47db10dd..9e15f4e399 100644
--- a/erts/emulator/beam/erl_bif_guard.c
+++ b/erts/emulator/beam/erl_bif_guard.c
@@ -318,6 +318,10 @@ double_to_integer(Process* p, double x)
* The following code is used when a guard that may build on the
* heap is called directly. They must not use HAlloc(), but must
* do a garbage collection if there is insufficient heap space.
+ *
+ * Important note: All error checking MUST be done before doing
+ * a garbage collection. The compiler assumes that all registers
+ * are still valid if a guard BIF generates an exception.
*/
#define ERTS_NEED_GC(p, need) ((HEAP_LIMIT((p)) - HEAP_TOP((p))) <= (need))
diff --git a/lib/compiler/src/beam_validator.erl b/lib/compiler/src/beam_validator.erl
index 08ba9c3ee4..5ddc534abc 100644
--- a/lib/compiler/src/beam_validator.erl
+++ b/lib/compiler/src/beam_validator.erl
@@ -604,9 +604,9 @@ valfun_4({gc_bif,Op,{f,Fail},Live,Src,Dst}, #vst{current=St0}=Vst0) ->
St = kill_heap_allocation(St0),
Vst1 = Vst0#vst{current=St},
verify_live(Live, Vst1),
- Vst2 = prune_x_regs(Live, Vst1),
- validate_src(Src, Vst2),
- Vst = branch_state(Fail, Vst2),
+ Vst2 = branch_state(Fail, Vst1),
+ Vst = prune_x_regs(Live, Vst2),
+ validate_src(Src, Vst),
Type = bif_type(Op, Src, Vst),
set_type_reg(Type, Dst, Vst);
valfun_4(return, #vst{current=#st{numy=none}}=Vst) ->
diff --git a/lib/compiler/test/beam_validator_SUITE.erl b/lib/compiler/test/beam_validator_SUITE.erl
index ef8feb8a27..0659d5575e 100644
--- a/lib/compiler/test/beam_validator_SUITE.erl
+++ b/lib/compiler/test/beam_validator_SUITE.erl
@@ -28,7 +28,7 @@
freg_range/1,freg_uninit/1,freg_state/1,
bin_match/1,bin_aligned/1,bad_dsetel/1,
state_after_fault_in_catch/1,no_exception_in_catch/1,
- undef_label/1,illegal_instruction/1]).
+ undef_label/1,illegal_instruction/1,failing_gc_guard_bif/1]).
-include("test_server.hrl").
@@ -52,13 +52,13 @@ all(suite) ->
freg_range,freg_uninit,freg_state,
bin_match,bin_aligned,
bad_dsetel,state_after_fault_in_catch,no_exception_in_catch,
- undef_label,illegal_instruction].
+ undef_label,illegal_instruction,failing_gc_guard_bif].
beam_files(Config) when is_list(Config) ->
?line {ok,Cwd} = file:get_cwd(),
?line Parent = filename:dirname(Cwd),
?line Wc = filename:join([Parent,"*","*.beam"]),
- %% Must have at least two files here, or there will could be
+ %% Must have at least two files here, or there will be
%% a grammatical error in the output of the io:format/2 call below. ;-)
?line [_,_|_] = Fs = filelib:wildcard(Wc),
?line io:format("~p files\n", [length(Fs)]),
@@ -356,6 +356,36 @@ illegal_instruction(Config) when is_list(Config) ->
{{'_',y,0},{[],0,illegal_instruction}}] = Errors,
ok.
+%% The beam_validator used to assume that a GC guard BIF could
+%% do a garbage collection even if it failed. That assumption
+%% is not correct, and will cause the beam_validator to reject
+%% valid programs such as this test case.
+%%
+%% (Thanks to Kiran Khaladkar.)
+%%
+failing_gc_guard_bif(Config) when is_list(Config) ->
+ ?line ok = process_request(lists:seq(1, 36)),
+ ?line error = process_request([]),
+ ?line error = process_request(not_a_list),
+ ok.
+
+process_request(ConfId) ->
+ case process_request_foo(ConfId) of
+ false ->
+ if
+ length(ConfId) == 36 ->
+ Response = ok;
+ true ->
+ Response = error
+ end
+ end,
+ process_request_bar(self(), [Response]).
+
+process_request_foo(_) ->
+ false.
+
+process_request_bar(Pid, [Response]) when is_pid(Pid) ->
+ Response.
%%%-------------------------------------------------------------------------