diff options
| author | Ingela Anderton Andin <[email protected]> | 2012-02-03 14:06:53 +0100 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Ingela Anderton Andin <[email protected]> | 2012-02-08 11:46:23 +0100 |
| commit | 25b2354cc9bcf09c87dc65526936e976fe95d3fd (patch) | |
| tree | b7c326771a1748df5f21d1d560e3df86c5d8488a /INSTALL-WIN32.md | |
| parent | ab2ba6f1b0713fbe5c78f67aeefb73ffc006e995 (diff) | |
| download | otp-25b2354cc9bcf09c87dc65526936e976fe95d3fd.tar.gz otp-25b2354cc9bcf09c87dc65526936e976fe95d3fd.tar.bz2 otp-25b2354cc9bcf09c87dc65526936e976fe95d3fd.zip | |
User defined verify_fun is now called correctly
Background from erlang-questions:
> We use this test suite to verify our PKIX-path-validation code,
> granted we do not yet support CRL-handling but that is on its
> way. Our verify_fun will let you work around the problem that it
> is not yet supported. (Not so fun for you perhaps but a possible
> solution for now).
this is unfortunately not the case since for versions that contain
commit 4dbf3c9e4ae7cfd19b247353369166d31b8f15e5 (it is in R14B04 and
R15B) the documented behaviour (verify_fun will be called for every
certificate) is broken: the verify_fun will only be called, if the
certificate contains unknown extensions.
it is therefore not useful as a CRL workaround (anymore).
best regards
Stefan Grundmann
Diffstat (limited to 'INSTALL-WIN32.md')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions