erts: Rename allocator aoffcbf to aoffcaobf

and add documentation in erts_alloc

1 files changed, 11 insertions, 1 deletions

diff --git a/erts/doc/src/erts_alloc.xml b/erts/doc/src/erts_alloc.xml
index a95b5d7cc4..f79241d692 100644
--- a/erts/doc/src/erts_alloc.xml
+++ b/erts/doc/src/erts_alloc.xml
@@ -170,6 +170,15 @@
           used. The time complexity is proportional to log N, where
           N is the number of free blocks.</p>
       </item>
+      <tag>Address order first fit carrier address order best fit</tag>
+      <item>
+        <p>Strategy: Find the <em>carrier</em> with the lowest address that
+	can satisfy the requested block size, then find a block within
+	that carrier using the "adress order best fit" strategy.</p>
+        <p>Implementation: Balanced binary search trees are
+          used. The time complexity is proportional to log N, where
+          N is the number of free blocks.</p>
+      </item>
       <tag>Good fit</tag>
       <item>
         <p>Strategy: Try to find the best fit, but settle for the best fit
@@ -300,10 +309,11 @@
        subsystem identifier, only the specific allocator identified will be
        effected:</p>
     <taglist>
-      <tag><marker id="M_as"><c><![CDATA[+M<S>as bf|aobf|aoff|gf|af]]></c></marker></tag>
+      <tag><marker id="M_as"><c><![CDATA[+M<S>as bf|aobf|aoff|aoffcaobf|gf|af]]></c></marker></tag>
       <item>
        Allocation strategy. Valid strategies are <c>bf</c> (best fit),
       <c>aobf</c> (address order best fit), <c>aoff</c> (address order first fit),
+      <c>aoffcaobf</c> (address order first fit carrier address order best fit),
       <c>gf</c> (good fit), and <c>af</c> (a fit). See 
       <seealso marker="#strategy">the description of allocation strategies</seealso> in "the <c>alloc_util</c> framework" section.</item>
       <tag><marker id="M_asbcst"><c><![CDATA[+M<S>asbcst <size>]]></c></marker></tag>