Merge branch 'maint'

1 files changed, 191 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/erts/emulator/internal_doc/SuperCarrier.md b/erts/emulator/internal_doc/SuperCarrier.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..0ad6af41de
--- /dev/null
+++ b/erts/emulator/internal_doc/SuperCarrier.md
@@ -0,0 +1,191 @@
+Super Carrier
+=============
+
+A super carrier is large memory area, allocated at VM start, which can
+be used during runtime to allocate normal carriers from.
+
+The super carrier feature was introduced in OTP R16B03. It is
+enabled with command line option +MMscs <size in Mb>
+and can be configured with other options.
+
+Problem
+-------
+
+The initial motivation for this feature was customers asking for a way
+to pre-allocate physcial memory at VM start for it to use.
+
+Other problems were different experienced limitations of the OS
+implementation of mmap:
+
+* Increasingly bad performance of mmap/munmap as the number of mmap'ed areas grow.
+* Fragmentation problem between mmap'ed areas.
+
+A third problem was management of low memory in the halfword
+emulator. The implementation used a naive linear search structure to
+hold free segments which would lead to poor performance when
+fragmentation increased.
+
+
+Solution
+--------
+
+Allocate one large continious area of address space at VM start and
+then use that area to satisfy our dynamic memory need during
+runtime. In other words: implement our own mmap.
+
+### Use cases ###
+
+If command line option +MMscrpm (Reserve Physical Memory) is set to
+false, only virtual space is allocated for the super carrier from
+start. The super carrier then acts as an "alternative mmap" implementation
+without changing the consumption of physical memory pages. Physical
+pages will be reserved on demand when an allocation is done from the super
+carrier and be unreserved when the memory is released back to the
+super carrier.
+
+If +MMscrpm is set to true, which is default, the initial allocation
+will reserve physical memory for the entire super carrier. This can be
+used by users that want to ensure a certain *minimum* amount of
+physical memory for the VM.
+
+However, what reservation of physical memory actually means highly
+depends on the operating system, and how it is configured. For
+example, different memory overcommit settings on Linux drastically
+change the behaviour.
+
+A third feature is to have the super carrier limit the *maximum*
+amount of memory used by the VM. If +MMsco (Super Carrier Only) is set
+to true, which is default, allocations will only be done from the
+super carrier. When the super carrier gets full, the VM will fail due
+to out of memory.
+If +MMsco is false, allocations will use mmap directly if the super
+carrier is full.
+
+
+
+### Implementation ###
+
+The entire super carrier implementation is kept in erl_mmap.c. The
+name suggest that it can be viewed as our own mmap implementation.
+
+A super carrier needs to satisfy two slightly different kinds of
+allocation requests; multi block carriers (MBC) and single block
+carriers (SBC). They are both rather large blocks of continious
+memory, but MBCs and SBCs have different demands on alignment and
+size.
+
+SBCs can have arbitrary size and do only need minimum 8-byte
+alignment.
+
+MBCs are more restricted. They can only have a number of fixed
+sizes that are powers of 2. The start address need to have a very
+large aligment (currently 256 kb, called "super alignment"). This is a
+design choice that allows very low overhead per allocated block in the
+MBC.
+
+To reduce fragmentation within the super carrier, it is good to keep SBCs
+and MBCs apart. MBCs with their uniform alignment and sizes can be
+packed very efficiently together. SBCs without demand for aligment can
+also be allocated quite efficiently together. But mixing them can lead
+to a lot of memory wasted when we need to create large holes of
+padding to the next alignment limit.
+
+The super carrier thus contains two areas. One area for MBCs growing from
+the bottom and up. And one area for SBCs growing from the top and
+down. Like a process with a heap and a stack growing towards each
+other.
+
+
+### Data structures ###
+
+The MBC area is called **sa** as in super aligned and the SBC area is
+called **sua** as in super un-aligned.
+
+Note that the "super" in super alignment and the "super" in super
+carrier has nothing to do with each other. We could have choosen
+another naming to avoid confusion, such as "meta" carrier or "giant"
+aligment.
+
+	+-------+ <---- sua.top
+	|  sua  |
+	|       |
+	|-------| <---- sua.bot
+	|       |
+	|       |
+	|       |
+	|-------| <---- sa.top
+	|       |
+	|  sa   |
+	|       |
+	+-------+ <---- sa.bot
+
+
+When a carrier is deallocated a free memory segment will be created
+inside the corresponding area, unless the carrier was at the very top
+(in `sa`) or bottom (in `sua`) in which case the area will just shrink
+down or up.
+
+We need to keep track of all the free segments in order to reuse them
+for new carrier allocations. One initial idea was to use the same
+mechanism that is used to keep track of free blocks within MBCs
+(alloc_util and the different strategies). However, that would not be
+as straight forward as one can think and can also waste quite a lot of
+memory as it uses prepended block headers. The granularity of the
+super carrier is one memory page (usually 4kb). We want to allocate
+and free entire pages and we don't want to waste an entire page just
+to hold the block header of the following pages.
+
+Instead we store the meta information about all the free segments in a
+dedicated area apart from the `sa` and `sua` areas. Every free segment is
+represented by a descriptor struct (`ErtsFreeSegDesc`).
+
+    typedef struct {
+        RBTNode snode;      /* node in 'stree' */
+        RBTNode anode;      /* node in 'atree' */
+        char* start;
+        char* end;
+    }ErtsFreeSegDesc;
+
+To find the smallest free segment that will satisfy a carrier allocation
+(best fit), the free segments are organized in a tree sorted by
+size (`stree`). We search in this tree at allocation. If no free segment of
+sufficient size was found, the area (`sa` or `sua`) is instead expanded.
+If two or more free segments with equal size exist, the one at lowest
+address is choosen for `sa` and highest address for `sua`.
+
+At carrier deallocation, we want to coalesce with any adjacent free
+segments, to form one large free segment. To do that, all free
+segments are also organized in a tree sorted in address order (`atree`).
+
+So, in total we keep four trees of free descriptors for the super
+carrier; two for `sa` and two for `sua`. They all use the same
+red-black-tree implementation that support the different sorting
+orders used.
+
+When allocating a new MBC we first search after a free segment in `sa`,
+then try to raise `sa.top`, and then as a fallback try to search after a
+free segment in `sua`. When an MBC is allocated in `sua`, a larger segment
+is allocated which is then trimmed to obtain the right
+alignment. Allocation search for an SBC is done in reverse order. When
+an SBC is allocated in `sa`, the size is aligned up to super aligned
+size.
+
+### The free descriptor area ###
+
+As mentioned above, the descriptors for the free segments are
+allocated in a separate area. This area has a constant configurable
+size (+MMscrfsd) that defaults to 65536 descriptors. This should be
+more than enough in most cases. If the descriptors area should fill up,
+new descriptor areas will be allocated first directly from the OS, and
+then from `sua` and `sa` in the super carrier, and lastly from the memory
+segment itself which is being deallocated. Allocating free descriptor
+areas from the super carrier is only a last resort, and should be
+avoided, as it creates fragmentation.
+
+### Halfword emulator ###
+
+The halfword emulator uses the super carrier implementation to manage
+its low memory mappings thar are needed for all term storage. The
+super carrier can here not be configured by command line options. One
+could imagine a second configurable instance of the super carrier used
+by high memory allocation, but that has not been implemented.