diff options
author | Patrik Nyblom <[email protected]> | 2010-05-04 14:24:50 +0200 |
---|---|---|
committer | Björn Gustavsson <[email protected]> | 2010-05-17 15:51:50 +0200 |
commit | 0a3305354685b311cfa85b29214b411b24aafcff (patch) | |
tree | 76f041b7bff237dc33ac0d28101cb4452ec99d26 /erts/emulator/test/guard_SUITE.erl | |
parent | ccf8728a95af72aa4847e0844d45dcda991ea435 (diff) | |
download | otp-0a3305354685b311cfa85b29214b411b24aafcff.tar.gz otp-0a3305354685b311cfa85b29214b411b24aafcff.tar.bz2 otp-0a3305354685b311cfa85b29214b411b24aafcff.zip |
Add guard BIFs binary_part/2,3
Add the gc_bif's to the VM.
Add infrastructure for gc_bif's (guard bifs that can gc) with two and.
three arguments in VM (loader and VM).
Add compiler support for gc_bif with three arguments.
Add compiler (and interpreter) support for new guard BIFs.
Add testcases for new guard BIFs in compiler and emulator.
Diffstat (limited to 'erts/emulator/test/guard_SUITE.erl')
-rw-r--r-- | erts/emulator/test/guard_SUITE.erl | 160 |
1 files changed, 158 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/erts/emulator/test/guard_SUITE.erl b/erts/emulator/test/guard_SUITE.erl index 23482a20d7..fa311badf1 100644 --- a/erts/emulator/test/guard_SUITE.erl +++ b/erts/emulator/test/guard_SUITE.erl @@ -20,14 +20,15 @@ -module(guard_SUITE). -export([all/1, bad_arith/1, bad_tuple/1, test_heap_guards/1, guard_bifs/1, - type_tests/1]). + type_tests/1,guard_bif_binary_part/1]). -include("test_server.hrl"). -export([init/3]). -import(lists, [member/2]). -all(suite) -> [bad_arith, bad_tuple, test_heap_guards, guard_bifs, type_tests]. +all(suite) -> [bad_arith, bad_tuple, test_heap_guards, guard_bifs, + type_tests, guard_bif_binary_part]. bad_arith(doc) -> "Test that a bad arithmetic operation in a guard works correctly."; bad_arith(Config) when is_list(Config) -> @@ -136,6 +137,161 @@ init(Fun, Args, Filler) -> dummy(_) -> ok. +-define(MASK_ERROR(EXPR),mask_error((catch (EXPR)))). +mask_error({'EXIT',{Err,_}}) -> + Err; +mask_error(Else) -> + Else. + +guard_bif_binary_part(doc) -> + ["Test the binary_part/2,3 guard BIF's extensively"]; +guard_bif_binary_part(Config) when is_list(Config) -> + F = fun(X) -> + Master = self(), + {Pid,Ref} = spawn_monitor( fun() -> + A = lists:duplicate(X,a), + B = [do_binary_part_guard() | A], + Master ! {self(),hd(B)}, + ok + end), + receive + {Pid,ok} -> + erlang:demonitor(Ref,[flush]), + ok; + Error -> + Error + end + end, + [ ok = F(N) || N <- lists:seq(1,10000) ], + ok. + + +do_binary_part_guard() -> + ?line 1 = bptest(<<1,2,3>>), + ?line 2 = bptest(<<2,1,3>>), + ?line error = bptest(<<1>>), + ?line error = bptest(<<>>), + ?line error = bptest(apa), + ?line 3 = bptest(<<2,3,3>>), + % With one variable (pos) + ?line 1 = bptest(<<1,2,3>>,1), + ?line 2 = bptest(<<2,1,3>>,1), + ?line error = bptest(<<1>>,1), + ?line error = bptest(<<>>,1), + ?line error = bptest(apa,1), + ?line 3 = bptest(<<2,3,3>>,1), + % With one variable (length) + ?line 1 = bptesty(<<1,2,3>>,1), + ?line 2 = bptesty(<<2,1,3>>,1), + ?line error = bptesty(<<1>>,1), + ?line error = bptesty(<<>>,1), + ?line error = bptesty(apa,1), + ?line 3 = bptesty(<<2,3,3>>,2), + % With one variable (whole tuple) + ?line 1 = bptestx(<<1,2,3>>,{1,1}), + ?line 2 = bptestx(<<2,1,3>>,{1,1}), + ?line error = bptestx(<<1>>,{1,1}), + ?line error = bptestx(<<>>,{1,1}), + ?line error = bptestx(apa,{1,1}), + ?line 3 = bptestx(<<2,3,3>>,{1,2}), + % With two variables + ?line 1 = bptest(<<1,2,3>>,1,1), + ?line 2 = bptest(<<2,1,3>>,1,1), + ?line error = bptest(<<1>>,1,1), + ?line error = bptest(<<>>,1,1), + ?line error = bptest(apa,1,1), + ?line 3 = bptest(<<2,3,3>>,1,2), + % Direct (autoimported) call, these will be evaluated by the compiler... + ?line <<2>> = binary_part(<<1,2,3>>,1,1), + ?line <<1>> = binary_part(<<2,1,3>>,1,1), + % Compiler warnings due to constant evaluation expected (3) + ?line badarg = ?MASK_ERROR(binary_part(<<1>>,1,1)), + ?line badarg = ?MASK_ERROR(binary_part(<<>>,1,1)), + ?line badarg = ?MASK_ERROR(binary_part(apa,1,1)), + ?line <<3,3>> = binary_part(<<2,3,3>>,1,2), + % Direct call through apply + ?line <<2>> = apply(erlang,binary_part,[<<1,2,3>>,1,1]), + ?line <<1>> = apply(erlang,binary_part,[<<2,1,3>>,1,1]), + % Compiler warnings due to constant evaluation expected (3) + ?line badarg = ?MASK_ERROR(apply(erlang,binary_part,[<<1>>,1,1])), + ?line badarg = ?MASK_ERROR(apply(erlang,binary_part,[<<>>,1,1])), + ?line badarg = ?MASK_ERROR(apply(erlang,binary_part,[apa,1,1])), + ?line <<3,3>> = apply(erlang,binary_part,[<<2,3,3>>,1,2]), + % Constant propagation + ?line Bin = <<1,2,3>>, + ?line ok = if + binary_part(Bin,1,1) =:= <<2>> -> + ok; + %% Compiler warning, clause cannot match (expected) + true -> + error + end, + ?line ok = if + binary_part(Bin,{1,1}) =:= <<2>> -> + ok; + %% Compiler warning, clause cannot match (expected) + true -> + error + end, + ok. + + +bptest(B) when length(B) =:= 1337 -> + 1; +bptest(B) when binary_part(B,{1,1}) =:= <<2>> -> + 1; +bptest(B) when erlang:binary_part(B,1,1) =:= <<1>> -> + 2; +bptest(B) when erlang:binary_part(B,{1,2}) =:= <<3,3>> -> + 3; +bptest(_) -> + error. + +bptest(B,A) when length(B) =:= A -> + 1; +bptest(B,A) when binary_part(B,{A,1}) =:= <<2>> -> + 1; +bptest(B,A) when erlang:binary_part(B,A,1) =:= <<1>> -> + 2; +bptest(B,A) when erlang:binary_part(B,{A,2}) =:= <<3,3>> -> + 3; +bptest(_,_) -> + error. + +bptestx(B,A) when length(B) =:= A -> + 1; +bptestx(B,A) when binary_part(B,A) =:= <<2>> -> + 1; +bptestx(B,A) when erlang:binary_part(B,A) =:= <<1>> -> + 2; +bptestx(B,A) when erlang:binary_part(B,A) =:= <<3,3>> -> + 3; +bptestx(_,_) -> + error. + +bptesty(B,A) when length(B) =:= A -> + 1; +bptesty(B,A) when binary_part(B,{1,A}) =:= <<2>> -> + 1; +bptesty(B,A) when erlang:binary_part(B,1,A) =:= <<1>> -> + 2; +bptesty(B,A) when erlang:binary_part(B,{1,A}) =:= <<3,3>> -> + 3; +bptesty(_,_) -> + error. + +bptest(B,A,_C) when length(B) =:= A -> + 1; +bptest(B,A,C) when binary_part(B,{A,C}) =:= <<2>> -> + 1; +bptest(B,A,C) when erlang:binary_part(B,A,C) =:= <<1>> -> + 2; +bptest(B,A,C) when erlang:binary_part(B,{A,C}) =:= <<3,3>> -> + 3; +bptest(_,_,_) -> + error. + + guard_bifs(doc) -> "Test all guard bifs with nasty (but legal arguments)."; guard_bifs(Config) when is_list(Config) -> ?line Big = -237849247829874297658726487367328971246284736473821617265433, |