diff options
author | Sverker Eriksson <[email protected]> | 2009-12-09 13:54:24 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | Erlang/OTP <[email protected]> | 2009-12-09 13:54:24 +0000 |
commit | e2ecf7de626ecc2c60f9c8738c20820d21403d77 (patch) | |
tree | f82fee31dbd03cf242f4e4aad6d62dadc711838e /erts/emulator/test/nif_SUITE.erl | |
parent | dd983db48113e78a919d7c6cf3cf3c944e935976 (diff) | |
download | otp-e2ecf7de626ecc2c60f9c8738c20820d21403d77.tar.gz otp-e2ecf7de626ecc2c60f9c8738c20820d21403d77.tar.bz2 otp-e2ecf7de626ecc2c60f9c8738c20820d21403d77.zip |
OTP-8304 Incompatible changes in the experimental NIF feature. Changed the
NIF function prototypes in order to allow more than 3 function
arguments. Also an incompatible change in the return value of
erlang:load_nif/2. Added support for references, floats and term
comparison in NIFs. Read more in the documentation of erl_nif and
erlang:load_nif/2.
Diffstat (limited to 'erts/emulator/test/nif_SUITE.erl')
-rw-r--r-- | erts/emulator/test/nif_SUITE.erl | 18 |
1 files changed, 16 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/erts/emulator/test/nif_SUITE.erl b/erts/emulator/test/nif_SUITE.erl index 3d1607475e..e47161fcbc 100644 --- a/erts/emulator/test/nif_SUITE.erl +++ b/erts/emulator/test/nif_SUITE.erl @@ -24,12 +24,13 @@ -include("test_server.hrl"). -export([all/1, fin_per_testcase/2, basic/1, reload/1, upgrade/1, heap_frag/1, - types/1, neg/1]). + types/1, many_args/1, neg/1]). +-export([many_args_100/100]). -define(nif_stub,nif_stub_error(?LINE)). all(suite) -> - [basic, reload, upgrade, heap_frag, types, neg]. + [basic, reload, upgrade, heap_frag, types, many_args, neg]. fin_per_testcase(_Func, _Config) -> P1 = code:purge(nif_mod), @@ -222,6 +223,18 @@ eq_cmp_do(A,B) -> end, ok. + +many_args(doc) -> ["Test NIF with many arguments"]; +many_args(suite) -> []; +many_args(Config) when is_list(Config) -> + ?line ensure_lib_loaded(Config ,1), + ?line ok = apply(?MODULE,many_args_100,lists:seq(1,100)), + ?line ok = many_args_100(1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63,64,65,66,67,68,69,70,71,72,73,74,75,76,77,78,79,80,81,82,83,84,85,86,87,88,89,90,91,92,93,94,95,96,97,98,99,100), + ok. + + + + neg(doc) -> ["Negative testing of load_nif"]; neg(suite) -> []; neg(Config) when is_list(Config) -> @@ -271,6 +284,7 @@ type_test() -> ?nif_stub. tuple_2_list(_) -> ?nif_stub. is_identical(_,_) -> ?nif_stub. compare(_,_) -> ?nif_stub. +many_args_100(_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_,_) -> ?nif_stub. nif_stub_error(Line) -> exit({nif_not_loaded,module,?MODULE,line,Line}). |