aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/erts
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorErlang/OTP <[email protected]>2010-06-03 09:02:35 +0000
committerErlang/OTP <[email protected]>2010-06-03 09:02:35 +0000
commitb770a19422f886d92a41eecee0a130d93bf42f80 (patch)
tree3d3797e47cb9f42a1cf74acc8bc714ab3c01de13 /erts
parent2d0fe96a13e51f61fbe9cc66b71ab42a690d3542 (diff)
parent7cba4a295b2b81fc627f9babcecaf4c686b6620e (diff)
downloadotp-b770a19422f886d92a41eecee0a130d93bf42f80.tar.gz
otp-b770a19422f886d92a41eecee0a130d93bf42f80.tar.bz2
otp-b770a19422f886d92a41eecee0a130d93bf42f80.zip
Merge branch 'pan/otp_8086_ms_grammar' into dev
* pan/otp_8086_ms_grammar: Add match_specification grammar documentation specifically for ets OTP-8086 Grammar for match specification describes tracing only The grammar for match specifications in ERTS users guide only described the tracing dialect of match specifications. An informal grammar for the ETS dialect is added.
Diffstat (limited to 'erts')
-rw-r--r--erts/doc/src/match_spec.xml52
1 files changed, 49 insertions, 3 deletions
diff --git a/erts/doc/src/match_spec.xml b/erts/doc/src/match_spec.xml
index d6492198ca..f0390c9db8 100644
--- a/erts/doc/src/match_spec.xml
+++ b/erts/doc/src/match_spec.xml
@@ -60,7 +60,7 @@
<section>
<title>Grammar</title>
- <p>A match_spec can be described in this <em>informal</em> grammar:</p>
+ <p>A match_spec used in tracing can be described in this <em>informal</em> grammar:</p>
<list type="bulleted">
<item>MatchExpression ::= [ MatchFunction, ... ]
</item>
@@ -117,6 +117,52 @@
<c><![CDATA[display]]></c> | <c><![CDATA[caller]]></c> | <c><![CDATA[set_tcw]]></c> |
<c><![CDATA[silent]]></c></item>
</list>
+
+ <p>A match_spec used in ets can be described in this <em>informal</em> grammar:</p>
+ <list type="bulleted">
+ <item>MatchExpression ::= [ MatchFunction, ... ]
+ </item>
+ <item>MatchFunction ::= { MatchHead, MatchConditions, MatchBody }
+ </item>
+ <item>MatchHead ::= MatchVariable | <c><![CDATA['_']]></c> | { MatchHeadPart, ... }
+ </item>
+ <item>MatchHeadPart ::= term() | MatchVariable | <c><![CDATA['_']]></c></item>
+ <item>MatchVariable ::= '$&lt;number&gt;'
+ </item>
+ <item>MatchConditions ::= [ MatchCondition, ...] | <c><![CDATA[[]]]></c></item>
+ <item>MatchCondition ::= { GuardFunction } |
+ { GuardFunction, ConditionExpression, ... }
+ </item>
+ <item>BoolFunction ::= <c><![CDATA[is_atom]]></c> | <c><![CDATA[is_constant]]></c> |
+ <c><![CDATA[is_float]]></c> | <c><![CDATA[is_integer]]></c> | <c><![CDATA[is_list]]></c> |
+ <c><![CDATA[is_number]]></c> | <c><![CDATA[is_pid]]></c> | <c><![CDATA[is_port]]></c> |
+ <c><![CDATA[is_reference]]></c> | <c><![CDATA[is_tuple]]></c> | <c><![CDATA[is_binary]]></c> |
+ <c><![CDATA[is_function]]></c> | <c><![CDATA[is_record]]></c> | <c><![CDATA[is_seq_trace]]></c> |
+ <c><![CDATA['and']]></c> | <c><![CDATA['or']]></c> | <c><![CDATA['not']]></c> | <c><![CDATA['xor']]></c> |
+ <c><![CDATA[andalso]]></c> | <c><![CDATA[orelse]]></c></item>
+ <item>ConditionExpression ::= ExprMatchVariable | { GuardFunction } |
+ { GuardFunction, ConditionExpression, ... } | TermConstruct
+ </item>
+ <item>ExprMatchVariable ::= MatchVariable (bound in the MatchHead) |
+ <c><![CDATA['$_']]></c> | <c><![CDATA['$$']]></c></item>
+ <item>TermConstruct = {{}} | {{ ConditionExpression, ... }} |
+ <c><![CDATA[[]]]></c> | [ConditionExpression, ...] | NonCompositeTerm | Constant
+ </item>
+ <item>NonCompositeTerm ::= term() (not list or tuple)
+ </item>
+ <item>Constant ::= {<c><![CDATA[const]]></c>, term()}
+ </item>
+ <item>GuardFunction ::= BoolFunction | <c><![CDATA[abs]]></c> |
+ <c><![CDATA[element]]></c> | <c><![CDATA[hd]]></c> | <c><![CDATA[length]]></c> | <c><![CDATA[node]]></c> |
+ <c><![CDATA[round]]></c> | <c><![CDATA[size]]></c> | <c><![CDATA[tl]]></c> | <c><![CDATA[trunc]]></c> |
+ <c><![CDATA['+']]></c> | <c><![CDATA['-']]></c> | <c><![CDATA['*']]></c> | <c><![CDATA['div']]></c> |
+ <c><![CDATA['rem']]></c> | <c><![CDATA['band']]></c> | <c><![CDATA['bor']]></c> | <c><![CDATA['bxor']]></c> |
+ <c><![CDATA['bnot']]></c> | <c><![CDATA['bsl']]></c> | <c><![CDATA['bsr']]></c> | <c><![CDATA['>']]></c> |
+ <c><![CDATA['>=']]></c> | <c><![CDATA['<']]></c> | <c><![CDATA['=<']]></c> | <c><![CDATA['=:=']]></c> |
+ <c><![CDATA['==']]></c> | <c><![CDATA['=/=']]></c> | <c><![CDATA['/=']]></c> | <c><![CDATA[self]]></c> |
+ <c><![CDATA[get_tcw]]></c></item>
+ <item>MatchBody ::= [ ConditionExpression, ... ]</item>
+ </list>
</section>
<section>
@@ -453,8 +499,8 @@
<section>
<title>Differences between match specifications in ETS and tracing</title>
<p>ETS match specifications are there to produce a return
- value. Usually the expression contains one single
- <c><![CDATA[ActionTerm]]></c> which defines the return value without having
+ value. Usually the <c><![CDATA[MatchBody]]></c> contains one single
+ <c><![CDATA[ConditionExpression]]></c> which defines the return value without having
any side effects. Calls with side effects are not allowed in the
ETS context.</p>
<p>When tracing there is no return value to produce, the