diff options
author | Björn Gustavsson <[email protected]> | 2011-04-06 14:56:39 +0200 |
---|---|---|
committer | Björn Gustavsson <[email protected]> | 2011-04-12 05:52:24 +0200 |
commit | 236b6e32118bfc064f88bebf9945080ed8ea9eb4 (patch) | |
tree | 4577c15d63098cc706fa0d4c218ceb171ecea07e /lib/compiler/test/bs_bit_binaries_SUITE.erl | |
parent | 73b16ada48c683529febd1167fd5a30f83c872af (diff) | |
download | otp-236b6e32118bfc064f88bebf9945080ed8ea9eb4.tar.gz otp-236b6e32118bfc064f88bebf9945080ed8ea9eb4.tar.bz2 otp-236b6e32118bfc064f88bebf9945080ed8ea9eb4.zip |
compiler tests: Reinstate ?MODULE macro in calls to test_lib:recompile/1
In 3d0f4a3085f11389e5b22d10f96f0cbf08c9337f (an update to conform
with common_test), in all test_lib:recompile(?MODULE) calls, ?MODULE
was changed to the actual name of the module. That would cause
test_lib:recompile/1 to compile the module with the incorrect
compiler options in cloned modules such as record_no_opt_SUITE,
causing worse coverage.
Diffstat (limited to 'lib/compiler/test/bs_bit_binaries_SUITE.erl')
-rw-r--r-- | lib/compiler/test/bs_bit_binaries_SUITE.erl | 2 |
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/lib/compiler/test/bs_bit_binaries_SUITE.erl b/lib/compiler/test/bs_bit_binaries_SUITE.erl index 8be0c4196a..30276f1259 100644 --- a/lib/compiler/test/bs_bit_binaries_SUITE.erl +++ b/lib/compiler/test/bs_bit_binaries_SUITE.erl @@ -33,7 +33,7 @@ suite() -> [{ct_hooks,[ts_install_cth]}]. all() -> - test_lib:recompile(bs_bit_binaries_SUITE), + test_lib:recompile(?MODULE), [misc, horrid_match, test_bitstr, test_bit_size, asymmetric_tests, big_asymmetric_tests, binary_to_and_from_list, big_binary_to_and_from_list, |