diff options
author | Björn Gustavsson <[email protected]> | 2011-08-25 11:25:29 +0200 |
---|---|---|
committer | Björn Gustavsson <[email protected]> | 2011-08-25 11:25:29 +0200 |
commit | 142700357d3c76aa4c916f0cd5f915a947cbf94c (patch) | |
tree | 3af82388a86d708b3185fc142013a459c0201652 /lib/debugger/test/guard_SUITE.erl | |
parent | 756a93ca2064b9e0eba3d82a7bd37aeae0f39be1 (diff) | |
parent | 26cceb7a0718182e74083b4ad044985e8f624ee2 (diff) | |
download | otp-142700357d3c76aa4c916f0cd5f915a947cbf94c.tar.gz otp-142700357d3c76aa4c916f0cd5f915a947cbf94c.tar.bz2 otp-142700357d3c76aa4c916f0cd5f915a947cbf94c.zip |
Merge branch 'bjorn/line-numbers-in-exceptions/OTP-9468' into major
* bjorn/line-numbers-in-exceptions/OTP-9468: (51 commits)
debugger: By default, only save non-tail-recursive calls
debugger: Add line_number_SUITE
debugger: Include line numbers in exceptions
Update examples in the documentation to include line numbers
Update documentation for erlang:raise/3 and erlang:get_stacktrace/0
beam_lib: Retain the "Line" chunk when stripping BEAM files
erl: Add +L to suppress loading of line number information
compiler: Add no_line_info for suppressing line/1 instructions
exception_SUITE: Test line numbers in exceptions
common_test: Use line numbers in exceptions
common_test tests: Don't do detailed testing of the stack backtrace
test_server: Refactor init_per_testcase/3 into two functions
Implement process_info(Pid, current_{location,stacktrace})
beam_emu: Factor out saving of stack trace from save_stacktrace()
compiler: Don't create filenames starting with "./"
ops.tab: Remove line instructions before tail-recursive calls
Lookup and include filenames and line numbers in exceptions
Fix decrement of continuation pointers
Refactor building of the exception stacktrace
BEAM loader: Load the line table
...
Diffstat (limited to 'lib/debugger/test/guard_SUITE.erl')
-rw-r--r-- | lib/debugger/test/guard_SUITE.erl | 217 |
1 files changed, 209 insertions, 8 deletions
diff --git a/lib/debugger/test/guard_SUITE.erl b/lib/debugger/test/guard_SUITE.erl index 611dcb4dff..bf5fa82749 100644 --- a/lib/debugger/test/guard_SUITE.erl +++ b/lib/debugger/test/guard_SUITE.erl @@ -35,7 +35,8 @@ t_is_boolean/1,is_function_2/1, tricky/1,rel_ops/1, basic_andalso_orelse/1,traverse_dcd/1, - check_qlc_hrl/1]). + check_qlc_hrl/1,andalso_semi/1,t_tuple_size/1,binary_part/1, + bad_constants/1]). -include_lib("test_server/include/test_server.hrl"). @@ -65,7 +66,8 @@ cases() -> xor_guard, more_xor_guards, build_in_guard, old_guard_tests, gbif, t_is_boolean, is_function_2, tricky, rel_ops, basic_andalso_orelse, traverse_dcd, - check_qlc_hrl]. + check_qlc_hrl, andalso_semi, t_tuple_size, binary_part, + bad_constants]. init_per_testcase(_Case, Config) -> test_lib:interpret(?MODULE), @@ -294,9 +296,7 @@ try_gbif(Id, X, Y) -> try_fail_gbif(Id, X, Y) -> case catch guard_bif(Id, X, Y) of - {'EXIT', {function_clause,{?MODULE,guard_bif,[Id,X,Y]}}} -> %Jam - io:format("guard_bif(~p, ~p, ~p) -- ok", [Id,X,Y]); - {'EXIT', {function_clause,[{?MODULE,guard_bif,[Id,X,Y]}|_]}} -> %Beam + {'EXIT', {function_clause,[{?MODULE,guard_bif,[Id,X,Y],_}|_]}} -> io:format("guard_bif(~p, ~p, ~p) -- ok", [Id,X,Y]); Other -> ?line ok = io:format("guard_bif(~p, ~p, ~p) -- bad result: ~p\n", @@ -367,9 +367,8 @@ type_tests(Test, [Type|T], Allowed) -> end; false -> case catch type_test(Test, Value) of - {'EXIT', {function_clause, {?MODULE, type_test, [Test, Value]}}} -> - ok; - {'EXIT', {function_clause,[{?MODULE,type_test,[Test,Value]}|_]}} -> + {'EXIT',{function_clause, + [{?MODULE,type_test,[Test,Value],_}|_]}} -> ok; {'EXIT',Other} -> ?line test_server:fail({unexpected_error_reason,Other}); @@ -1477,7 +1476,207 @@ cqlc(M, F, As, St) -> St end. +%% OTP-7679: Thanks to Hunter Morris. +andalso_semi(Config) when is_list(Config) -> + ?line ok = andalso_semi_foo(0), + ?line ok = andalso_semi_foo(1), + ?line fc(catch andalso_semi_foo(2)), + + ?line ok = andalso_semi_bar([a,b,c]), + ?line ok = andalso_semi_bar(1), + ?line fc(catch andalso_semi_bar([a,b])), + ok. + +andalso_semi_foo(Bar) when is_integer(Bar) andalso Bar =:= 0; Bar =:= 1 -> + ok. + +andalso_semi_bar(Bar) when is_list(Bar) andalso length(Bar) =:= 3; Bar =:= 1 -> + ok. + + +t_tuple_size(Config) when is_list(Config) -> + ?line 10 = do_tuple_size({1,2,3,4}), + ?line fc(catch do_tuple_size({1,2,3})), + ?line fc(catch do_tuple_size(42)), + ?line error = ludicrous_tuple_size({a,b,c}), + ?line error = ludicrous_tuple_size([a,b,c]), + + ok. + +do_tuple_size(T) when tuple_size(T) =:= 4 -> + {A,B,C,D} = T, + A+B+C+D. + +ludicrous_tuple_size(T) + when tuple_size(T) =:= 16#7777777777777777777777777777777777 -> ok; +ludicrous_tuple_size(T) + when tuple_size(T) =:= 16#10000000000000000 -> ok; +ludicrous_tuple_size(T) + when tuple_size(T) =:= (1 bsl 64) - 1 -> ok; +ludicrous_tuple_size(T) + when tuple_size(T) =:= 16#FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF -> ok; +ludicrous_tuple_size(_) -> error. + +%% +%% The binary_part/2,3 guard BIFs +%% +-define(MASK_ERROR(EXPR),mask_error((catch (EXPR)))). +mask_error({'EXIT',{Err,_}}) -> + Err; +mask_error(Else) -> + Else. + +binary_part(doc) -> + ["Tests the binary_part/2,3 guard (GC) bif's"]; +binary_part(Config) when is_list(Config) -> + %% This is more or less a copy of what the guard_SUITE in emulator + %% does to cover the guard bif's + ?line 1 = bptest(<<1,2,3>>), + ?line 2 = bptest(<<2,1,3>>), + ?line error = bptest(<<1>>), + ?line error = bptest(<<>>), + ?line error = bptest(apa), + ?line 3 = bptest(<<2,3,3>>), + % With one variable (pos) + ?line 1 = bptest(<<1,2,3>>,1), + ?line 2 = bptest(<<2,1,3>>,1), + ?line error = bptest(<<1>>,1), + ?line error = bptest(<<>>,1), + ?line error = bptest(apa,1), + ?line 3 = bptest(<<2,3,3>>,1), + % With one variable (length) + ?line 1 = bptesty(<<1,2,3>>,1), + ?line 2 = bptesty(<<2,1,3>>,1), + ?line error = bptesty(<<1>>,1), + ?line error = bptesty(<<>>,1), + ?line error = bptesty(apa,1), + ?line 3 = bptesty(<<2,3,3>>,2), + % With one variable (whole tuple) + ?line 1 = bptestx(<<1,2,3>>,{1,1}), + ?line 2 = bptestx(<<2,1,3>>,{1,1}), + ?line error = bptestx(<<1>>,{1,1}), + ?line error = bptestx(<<>>,{1,1}), + ?line error = bptestx(apa,{1,1}), + ?line 3 = bptestx(<<2,3,3>>,{1,2}), + % With two variables + ?line 1 = bptest(<<1,2,3>>,1,1), + ?line 2 = bptest(<<2,1,3>>,1,1), + ?line error = bptest(<<1>>,1,1), + ?line error = bptest(<<>>,1,1), + ?line error = bptest(apa,1,1), + ?line 3 = bptest(<<2,3,3>>,1,2), + % Direct (autoimported) call, these will be evaluated by the compiler... + ?line <<2>> = binary_part(<<1,2,3>>,1,1), + ?line <<1>> = binary_part(<<2,1,3>>,1,1), + % Compiler warnings due to constant evaluation expected (3) + ?line badarg = ?MASK_ERROR(binary_part(<<1>>,1,1)), + ?line badarg = ?MASK_ERROR(binary_part(<<>>,1,1)), + ?line badarg = ?MASK_ERROR(binary_part(apa,1,1)), + ?line <<3,3>> = binary_part(<<2,3,3>>,1,2), + % Direct call through apply + ?line <<2>> = apply(erlang,binary_part,[<<1,2,3>>,1,1]), + ?line <<1>> = apply(erlang,binary_part,[<<2,1,3>>,1,1]), + % Compiler warnings due to constant evaluation expected (3) + ?line badarg = ?MASK_ERROR(apply(erlang,binary_part,[<<1>>,1,1])), + ?line badarg = ?MASK_ERROR(apply(erlang,binary_part,[<<>>,1,1])), + ?line badarg = ?MASK_ERROR(apply(erlang,binary_part,[apa,1,1])), + ?line <<3,3>> = apply(erlang,binary_part,[<<2,3,3>>,1,2]), + % Constant propagation + ?line Bin = <<1,2,3>>, + ?line ok = if + binary_part(Bin,1,1) =:= <<2>> -> + ok; + %% Compiler warning, clause cannot match (expected) + true -> + error + end, + ?line ok = if + binary_part(Bin,{1,1}) =:= <<2>> -> + ok; + %% Compiler warning, clause cannot match (expected) + true -> + error + end, + ok. + + +bptest(B) when length(B) =:= 1337 -> + 1; +bptest(B) when binary_part(B,{1,1}) =:= <<2>> -> + 1; +bptest(B) when erlang:binary_part(B,1,1) =:= <<1>> -> + 2; +bptest(B) when erlang:binary_part(B,{1,2}) =:= <<3,3>> -> + 3; +bptest(_) -> + error. + +bptest(B,A) when length(B) =:= A -> + 1; +bptest(B,A) when binary_part(B,{A,1}) =:= <<2>> -> + 1; +bptest(B,A) when erlang:binary_part(B,A,1) =:= <<1>> -> + 2; +bptest(B,A) when erlang:binary_part(B,{A,2}) =:= <<3,3>> -> + 3; +bptest(_,_) -> + error. + +bptestx(B,A) when length(B) =:= A -> + 1; +bptestx(B,A) when binary_part(B,A) =:= <<2>> -> + 1; +bptestx(B,A) when erlang:binary_part(B,A) =:= <<1>> -> + 2; +bptestx(B,A) when erlang:binary_part(B,A) =:= <<3,3>> -> + 3; +bptestx(_,_) -> + error. + +bptesty(B,A) when length(B) =:= A -> + 1; +bptesty(B,A) when binary_part(B,{1,A}) =:= <<2>> -> + 1; +bptesty(B,A) when erlang:binary_part(B,1,A) =:= <<1>> -> + 2; +bptesty(B,A) when erlang:binary_part(B,{1,A}) =:= <<3,3>> -> + 3; +bptesty(_,_) -> + error. + +bptest(B,A,_C) when length(B) =:= A -> + 1; +bptest(B,A,C) when binary_part(B,{A,C}) =:= <<2>> -> + 1; +bptest(B,A,C) when erlang:binary_part(B,A,C) =:= <<1>> -> + 2; +bptest(B,A,C) when erlang:binary_part(B,{A,C}) =:= <<3,3>> -> + 3; +bptest(_,_,_) -> + error. + +-define(FAILING(C), + if + C -> ?t:fail(should_fail); + true -> ok + end, + if + true, C -> ?t:fail(should_fail); + true -> ok + end). + +bad_constants(Config) when is_list(Config) -> + ?line ?FAILING(false), + ?line ?FAILING([]), + ?line ?FAILING([a]), + ?line ?FAILING([Config]), + ?line ?FAILING({a,b}), + ?line ?FAILING({a,Config}), + ?line ?FAILING(<<1>>), + ?line ?FAILING(42), + ?line ?FAILING(3.14), + ok. %% Call this function to turn off constant propagation. id(I) -> I. @@ -1490,3 +1689,5 @@ check(F, Result) -> io:format(" Got: ~p\n", [Other]), test_server:fail() end. + +fc({'EXIT',{function_clause,_}}) -> ok. |