diff options
author | Fredrik Gustafsson <[email protected]> | 2013-10-14 11:15:07 +0200 |
---|---|---|
committer | Fredrik Gustafsson <[email protected]> | 2013-10-14 11:15:07 +0200 |
commit | 4db36c5ac1ade665fdf3ddfc1c5782fdf40ef0dc (patch) | |
tree | e50f3b0f0d3b96a44bbaf93c90c6670d75438e2c /lib/dialyzer/test | |
parent | 240c5e4785fee63457e87c443eff5da82976c785 (diff) | |
parent | e978ff2a2c634ef2a4af7372cf2ecce8d70743b9 (diff) | |
download | otp-4db36c5ac1ade665fdf3ddfc1c5782fdf40ef0dc.tar.gz otp-4db36c5ac1ade665fdf3ddfc1c5782fdf40ef0dc.tar.bz2 otp-4db36c5ac1ade665fdf3ddfc1c5782fdf40ef0dc.zip |
Merge branch 'kostis/dialyzer_R16B02_fixes/OTP-11374' into maint
* kostis/dialyzer_R16B02_fixes/OTP-11374:
Fix crash when using remote types in the tail of list types
Adopt a convention about unknown modules
No reason for calls to unknown modules
Use the modern version of is_subtype
Adopt a convention about unknown modules
Fix a comment
Add some more comments about what the test does
Diffstat (limited to 'lib/dialyzer/test')
8 files changed, 48 insertions, 28 deletions
diff --git a/lib/dialyzer/test/small_SUITE_data/results/trec b/lib/dialyzer/test/small_SUITE_data/results/trec index 01ccc63761..b95df1e6ef 100644 --- a/lib/dialyzer/test/small_SUITE_data/results/trec +++ b/lib/dialyzer/test/small_SUITE_data/results/trec @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ -trec.erl:26: Function test/0 has no local return -trec.erl:27: The call trec:mk_foo_loc(42,any()) will never return since it differs in the 1st argument from the success typing arguments: ('undefined',atom()) -trec.erl:29: Function mk_foo_loc/2 has no local return -trec.erl:30: Record construction violates the declared type for #foo{} since variable A cannot be of type atom() -trec.erl:36: Function mk_foo_exp/2 has no local return -trec.erl:37: Record construction violates the declared type for #foo{} since variable A cannot be of type atom() +trec.erl:28: Function test/0 has no local return +trec.erl:29: The call trec:mk_foo_loc(42,any()) will never return since it differs in the 1st argument from the success typing arguments: ('undefined',atom()) +trec.erl:31: Function mk_foo_loc/2 has no local return +trec.erl:32: Record construction violates the declared type for #foo{} since variable A cannot be of type atom() +trec.erl:38: Function mk_foo_exp/2 has no local return +trec.erl:39: Record construction violates the declared type for #foo{} since variable A cannot be of type atom() diff --git a/lib/dialyzer/test/small_SUITE_data/src/appmon_place.erl b/lib/dialyzer/test/small_SUITE_data/src/appmon_place.erl index 60ffbe818f..ddb97796fb 100644 --- a/lib/dialyzer/test/small_SUITE_data/src/appmon_place.erl +++ b/lib/dialyzer/test/small_SUITE_data/src/appmon_place.erl @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ %%--------------------------------------------------------------------- %% This is added as a test because it was giving a false positive -%% (function move/4 will nevr be called) due to the strange use of +%% (function move/4 will never be called) due to the strange use of %% self-recursive fun construction in placex/3. %% %% The analysis was getting confused that the foldl call will never diff --git a/lib/dialyzer/test/small_SUITE_data/src/contract3.erl b/lib/dialyzer/test/small_SUITE_data/src/contract3.erl index 5b0bee9694..a6ce91882e 100644 --- a/lib/dialyzer/test/small_SUITE_data/src/contract3.erl +++ b/lib/dialyzer/test/small_SUITE_data/src/contract3.erl @@ -18,16 +18,23 @@ t(X, Y, Z) -> (atom()|list()) -> atom(). t1(X) -> - foo:bar(X). + f(X). -spec t2(atom(), integer()) -> integer(); (atom(), list()) -> atom(). t2(X, Y) -> - foo:bar(X, Y). + g(X, Y). -spec t3(atom(), integer(), list()) -> integer(); (X, integer(), list()) -> X. t3(X, Y, Z) -> X. + +%% dummy functions below + +f(X) -> X. + +g(X, Y) when is_atom(X), is_integer(Y) -> Y; +g(X, Y) when is_atom(X), is_list(Y) -> X. diff --git a/lib/dialyzer/test/small_SUITE_data/src/empty_list_infimum.erl b/lib/dialyzer/test/small_SUITE_data/src/empty_list_infimum.erl index b58fa732cb..3acc5ca065 100644 --- a/lib/dialyzer/test/small_SUITE_data/src/empty_list_infimum.erl +++ b/lib/dialyzer/test/small_SUITE_data/src/empty_list_infimum.erl @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ %% -%% The Original Code is RabbitMQ. -%% +%% This is stripped down code from RabbitMQ. It is used to report an +%% invalid type specification for function list_vhost_permissions/1. %% The Initial Developer of the Original Code is VMware, Inc. %% @@ -38,7 +38,7 @@ vhost_perms_info_keys() -> -spec list_vhost_permissions(vhost()) -> infos(). list_vhost_permissions(VHostPath) -> - list_permissions(vhost_perms_info_keys(), rabbit_foo:some_list()). + list_permissions(vhost_perms_info_keys(), some_mod:some_function()). filter_props(Keys, Props) -> [T || T = {K, _} <- Props, lists:member(K, Keys)]. diff --git a/lib/dialyzer/test/small_SUITE_data/src/gencall.erl b/lib/dialyzer/test/small_SUITE_data/src/gencall.erl index d2875c9df1..762be55007 100644 --- a/lib/dialyzer/test/small_SUITE_data/src/gencall.erl +++ b/lib/dialyzer/test/small_SUITE_data/src/gencall.erl @@ -7,6 +7,6 @@ f() -> gen_server:call(1,2,3), ets:lookup(1,2,3), - gencall2:foo(), + some_mod:some_function(), gencall:foo(), gen_server:handle_cast(1,2). diff --git a/lib/dialyzer/test/small_SUITE_data/src/maybe_improper.erl b/lib/dialyzer/test/small_SUITE_data/src/maybe_improper.erl index 1743d81493..6d2a35b7c8 100644 --- a/lib/dialyzer/test/small_SUITE_data/src/maybe_improper.erl +++ b/lib/dialyzer/test/small_SUITE_data/src/maybe_improper.erl @@ -1,7 +1,18 @@ +%%%======================================================================== +%%% Tests handling of maybe improper lists +%%%======================================================================== -module(maybe_improper). --export([s/1]). +-export([s/1, t/0]). -spec s(maybe_improper_list(X,Y)) -> {[X], maybe_improper_list(X,Y)}. -s(A) -> - lists:split(2,A). +s(L) -> + lists:split(2, L). + +%% Having a remote type in the 'tail' of the list crashed dialyzer. +%% The problem was fixed for R16B03. +-type t_mil() :: maybe_improper_list(integer(), orddict:orddict()). + +-spec t() -> t_mil(). +t() -> + [42 | []]. diff --git a/lib/dialyzer/test/small_SUITE_data/src/overloaded1.erl b/lib/dialyzer/test/small_SUITE_data/src/overloaded1.erl index 0af4f7446f..074a93e2fe 100644 --- a/lib/dialyzer/test/small_SUITE_data/src/overloaded1.erl +++ b/lib/dialyzer/test/small_SUITE_data/src/overloaded1.erl @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ %%----------------------------------------------------------------------------- -%% Test that tests overloaded contratcs. +%% Test that tests overloaded contracts. %% In December 2008 it works as far as intersection types are concerned (test1) %% However, it does NOT work as far as type variables are concerned (test2) %%----------------------------------------------------------------------------- @@ -16,13 +16,13 @@ test2() -> -type mod() :: atom(). --spec foo(ATM, list()) -> {'ok', ATM} | {'error', _} when is_subtype(ATM, mod()) - ; (MFA, list()) -> {'ok', MFA} | {'error', _} when is_subtype(MFA, mfa()). +-spec foo(ATM, list()) -> {'ok', ATM} | {'error', _} when ATM :: mod() + ; (MFA, list()) -> {'ok', MFA} | {'error', _} when MFA :: mfa(). foo(F, _) when is_atom(F) -> case atom_to_list(F) of - [42|_] -> {ok, F}; - _Other -> {error, mod:bar(F)} + [42|_] -> {ok, F}; + _Other -> {error, some_mod:some_function()} end; foo({M,F,A}, _) -> case A =:= 0 of diff --git a/lib/dialyzer/test/small_SUITE_data/src/trec.erl b/lib/dialyzer/test/small_SUITE_data/src/trec.erl index ba50c3b401..06706162c1 100644 --- a/lib/dialyzer/test/small_SUITE_data/src/trec.erl +++ b/lib/dialyzer/test/small_SUITE_data/src/trec.erl @@ -18,20 +18,22 @@ %% ('undefined',atom()) %% 3. Function mk_foo_loc/2 has no local return %% -%% Arguably, the second warning is not what most users have in mind -%% when they wrote the type declarations in the 'foo' record, so no -%% doubt they'll find it confusing. But note that it is also inconsistent! -%% How come there is a success typing for a function that has no local return? +%% Arguably, the second warning is not what most users have in mind when +%% they wrote the type declarations in the 'foo' record, so no doubt +%% they'll find it confusing. But note that it is also quite confusing! +%% Many users may be wondering: How come there is a success typing for a +%% function that has no local return? Running typer on this module +%% reveals a success typing for this function that is interesting indeed. %% test() -> - mk_foo_loc(42, bar:f()). + mk_foo_loc(42, some_mod:some_function()). mk_foo_loc(A, B) -> #foo{a = A, b = [A,B]}. %% -%% For this function we currently get "has no local return" but we get -%% no reason; I want us to get a reason. +%% For this function we used to get a "has no local return" warning +%% but we got no reason. This has now been fixed. %% mk_foo_exp(A, B) when is_integer(A) -> #foo{a = A, b = [A,B]}. |