aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/lib/dialyzer
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorHans Bolinder <[email protected]>2016-11-16 15:06:17 +0100
committerHans Bolinder <[email protected]>2016-11-22 10:29:04 +0100
commit773948083b57ad59eb90b5668e72175d79acbe1f (patch)
tree36683a8f496a556801bbba3f0fa121a71777350d /lib/dialyzer
parenta202c2e0fa1f7810fb19c5a051369ce8b308ebc1 (diff)
downloadotp-773948083b57ad59eb90b5668e72175d79acbe1f.tar.gz
otp-773948083b57ad59eb90b5668e72175d79acbe1f.tar.bz2
otp-773948083b57ad59eb90b5668e72175d79acbe1f.zip
dialyzer: Improve a warning message
Messages regarding guards with orelse/andalso could look like "Clause guard cannot succeed. The variable A was matched against the type any()". Now they look like as if or/and is used: "Guard test is_integer(A::atom()) can never succeed".
Diffstat (limited to 'lib/dialyzer')
-rw-r--r--lib/dialyzer/src/dialyzer_dataflow.erl27
-rw-r--r--lib/dialyzer/test/map_SUITE_data/results/map_in_guard24
-rw-r--r--lib/dialyzer/test/small_SUITE_data/results/guards2
3 files changed, 21 insertions, 12 deletions
diff --git a/lib/dialyzer/src/dialyzer_dataflow.erl b/lib/dialyzer/src/dialyzer_dataflow.erl
index 153842058c..639ed426df 100644
--- a/lib/dialyzer/src/dialyzer_dataflow.erl
+++ b/lib/dialyzer/src/dialyzer_dataflow.erl
@@ -2622,7 +2622,7 @@ bind_guard_case_clauses(Arg, Clauses, Map0, Env, Eval, State) ->
Map = join_maps_begin(Map0),
{GenMap, GenArgType} = bind_guard(Arg, Map, Env, dont_know, State),
bind_guard_case_clauses(GenArgType, GenMap, Arg, Clauses1, Map, Env, Eval,
- t_none(), [], State).
+ t_none(), [], [], State).
filter_fail_clauses([Clause|Left]) ->
case (cerl:clause_pats(Clause) =:= []) of
@@ -2641,7 +2641,7 @@ filter_fail_clauses([]) ->
[].
bind_guard_case_clauses(GenArgType, GenMap, ArgExpr, [Clause|Left],
- Map, Env, Eval, AccType, AccMaps, State) ->
+ Map, Env, Eval, AccType, AccMaps, Throws, State) ->
Pats = cerl:clause_pats(Clause),
{NewMap0, ArgType} =
case Pats of
@@ -2685,9 +2685,9 @@ bind_guard_case_clauses(GenArgType, GenMap, ArgExpr, [Clause|Left],
case (NewMap1 =:= none) orelse t_is_none(GenArgType) of
true ->
bind_guard_case_clauses(NewGenArgType, GenMap, ArgExpr, Left, Map, Env,
- Eval, AccType, AccMaps, State);
+ Eval, AccType, AccMaps, Throws, State);
false ->
- {NewAccType, NewAccMaps} =
+ {NewAccType, NewAccMaps, NewThrows} =
try
{NewMap2, GuardType} = bind_guard(Guard, NewMap1, Env, pos, State),
case t_is_none(t_inf(t_atom(true), GuardType)) of
@@ -2711,17 +2711,26 @@ bind_guard_case_clauses(GenArgType, GenMap, ArgExpr, [Clause|Left],
dont_know ->
ok
end,
- {t_sup(AccType, CType), [NewMap3|AccMaps]}
+ {t_sup(AccType, CType), [NewMap3|AccMaps], Throws}
catch
- throw:{fail, _What} -> {AccType, AccMaps}
+ throw:{fail, Reason} ->
+ Throws1 = case Reason of
+ none -> Throws;
+ _ -> Throws ++ [Reason]
+ end,
+ {AccType, AccMaps, Throws1}
end,
bind_guard_case_clauses(NewGenArgType, GenMap, ArgExpr, Left, Map, Env,
- Eval, NewAccType, NewAccMaps, State)
+ Eval, NewAccType, NewAccMaps, NewThrows, State)
end;
bind_guard_case_clauses(_GenArgType, _GenMap, _ArgExpr, [], Map, _Env, _Eval,
- AccType, AccMaps, _State) ->
+ AccType, AccMaps, Throws, _State) ->
case t_is_none(AccType) of
- true -> throw({fail, none});
+ true ->
+ case Throws of
+ [Throw|_] -> throw({fail, Throw});
+ [] -> throw({fail, none})
+ end;
false -> {join_maps_end(AccMaps, Map), AccType}
end.
diff --git a/lib/dialyzer/test/map_SUITE_data/results/map_in_guard2 b/lib/dialyzer/test/map_SUITE_data/results/map_in_guard2
index f6fb98a863..46e2e8d36c 100644
--- a/lib/dialyzer/test/map_SUITE_data/results/map_in_guard2
+++ b/lib/dialyzer/test/map_SUITE_data/results/map_in_guard2
@@ -2,11 +2,11 @@
map_in_guard2.erl:10: The call map_in_guard2:assoc_guard_clause('not_a_map') will never return since it differs in the 1st argument from the success typing arguments: (map())
map_in_guard2.erl:12: The pattern 'true' can never match the type 'false'
map_in_guard2.erl:14: The call map_in_guard2:exact_guard_clause(#{}) will never return since it differs in the 1st argument from the success typing arguments: (#{'a':=_, _=>_})
-map_in_guard2.erl:17: Clause guard cannot succeed. The variable M was matched against the type 'not_a_map'
+map_in_guard2.erl:17: Guard test is_map(M::'not_a_map') can never succeed
map_in_guard2.erl:20: Function assoc_update/1 has no local return
map_in_guard2.erl:20: Guard test is_map(M::'not_a_map') can never succeed
-map_in_guard2.erl:22: Clause guard cannot succeed. The variable M was matched against the type 'not_a_map'
map_in_guard2.erl:22: Function assoc_guard_clause/1 has no local return
+map_in_guard2.erl:22: Guard test is_map(M::'not_a_map') can never succeed
map_in_guard2.erl:24: Clause guard cannot succeed. The variable M was matched against the type #{}
map_in_guard2.erl:27: Clause guard cannot succeed. The variable M was matched against the type #{}
map_in_guard2.erl:27: Function exact_guard_clause/1 has no local return
diff --git a/lib/dialyzer/test/small_SUITE_data/results/guards b/lib/dialyzer/test/small_SUITE_data/results/guards
index 824a7cfa24..cd0d3cace0 100644
--- a/lib/dialyzer/test/small_SUITE_data/results/guards
+++ b/lib/dialyzer/test/small_SUITE_data/results/guards
@@ -10,8 +10,8 @@ guards.erl:136: The call guards:t16('a') will never return since it differs in t
guards.erl:136: The call guards:t16('c') will never return since it differs in the 1st argument from the success typing arguments: ('b')
guards.erl:55: Function t5/1 has no local return
guards.erl:55: Guard test is_integer(A::atom()) can never succeed
-guards.erl:59: Clause guard cannot succeed. The variable A was matched against the type any()
guards.erl:59: Function t6/1 has no local return
+guards.erl:59: Guard test is_integer(A::atom()) can never succeed
guards.erl:67: The call guards:t7({42}) will never return since it differs in the 1st argument from the success typing arguments: (atom() | integer())
guards.erl:75: The call guards:t8({42}) will never return since it differs in the 1st argument from the success typing arguments: (atom() | integer())
guards.erl:92: The variable _ can never match since previous clauses completely covered the type {'true','true'}