diff options
author | Anders Svensson <[email protected]> | 2013-05-02 18:52:18 +0200 |
---|---|---|
committer | Anders Svensson <[email protected]> | 2013-05-17 15:16:03 +0200 |
commit | f7ec93e3aabdae29aba51f1e2aff0cfc5f983043 (patch) | |
tree | 26871cc27e5d11b9a400bd3fb90b50fb9ff8d5e1 /lib/diameter | |
parent | bbf57326a758f01fd29940f0ea06755c9f7c5cb4 (diff) | |
download | otp-f7ec93e3aabdae29aba51f1e2aff0cfc5f983043.tar.gz otp-f7ec93e3aabdae29aba51f1e2aff0cfc5f983043.tar.bz2 otp-f7ec93e3aabdae29aba51f1e2aff0cfc5f983043.zip |
Adapt Failed-AVP setting to RFC 6733
When setting these from an #diameter_packet.errors list, select one
Result-Code or {Result-Code, Failed-AVP}, instead of accumulating all
AVP's from the 2-tuples in the list. This is more in keeping with RFC
6733:
7.5. Failed-AVP AVP
The Failed-AVP AVP (AVP Code 279) is of type Grouped and provides
debugging information in cases where a request is rejected or not
fully processed due to erroneous information in a specific AVP. The
value of the Result-Code AVP will provide information on the reason
for the Failed-AVP AVP. A Diameter answer message SHOULD contain an
instance of the Failed-AVP AVP that corresponds to the error
indicated by the Result-Code AVP. For practical purposes, this
Failed-AVP would typically refer to the first AVP processing error
that a Diameter node encounters.
The text of RFC 3588 was less specific, not including the last two
sentences.
Note that an improper AVP Length will result in both 5014 and 5005 being
detected for the same AVP. Without this commit, Failed-AVP would be
populated with two AVP's for the same error.
Diffstat (limited to 'lib/diameter')
-rw-r--r-- | lib/diameter/src/base/diameter_traffic.erl | 120 |
1 files changed, 71 insertions, 49 deletions
diff --git a/lib/diameter/src/base/diameter_traffic.erl b/lib/diameter/src/base/diameter_traffic.erl index 4733b67131..820d37535a 100644 --- a/lib/diameter/src/base/diameter_traffic.erl +++ b/lib/diameter/src/base/diameter_traffic.erl @@ -596,69 +596,86 @@ reply([Msg], Dict, TPid, Dict0, Fs, ReqPkt) reply(Msg, Dict, TPid, Dict0, Fs, ReqPkt#diameter_packet{errors = []}); reply(Msg, Dict, TPid, Dict0, Fs, ReqPkt) -> - Pkt = encode(Dict, reset(make_answer_packet(Msg, ReqPkt), Dict), Fs), + Pkt = encode(Dict, + reset(make_answer_packet(Msg, ReqPkt), Dict, Dict0), + Fs), incr(send, Pkt, Dict, TPid, Dict0), %% count outgoing result codes send(TPid, Pkt). -%% reset/2 +%% reset/3 %% Header/avps list: send as is. -reset(#diameter_packet{msg = [#diameter_header{} | _]} = Pkt, _) -> +reset(#diameter_packet{msg = [#diameter_header{} | _]} = Pkt, _, _) -> Pkt; %% No errors to set or errors explicitly ignored. -reset(#diameter_packet{errors = Es} = Pkt, _) +reset(#diameter_packet{errors = Es} = Pkt, _, _) when Es == []; Es == false -> Pkt; %% Otherwise possibly set Result-Code and/or Failed-AVP. -reset(#diameter_packet{msg = Msg, errors = Es} = Pkt, Dict) -> - Pkt#diameter_packet{msg = reset(Msg, Dict, Es)}. - -%% reset/3 - -reset(Msg, Dict, Es) - when is_list(Es) -> - {E3, E5, Failed} = partition(Es), - FailedAVP = failed_avp(Msg, Failed, Dict), - reset(set(Msg, FailedAVP, Dict), - Dict, - choose(is_answer_message(Msg, Dict), E3, E5)); - -reset(Msg, Dict, N) - when is_integer(N) -> - ResultCode = rc(Msg, {'Result-Code', N}, Dict), - set(Msg, ResultCode, Dict); - -reset(Msg, _, _) -> - Msg. - -partition(Es) -> - lists:foldl(fun pacc/2, {false, false, []}, Es). +reset(#diameter_packet{msg = Msg, errors = Es} = Pkt, Dict, Dict0) -> + {RC, Failed} = select_error(Msg, Es, Dict0), + Pkt#diameter_packet{msg = reset(Msg, Dict, RC, Failed)}. -%% Note that the errors list can contain not only integer() and -%% {integer(), #diameter_avp{}} but also #diameter_avp{}. The latter -%% isn't something that's returned by decode but can be set in a reply -%% for encode. +%% select_error/3 +%% +%% Extract the first appropriate RC or {RC, #diameter_avp{}} +%% pair from an errors list, and accumulate all #diameter_avp{}. +%% +%% RFC 6733: +%% +%% 7.5. Failed-AVP AVP +%% +%% The Failed-AVP AVP (AVP Code 279) is of type Grouped and provides +%% debugging information in cases where a request is rejected or not +%% fully processed due to erroneous information in a specific AVP. The +%% value of the Result-Code AVP will provide information on the reason +%% for the Failed-AVP AVP. A Diameter answer message SHOULD contain an +%% instance of the Failed-AVP AVP that corresponds to the error +%% indicated by the Result-Code AVP. For practical purposes, this +%% Failed-AVP would typically refer to the first AVP processing error +%% that a Diameter node encounters. + +select_error(Msg, Es, Dict0) -> + {RC, Avps} = lists:foldl(fun(T,A) -> select(T, A, Dict0) end, + {is_answer_message(Msg, Dict0), []}, + Es), + {RC, lists:reverse(Avps)}. + +%% Only integer() and {integer(), #diameter_avp{}} are the result of +%% decode. #diameter_avp{} can only be set in a reply for encode. + +select(#diameter_avp{} = A, {RC, As}, _) -> + {RC, [A|As]}; + +select(_, {RC, _} = Acc, _) + when is_integer(RC) -> + Acc; -pacc({RC, #diameter_avp{} = A}, {E3, E5, Acc}) +select({RC, #diameter_avp{} = A}, {IsAns, As} = Acc, Dict0) when is_integer(RC) -> - pacc(RC, {E3, E5, [A|Acc]}); + case is_result(RC, IsAns, Dict0) of + true -> {RC, [A|As]}; + false -> Acc + end; -pacc(#diameter_avp{} = A, {E3, E5, Acc}) -> - {E3, E5, [A|Acc]}; +select(RC, {IsAns, As} = Acc, Dict0) + when is_boolean(IsAns), is_integer(RC) -> + case is_result(RC, IsAns, Dict0) of + true -> {RC, As}; + false -> Acc + end. -pacc(RC, {false, E5, Acc}) - when 3 == RC div 1000 -> - {RC, E5, Acc}; +%% reset/4 -pacc(RC, {E3, false, Acc}) - when 5 == RC div 1000 -> - {E3, RC, Acc}; +reset(Msg, Dict, RC, Avps) -> + FailedAVP = failed_avp(Msg, Avps, Dict), + ResultCode = rc(Msg, RC, Dict), + set(set(Msg, FailedAVP, Dict), ResultCode, Dict). -pacc(_, Acc) -> - Acc. +%% eval_packet/2 eval_packet(Pkt, Fs) -> lists:foreach(fun(F) -> diameter_lib:eval([F,Pkt]) end, Fs). @@ -724,15 +741,20 @@ set(Rec, Avps, Dict) -> %% the arity is 1 or {0,1}. In other cases (which probably shouldn't %% exist in practise) we can't know what's appropriate. -rc([MsgName | _], {'Result-Code' = K, RC} = T, Dict) -> - case Dict:avp_arity(MsgName, 'Result-Code') of - 1 -> [T]; +rc(_, B, _) + when is_boolean(B) -> + []; + +rc([MsgName | _], RC, Dict) -> + K = 'Result-Code', + case Dict:avp_arity(MsgName, K) of + 1 -> [{K, RC}]; {0,1} -> [{K, [RC]}]; _ -> [] end; -rc(Rec, T, Dict) -> - rc([Dict:rec2msg(element(1, Rec))], T, Dict). +rc(Rec, RC, Dict) -> + rc([Dict:rec2msg(element(1, Rec))], RC, Dict). %% failed_avp/3 @@ -740,7 +762,7 @@ failed_avp(_, [] = No, _) -> No; failed_avp(Rec, Avps, Dict) -> - [failed(Rec, [{'AVP', lists:reverse(Avps)}], Dict)]. + [failed(Rec, [{'AVP', Avps}], Dict)]. %% Reply as name and tuple list ... failed([MsgName | Values], FailedAvp, Dict) -> |