diff options
| author | Kenneth Lakin <[email protected]> | 2016-04-30 20:17:03 -0700 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Ingela Anderton Andin <[email protected]> | 2016-05-05 08:14:03 +0200 |
| commit | 8da6f7108cc9a49e7d7ccb07fa6382e293b19a4a (patch) | |
| tree | 4b459af3ec753898ede5a9c6ce6c2789b2c341c9 /lib/erl_interface | |
| parent | fbc2d05c2659debff1c78d989b6921a3fff6037b (diff) | |
| download | otp-8da6f7108cc9a49e7d7ccb07fa6382e293b19a4a.tar.gz otp-8da6f7108cc9a49e7d7ccb07fa6382e293b19a4a.tar.bz2 otp-8da6f7108cc9a49e7d7ccb07fa6382e293b19a4a.zip | |
ssl: Use cipher suite's PRF in prf/5
Use the negotiated cipher suite's PRF algorithm in calls to
ssl:prf/5, rather than a hard-coded one.
For TLS 1.0 the PRF algorithm was hard-coded to MD5/SHA1. This
was correct 100% of the time.
For TLS 1.1 and 1.2 the PRF algorithm was hard-coded to SHA256.
This was correct only some of the time for TLS 1.2 and none of the
time for TLS 1.1. Because the TLS handshake code calls tls_v1:prf/5
through another path, the handshaking process used the negotiated
PRF and did not encounter this bug.
A new test (prf) has been added to ssl_basic_SUITE to guard against future
breakage.
Diffstat (limited to 'lib/erl_interface')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions