diff options
author | Ingela Anderton Andin <[email protected]> | 2012-02-03 14:06:53 +0100 |
---|---|---|
committer | Ingela Anderton Andin <[email protected]> | 2012-02-08 11:46:23 +0100 |
commit | 25b2354cc9bcf09c87dc65526936e976fe95d3fd (patch) | |
tree | b7c326771a1748df5f21d1d560e3df86c5d8488a /lib/ssl/test/ssl_basic_SUITE.erl | |
parent | ab2ba6f1b0713fbe5c78f67aeefb73ffc006e995 (diff) | |
download | otp-25b2354cc9bcf09c87dc65526936e976fe95d3fd.tar.gz otp-25b2354cc9bcf09c87dc65526936e976fe95d3fd.tar.bz2 otp-25b2354cc9bcf09c87dc65526936e976fe95d3fd.zip |
User defined verify_fun is now called correctly
Background from erlang-questions:
> We use this test suite to verify our PKIX-path-validation code,
> granted we do not yet support CRL-handling but that is on its
> way. Our verify_fun will let you work around the problem that it
> is not yet supported. (Not so fun for you perhaps but a possible
> solution for now).
this is unfortunately not the case since for versions that contain
commit 4dbf3c9e4ae7cfd19b247353369166d31b8f15e5 (it is in R14B04 and
R15B) the documented behaviour (verify_fun will be called for every
certificate) is broken: the verify_fun will only be called, if the
certificate contains unknown extensions.
it is therefore not useful as a CRL workaround (anymore).
best regards
Stefan Grundmann
Diffstat (limited to 'lib/ssl/test/ssl_basic_SUITE.erl')
-rw-r--r-- | lib/ssl/test/ssl_basic_SUITE.erl | 103 |
1 files changed, 102 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/lib/ssl/test/ssl_basic_SUITE.erl b/lib/ssl/test/ssl_basic_SUITE.erl index 527263363c..0059a1e1ec 100644 --- a/lib/ssl/test/ssl_basic_SUITE.erl +++ b/lib/ssl/test/ssl_basic_SUITE.erl @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ %% %% %CopyrightBegin% %% -%% Copyright Ericsson AB 2007-2011. All Rights Reserved. +%% Copyright Ericsson AB 2007-2012. All Rights Reserved. %% %% The contents of this file are subject to the Erlang Public License, %% Version 1.1, (the "License"); you may not use this file except in @@ -250,6 +250,8 @@ all() -> no_authority_key_identifier, invalid_signature_client, invalid_signature_server, cert_expired, client_with_cert_cipher_suites_handshake, + verify_fun_always_run_client, + verify_fun_always_run_server, unknown_server_ca_fail, der_input, unknown_server_ca_accept_verify_none, unknown_server_ca_accept_verify_peer, @@ -3217,6 +3219,105 @@ client_with_cert_cipher_suites_handshake(Config) when is_list(Config) -> ssl_test_lib:check_result(Server, ok, Client, ok), ssl_test_lib:close(Server), ssl_test_lib:close(Client). + +%%-------------------------------------------------------------------- +verify_fun_always_run_client(doc) -> + ["Verify that user verify_fun is always run (for valid and valid_peer not only unknown_extension)"]; +verify_fun_always_run_client(suite) -> + []; +verify_fun_always_run_client(Config) when is_list(Config) -> + ClientOpts = ?config(client_verification_opts, Config), + ServerOpts = ?config(server_verification_opts, Config), + {ClientNode, ServerNode, Hostname} = ssl_test_lib:run_where(Config), + Server = ssl_test_lib:start_server_error([{node, ServerNode}, {port, 0}, + {from, self()}, + {mfa, {ssl_test_lib, + no_result, []}}, + {options, ServerOpts}]), + Port = ssl_test_lib:inet_port(Server), + + %% If user verify fun is called correctly we fail the connection. + %% otherwise we can not tell this case apart form where we miss + %% to call users verify fun + FunAndState = {fun(_,{extension, _}, UserState) -> + {unknown, UserState}; + (_, valid, [ChainLen]) -> + {valid, [ChainLen + 1]}; + (_, valid_peer, [2]) -> + {fail, "verify_fun_was_always_run"}; + (_, valid_peer, UserState) -> + {valid, UserState} + end, [0]}, + + Client = ssl_test_lib:start_client_error([{node, ClientNode}, {port, Port}, + {host, Hostname}, + {from, self()}, + {mfa, {ssl_test_lib, + no_result, []}}, + {options, + [{verify, verify_peer}, + {verify_fun, FunAndState} + | ClientOpts]}]), + %% Server error may be esslaccept or closed depending on timing + %% this is not a bug it is a circumstance of how tcp works! + receive + {Server, ServerError} -> + test_server:format("Server Error ~p~n", [ServerError]) + end, + + ssl_test_lib:check_result(Client, {error, esslconnect}). + +%%-------------------------------------------------------------------- +verify_fun_always_run_server(doc) -> + ["Verify that user verify_fun is always run (for valid and valid_peer not only unknown_extension)"]; +verify_fun_always_run_server(suite) -> + []; +verify_fun_always_run_server(Config) when is_list(Config) -> + ClientOpts = ?config(client_verification_opts, Config), + ServerOpts = ?config(server_verification_opts, Config), + {ClientNode, ServerNode, Hostname} = ssl_test_lib:run_where(Config), + + %% If user verify fun is called correctly we fail the connection. + %% otherwise we can not tell this case apart form where we miss + %% to call users verify fun + FunAndState = {fun(_,{extension, _}, UserState) -> + {unknown, UserState}; + (_, valid, [ChainLen]) -> + {valid, [ChainLen + 1]}; + (_, valid_peer, [2]) -> + {fail, "verify_fun_was_always_run"}; + (_, valid_peer, UserState) -> + {valid, UserState} + end, [0]}, + + Server = ssl_test_lib:start_server_error([{node, ServerNode}, {port, 0}, + {from, self()}, + {mfa, {ssl_test_lib, + no_result, []}}, + {options, + [{verify, verify_peer}, + {verify_fun, FunAndState} | + ServerOpts]}]), + Port = ssl_test_lib:inet_port(Server), + + Client = ssl_test_lib:start_client_error([{node, ClientNode}, {port, Port}, + {host, Hostname}, + {from, self()}, + {mfa, {ssl_test_lib, + no_result, []}}, + {options, + [{verify, verify_peer} + | ClientOpts]}]), + + %% Client error may be esslconnect or closed depending on timing + %% this is not a bug it is a circumstance of how tcp works! + receive + {Client, ClientError} -> + test_server:format("Client Error ~p~n", [ClientError]) + end, + + ssl_test_lib:check_result(Server, {error, esslaccept}). + %%-------------------------------------------------------------------- unknown_server_ca_fail(doc) -> ["Test that the client fails if the ca is unknown in verify_peer mode"]; |