diff options
author | Magnus Henoch <[email protected]> | 2016-01-22 12:31:36 +0000 |
---|---|---|
committer | Magnus Henoch <[email protected]> | 2016-02-17 10:24:11 +0000 |
commit | 331afa5dfaa129a5ea41af5dd76246bb922ac7df (patch) | |
tree | 489deae2e97d50d9905408a6e4404b00e624cc8b /lib/ssl | |
parent | 56b40d01c47170fea0d798dcc46fbde7ffc853dc (diff) | |
download | otp-331afa5dfaa129a5ea41af5dd76246bb922ac7df.tar.gz otp-331afa5dfaa129a5ea41af5dd76246bb922ac7df.tar.bz2 otp-331afa5dfaa129a5ea41af5dd76246bb922ac7df.zip |
Be suspicious of certificates without CRL DPs
Previously, if certificate revocation checking was turned on, and a
certificate didn't contain a CRL Distribution Points extension, and
there was no relevant CRL in the cache, then ssl_handshake:crl_check
would accept the certificate even if the crl_check option was set to
reject certificates for which the revocation status could not be
determined. With this change, such certificates will only be accepted
if the crl_check option was set to best_effort.
The process for CRL validation is described in section 6.3 of RFC
5280. The text doesn't mention any special treatment to be given to
certificates without distribution points: it just says "For each
distribution point..." (section 6.3.3), which would leave the
revocation status undetermined, unless there were "any available CRLs
not specified in a distribution point but issued by the certificate
issuer". Thus the result of this algorithm should be UNDETERMINED in
this case, not UNREVOKED, and the crl_check option should govern how
the implementation reacts to this result.
Diffstat (limited to 'lib/ssl')
-rw-r--r-- | lib/ssl/src/ssl_handshake.erl | 9 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | lib/ssl/test/ssl_crl_SUITE.erl | 50 |
2 files changed, 52 insertions, 7 deletions
diff --git a/lib/ssl/src/ssl_handshake.erl b/lib/ssl/src/ssl_handshake.erl index e9e140836b..e98073080a 100644 --- a/lib/ssl/src/ssl_handshake.erl +++ b/lib/ssl/src/ssl_handshake.erl @@ -2072,12 +2072,9 @@ crl_check(OtpCert, Check, CertDbHandle, CertDbRef, {Callback, CRLDbHandle}, _) - ], case dps_and_crls(OtpCert, Callback, CRLDbHandle, ext) of no_dps -> - case dps_and_crls(OtpCert, Callback, CRLDbHandle, same_issuer) of - [] -> - valid; %% No relevant CRL existed - DpsAndCRls -> - crl_check_same_issuer(OtpCert, Check, DpsAndCRls, Options) - end; + crl_check_same_issuer(OtpCert, Check, + dps_and_crls(OtpCert, Callback, CRLDbHandle, same_issuer), + Options); DpsAndCRLs -> %% This DP list may be empty if relevant CRLs existed %% but could not be retrived, will result in {bad_cert, revocation_status_undetermined} case public_key:pkix_crls_validate(OtpCert, DpsAndCRLs, Options) of diff --git a/lib/ssl/test/ssl_crl_SUITE.erl b/lib/ssl/test/ssl_crl_SUITE.erl index 68ed36caa3..5b86027210 100644 --- a/lib/ssl/test/ssl_crl_SUITE.erl +++ b/lib/ssl/test/ssl_crl_SUITE.erl @@ -53,7 +53,7 @@ groups() -> {idp_crl, [], basic_tests()}]. basic_tests() -> - [crl_verify_valid, crl_verify_revoked]. + [crl_verify_valid, crl_verify_revoked, crl_verify_no_crl]. init_per_suite(Config) -> @@ -204,6 +204,52 @@ crl_verify_revoked(Config) when is_list(Config) -> crl_verify_error(Hostname, ServerNode, ServerOpts, ClientNode, ClientOpts, "certificate revoked"). +crl_verify_no_crl() -> + [{doc,"Verify a simple CRL chain when the CRL is missing"}]. +crl_verify_no_crl(Config) when is_list(Config) -> + PrivDir = ?config(cert_dir, Config), + Check = ?config(crl_check, Config), + ServerOpts = [{keyfile, filename:join([PrivDir, "server", "key.pem"])}, + {certfile, filename:join([PrivDir, "server", "cert.pem"])}, + {cacertfile, filename:join([PrivDir, "server", "cacerts.pem"])}], + ClientOpts = case ?config(idp_crl, Config) of + true -> + [{cacertfile, filename:join([PrivDir, "server", "cacerts.pem"])}, + {crl_check, Check}, + {crl_cache, {ssl_crl_cache, {internal, [{http, 5000}]}}}, + {verify, verify_peer}]; + false -> + [{cacertfile, filename:join([PrivDir, "server", "cacerts.pem"])}, + {crl_check, Check}, + {verify, verify_peer}] + end, + {ClientNode, ServerNode, Hostname} = ssl_test_lib:run_where(Config), + + %% In case we're running an HTTP server that serves CRLs, let's + %% rename those files, so the CRL is absent when we try to verify + %% it. + %% + %% If we're not using an HTTP server, we just need to refrain from + %% adding the CRLs to the cache manually. + rename_crl(filename:join([PrivDir, "erlangCA", "crl.pem"])), + rename_crl(filename:join([PrivDir, "otpCA", "crl.pem"])), + + %% The expected outcome when the CRL is missing depends on the + %% crl_check setting. + case Check of + true -> + %% The error "revocation status undetermined" gets turned + %% into "bad certificate". + crl_verify_error(Hostname, ServerNode, ServerOpts, ClientNode, ClientOpts, + "bad certificate"); + peer -> + crl_verify_error(Hostname, ServerNode, ServerOpts, ClientNode, ClientOpts, + "bad certificate"); + best_effort -> + %% In "best effort" mode, we consider the certificate not + %% to be revoked if we can't find the appropriate CRL. + crl_verify_valid(Hostname, ServerNode, ServerOpts, ClientNode, ClientOpts) + end. crl_verify_valid(Hostname, ServerNode, ServerOpts, ClientNode, ClientOpts) -> Server = ssl_test_lib:start_server([{node, ServerNode}, {port, 0}, @@ -263,3 +309,5 @@ make_dir_path(PathComponents) -> "", PathComponents). +rename_crl(Filename) -> + file:rename(Filename, Filename ++ ".notfound"). |