diff options
| author | Christian von Roques <[email protected]> | 2011-08-08 12:25:05 +0200 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Henrik Nord <[email protected]> | 2011-08-08 14:47:46 +0200 |
| commit | e011c1aa263f7f08177347fe619b54a621c17372 (patch) | |
| tree | b1455e59f128edba1b730e0d3e94b6ac0c23cddc /lib/stdlib/doc/src/unicode_usage.xml | |
| parent | 44a70b59a1903265a33ccefa3846e10b3f86eb5d (diff) | |
| download | otp-e011c1aa263f7f08177347fe619b54a621c17372.tar.gz otp-e011c1aa263f7f08177347fe619b54a621c17372.tar.bz2 otp-e011c1aa263f7f08177347fe619b54a621c17372.zip | |
Trivial documentation fixes
Diffstat (limited to 'lib/stdlib/doc/src/unicode_usage.xml')
| -rw-r--r-- | lib/stdlib/doc/src/unicode_usage.xml | 2 |
1 files changed, 1 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/lib/stdlib/doc/src/unicode_usage.xml b/lib/stdlib/doc/src/unicode_usage.xml index 416df1f02c..b48ad8c1f3 100644 --- a/lib/stdlib/doc/src/unicode_usage.xml +++ b/lib/stdlib/doc/src/unicode_usage.xml @@ -52,7 +52,7 @@ <tag>UCS-4</tag> <item>Basically the same as UTF-32, but without some Unicode semantics, defined by IEEE and has little use as a separate encoding standard. For all normal (and possibly abnormal) usages, UTF-32 and UCS-4 are interchangeable.</item> </taglist> -<p>Certain ranges of characters are left unused and certain ranges are even deemed invalid. The most notable invalid range is 16#D800 - 16#DFFF, as the UTF-16 encoding does not allow for encoding of these numbers. It can be speculated that the UTF-16 encoding standard was, from the beginning, expected to be able to hold all Unicode characters in one 16-bit entity, but then had to be extended, leaving a whole in the Unicode range to cope with backward compatibility.</p> +<p>Certain ranges of characters are left unused and certain ranges are even deemed invalid. The most notable invalid range is 16#D800 - 16#DFFF, as the UTF-16 encoding does not allow for encoding of these numbers. It can be speculated that the UTF-16 encoding standard was, from the beginning, expected to be able to hold all Unicode characters in one 16-bit entity, but then had to be extended, leaving a hole in the Unicode range to cope with backward compatibility.</p> <p>Additionally, the codepoint 16#FEFF is used for byte order marks (BOM's) and use of that character is not encouraged in other contexts than that. It actually is valid though, as the character "ZWNBS" (Zero Width Non Breaking Space). BOM's are used to identify encodings and byte order for programs where such parameters are not known in advance. Byte order marks are more seldom used than one could expect, put their use is becoming more widely spread as they provide the means for programs to make educated guesses about the Unicode format of a certain file.</p> </section> <section> |