diff options
author | Sverker Eriksson <[email protected]> | 2017-03-03 14:29:54 +0100 |
---|---|---|
committer | Sverker Eriksson <[email protected]> | 2017-03-22 15:27:17 +0100 |
commit | ec5510e2a1a10c3d794103946d48434504038056 (patch) | |
tree | 95dc1f165fcc59b8917ae4e385e57d4990bec1de /lib/stdlib | |
parent | b9240f72148c536b038c0d26b1ef83da7c951429 (diff) | |
download | otp-ec5510e2a1a10c3d794103946d48434504038056.tar.gz otp-ec5510e2a1a10c3d794103946d48434504038056.tar.bz2 otp-ec5510e2a1a10c3d794103946d48434504038056.zip |
stdlib: Remove ets_SUITE:memory_check_summary
and let each test case fail, like it was before.
Seems growing/shrinking meta tables was causing the sporadic
failed memory checks.
Diffstat (limited to 'lib/stdlib')
-rw-r--r-- | lib/stdlib/test/ets_SUITE.erl | 45 |
1 files changed, 6 insertions, 39 deletions
diff --git a/lib/stdlib/test/ets_SUITE.erl b/lib/stdlib/test/ets_SUITE.erl index 101be82605..ebf7dbff62 100644 --- a/lib/stdlib/test/ets_SUITE.erl +++ b/lib/stdlib/test/ets_SUITE.erl @@ -75,7 +75,6 @@ -export([otp_9423/1]). -export([otp_10182/1]). -export([ets_all/1]). --export([memory_check_summary/1]). -export([massive_ets_all/1]). -export([take/1]). @@ -94,7 +93,6 @@ init_per_testcase(Case, Config) -> io:format("*** SEED: ~p ***\n", [rand:export_seed()]), start_spawn_logger(), wait_for_test_procs(), %% Ensure previous case cleaned up - put('__ETS_TEST_CASE__', Case), [{test_case, Case} | Config]. end_per_testcase(_Func, _Config) -> @@ -136,9 +134,7 @@ all() -> otp_9423, ets_all, massive_ets_all, - take, - - memory_check_summary]. % MUST BE LAST + take]. groups() -> [{new, [], @@ -183,27 +179,6 @@ init_per_group(_GroupName, Config) -> end_per_group(_GroupName, Config) -> Config. -%% Test that we did not have "too many" failed verify_etsmem()'s -%% in the test suite. -%% verify_etsmem() may give a low number of false positives -%% as concurrent activities, such as lingering processes -%% from earlier test suites, may do unrelated ets (de)allocations. -memory_check_summary(_Config) -> - case whereis(ets_test_spawn_logger) of - undefined -> - ct:fail("No spawn logger exist"); - _ -> - ets_test_spawn_logger ! {self(), get_failed_memchecks}, - receive {get_failed_memchecks, FailedMemchecks} -> ok end, - io:format("Failed memchecks: ~p\n",[FailedMemchecks]), - NoFailedMemchecks = length(FailedMemchecks), - if NoFailedMemchecks > 1 -> - ct:fail("Too many failed (~p) memchecks", [NoFailedMemchecks]); - true -> - ok - end - end. - %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% @@ -5796,8 +5771,7 @@ verify_etsmem({MemInfo,AllTabs}) -> io:format("Actual: ~p", [MemInfo2]), io:format("Changed tables before: ~p\n",[AllTabs -- AllTabs2]), io:format("Changed tables after: ~p\n", [AllTabs2 -- AllTabs]), - ets_test_spawn_logger ! {failed_memcheck, get('__ETS_TEST_CASE__')}, - {comment, "Failed memory check"} + ct:fail("Failed memory check") end. @@ -5819,10 +5793,10 @@ stop_loopers(Loopers) -> looper(Fun, State) -> looper(Fun, Fun(State)). -spawn_logger(Procs, FailedMemchecks) -> +spawn_logger(Procs) -> receive {new_test_proc, Proc} -> - spawn_logger([Proc|Procs], FailedMemchecks); + spawn_logger([Proc|Procs]); {sync_test_procs, Kill, From} -> lists:foreach(fun (Proc) when From == Proc -> ok; @@ -5846,14 +5820,7 @@ spawn_logger(Procs, FailedMemchecks) -> end end, Procs), From ! test_procs_synced, - spawn_logger([From], FailedMemchecks); - - {failed_memcheck, TestCase} -> - spawn_logger(Procs, [TestCase|FailedMemchecks]); - - {Pid, get_failed_memchecks} -> - Pid ! {get_failed_memchecks, FailedMemchecks}, - spawn_logger(Procs, FailedMemchecks) + spawn_logger([From]) end. pid_status(Pid) -> @@ -5869,7 +5836,7 @@ start_spawn_logger() -> case whereis(ets_test_spawn_logger) of Pid when is_pid(Pid) -> true; _ -> register(ets_test_spawn_logger, - spawn_opt(fun () -> spawn_logger([], []) end, + spawn_opt(fun () -> spawn_logger([]) end, [{priority, max}])) end. |