diff options
author | Björn-Egil Dahlberg <[email protected]> | 2014-12-11 16:56:13 +0100 |
---|---|---|
committer | Björn-Egil Dahlberg <[email protected]> | 2014-12-11 16:56:13 +0100 |
commit | c54143281596a7757786057e759ed08ec482aae4 (patch) | |
tree | 284eaefaacb973f1ec2c5983c85c5ed689438696 /lib/tools/src/lcnt.erl | |
parent | 1ee58f610fa2080ea616231f5c01d6339639ceb9 (diff) | |
download | otp-c54143281596a7757786057e759ed08ec482aae4.tar.gz otp-c54143281596a7757786057e759ed08ec482aae4.tar.bz2 otp-c54143281596a7757786057e759ed08ec482aae4.zip |
tools: Fix lcnt sort of inspected locks
An error was introduced in commit f24d1ad9004b2885cd3b15ac0bf9d1407ca68bc8 which
reversed the sorting of all locks. This meant that the least contended locks was
printed instead of the most contended.
This commit reverses the reverse.
Diffstat (limited to 'lib/tools/src/lcnt.erl')
-rw-r--r-- | lib/tools/src/lcnt.erl | 34 |
1 files changed, 18 insertions, 16 deletions
diff --git a/lib/tools/src/lcnt.erl b/lib/tools/src/lcnt.erl index f1251fddab..5b125c6f5a 100644 --- a/lib/tools/src/lcnt.erl +++ b/lib/tools/src/lcnt.erl @@ -305,7 +305,7 @@ handle_call({inspect, Lockname, InOpts}, _From, #state{ duration=Duration, locks {true, true} -> locks_ids(Filtered); _ -> [] end, - Combos = combine_classes(Filtered, proplists:get_value(combine, Opts)), + Combos = combine_classes(Filtered, proplists:get_value(combine, Opts)), case proplists:get_value(locations, Opts) of true -> lists:foreach(fun @@ -329,9 +329,8 @@ handle_call({inspect, Lockname, InOpts}, _From, #state{ duration=Duration, locks end end, Combos); _ -> - Print1 = locks2print(Combos, Duration), - Print2 = filter_print(Print1, Opts), - print_lock_information(Print2, proplists:get_value(print, Opts)) + Print = filter_print(locks2print(Combos, Duration), Opts), + print_lock_information(Print, proplists:get_value(print, Opts)) end, {reply, ok, State}; @@ -509,20 +508,23 @@ filter_locks(Locks, Lockname) -> % 4. max length of locks filter_print(PLs, Opts) -> - TLs = threshold_locks(PLs, proplists:get_value(thresholds, Opts, [])), - SLs = sort_locks(TLs, proplists:get_value(sort, Opts, time)), - CLs = cut_locks(SLs, proplists:get_value(max_locks, Opts, none)), - reverse_locks(CLs, not proplists:get_value(reverse,Opts, false)). - -sort_locks(Locks, name) -> lists:keysort(#print.name, Locks); -sort_locks(Locks, id) -> lists:keysort(#print.id, Locks); -sort_locks(Locks, type) -> lists:keysort(#print.type, Locks); -sort_locks(Locks, tries) -> lists:keysort(#print.tries, Locks); -sort_locks(Locks, colls) -> lists:keysort(#print.colls, Locks); -sort_locks(Locks, ratio) -> lists:keysort(#print.cr, Locks); -sort_locks(Locks, time) -> lists:keysort(#print.time, Locks); + TLs = threshold_locks(PLs, proplists:get_value(thresholds, Opts, [])), + SLs = sort_locks(TLs, proplists:get_value(sort, Opts, time)), + CLs = cut_locks(SLs, proplists:get_value(max_locks, Opts, none)), + reverse_locks(CLs, proplists:get_value(reverse, Opts, false)). + +sort_locks(Locks, name) -> reverse_sort_locks(#print.name, Locks); +sort_locks(Locks, id) -> reverse_sort_locks(#print.id, Locks); +sort_locks(Locks, type) -> reverse_sort_locks(#print.type, Locks); +sort_locks(Locks, tries) -> reverse_sort_locks(#print.tries, Locks); +sort_locks(Locks, colls) -> reverse_sort_locks(#print.colls, Locks); +sort_locks(Locks, ratio) -> reverse_sort_locks(#print.cr, Locks); +sort_locks(Locks, time) -> reverse_sort_locks(#print.time, Locks); sort_locks(Locks, _) -> sort_locks(Locks, time). +reverse_sort_locks(Ix, Locks) -> + lists:reverse(lists:keysort(Ix, Locks)). + % cut locks not above certain thresholds threshold_locks(Locks, Thresholds) -> Tries = proplists:get_value(tries, Thresholds, -1), |