diff options
author | Anders Svensson <[email protected]> | 2015-08-24 16:14:49 +0200 |
---|---|---|
committer | Anders Svensson <[email protected]> | 2015-08-25 00:03:03 +0200 |
commit | 502189ba42469d3332bc0658caa2bd0de1e3fcb9 (patch) | |
tree | 0099a98bd0d934766809085056fb1e2022b52790 /lib/tools/test/tools_SUITE.erl | |
parent | 155c22ff3ce3f667d4a984bd6648f029e0998381 (diff) | |
download | otp-502189ba42469d3332bc0658caa2bd0de1e3fcb9.tar.gz otp-502189ba42469d3332bc0658caa2bd0de1e3fcb9.tar.bz2 otp-502189ba42469d3332bc0658caa2bd0de1e3fcb9.zip |
Add service_opt() strict_mbit
There are differing opinions on whether or not reception of an arbitrary
AVP setting the M-bit is an error. 1.3.4 of RFC 6733 says this about
how an existing Diameter application may be modified:
o The M-bit allows the sender to indicate to the receiver whether or
not understanding the semantics of an AVP and its content is
mandatory. If the M-bit is set by the sender and the receiver
does not understand the AVP or the values carried within that AVP,
then a failure is generated (see Section 7).
It is the decision of the protocol designer when to develop a new
Diameter application rather than extending Diameter in other ways.
However, a new Diameter application MUST be created when one or more
of the following criteria are met:
M-bit Setting
An AVP with the M-bit in the MUST column of the AVP flag table is
added to an existing Command/Application. An AVP with the M-bit
in the MAY column of the AVP flag table is added to an existing
Command/Application.
The point here is presumably interoperability: that the command grammar
should specify explicitly what mandatory AVPs much be understood, and
that anything more is an error.
On the other hand, 3.2 says thus about command grammars:
avp-name = avp-spec / "AVP"
; The string "AVP" stands for *any* arbitrary AVP
; Name, not otherwise listed in that Command Code
; definition. The inclusion of this string
; is recommended for all CCFs to allow for
; extensibility.
This renders 1.3.4 pointless unless "*any* AVP" is qualified by "not
setting the M-bit", since the sender can effectively violate 1.3.4
without this necessitating an error at the receiver. If clients add
arbitrary AVPs setting the M-bit then request handling becomes more
implementation-dependent.
The current interpretation in diameter is strict: if a command grammar
doesn't explicitly allow an AVP setting the M-bit then reception of such
an AVP is regarded as an error. The strict_mbit option now allows this
behaviour to be changed, false turning all responsibility for the M-bit
over to the user.
Diffstat (limited to 'lib/tools/test/tools_SUITE.erl')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions