diff options
author | Sverker Eriksson <[email protected]> | 2016-03-21 18:04:45 +0100 |
---|---|---|
committer | Sverker Eriksson <[email protected]> | 2016-03-21 18:04:45 +0100 |
commit | 8f5e589c7adab9450513852e8b71643d6c11e711 (patch) | |
tree | 493d3ed66cf78edea74d4bd04d11dec1772ccff3 /lib | |
parent | fa9b620d82ad6370800008ab436f17f75b99bfe3 (diff) | |
parent | a6fa6f54bb508da8c92b597a56acbb866abf2f0b (diff) | |
download | otp-8f5e589c7adab9450513852e8b71643d6c11e711.tar.gz otp-8f5e589c7adab9450513852e8b71643d6c11e711.tar.bz2 otp-8f5e589c7adab9450513852e8b71643d6c11e711.zip |
Merge branch 'kostis/hipe-inline-fp-crash/PR-984/OTP-13407'
Diffstat (limited to 'lib')
-rw-r--r-- | lib/hipe/icode/hipe_icode_fp.erl | 400 | ||||
-rw-r--r-- | lib/hipe/test/basic_SUITE_data/basic_floats.erl | 70 |
2 files changed, 346 insertions, 124 deletions
diff --git a/lib/hipe/icode/hipe_icode_fp.erl b/lib/hipe/icode/hipe_icode_fp.erl index 5ae0395b72..ae12f20cc2 100644 --- a/lib/hipe/icode/hipe_icode_fp.erl +++ b/lib/hipe/icode/hipe_icode_fp.erl @@ -34,13 +34,37 @@ -include("hipe_icode.hrl"). -include("../flow/cfg.hrl"). --record(state, {edge_map = gb_trees:empty() :: gb_trees:tree(), - fp_ebb_map = gb_trees:empty() :: gb_trees:tree(), - cfg :: #cfg{}}). +-type mapped_fvar() :: icode_fvar() | {assigned, icode_fvar()} . +-type incoming_fvars() :: [{icode_lbl(), mapped_fvar()}]. +-type initial_var_map() :: #{icode_var() => incoming_fvars()}. +-type bb_phi_list() :: [{icode_fvar(), [{icode_lbl(), icode_fvar()}]}]. +-type var_map_phi() :: #{phi => bb_phi_list(), + icode_var() => mapped_fvar()}. +-type var_map() :: #{icode_var() => mapped_fvar()}. + +-type edge() :: {icode_lbl(), icode_lbl()}. +-type edge_map() :: #{edge() => var_map()}. + +-type worklist(Item) :: {[Item], [Item], gb_sets:set(Item)}. +-type worklist() :: worklist(icode_lbl()). + +-type fail_lbl() :: [] | icode_lbl(). +-type in_block() :: {true, fail_lbl()} | false. +-type fp_ebb_map() :: #{{inblock_in | inblock_out, icode_lbl()} | edge() + => in_block()}. + +-record(state, {edge_map = #{} :: edge_map(), + fp_ebb_map = #{} :: fp_ebb_map(), + cfg :: cfg()}). +-type state() :: #state{}. + +-type icode_phi() :: #icode_phi{}. +-type icode_variable() :: #icode_variable{}. +-type icode_const() :: #icode_const{}. %%-------------------------------------------------------------------- --spec cfg(#cfg{}) -> #cfg{}. +-spec cfg(cfg()) -> cfg(). cfg(Cfg) -> %%hipe_icode_cfg:pp(Cfg), @@ -59,10 +83,14 @@ cfg(Cfg) -> %% corresponding fcheckerror. %%-------------------------------------------------------------------- +-spec annotate_fclearerror(cfg()) -> cfg(). + annotate_fclearerror(Cfg) -> Labels = hipe_icode_cfg:reverse_postorder(Cfg), annotate_fclearerror(Labels, Cfg). +-spec annotate_fclearerror([icode_lbl()], cfg()) -> cfg(). + annotate_fclearerror([Label|Left], Cfg) -> BB = hipe_icode_cfg:bb(Cfg, Label), Code = hipe_bb:code(BB), @@ -73,6 +101,9 @@ annotate_fclearerror([Label|Left], Cfg) -> annotate_fclearerror([], Cfg) -> Cfg. +-spec annotate_fclearerror1(icode_instrs(), icode_lbl(), cfg(), icode_instrs()) + -> icode_instrs(). + annotate_fclearerror1([I|Left], Label, Cfg, Acc) -> case I of #icode_call{} -> @@ -90,6 +121,9 @@ annotate_fclearerror1([I|Left], Label, Cfg, Acc) -> annotate_fclearerror1([], _Label, _Cfg, Acc) -> lists:reverse(Acc). +-spec lookahead_for_fcheckerror(icode_instrs(), icode_lbl(), cfg()) -> + fail_lbl(). + lookahead_for_fcheckerror([I|Left], Label, Cfg) -> case I of #icode_call{} -> @@ -111,10 +145,14 @@ lookahead_for_fcheckerror([], Label, Cfg) -> lookahead_for_fcheckerror(Code, Succ, Cfg) end. +-spec unannotate_fclearerror(cfg()) -> cfg(). + unannotate_fclearerror(Cfg) -> Labels = hipe_icode_cfg:reverse_postorder(Cfg), unannotate_fclearerror(Labels, Cfg). +-spec unannotate_fclearerror([icode_lbl()], cfg()) -> cfg(). + unannotate_fclearerror([Label|Left], Cfg) -> BB = hipe_icode_cfg:bb(Cfg, Label), Code = hipe_bb:code(BB), @@ -125,6 +163,9 @@ unannotate_fclearerror([Label|Left], Cfg) -> unannotate_fclearerror([], Cfg) -> Cfg. +-spec unannotate_fclearerror1(icode_instrs(), icode_instrs()) -> + icode_instrs(). + unannotate_fclearerror1([I|Left], Acc) -> case I of #icode_call{} -> @@ -145,10 +186,14 @@ unannotate_fclearerror1([], Acc) -> %% Make float EBBs %%-------------------------------------------------------------------- +-spec place_fp_blocks(state()) -> state(). + place_fp_blocks(State) -> WorkList = new_worklist(State), transform_block(WorkList, State). +-spec transform_block(worklist(), state()) -> state(). + transform_block(WorkList, State) -> case get_work(WorkList) of none -> @@ -182,6 +227,10 @@ transform_block(WorkList, State) -> end end. +-spec update_maps(state(), icode_lbl(), ordsets:ordset(icode_lbl()), + var_map(), ordsets:ordset(icode_lbl()), var_map()) + -> fixpoint | {state(), [icode_lbl()]}. + update_maps(State, Label, SuccSet, SuccMap, FailSet, FailMap) -> {NewState, Add1} = update_maps(State, Label, SuccSet, SuccMap, []), case update_maps(NewState, Label, FailSet, FailMap, Add1) of @@ -189,6 +238,10 @@ update_maps(State, Label, SuccSet, SuccMap, FailSet, FailMap) -> {_NewState1, _Add} = Ret -> Ret end. +-spec update_maps(state(), icode_lbl(), ordsets:ordset(icode_lbl()), + var_map(), [icode_lbl()]) + -> {state(), [icode_lbl()]}. + update_maps(State, From, [To|Left], Map, Acc) -> case state__map_update(State, From, To, Map) of fixpoint -> @@ -199,10 +252,13 @@ update_maps(State, From, [To|Left], Map, Acc) -> update_maps(State, _From, [], _Map, Acc) -> {State, Acc}. +-spec transform_instrs(icode_instrs(), edge_map(), var_map(), icode_instrs()) + -> {var_map(), icode_instrs()}. + transform_instrs([I|Left], PhiMap, Map, Acc) -> Defines = hipe_icode:defines(I), - NewMap = delete_all(Defines, Map), - NewPhiMap = delete_all(Defines, PhiMap), + NewMap = maps:without(Defines, Map), + NewPhiMap = maps:without(Defines, PhiMap), case I of #icode_phi{} -> Uses = hipe_icode:uses(I), @@ -214,7 +270,7 @@ transform_instrs([I|Left], PhiMap, Map, Acc) -> %% All arguments are untagged. Let's untag the destination. Dst = hipe_icode:phi_dst(I), NewDst = hipe_icode:mk_new_fvar(), - NewMap1 = gb_trees:enter(Dst, NewDst, NewMap), + NewMap1 = NewMap#{Dst => NewDst}, NewI = subst_phi_uncond(I, NewDst, PhiMap), transform_instrs(Left, NewPhiMap, NewMap1, [NewI|Acc]); _ -> @@ -233,7 +289,7 @@ transform_instrs([I|Left], PhiMap, Map, Acc) -> [Src] -> case lookup(Src, Map) of none -> - NewMap1 = gb_trees:enter(Src, {assigned, Dst}, NewMap), + NewMap1 = NewMap#{Src => {assigned, Dst}}, transform_instrs(Left, NewPhiMap, NewMap1, [I|Acc]); Dst -> %% This is the instruction that untagged the variable. @@ -256,7 +312,7 @@ transform_instrs([I|Left], PhiMap, Map, Acc) -> unsafe_tag_float -> [Dst] = hipe_icode:defines(I), [Src] = hipe_icode:uses(I), - NewMap1 = gb_trees:enter(Dst, {assigned, Src}, NewMap), + NewMap1 = NewMap#{Dst => {assigned, Src}}, transform_instrs(Left, NewPhiMap, NewMap1,[I|Acc]); _ -> {NewMap1, NewAcc} = check_for_fop_candidates(I, NewMap, Acc), @@ -269,6 +325,9 @@ transform_instrs([I|Left], PhiMap, Map, Acc) -> transform_instrs([], _PhiMap, Map, Acc) -> {Map, lists:reverse(Acc)}. +-spec check_for_fop_candidates(icode_instr(), var_map(), icode_instrs()) + -> {var_map(), icode_instrs()}. + check_for_fop_candidates(I, Map, Acc) -> case is_fop_cand(I) of false -> @@ -311,6 +370,8 @@ check_for_fop_candidates(I, Map, Acc) -> end. +-spec handle_untagged_arguments(icode_instr(), var_map()) -> icode_instrs(). + %% If this is an instruction that needs to operate on tagged values, %% which currently are untagged, we must tag the values and perhaps %% end the fp ebb. @@ -322,23 +383,24 @@ handle_untagged_arguments(I, Map) -> Tag -> TagIntrs = [hipe_icode:mk_primop([Dst], unsafe_tag_float, - [gb_trees:get(Dst, Map)]) || Dst <- Tag], + [maps:get(Dst, Map)]) || Dst <- Tag], [I|TagIntrs] end. +-spec do_prelude(var_map_phi()) -> {[icode_phi()], var_map()}. + %% Add phi nodes for untagged fp values. -do_prelude(Map) -> - case gb_trees:lookup(phi, Map) of - none -> - {[], Map}; - {value, List} -> - %%io:format("Adding phi: ~w\n", [List]), - Fun = fun ({FVar, Bindings}, Acc) -> - [hipe_icode:mk_phi(FVar, Bindings)|Acc] - end, - {lists:foldl(Fun, [], List), gb_trees:delete(phi, Map)} - end. +do_prelude(Map = #{phi := List}) -> + %%io:format("Adding phi: ~w\n", [List]), + Fun = fun ({FVar, Bindings}, Acc) -> + [hipe_icode:mk_phi(FVar, Bindings)|Acc] + end, + {lists:foldl(Fun, [], List), maps:remove(phi, Map)}; +do_prelude(Map) -> {[], Map}. + +-spec split_code([I]) -> {[I], I} when + I :: icode_instr(). split_code(Code) -> split_code(Code, []). @@ -349,6 +411,8 @@ split_code([I|Left], Acc) -> split_code(Left, [I|Acc]). +-spec finalize(state()) -> state(). + %% When all code is mapped to fp instructions we must make sure that %% the fp ebb information going into each block is the same as the %% information coming out of each predecessor. Otherwise, we must add @@ -360,17 +424,25 @@ finalize(State) -> Edges = needs_fcheckerror(NewState), finalize(Edges, NewState). +-spec finalize([edge()], state()) -> state(). + finalize([{From, To}|Left], State) -> NewState = add_fp_ebb_fixup(From, To, State), finalize(Left, NewState); finalize([], State) -> State. +-spec needs_fcheckerror(state()) -> [{none | icode_lbl(), icode_lbl()}]. + needs_fcheckerror(State) -> Cfg = state__cfg(State), Labels = hipe_icode_cfg:labels(Cfg), needs_fcheckerror(Labels, State, []). +-spec needs_fcheckerror([icode_lbl()], state(), + [{none | icode_lbl(), icode_lbl()}]) + -> [{none | icode_lbl(), icode_lbl()}]. + needs_fcheckerror([Label|Left], State, Acc) -> case state__get_in_block_in(State, Label) of {true, _} -> @@ -395,6 +467,8 @@ needs_fcheckerror([Label|Left], State, Acc) -> needs_fcheckerror([], _State, Acc) -> Acc. +-spec add_fp_ebb_fixup(none | icode_lbl(), icode_lbl(), state()) -> state(). + add_fp_ebb_fixup('none', To, State) -> %% Add the fcheckerror to the start of the block. BB = state__bb(State, To), @@ -416,9 +490,15 @@ add_fp_ebb_fixup(From, To, State) -> NewToBB = hipe_bb:code_update(ToBB, NewToCode), state__bb_add(NewState1, To, NewToBB). +-spec redirect_phis(icode_instrs(), icode_lbl(), icode_lbl()) + -> icode_instrs(). + redirect_phis(Code, OldFrom, NewFrom) -> redirect_phis(Code, OldFrom, NewFrom, []). +-spec redirect_phis(icode_instrs(), icode_lbl(), icode_lbl(), icode_instrs()) + -> icode_instrs(). + redirect_phis([I|Is] = Code, OldFrom, NewFrom, Acc) -> case I of #icode_phi{} -> @@ -430,13 +510,20 @@ redirect_phis([I|Is] = Code, OldFrom, NewFrom, Acc) -> redirect_phis([], _OldFrom, _NewFrom, Acc) -> lists:reverse(Acc). +-spec subst_phi(icode_phi(), icode_variable(), edge_map()) + -> icode_phi(). + subst_phi(I, Dst, Map) -> ArgList = subst_phi_uses0(hipe_icode:phi_arglist(I), Map, []), hipe_icode:mk_phi(Dst, ArgList). +-spec subst_phi_uses0([{icode_lbl(), icode_variable()}], edge_map(), + [{icode_lbl(), icode_variable()}]) + -> [{icode_lbl(), icode_variable()}]. + subst_phi_uses0([{Pred, Var}|Left], Map, Acc) -> - case gb_trees:lookup(Var, Map) of - {value, List} -> + case Map of + #{Var := List} -> case lists:keyfind(Pred, 1, List) of {Pred, {assigned, _NewVar}} -> %% The variable is untagged, but it has been assigned. Keep it! @@ -448,20 +535,27 @@ subst_phi_uses0([{Pred, Var}|Left], Map, Acc) -> %% The variable is not untagged. subst_phi_uses0(Left, Map, [{Pred, Var} | Acc]) end; - none -> + #{} -> %% The variable is not untagged. subst_phi_uses0(Left, Map, [{Pred, Var} | Acc]) end; subst_phi_uses0([], _Map, Acc) -> Acc. +-spec subst_phi_uncond(icode_phi(), icode_variable(), edge_map()) + -> icode_phi(). + subst_phi_uncond(I, Dst, Map) -> ArgList = subst_phi_uses_uncond0(hipe_icode:phi_arglist(I), Map, []), hipe_icode:mk_phi(Dst, ArgList). +-spec subst_phi_uses_uncond0([{icode_lbl(), icode_variable()}], edge_map(), + [{icode_lbl(), icode_variable()}]) + -> [{icode_lbl(), icode_variable()}]. + subst_phi_uses_uncond0([{Pred, Var}|Left], Map, Acc) -> - case gb_trees:lookup(Var, Map) of - {value, List} -> + case Map of + #{Var := List} -> case lists:keyfind(Pred, 1, List) of {Pred, {assigned, NewVar}} -> %% The variable is untagged! @@ -473,13 +567,15 @@ subst_phi_uses_uncond0([{Pred, Var}|Left], Map, Acc) -> %% The variable is not untagged. subst_phi_uses_uncond0(Left, Map, [{Pred, Var} | Acc]) end; - none -> + #{} -> %% The variable is not untagged. subst_phi_uses_uncond0(Left, Map, [{Pred, Var} | Acc]) end; subst_phi_uses_uncond0([], _Map, Acc) -> Acc. +-spec place_error_handling(worklist(), state()) -> state(). + place_error_handling(WorkList, State) -> case get_work(WorkList) of none -> @@ -502,6 +598,9 @@ place_error_handling(WorkList, State) -> end end. +-spec place_error(icode_instrs(), in_block(), icode_instrs()) + -> {icode_instrs(), in_block()}. + place_error([I|Left], InBlock, Acc) -> case I of #icode_call{} -> @@ -638,12 +737,10 @@ instr_allowed_in_fp_ebb(Instr) -> %%============================================================= %% ------------------------------------------------------------ -%% Handling the gb_tree +%% Handling the variable map -delete_all([Key|Left], Tree) -> - delete_all(Left, gb_trees:delete_any(Key, Tree)); -delete_all([], Tree) -> - Tree. +-spec lookup_list([icode_var() | icode_const()], var_map()) + -> [none | icode_fvar()]. lookup_list(List, Info) -> lookup_list(List, fun lookup/2, Info, []). @@ -653,33 +750,43 @@ lookup_list([H|T], Fun, Info, Acc) -> lookup_list([], _, _, Acc) -> lists:reverse(Acc). +-spec lookup(icode_var() | icode_const(), var_map()) -> none | icode_fvar(). + lookup(Key, Tree) -> case hipe_icode:is_const(Key) of %% This can be true if the same constant has been %% untagged more than once true -> none; false -> - case gb_trees:lookup(Key, Tree) of - none -> none; - {value, {assigned, Val}} -> Val; - {value, Val} -> Val + case Tree of + #{Key := {assigned, Val}} -> Val; + #{Key := Val} -> Val; + #{} -> none end end. +-spec lookup_list_keep_consts([icode_var() | icode_const()], var_map()) + -> [none | icode_fvar() | icode_const()]. + lookup_list_keep_consts(List, Info) -> lookup_list(List, fun lookup_keep_consts/2, Info, []). +-spec lookup_keep_consts(icode_var() | icode_const(), var_map()) + -> none | icode_fvar() | icode_const(). + lookup_keep_consts(Key, Tree) -> case hipe_icode:is_const(Key) of true -> Key; false -> - case gb_trees:lookup(Key, Tree) of - none -> none; - {value, {assigned, Val}} -> Val; - {value, Val} -> Val + case Tree of + #{Key := {assigned, Val}} -> Val; + #{Key := Val} -> Val; + #{} -> none end end. +-spec get_type(icode_argument()) -> erl_types:erl_type(). + get_type(Var) -> case hipe_icode:is_const(Var) of true -> erl_types:t_from_term(hipe_icode:const_value(Var)); @@ -695,98 +802,108 @@ get_type(Var) -> %% ------------------------------------------------------------ %% Handling the map from variables to fp-variables +-spec join_maps([edge()], edge_map()) -> initial_var_map(). + join_maps(Edges, EdgeMap) -> - join_maps(Edges, EdgeMap, gb_trees:empty()). + join_maps(Edges, EdgeMap, #{}). join_maps([Edge = {Pred, _}|Left], EdgeMap, Map) -> - case gb_trees:lookup(Edge, EdgeMap) of - none -> + case EdgeMap of + #{Edge := OldMap} -> + NewMap = join_maps0(maps:to_list(OldMap), Pred, Map), + join_maps(Left, EdgeMap, NewMap); + #{} -> %% All predecessors have not been handled. Use empty map. - gb_trees:empty(); - {value, OldMap} -> - NewMap = join_maps0(gb_trees:to_list(OldMap), Pred, Map), - join_maps(Left, EdgeMap, NewMap) + #{} end; join_maps([], _, Map) -> Map. -join_maps0([{phi, _}|Tail], Pred, Map) -> - join_maps0(Tail, Pred, Map); -join_maps0([{Var, FVar}|Tail], Pred, Map) -> - case gb_trees:lookup(Var, Map) of - none -> - join_maps0(Tail, Pred, gb_trees:enter(Var, [{Pred, FVar}], Map)); - {value, List} -> +-spec join_maps0(list(), icode_lbl(), initial_var_map()) -> initial_var_map(). + +join_maps0([{Var=#icode_variable{kind=var}, FVar}|Tail], Pred, Map) -> + case Map of + #{Var := List} -> case lists:keyfind(Pred, 1, List) of false -> - join_maps0(Tail, Pred, gb_trees:update(Var, [{Pred, FVar}|List], Map)); + join_maps0(Tail, Pred, Map#{Var := [{Pred, FVar}|List]}); {Pred, FVar} -> %% No problem. join_maps0(Tail, Pred, Map); _ -> exit('New binding to same variable') - end + end; + #{} -> + join_maps0(Tail, Pred, Map#{Var => [{Pred, FVar}]}) end; join_maps0([], _, Map) -> Map. +-spec filter_map(initial_var_map(), pos_integer()) -> var_map_phi(). + filter_map(Map, NofPreds) -> - filter_map(gb_trees:to_list(Map), NofPreds, Map). + filter_map(maps:to_list(Map), NofPreds, Map). + +-spec filter_map([{icode_var(), incoming_fvars()}], pos_integer(), + var_map_phi()) -> var_map_phi(). filter_map([{Var, Bindings}|Left], NofPreds, Map) -> case length(Bindings) =:= NofPreds of true -> + BindingsAllAssigned = lists:all(fun({_, {assigned, _}}) -> true; + ({_, _}) -> false + end, Bindings), case all_args_equal(Bindings) of true -> - {_, FVar} = hd(Bindings), - filter_map(Left, NofPreds, gb_trees:update(Var, FVar, Map)); + NewBinding = + case hd(Bindings) of + {Pred, {assigned, FVar0}} when is_integer(Pred) -> + case BindingsAllAssigned of + true -> {assigned, FVar0}; + false -> FVar0 + end; + {Pred, FVar0} when is_integer(Pred) -> FVar0 + end, + filter_map(Left, NofPreds, Map#{Var := NewBinding}); false -> PhiDst = hipe_icode:mk_new_fvar(), PhiArgs = strip_of_assigned(Bindings), NewMap = - case gb_trees:lookup(phi, Map) of - none -> - gb_trees:insert(phi, [{PhiDst, PhiArgs}], Map); - {value, Val} -> - gb_trees:update(phi, [{PhiDst, PhiArgs}|Val], Map) + case Map of + #{phi := Val} -> + Map#{phi := [{PhiDst, PhiArgs}|Val]}; + #{} -> + Map#{phi => [{PhiDst, PhiArgs}]} end, NewBinding = - case bindings_are_assigned(Bindings) of + case BindingsAllAssigned of true -> {assigned, PhiDst}; false -> PhiDst end, - filter_map(Left, NofPreds, gb_trees:update(Var, NewBinding, NewMap)) + filter_map(Left, NofPreds, NewMap#{Var := NewBinding}) end; false -> - filter_map(Left, NofPreds, gb_trees:delete(Var, Map)) + filter_map(Left, NofPreds, maps:remove(Var, Map)) end; filter_map([], _NofPreds, Map) -> Map. -bindings_are_assigned([{_, {assigned, _}}|Left]) -> - assert_assigned(Left), - true; -bindings_are_assigned(Bindings) -> - assert_not_assigned(Bindings), - false. - -assert_assigned([{_, {assigned, _}}|Left]) -> - assert_assigned(Left); -assert_assigned([]) -> - ok. - -assert_not_assigned([{_, FVar}|Left]) -> - true = hipe_icode:is_fvar(FVar), - assert_not_assigned(Left); -assert_not_assigned([]) -> - ok. +-spec all_args_equal(incoming_fvars()) -> boolean(). %% all_args_equal returns true if the mapping for a variable is the %% same from all predecessors, i.e., we do not need a phi-node. +%% During the fixpoint loop, a mapping might become assigned, without that +%% information having propagated into all predecessors. We take care to answer +%% true even if FVar is only assigned in some predecessors. + +all_args_equal([{_, {assigned, FVar}}|Left]) -> + all_args_equal(Left, FVar); all_args_equal([{_, FVar}|Left]) -> all_args_equal(Left, FVar). +all_args_equal([{_, {assigned, FVar1}}|Left], FVar1) -> + all_args_equal(Left, FVar1); all_args_equal([{_, FVar1}|Left], FVar1) -> all_args_equal(Left, FVar1); all_args_equal([], _) -> @@ -795,20 +912,24 @@ all_args_equal(_, _) -> false. +-spec add_new_bindings_unassigned([icode_var()], var_map()) -> var_map(). + %% We differentiate between values that have been assigned as %% tagged variables and those that got a 'virtual' binding. add_new_bindings_unassigned([Var|Left], Map) -> FVar = hipe_icode:mk_new_fvar(), - add_new_bindings_unassigned(Left, gb_trees:insert(Var, FVar, Map)); + add_new_bindings_unassigned(Left, Map#{Var => FVar}); add_new_bindings_unassigned([], Map) -> Map. +-spec add_new_bindings_assigned([icode_var()], var_map()) -> var_map(). + add_new_bindings_assigned([Var|Left], Map) -> case lookup(Var, Map) of none -> FVar = hipe_icode:mk_new_fvar(), - NewMap = gb_trees:insert(Var, {assigned, FVar}, Map), + NewMap = Map#{Var => {assigned, FVar}}, add_new_bindings_assigned(Left, NewMap); _ -> add_new_bindings_assigned(Left, Map) @@ -816,6 +937,8 @@ add_new_bindings_assigned([Var|Left], Map) -> add_new_bindings_assigned([], Map) -> Map. +-spec strip_of_assigned(incoming_fvars()) -> [{icode_lbl(), icode_fvar()}]. + strip_of_assigned(List) -> strip_of_assigned(List, []). @@ -830,6 +953,8 @@ strip_of_assigned([], Acc) -> %% Help functions for the transformation from ordinary instruction to %% fp-instruction +-spec is_fop_cand(icode_instr()) -> boolean(). + is_fop_cand(I) -> case hipe_icode:call_fun(I) of '/' -> true; @@ -840,6 +965,8 @@ is_fop_cand(I) -> end end. +-spec any_is_float([icode_argument()]) -> boolean(). + any_is_float(Vars) -> lists:any(fun (V) -> erl_types:t_is_float(get_type(V)) end, Vars). @@ -866,25 +993,32 @@ fun_to_fop(Fun) -> end. +-spec must_be_tagged(icode_var(), var_map()) -> boolean(). + %% If there is a tagged version of this variable available we don't %% have to tag the untagged version. must_be_tagged(Var, Map) -> - case gb_trees:lookup(Var, Map) of - none -> false; - {value, {assigned, _}} -> false; - {value, Val} -> hipe_icode:is_fvar(Val) + case Map of + #{Var := {assigned, _}} -> false; + #{Var := Val} -> hipe_icode:is_fvar(Val); + #{} -> false end. +-spec get_conv_instrs([icode_argument()], var_map()) -> icode_instrs(). + %% Converting to floating point variables get_conv_instrs(Vars, Map) -> get_conv_instrs(Vars, Map, []). +-spec get_conv_instrs([icode_argument()], var_map(), icode_instrs()) + -> icode_instrs(). + get_conv_instrs([Var|Left], Map, Acc) -> - {_, Dst} = gb_trees:get(Var, Map), - NewI = + #{Var := {_, Dst}} = Map, + NewI = case erl_types:t_is_float(get_type(Var)) of true -> [hipe_icode:mk_primop([Dst], unsafe_untag_float, [Var])]; @@ -896,6 +1030,8 @@ get_conv_instrs([], _, Acc) -> Acc. +-spec conv_consts([icode_const()], icode_instr()) -> icode_instr(). + conv_consts(ConstArgs, I) -> conv_consts(ConstArgs, I, []). @@ -934,63 +1070,79 @@ state__bb_add(S = #state{cfg = Cfg}, Label, BB) -> NewCfg = hipe_icode_cfg:bb_add(Cfg, Label, BB), S#state{cfg = NewCfg}. +-spec state__map(state(), icode_lbl()) -> initial_var_map(). + state__map(S = #state{edge_map = EM}, To) -> join_maps([{From, To} || From <- state__pred(S, To)], EM). +-spec state__map_update(state(), icode_lbl(), icode_lbl(), var_map()) -> + fixpoint | state(). + state__map_update(S = #state{edge_map = EM}, From, To, Map) -> FromTo = {From, To}, MapChanged = - case gb_trees:lookup(FromTo, EM) of - {value, Map1} -> not match(Map1, Map); - none -> true + case EM of + #{FromTo := Map1} -> not match(Map1, Map); + #{} -> true end, case MapChanged of true -> - NewEM = gb_trees:enter(FromTo, Map, EM), + NewEM = EM#{FromTo => Map}, S#state{edge_map = NewEM}; false -> fixpoint end. +-spec state__join_in_block(state(), icode_lbl()) + -> fixpoint | {state(), in_block()}. + state__join_in_block(S = #state{fp_ebb_map = Map}, Label) -> Pred = state__pred(S, Label), Edges = [{X, Label} || X <- Pred], - NewInBlock = join_in_block([gb_trees:lookup(X, Map) || X <- Edges]), + NewInBlock = join_in_block([maps:find(X, Map) || X <- Edges]), InBlockLabel = {inblock_in, Label}, - case gb_trees:lookup(InBlockLabel, Map) of - none -> - NewMap = gb_trees:insert(InBlockLabel, NewInBlock, Map), - {S#state{fp_ebb_map = NewMap}, NewInBlock}; - {value, NewInBlock} -> + case Map of + #{InBlockLabel := NewInBlock} -> fixpoint; - _Other -> - NewMap = gb_trees:update(InBlockLabel, NewInBlock, Map), + _ -> + NewMap = Map#{InBlockLabel => NewInBlock}, {S#state{fp_ebb_map = NewMap}, NewInBlock} end. +-spec state__in_block_out_update(state(), icode_lbl(), in_block()) + -> state(). + state__in_block_out_update(S = #state{fp_ebb_map = Map}, Label, NewInBlock) -> Succ = state__succ(S, Label), Edges = [{Label, X} || X <- Succ], NewMap = update_edges(Edges, NewInBlock, Map), - NewMap1 = gb_trees:enter({inblock_out, Label}, NewInBlock, NewMap), + NewMap1 = NewMap#{{inblock_out, Label} => NewInBlock}, S#state{fp_ebb_map = NewMap1}. +-spec update_edges([edge()], in_block(), fp_ebb_map()) -> fp_ebb_map(). + update_edges([Edge|Left], NewInBlock, Map) -> - NewMap = gb_trees:enter(Edge, NewInBlock, Map), + NewMap = Map#{Edge => NewInBlock}, update_edges(Left, NewInBlock, NewMap); update_edges([], _NewInBlock, NewMap) -> NewMap. +-spec join_in_block([error | {ok, in_block()}]) -> in_block(). + join_in_block([]) -> false; -join_in_block([none|_]) -> +join_in_block([error|_]) -> false; -join_in_block([{value, InBlock}|Left]) -> +join_in_block([{ok, InBlock}|Left]) -> join_in_block(Left, InBlock). -join_in_block([none|_], _Current) -> +-spec join_in_block([error | {ok, in_block()}], Current) + -> false | Current when + Current :: in_block(). + +join_in_block([error|_], _Current) -> false; -join_in_block([{value, InBlock}|Left], Current) -> +join_in_block([{ok, InBlock}|Left], Current) -> if Current =:= InBlock -> join_in_block(Left, Current); Current =:= false -> false; InBlock =:= false -> false; @@ -998,19 +1150,25 @@ join_in_block([{value, InBlock}|Left], Current) -> end; join_in_block([], Current) -> Current. - + + +-spec state__get_in_block_in(state(), icode_lbl()) -> in_block(). state__get_in_block_in(#state{fp_ebb_map = Map}, Label) -> - gb_trees:get({inblock_in, Label}, Map). + maps:get({inblock_in, Label}, Map). state__get_in_block_out(#state{fp_ebb_map = Map}, Label) -> - gb_trees:get({inblock_out, Label}, Map). + maps:get({inblock_out, Label}, Map). + +-spec new_worklist(state()) -> worklist(). new_worklist(#state{cfg = Cfg}) -> Start = hipe_icode_cfg:start_label(Cfg), {[Start], [], gb_sets:insert(Start, gb_sets:empty())}. +-spec get_work(worklist()) -> none | {icode_lbl(), worklist()}. + get_work({[Label|Left], List, Set}) -> {Label, {Left, List, gb_sets:delete(Label, Set)}}; get_work({[], [], _Set}) -> @@ -1018,6 +1176,8 @@ get_work({[], [], _Set}) -> get_work({[], List, Set}) -> get_work({lists:reverse(List), [], Set}). +-spec add_work(worklist(), [icode_lbl()]) -> worklist(). + add_work({List1, List2, Set} = Work, [Label|Left]) -> case gb_sets:is_member(Label, Set) of true -> @@ -1030,15 +1190,7 @@ add_work({List1, List2, Set} = Work, [Label|Left]) -> add_work(WorkList, []) -> WorkList. -match(Tree1, Tree2) -> - match_1(gb_trees:to_list(Tree1), Tree2) andalso - match_1(gb_trees:to_list(Tree2), Tree1). +-spec match(var_map(), var_map()) -> boolean(). -match_1([{Key, Val}|Left], Tree2) -> - case gb_trees:lookup(Key, Tree2) of - {value, Val} -> - match_1(Left, Tree2); - _ -> false - end; -match_1([], _) -> - true. +match(Tree1, Tree2) when is_map(Tree1), is_map(Tree2) -> + Tree1 =:= Tree2. diff --git a/lib/hipe/test/basic_SUITE_data/basic_floats.erl b/lib/hipe/test/basic_SUITE_data/basic_floats.erl index eec175075a..ce28f6e156 100644 --- a/lib/hipe/test/basic_SUITE_data/basic_floats.erl +++ b/lib/hipe/test/basic_SUITE_data/basic_floats.erl @@ -18,6 +18,8 @@ test() -> ok = test_catch_fp_conv(), ok = test_fp_with_fp_exceptions(), %% ok = test_fmt_double_fpe_leak(), % this requires printing + ok = test_icode_type_crash(), + ok = test_icode_type_crash_2(), ok. %%-------------------------------------------------------------------- @@ -178,3 +180,71 @@ test_fmt_double_fpe_leak(X, Y) -> math:log10(Y). int_two() -> 2. + +%%-------------------------------------------------------------------- +%% Contains code which confuses the icode_type analysis and results +%% in a compiler crash. Stipped down from code sent by Paul Guyot. +%% Compiles alright with the option 'no_icode_type' but that defeats +%% the purpose of the test. + +test_icode_type_crash() -> + Fun = f(1, 2, 3), + 42.0 = Fun(), + ok. + +f(A, B, C) -> + fun () -> + X = case A of + 0 -> 1 / B; + _ -> A / C + end, + Y = case B of + a -> 1.0; + b -> 2.0; + _ -> 6.0 + end, + Z = case C of + c -> 0.1 * X; + _ -> 7.0 + end, + Y * Z + end. + +%%-------------------------------------------------------------------- +%% Contains another case that crashed hipe_icode_fp. This sample was +%% sent by Mattias Jansson (25 Nov 2015). It compiled alright with the +%% option 'no_icode_type' but that defeats the purpose of the test. +%% Unfortunately, the execution of this code goes into an infinite +%% loop, even if the map in the second argument of eat_what/2 gets the +%% appropriate key-value pairs. Still, it is retained as a test +%% because it exposed a different crash than test_icode_type_crash/0. + +test_icode_type_crash_2() -> + {'EXIT', {function_clause, _}} = (catch eat()), + ok. + +eat() -> + eat_what(1.0, #{}). + +eat_what(Factor, #{rat_type := LT} = Rat) -> + #{cheese := Cheese} = Rat, + UnitCheese = Cheese / 2, + RetA = case eat() of + {full, RetA1} -> + CheeseB2 = min(RetA1, UnitCheese) * Factor, + case eat() of + full -> {win, RetA1}; + hungry -> {partial, RetA1 - CheeseB2} + end; + AOther -> AOther + end, + RetB = case eat() of + {full, RetB1} -> + CheeseA2 = min(RetB1, UnitCheese) * Factor, + rat:init(single, LT, CheeseA2), + case eat() of + full -> {full, RetB1}; + hungry -> {hungry, RetB1 - CheeseA2} + end + end, + {RetA, RetB}. |