diff options
author | Björn Gustavsson <[email protected]> | 2016-05-10 13:15:04 +0200 |
---|---|---|
committer | Björn Gustavsson <[email protected]> | 2016-05-13 10:52:24 +0200 |
commit | 6d66e21dd6b1b891f917e86902edaea3ed86a6eb (patch) | |
tree | b1482694f3061c3bb13a43725c7a8f8cb3ea0218 /lib | |
parent | b956a9ec915f4ec0ab3d0136ea32d8f5f159ae37 (diff) | |
download | otp-6d66e21dd6b1b891f917e86902edaea3ed86a6eb.tar.gz otp-6d66e21dd6b1b891f917e86902edaea3ed86a6eb.tar.bz2 otp-6d66e21dd6b1b891f917e86902edaea3ed86a6eb.zip |
test_lib: Correct calculation of number of processes
Correct calculation of the number of parallel processes to use
when cover is used. It was supposed not to exceed 4 (according to
the comment), but it was calculated as the number of schedulers.
On my computer, having 8 schedulers, this change made the compiler
test suite with cover run almost twice as fast.
Diffstat (limited to 'lib')
-rw-r--r-- | lib/compiler/test/test_lib.erl | 3 |
1 files changed, 2 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/lib/compiler/test/test_lib.erl b/lib/compiler/test/test_lib.erl index d141d86021..a9236df414 100644 --- a/lib/compiler/test/test_lib.erl +++ b/lib/compiler/test/test_lib.erl @@ -106,8 +106,9 @@ p_run(Test, List) -> %% slightly faster than using 3. Using more than %% 4 would not buy us much and could actually be %% slower. - max(S, 4) + min(S, 4) end, + io:format("p_run: ~p parallel processes\n", [N]), p_run_loop(Test, List, N, [], 0, 0). p_run_loop(_, [], _, [], Errors, Ws) -> |