diff options
| -rw-r--r-- | lib/stdlib/test/ets_SUITE.erl | 68 |
1 files changed, 53 insertions, 15 deletions
diff --git a/lib/stdlib/test/ets_SUITE.erl b/lib/stdlib/test/ets_SUITE.erl index b6c94a6f6d..8c7d3fe55b 100644 --- a/lib/stdlib/test/ets_SUITE.erl +++ b/lib/stdlib/test/ets_SUITE.erl @@ -75,6 +75,7 @@ -export([otp_9932/1]). -export([otp_9423/1]). -export([otp_10182/1]). +-export([memory_check_summary/1]). -export([init_per_testcase/2, end_per_testcase/2]). %% Convenience for manual testing @@ -149,7 +150,9 @@ all() -> give_away, setopts, bad_table, types, otp_10182, otp_9932, - otp_9423]. + otp_9423, + + memory_check_summary]. % MUST BE LAST groups() -> [{new, [], @@ -185,7 +188,8 @@ init_per_suite(Config) -> end_per_suite(_Config) -> stop_spawn_logger(), - catch erts_debug:set_internal_state(available_internal_state, false). + catch erts_debug:set_internal_state(available_internal_state, false), + ok. init_per_group(_GroupName, Config) -> Config. @@ -193,6 +197,26 @@ init_per_group(_GroupName, Config) -> end_per_group(_GroupName, Config) -> Config. +%% Test that we did not have "too many" failed verify_etsmem()'s +%% in the test suite. +%% verify_etsmem() may give a low number of false positives +%% as concurrent activities, such as lingering processes +%% from earlier test suites, may do unrelated ets (de)allocations. +memory_check_summary(_Config) -> + case whereis(ets_test_spawn_logger) of + undefined -> + ?t:fail("No spawn logger exist"); + _ -> + ets_test_spawn_logger ! {self(), get_failed_memchecks}, + receive {get_failed_memchecks, FailedMemchecks} -> ok end, + io:format("Failed memchecks: ~p\n",[FailedMemchecks]), + if FailedMemchecks > 3 -> + ct:fail("Too many failed (~p) memchecks", [FailedMemchecks]); + true -> + ok + end + end. + %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% @@ -5632,7 +5656,8 @@ verify_etsmem({MemInfo,AllTabs}) -> io:format("Actual: ~p", [MemInfo2]), io:format("Changed tables before: ~p\n",[AllTabs -- AllTabs2]), io:format("Changed tables after: ~p\n", [AllTabs2 -- AllTabs]), - ?t:fail() + ets_test_spawn_logger ! failed_memcheck, + {comment, "Failed memory check"} end. @@ -5654,10 +5679,10 @@ stop_loopers(Loopers) -> looper(Fun, State) -> looper(Fun, Fun(State)). -spawn_logger(Procs) -> +spawn_logger(Procs, FailedMemchecks) -> receive {new_test_proc, Proc} -> - spawn_logger([Proc|Procs]); + spawn_logger([Proc|Procs], FailedMemchecks); {sync_test_procs, Kill, From} -> lists:foreach(fun (Proc) when From == Proc -> ok; @@ -5680,7 +5705,14 @@ spawn_logger(Procs) -> end end, Procs), From ! test_procs_synced, - spawn_logger([From]) + spawn_logger([From], FailedMemchecks); + + failed_memcheck -> + spawn_logger(Procs, FailedMemchecks+1); + + {Pid, get_failed_memchecks} -> + Pid ! {get_failed_memchecks, FailedMemchecks}, + spawn_logger(Procs, FailedMemchecks) end. pid_status(Pid) -> @@ -5696,7 +5728,7 @@ start_spawn_logger() -> case whereis(ets_test_spawn_logger) of Pid when is_pid(Pid) -> true; _ -> register(ets_test_spawn_logger, - spawn_opt(fun () -> spawn_logger([]) end, + spawn_opt(fun () -> spawn_logger([], 0) end, [{priority, max}])) end. @@ -5707,8 +5739,7 @@ start_spawn_logger() -> stop_spawn_logger() -> Mon = erlang:monitor(process, ets_test_spawn_logger), (catch exit(whereis(ets_test_spawn_logger), kill)), - receive {'DOWN', Mon, _, _, _} -> ok end, - ok. + receive {'DOWN', Mon, _, _, _} -> ok end. wait_for_test_procs() -> wait_for_test_procs(false). @@ -5808,7 +5839,7 @@ spawn_monitor_with_pid(Pid, Fun, N) -> end) of Pid -> {Pid, erlang:monitor(process, Pid)}; - Other -> + _Other -> spawn_monitor_with_pid(Pid,Fun,N-1) end. @@ -6114,11 +6145,18 @@ repeat_for_opts(F, OptGenList) -> repeat_for_opts(F, OptGenList, []). repeat_for_opts(F, [], Acc) -> - lists:map(fun(Opts) -> - OptList = lists:filter(fun(E) -> E =/= void end, Opts), - io:format("Calling with options ~p\n",[OptList]), - F(OptList) - end, Acc); + lists:foldl(fun(Opts, RV_Acc) -> + OptList = lists:filter(fun(E) -> E =/= void end, Opts), + io:format("Calling with options ~p\n",[OptList]), + RV = F(OptList), + case RV_Acc of + {comment,_} -> RV_Acc; + _ -> case RV of + {comment,_} -> RV; + _ -> [RV | RV_Acc] + end + end + end, [], Acc); repeat_for_opts(F, [OptList | Tail], []) when is_list(OptList) -> repeat_for_opts(F, Tail, [[Opt] || Opt <- OptList]); repeat_for_opts(F, [OptList | Tail], AccList) when is_list(OptList) -> |