aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/erts/doc/src/erl.xml
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'erts/doc/src/erl.xml')
-rw-r--r--erts/doc/src/erl.xml58
1 files changed, 56 insertions, 2 deletions
diff --git a/erts/doc/src/erl.xml b/erts/doc/src/erl.xml
index bb741c7836..f477280a6f 100644
--- a/erts/doc/src/erl.xml
+++ b/erts/doc/src/erl.xml
@@ -41,6 +41,26 @@
to scroll back to text which has scrolled off the screen.
The <c><![CDATA[erl]]></c> program must be used, however, in pipelines or if
you want to redirect standard input or output.</p>
+ <note><p>As of ERTS version 5.8 (OTP-R14A) the runtime system will by
+ default bind schedulers to logical processors using the
+ <c>default_bind</c> bind type if the amount of schedulers are
+ at least equal to the amount of logical processors configured,
+ binding of schedulers is supported, and a CPU topology is
+ available at startup.
+ </p><p>
+ If the Erlang runtime system is the only operating system
+ process that binds threads to logical processors, this
+ improves the performance of the runtime system. However,
+ if other operating system processes (as for example
+ another Erlang runtime system) also bind threads to
+ logical processors, there might be a performance penalty
+ instead. If this is the case you, are are advised to
+ unbind the schedulers using the
+ <seealso marker="#+sbt">+sbtu</seealso> command line argument,
+ or by invoking
+ <seealso marker="erlang#system_flag_scheduler_bind_type">erlang:system_flag(scheduler_bind_type,
+ unbound)</seealso>.</p>
+ </note>
</description>
<funcs>
<func>
@@ -583,6 +603,24 @@
<item>
<p>Force ets memory block to be moved on realloc.</p>
</item>
+ <tag><marker id="+rg"><c><![CDATA[+rg ReaderGroupsLimit]]></c></marker></tag>
+ <item>
+ <p>Limits the amount of reader groups used by read/write locks
+ optimized for read operations in the Erlang runtime system. By
+ default the reader groups limit equals 8.</p>
+ <p>When the amount of schedulers is less than or equal to the reader
+ groups limit, each scheduler has its own reader group. When the
+ amount of schedulers is larger than the reader groups limit,
+ schedulers share reader groups. Shared reader groups degrades
+ read lock and read unlock performance while a large amount of
+ reader groups degrades write lock performance, so the limit is a
+ tradeoff between performance for read operations and performance
+ for write operations. Each reader group currently consumes 64 byte
+ in each read/write lock. Also note that a runtime system using
+ shared reader groups benefits from <seealso marker="#+sbt">binding
+ schedulers to logical processors</seealso>, since the reader groups
+ are distributed better between schedulers.</p>
+ </item>
<tag><marker id="+S"><c><![CDATA[+S Schedulers:SchedulerOnline]]></c></marker></tag>
<item>
<p>Sets the amount of scheduler threads to create and scheduler
@@ -647,8 +685,8 @@
<seealso marker="erlang#system_flag_scheduler_bind_type">erlang:system_flag(scheduler_bind_type, default_bind)</seealso>.
</p></item>
</taglist>
- <p>Binding of schedulers are currently only supported on newer
- Linux and Solaris systems.</p>
+ <p>Binding of schedulers is currently only supported on newer
+ Linux, Solaris, and Windows systems.</p>
<p>If no CPU topology is available when the <c>+sbt</c> flag
is processed and <c>BindType</c> is any other type than
<c>u</c>, the runtime system will fail to start. CPU
@@ -657,6 +695,22 @@
that the <c>+sct</c> flag may have to be passed before the
<c>+sbt</c> flag on the command line (in case no CPU topology
has been automatically detected).</p>
+ <p>The runtime system will by default bind schedulers to logical
+ processors using the <c>default_bind</c> bind type if the amount
+ of schedulers are at least equal to the amount of logical
+ processors configured, binding of schedulers is supported,
+ and a CPU topology is available at startup.
+ </p>
+ <p><em>NOTE:</em> If the Erlang runtime system is the only operating
+ system process that binds threads to logical processors, this
+ improves the performance of the runtime system. However, if other
+ operating system processes (as for example another Erlang runtime
+ system) also bind threads to logical processors, there might be a
+ performance penalty instead. If this is the case you, are advised
+ to unbind the schedulers using the <c>+sbtu</c> command line
+ argument, or by invoking
+ <seealso marker="erlang#system_flag_scheduler_bind_type">erlang:system_flag(scheduler_bind_type,
+ unbound)</seealso>.</p>
<p>For more information, see
<seealso marker="erlang#system_flag_scheduler_bind_type">erlang:system_flag(scheduler_bind_type, SchedulerBindType)</seealso>.
</p>