aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/lib/common_test/src/ct_testspec.erl
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'lib/common_test/src/ct_testspec.erl')
-rw-r--r--lib/common_test/src/ct_testspec.erl369
1 files changed, 282 insertions, 87 deletions
diff --git a/lib/common_test/src/ct_testspec.erl b/lib/common_test/src/ct_testspec.erl
index 202d8f9373..e341391a91 100644
--- a/lib/common_test/src/ct_testspec.erl
+++ b/lib/common_test/src/ct_testspec.erl
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
%%
%% %CopyrightBegin%
%%
-%% Copyright Ericsson AB 2006-2012. All Rights Reserved.
+%% Copyright Ericsson AB 2006-2013. All Rights Reserved.
%%
%% The contents of this file are subject to the Erlang Public License,
%% Version 1.1, (the "License"); you may not use this file except in
@@ -28,7 +28,6 @@
collect_tests_from_file/2, collect_tests_from_file/3]).
-include("ct_util.hrl").
-
-define(testspec_fields, record_info(fields, testspec)).
%%%------------------------------------------------------------------
@@ -93,7 +92,7 @@ prepare_tests(TestSpec) when is_record(TestSpec,testspec) ->
%% run_per_node/2 takes the Run list as input and returns a list
%% of {Node,RunPerNode,[]} tuples where the tests have been sorted
%% on a per node basis.
-run_per_node([{{Node,Dir},Test}|Ts],Result, MergeTests) ->
+run_per_node([{{Node,Dir},Test}|Ts],Result,MergeTests) ->
{value,{Node,{Run,Skip}}} = lists:keysearch(Node,1,Result),
Run1 = case MergeTests of
false ->
@@ -190,7 +189,7 @@ prepare_suites(_Node,_Dir,[],Run,Skip) ->
prepare_cases(Node,Dir,Suite,Cases) ->
case get_skipped_cases(Node,Dir,Suite,Cases) of
- SkipAll=[{{Node,Dir},{Suite,_Cmt}}] -> % all cases to be skipped
+ SkipAll=[{{Node,Dir},{Suite,_Cmt}}] -> % all cases to be skipped
%% note: this adds an 'all' test even if only skip is specified
{[{{Node,Dir},{Suite,all}}],SkipAll};
Skipped ->
@@ -241,34 +240,147 @@ get_skipped_cases1(_,_,_,[]) ->
%%% collect_tests_from_file reads a testspec file and returns a record
%%% containing the data found.
-collect_tests_from_file(Specs, Relaxed) ->
+collect_tests_from_file(Specs,Relaxed) ->
collect_tests_from_file(Specs,[node()],Relaxed).
collect_tests_from_file(Specs,Nodes,Relaxed) when is_list(Nodes) ->
NodeRefs = lists:map(fun(N) -> {undefined,N} end, Nodes),
- catch collect_tests_from_file1(Specs,#testspec{nodes=NodeRefs},Relaxed).
+ %% [Spec1,Spec2,...] means create one testpec record per Spec file
+ %% [[Spec1,Spec2,...]] means merge all specs into one testspec record
+ {Join,Specs1} = if is_list(hd(hd(Specs))) -> {true,hd(Specs)};
+ true -> {false,Specs}
+ end,
+ Specs2 = [filename:absname(S) || S <- Specs1],
+ TS0 = #testspec{nodes=NodeRefs},
+
+ try create_specs(Specs2,TS0,Relaxed,Join) of
+ {{[],_},SeparateTestSpecs} ->
+ filter_and_convert(SeparateTestSpecs);
+ {{_,#testspec{tests=[]}},SeparateTestSpecs} ->
+ filter_and_convert(SeparateTestSpecs);
+ {Joined,SeparateTestSpecs} ->
+ [filter_and_convert(Joined) |
+ filter_and_convert(SeparateTestSpecs)]
+ catch
+ _:Error ->
+ Error
+ end.
+
+filter_and_convert(Joined) when is_tuple(Joined) ->
+ hd(filter_and_convert([Joined]));
+filter_and_convert([{_,#testspec{tests=[]}}|TSs]) ->
+ filter_and_convert(TSs);
+filter_and_convert([{[{SpecFile,MergeTests}|SMs],TestSpec}|TSs]) ->
+ #testspec{config = CfgFiles} = TestSpec,
+ TestSpec1 = TestSpec#testspec{config = delete_dups(CfgFiles),
+ merge_tests = MergeTests},
+ %% set the merge_tests value for the testspec to the value
+ %% of the first test spec in the set
+ [{[SpecFile | [SF || {SF,_} <- SMs]], TestSpec1} | filter_and_convert(TSs)];
+filter_and_convert([]) ->
+ [].
+
+delete_dups(Elems) ->
+ delete_dups1(lists:reverse(Elems),[]).
+
+delete_dups1([E|Es],Keep) ->
+ case lists:member(E,Es) of
+ true ->
+ delete_dups1(Es,Keep);
+ false ->
+ delete_dups1(Es,[E|Keep])
+ end;
+delete_dups1([],Keep) ->
+ Keep.
+
+create_specs(Specs,TestSpec,Relaxed,Join) ->
+ SpecsTree = create_spec_tree(Specs,TestSpec,Join,[]),
+ create_specs(SpecsTree,TestSpec,Relaxed).
-collect_tests_from_file1([Spec|Specs],TestSpec,Relaxed) ->
+create_spec_tree([Spec|Specs],TS,JoinWithNext,Known) ->
SpecDir = filename:dirname(filename:absname(Spec)),
- case file:consult(Spec) of
- {ok,Terms} ->
- case collect_tests(Terms,
- TestSpec#testspec{spec_dir=SpecDir},
- Relaxed) of
- TS = #testspec{tests=Tests, logdir=LogDirs} when Specs == [] ->
- LogDirs1 = lists:delete(".",LogDirs) ++ ["."],
- TS#testspec{tests=lists:flatten(Tests), logdir=LogDirs1};
- TS = #testspec{alias = As, nodes = Ns} ->
- TS1 = TS#testspec{alias = lists:reverse(As),
- nodes = lists:reverse(Ns)},
- collect_tests_from_file1(Specs,TS1,Relaxed)
- end;
- {error,Reason} ->
- ReasonStr =
- lists:flatten(io_lib:format("~s",
- [file:format_error(Reason)])),
- throw({error,{Spec,ReasonStr}})
- end.
+ TS1 = TS#testspec{spec_dir=SpecDir},
+ SpecAbsName = get_absfile(Spec,TS1),
+ case lists:member(SpecAbsName,Known) of
+ true ->
+ throw({error,{cyclic_reference,SpecAbsName}});
+ false ->
+ case file:consult(SpecAbsName) of
+ {ok,Terms} ->
+ Terms1 = replace_names(Terms),
+ {InclJoin,InclSep} = get_included_specs(Terms1,TS1),
+ {SpecAbsName,Terms1,
+ create_spec_tree(InclJoin,TS,true,[SpecAbsName|Known]),
+ create_spec_tree(InclSep,TS,false,[SpecAbsName|Known]),
+ JoinWithNext,
+ create_spec_tree(Specs,TS,JoinWithNext,Known)};
+ {error,Reason} ->
+ ReasonStr =
+ lists:flatten(io_lib:format("~s",
+ [file:format_error(Reason)])),
+ throw({error,{SpecAbsName,ReasonStr}})
+ end
+ end;
+create_spec_tree([],_TS,_JoinWithNext,_Known) ->
+ [].
+
+create_specs({Spec,Terms,InclJoin,InclSep,JoinWithNext,NextSpec},
+ TestSpec,Relaxed) ->
+ SpecDir = filename:dirname(filename:absname(Spec)),
+ TestSpec1 = create_spec(Terms,TestSpec#testspec{spec_dir=SpecDir},
+ JoinWithNext,Relaxed),
+
+ {{JoinSpecs1,JoinTS1},Separate1} = create_specs(InclJoin,TestSpec1,Relaxed),
+
+ {{JoinSpecs2,JoinTS2},Separate2} =
+ case JoinWithNext of
+ true ->
+ create_specs(NextSpec,JoinTS1,Relaxed);
+ false ->
+ {{[],JoinTS1},[]}
+ end,
+ {SepJoinSpecs,Separate3} = create_specs(InclSep,TestSpec,Relaxed),
+ {SepJoinSpecs1,Separate4} =
+ case JoinWithNext of
+ true ->
+ {{[],TestSpec},[]};
+ false ->
+ create_specs(NextSpec,TestSpec,Relaxed)
+ end,
+
+ SpecInfo = {Spec,TestSpec1#testspec.merge_tests},
+ AllSeparate =
+ [TSData || TSData = {Ss,_TS} <- Separate3++Separate1++
+ [SepJoinSpecs]++Separate2++
+ [SepJoinSpecs1]++Separate4,
+ Ss /= []],
+
+ case {JoinWithNext,JoinSpecs1} of
+ {true,_} ->
+ {{[SpecInfo|(JoinSpecs1++JoinSpecs2)],JoinTS2},
+ AllSeparate};
+ {false,[]} ->
+ {{[],TestSpec},
+ [{[SpecInfo],TestSpec1}|AllSeparate]};
+ {false,_} ->
+ {{[SpecInfo|(JoinSpecs1++JoinSpecs2)],JoinTS2},
+ AllSeparate}
+ end;
+create_specs([],TestSpec,_Relaxed) ->
+ {{[],TestSpec},[]}.
+
+create_spec(Terms,TestSpec,JoinedByPrev,Relaxed) ->
+ %% it's the "includer" that decides the value of merge_tests
+ Terms1 = if not JoinedByPrev ->
+ [{set_merge_tests,true}|Terms];
+ true ->
+ [{set_merge_tests,false}|Terms]
+ end,
+ TS = #testspec{tests=Tests, logdir=LogDirs} =
+ collect_tests({false,Terms1},TestSpec,Relaxed),
+ LogDirs1 = lists:delete(".",LogDirs) ++ ["."],
+ TS#testspec{tests=lists:flatten(Tests),
+ logdir=LogDirs1}.
collect_tests_from_list(Terms,Relaxed) ->
collect_tests_from_list(Terms,[node()],Relaxed).
@@ -276,8 +388,8 @@ collect_tests_from_list(Terms,Relaxed) ->
collect_tests_from_list(Terms,Nodes,Relaxed) when is_list(Nodes) ->
{ok,Cwd} = file:get_cwd(),
NodeRefs = lists:map(fun(N) -> {undefined,N} end, Nodes),
- case catch collect_tests(Terms,#testspec{nodes=NodeRefs,
- spec_dir=Cwd},
+ case catch collect_tests({true,Terms},#testspec{nodes=NodeRefs,
+ spec_dir=Cwd},
Relaxed) of
E = {error,_} ->
E;
@@ -287,13 +399,28 @@ collect_tests_from_list(Terms,Nodes,Relaxed) when is_list(Nodes) ->
TS#testspec{tests=lists:flatten(Tests), logdir=LogDirs1}
end.
-collect_tests(Terms,TestSpec,Relaxed) ->
+collect_tests({Replace,Terms},TestSpec=#testspec{alias=As,nodes=Ns},Relaxed) ->
put(relaxed,Relaxed),
- Terms1 = replace_names(Terms),
- TestSpec1 = get_global(Terms1,TestSpec),
- TestSpec2 = get_all_nodes(Terms1,TestSpec1),
- {Terms2, TestSpec3} = filter_init_terms(Terms1, [], TestSpec2),
- add_tests(Terms2,TestSpec3).
+ Terms1 = if Replace -> replace_names(Terms);
+ true -> Terms
+ end,
+ {MergeTestsDef,Terms2} =
+ case proplists:get_value(set_merge_tests,Terms1,true) of
+ false ->
+ %% disable merge_tests
+ {TestSpec#testspec.merge_tests,
+ proplists:delete(merge_tests,Terms1)};
+ true ->
+ {true,Terms1}
+ end,
+ %% reverse nodes and aliases initially to get the order of them right
+ %% in case this spec is being joined with a previous one
+ TestSpec1 = get_global(Terms2,TestSpec#testspec{alias = lists:reverse(As),
+ nodes = lists:reverse(Ns),
+ merge_tests = MergeTestsDef}),
+ TestSpec2 = get_all_nodes(Terms2,TestSpec1),
+ {Terms3, TestSpec3} = filter_init_terms(Terms2, [], TestSpec2),
+ add_tests(Terms3,TestSpec3).
%% replace names (atoms) in the testspec matching those in 'define' terms by
%% searching recursively through tuples and lists
@@ -420,9 +547,30 @@ replace_names_in_node1(NodeStr,Defs=[{Name,Replacement}|Ds]) ->
replace_names_in_node1(NodeStr,[]) ->
NodeStr.
+%% look for other specification files, either to join with the
+%% current spec, or execute as separate test runs
+get_included_specs(Terms,TestSpec) ->
+ get_included_specs(Terms,TestSpec,[],[]).
+
+get_included_specs([{specs,How,SpecOrSpecs}|Ts],TestSpec,Join,Sep) ->
+ Specs = case SpecOrSpecs of
+ [File|_] when is_list(File) ->
+ [get_absfile(Spec,TestSpec) || Spec <- SpecOrSpecs];
+ [Ch|_] when is_integer(Ch) ->
+ [get_absfile(SpecOrSpecs,TestSpec)]
+ end,
+ if How == join ->
+ get_included_specs(Ts,TestSpec,Join++Specs,Sep);
+ true ->
+ get_included_specs(Ts,TestSpec,Join,Sep++Specs)
+ end;
+get_included_specs([_|Ts],TestSpec,Join,Sep) ->
+ get_included_specs(Ts,TestSpec,Join,Sep);
+get_included_specs([],_,Join,Sep) ->
+ {Join,Sep}.
%% global terms that will be used for analysing all other terms in the spec
-get_global([{merge_tests,Bool} | Ts], Spec) ->
+get_global([{merge_tests,Bool}|Ts],Spec) ->
get_global(Ts,Spec#testspec{merge_tests=Bool});
%% the 'define' term replaces the 'alias' and 'node' terms, but we need to keep
@@ -588,7 +736,7 @@ add_option({Key,Value},Node,List,WarnIfExists) when is_list(Value) ->
NewOption = case lists:keyfind(Key,1,OldOptions) of
{Key,OldOption} when WarnIfExists,OldOption/=[]->
io:format("There is an option ~w=~w already "
- "defined for node ~p, skipping new ~w~n",
+ "defined for node ~w, skipping new ~w~n",
[Key,OldOption,Node,Value]),
OldOption;
{Key,OldOption}->
@@ -637,7 +785,7 @@ add_tests([{suites,all_nodes,Dir,Ss}|Ts],Spec) ->
add_tests([{suites,Dir,Ss}|Ts],Spec) ->
add_tests([{suites,all_nodes,Dir,Ss}|Ts],Spec);
add_tests([{suites,Nodes,Dir,Ss}|Ts],Spec) when is_list(Nodes) ->
- Ts1 = separate(Nodes,suites,[Dir,Ss],Ts,Spec#testspec.nodes),
+ Ts1 = per_node(Nodes,suites,[Dir,Ss],Ts,Spec#testspec.nodes),
add_tests(Ts1,Spec);
add_tests([{suites,Node,Dir,Ss}|Ts],Spec) ->
Tests = Spec#testspec.tests,
@@ -660,11 +808,11 @@ add_tests([{groups,Dir,Suite,Gs}|Ts],Spec) ->
add_tests([{groups,Dir,Suite,Gs,{cases,TCs}}|Ts],Spec) ->
add_tests([{groups,all_nodes,Dir,Suite,Gs,{cases,TCs}}|Ts],Spec);
add_tests([{groups,Nodes,Dir,Suite,Gs}|Ts],Spec) when is_list(Nodes) ->
- Ts1 = separate(Nodes,groups,[Dir,Suite,Gs],Ts,Spec#testspec.nodes),
+ Ts1 = per_node(Nodes,groups,[Dir,Suite,Gs],Ts,Spec#testspec.nodes),
add_tests(Ts1,Spec);
add_tests([{groups,Nodes,Dir,Suite,Gs,{cases,TCs}}|Ts],
Spec) when is_list(Nodes) ->
- Ts1 = separate(Nodes,groups,[Dir,Suite,Gs,{cases,TCs}],Ts,
+ Ts1 = per_node(Nodes,groups,[Dir,Suite,Gs,{cases,TCs}],Ts,
Spec#testspec.nodes),
add_tests(Ts1,Spec);
add_tests([{groups,Node,Dir,Suite,Gs}|Ts],Spec) ->
@@ -688,7 +836,7 @@ add_tests([{cases,all_nodes,Dir,Suite,Cs}|Ts],Spec) ->
add_tests([{cases,Dir,Suite,Cs}|Ts],Spec) ->
add_tests([{cases,all_nodes,Dir,Suite,Cs}|Ts],Spec);
add_tests([{cases,Nodes,Dir,Suite,Cs}|Ts],Spec) when is_list(Nodes) ->
- Ts1 = separate(Nodes,cases,[Dir,Suite,Cs],Ts,Spec#testspec.nodes),
+ Ts1 = per_node(Nodes,cases,[Dir,Suite,Cs],Ts,Spec#testspec.nodes),
add_tests(Ts1,Spec);
add_tests([{cases,Node,Dir,Suite,Cs}|Ts],Spec) ->
Tests = Spec#testspec.tests,
@@ -703,7 +851,7 @@ add_tests([{skip_suites,all_nodes,Dir,Ss,Cmt}|Ts],Spec) ->
add_tests([{skip_suites,Dir,Ss,Cmt}|Ts],Spec) ->
add_tests([{skip_suites,all_nodes,Dir,Ss,Cmt}|Ts],Spec);
add_tests([{skip_suites,Nodes,Dir,Ss,Cmt}|Ts],Spec) when is_list(Nodes) ->
- Ts1 = separate(Nodes,skip_suites,[Dir,Ss,Cmt],Ts,Spec#testspec.nodes),
+ Ts1 = per_node(Nodes,skip_suites,[Dir,Ss,Cmt],Ts,Spec#testspec.nodes),
add_tests(Ts1,Spec);
add_tests([{skip_suites,Node,Dir,Ss,Cmt}|Ts],Spec) ->
Tests = Spec#testspec.tests,
@@ -724,11 +872,11 @@ add_tests([{skip_groups,Dir,Suite,Gs,Cmt}|Ts],Spec) ->
add_tests([{skip_groups,Dir,Suite,Gs,{cases,TCs},Cmt}|Ts],Spec) ->
add_tests([{skip_groups,all_nodes,Dir,Suite,Gs,{cases,TCs},Cmt}|Ts],Spec);
add_tests([{skip_groups,Nodes,Dir,Suite,Gs,Cmt}|Ts],Spec) when is_list(Nodes) ->
- Ts1 = separate(Nodes,skip_groups,[Dir,Suite,Gs,Cmt],Ts,Spec#testspec.nodes),
+ Ts1 = per_node(Nodes,skip_groups,[Dir,Suite,Gs,Cmt],Ts,Spec#testspec.nodes),
add_tests(Ts1,Spec);
add_tests([{skip_groups,Nodes,Dir,Suite,Gs,{cases,TCs},Cmt}|Ts],
Spec) when is_list(Nodes) ->
- Ts1 = separate(Nodes,skip_groups,[Dir,Suite,Gs,{cases,TCs},Cmt],Ts,
+ Ts1 = per_node(Nodes,skip_groups,[Dir,Suite,Gs,{cases,TCs},Cmt],Ts,
Spec#testspec.nodes),
add_tests(Ts1,Spec);
add_tests([{skip_groups,Node,Dir,Suite,Gs,Cmt}|Ts],Spec) ->
@@ -752,7 +900,7 @@ add_tests([{skip_cases,all_nodes,Dir,Suite,Cs,Cmt}|Ts],Spec) ->
add_tests([{skip_cases,Dir,Suite,Cs,Cmt}|Ts],Spec) ->
add_tests([{skip_cases,all_nodes,Dir,Suite,Cs,Cmt}|Ts],Spec);
add_tests([{skip_cases,Nodes,Dir,Suite,Cs,Cmt}|Ts],Spec) when is_list(Nodes) ->
- Ts1 = separate(Nodes,skip_cases,[Dir,Suite,Cs,Cmt],Ts,Spec#testspec.nodes),
+ Ts1 = per_node(Nodes,skip_cases,[Dir,Suite,Cs,Cmt],Ts,Spec#testspec.nodes),
add_tests(Ts1,Spec);
add_tests([{skip_cases,Node,Dir,Suite,Cs,Cmt}|Ts],Spec) ->
Tests = Spec#testspec.tests,
@@ -783,6 +931,9 @@ add_tests([{release_shell,Bool}|Ts],Spec) ->
add_tests(Ts, Spec#testspec{release_shell = Bool});
%% --- handled/errors ---
+add_tests([{set_merge_tests,_}|Ts],Spec) -> % internal
+ add_tests(Ts,Spec);
+
add_tests([{define,_,_}|Ts],Spec) -> % handled
add_tests(Ts,Spec);
@@ -792,7 +943,10 @@ add_tests([{alias,_,_}|Ts],Spec) -> % handled
add_tests([{node,_,_}|Ts],Spec) -> % handled
add_tests(Ts,Spec);
-add_tests([{merge_tests, _} | Ts], Spec) -> % handled
+add_tests([{merge_tests,_} | Ts], Spec) -> % handled
+ add_tests(Ts,Spec);
+
+add_tests([{specs,_,_} | Ts], Spec) -> % handled
add_tests(Ts,Spec);
%% --------------------------------------------------
@@ -821,7 +975,7 @@ add_tests([{Tag,NodesOrOther,Data}|Ts],Spec) when is_list(NodesOrOther) ->
case lists:all(fun(Test) -> is_node(Test,Spec#testspec.nodes)
end, NodesOrOther) of
true ->
- Ts1 = separate(NodesOrOther,Tag,[Data],Ts,Spec#testspec.nodes),
+ Ts1 = per_node(NodesOrOther,Tag,[Data],Ts,Spec#testspec.nodes),
add_tests(Ts1,Spec);
false ->
add_tests([{Tag,all_nodes,{NodesOrOther,Data}}|Ts],Spec)
@@ -866,7 +1020,18 @@ add_tests([],Spec) -> % done
%% check if it's a CT term that has bad format or if the user seems to
%% have added something of his/her own, which we'll let pass if relaxed
%% mode is enabled.
-check_term(Term) ->
+check_term(Atom) when is_atom(Atom) ->
+ Valid = valid_terms(),
+ case lists:member(Atom,Valid) of
+ true ->
+ valid;
+ false -> % ignore
+ case get(relaxed) of
+ true -> invalid;
+ false -> throw({error,{undefined_term_in_spec,Atom}})
+ end
+ end;
+check_term(Term) when is_tuple(Term) ->
Size = size(Term),
[Name|_] = tuple_to_list(Term),
Valid = valid_terms(),
@@ -894,7 +1059,9 @@ check_term(Term) ->
throw({error,{undefined_term_in_spec,Term}})
end
end
- end.
+ end;
+check_term(Other) ->
+ throw({error,{undefined_term_in_spec,Other}}).
%% specific data handling before saving in testspec record, e.g.
%% converting relative paths to absolute for directories and files
@@ -977,12 +1144,12 @@ update_recorded(Tag,Node,Spec) ->
end.
%% create one test term per node
-separate(Nodes,Tag,Data,Tests,Refs) ->
- Separated = separate(Nodes,Tag,Data,Refs),
+per_node(Nodes,Tag,Data,Tests,Refs) ->
+ Separated = per_node(Nodes,Tag,Data,Refs),
Separated ++ Tests.
-separate([N|Ns],Tag,Data,Refs) ->
- [list_to_tuple([Tag,ref2node(N,Refs)|Data])|separate(Ns,Tag,Data,Refs)];
-separate([],_,_,_) ->
+per_node([N|Ns],Tag,Data,Refs) ->
+ [list_to_tuple([Tag,ref2node(N,Refs)|Data])|per_node(Ns,Tag,Data,Refs)];
+per_node([],_,_,_) ->
[].
%% read the value for FieldName in record Rec#testspec
@@ -1039,14 +1206,21 @@ insert_groups(Node,Dir,Suite,Groups,Cases,Tests,true) when
{[Gr],Cases};
true ->
{Gr,Cases} end || Gr <- Groups],
- case lists:keysearch({Node,Dir},1,Tests) of
- {value,{{Node,Dir},[{all,_}]}} ->
- Tests;
- {value,{{Node,Dir},Suites0}} ->
- Suites1 = insert_groups1(Suite,Groups1,Suites0),
- insert_in_order({{Node,Dir},Suites1},Tests);
- false ->
- insert_in_order({{Node,Dir},[{Suite,Groups1}]},Tests)
+ {Tests1,Done} =
+ lists:foldr(fun(All={{N,D},[{all,_}]},{Replaced,_}) when N == Node,
+ D == Dir ->
+ {[All|Replaced],true};
+ ({{N,D},Suites0},{Replaced,_}) when N == Node,
+ D == Dir ->
+ Suites1 = insert_groups1(Suite,Groups1,Suites0),
+ {[{{N,D},Suites1}|Replaced],true};
+ (T,{Replaced,Match}) ->
+ {[T|Replaced],Match}
+ end, {[],false}, Tests),
+ if not Done ->
+ Tests ++ [{{Node,Dir},[{Suite,Groups1}]}];
+ true ->
+ Tests1
end;
insert_groups(Node,Dir,Suite,Groups,Case,Tests, MergeTests)
when is_atom(Case) ->
@@ -1084,14 +1258,21 @@ insert_groups2([],GrAndCases) ->
insert_cases(Node,Dir,Suite,Cases,Tests,false) when is_list(Cases) ->
append({{Node,Dir},[{Suite,Cases}]},Tests);
insert_cases(Node,Dir,Suite,Cases,Tests,true) when is_list(Cases) ->
- case lists:keysearch({Node,Dir},1,Tests) of
- {value,{{Node,Dir},[{all,_}]}} ->
- Tests;
- {value,{{Node,Dir},Suites0}} ->
- Suites1 = insert_cases1(Suite,Cases,Suites0),
- insert_in_order({{Node,Dir},Suites1},Tests);
- false ->
- insert_in_order({{Node,Dir},[{Suite,Cases}]},Tests)
+ {Tests1,Done} =
+ lists:foldr(fun(All={{N,D},[{all,_}]},{Replaced,_}) when N == Node,
+ D == Dir ->
+ {[All|Replaced],true};
+ ({{N,D},Suites0},{Replaced,_}) when N == Node,
+ D == Dir ->
+ Suites1 = insert_cases1(Suite,Cases,Suites0),
+ {[{{N,D},Suites1}|Replaced],true};
+ (T,{Replaced,Match}) ->
+ {[T|Replaced],Match}
+ end, {[],false}, Tests),
+ if not Done ->
+ Tests ++ [{{Node,Dir},[{Suite,Cases}]}];
+ true ->
+ Tests1
end;
insert_cases(Node,Dir,Suite,Case,Tests,MergeTests) when is_atom(Case) ->
insert_cases(Node,Dir,Suite,[Case],Tests,MergeTests).
@@ -1132,15 +1313,23 @@ skip_groups(Node,Dir,Suite,Groups,Cases,Cmt,Tests,false) when
append({{Node,Dir},Suites1},Tests);
skip_groups(Node,Dir,Suite,Groups,Cases,Cmt,Tests,true) when
((Cases == all) or is_list(Cases)) and is_list(Groups) ->
- Suites =
- case lists:keysearch({Node,Dir},1,Tests) of
- {value,{{Node,Dir},Suites0}} ->
- Suites0;
- false ->
- []
- end,
- Suites1 = skip_groups1(Suite,[{Gr,Cases} || Gr <- Groups],Cmt,Suites),
- insert_in_order({{Node,Dir},Suites1},Tests);
+ {Tests1,Done} =
+ lists:foldr(fun({{N,D},Suites0},{Replaced,_}) when N == Node,
+ D == Dir ->
+ Suites1 = skip_groups1(Suite,
+ [{Gr,Cases} || Gr <- Groups],
+ Cmt,Suites0),
+ {[{{N,D},Suites1}|Replaced],true};
+ (T,{Replaced,Match}) ->
+ {[T|Replaced],Match}
+ end, {[],false}, Tests),
+ if not Done ->
+ Tests ++ [{{Node,Dir},skip_groups1(Suite,
+ [{Gr,Cases} || Gr <- Groups],
+ Cmt,[])}];
+ true ->
+ Tests1
+ end;
skip_groups(Node,Dir,Suite,Groups,Case,Cmt,Tests,MergeTests)
when is_atom(Case) ->
Cases = if Case == all -> all; true -> [Case] end,
@@ -1162,15 +1351,19 @@ skip_cases(Node,Dir,Suite,Cases,Cmt,Tests,false) when is_list(Cases) ->
Suites1 = skip_cases1(Suite,Cases,Cmt,[]),
append({{Node,Dir},Suites1},Tests);
skip_cases(Node,Dir,Suite,Cases,Cmt,Tests,true) when is_list(Cases) ->
- Suites =
- case lists:keysearch({Node,Dir},1,Tests) of
- {value,{{Node,Dir},Suites0}} ->
- Suites0;
- false ->
- []
- end,
- Suites1 = skip_cases1(Suite,Cases,Cmt,Suites),
- insert_in_order({{Node,Dir},Suites1},Tests);
+ {Tests1,Done} =
+ lists:foldr(fun({{N,D},Suites0},{Replaced,_}) when N == Node,
+ D == Dir ->
+ Suites1 = skip_cases1(Suite,Cases,Cmt,Suites0),
+ {[{{N,D},Suites1}|Replaced],true};
+ (T,{Replaced,Match}) ->
+ {[T|Replaced],Match}
+ end, {[],false}, Tests),
+ if not Done ->
+ Tests ++ [{{Node,Dir},skip_cases1(Suite,Cases,Cmt,[])}];
+ true ->
+ Tests1
+ end;
skip_cases(Node,Dir,Suite,Case,Cmt,Tests,MergeTests) when is_atom(Case) ->
skip_cases(Node,Dir,Suite,[Case],Cmt,Tests,MergeTests).
@@ -1260,7 +1453,9 @@ is_node([],_) ->
valid_terms() ->
[
+ {set_merge_tests,2},
{define,3},
+ {specs,3},
{node,3},
{cover,2},
{cover,3},