diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'lib/compiler/test/match_SUITE.erl')
| -rw-r--r-- | lib/compiler/test/match_SUITE.erl | 174 |
1 files changed, 168 insertions, 6 deletions
diff --git a/lib/compiler/test/match_SUITE.erl b/lib/compiler/test/match_SUITE.erl index 52b2da05f7..72e5356a8d 100644 --- a/lib/compiler/test/match_SUITE.erl +++ b/lib/compiler/test/match_SUITE.erl @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ %% %% %CopyrightBegin% %% -%% Copyright Ericsson AB 2004-2016. All Rights Reserved. +%% Copyright Ericsson AB 2004-2018. All Rights Reserved. %% %% Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License"); %% you may not use this file except in compliance with the License. @@ -23,27 +23,28 @@ init_per_group/2,end_per_group/2, pmatch/1,mixed/1,aliases/1,non_matching_aliases/1, match_in_call/1,untuplify/1,shortcut_boolean/1,letify_guard/1, - selectify/1,underscore/1,match_map/1,map_vars_used/1, - coverage/1,grab_bag/1,literal_binary/1]). + selectify/1,deselectify/1,underscore/1,match_map/1,map_vars_used/1, + coverage/1,grab_bag/1,literal_binary/1, + unary_op/1]). -include_lib("common_test/include/ct.hrl"). suite() -> [{ct_hooks,[ts_install_cth]}]. all() -> - test_lib:recompile(?MODULE), [{group,p}]. groups() -> [{p,[parallel], [pmatch,mixed,aliases,non_matching_aliases, match_in_call,untuplify, - shortcut_boolean,letify_guard,selectify, + shortcut_boolean,letify_guard,selectify,deselectify, underscore,match_map,map_vars_used,coverage, - grab_bag,literal_binary]}]. + grab_bag,literal_binary,unary_op]}]. init_per_suite(Config) -> + test_lib:recompile(?MODULE), Config. end_per_suite(_Config) -> @@ -377,6 +378,13 @@ untuplify(Config) when is_list(Config) -> %% We do this to cover sys_core_fold:unalias_pat/1. {1,2,3,4,alias,{[1,2],{3,4},alias}} = untuplify_1([1,2], {3,4}, alias), error = untuplify_1([1,2], {3,4}, 42), + + %% Test that a previous bug in v3_codegen is gone. (The sinking of + %% stack frames into only the case arms that needed them was not always + %% safe.) + [33, -1, -33, 1] = untuplify_2(32, 65), + {33, 1, -33, -1} = untuplify_2(65, 32), + ok. untuplify_1(A, B, C) -> @@ -389,6 +397,21 @@ untuplify_1(A, B, C) -> error end. +untuplify_2(V1, V2) -> + {D1,D2,D3,D4} = + if V1 > V2 -> + %% The 1 value was overwritten by the value of V2-V1. + {V1-V2, 1, V2-V1, -1}; + true -> + {V2-V1, -1, V1-V2, 1} + end, + if + D2 > D4 -> + {D1, D2, D3, D4}; + true -> + [D1, D2, D3, D4] + end. + %% Coverage of beam_dead:shortcut_boolean_label/4. shortcut_boolean(Config) when is_list(Config) -> false = shortcut_boolean_1([0]), @@ -466,6 +489,66 @@ sel_same_value2(V) when V =:= 42; V =:= 43 -> sel_same_value2(_) -> error. +%% Test deconstruction of select_val instructions in beam_peep into +%% regular tests with just one possible value left. Hitting proper cases +%% in beam_peep relies on unification of labels by beam_jump. + +deselectify(Config) when is_list(Config) -> + one_or_other = desel_tuple_arity({1}), + two = desel_tuple_arity({1,1}), + one_or_other = desel_tuple_arity({1,1,1}), + + one_or_other = dsel_integer(1), + two = dsel_integer(2), + one_or_other = dsel_integer(3), + + one_or_other = dsel_integer_typecheck(1), + two = dsel_integer_typecheck(2), + one_or_other = dsel_integer_typecheck(3), + + one_or_other = dsel_atom(one), + two = dsel_atom(two), + one_or_other = dsel_atom(three), + + one_or_other = dsel_atom_typecheck(one), + two = dsel_atom_typecheck(two), + one_or_other = dsel_atom_typecheck(three). + +desel_tuple_arity(Tuple) when is_tuple(Tuple) -> + case Tuple of + {_} -> one_or_other; + {_,_} -> two; + _ -> one_or_other + end. + +dsel_integer(Val) -> + case Val of + 1 -> one_or_other; + 2 -> two; + _ -> one_or_other + end. + +dsel_integer_typecheck(Val) when is_integer(Val) -> + case Val of + 1 -> one_or_other; + 2 -> two; + _ -> one_or_other + end. + +dsel_atom(Val) -> + case Val of + one -> one_or_other; + two -> two; + _ -> one_or_other + end. + +dsel_atom_typecheck(Val) when is_atom(Val) -> + case Val of + one -> one_or_other; + two -> two; + _ -> one_or_other + end. + underscore(Config) when is_list(Config) -> case Config of [] -> @@ -557,6 +640,10 @@ grab_bag(_Config) -> {bad,16#555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555555}], ok = grab_bag_remove_failure(L, unit, 0), + {42,<<43,44>>} = grab_bag_single_valued(<<42,43,44>>), + empty_list = grab_bag_single_valued([]), + empty_tuple = grab_bag_single_valued({}), + ok. grab_bag_remove_failure([], _Unit, _MaxFailure) -> @@ -574,6 +661,12 @@ grab_bag_remove_failure([{stretch,_,Mi}=Stretch | Specs], Unit, _MaxFailure) -> ok end. +%% Cover a line v3_kernel that places binary matching first. +grab_bag_single_valued(<<H,T/bytes>>) -> {H,T}; +grab_bag_single_valued([]) -> empty_list; +grab_bag_single_valued({}) -> empty_tuple. + + %% Regression in 19.0, reported by Alexei Sholik literal_binary(_Config) -> 3 = literal_binary_match(bar, <<"y">>), @@ -592,5 +685,74 @@ literal_binary_match(_, <<"x">>) -> 2; literal_binary_match(_, <<"y">>) -> 3; literal_binary_match(_, _) -> fail. +unary_op(Config) -> + %% ERL-514. This test case only verifies that the code + %% calculates the correct result, not that the generated + %% code is optimial. + + {non_associative,30} = unary_op_1('&'), + {non_associative,300} = unary_op_1('^'), + {non_associative,300} = unary_op_1('not'), + {non_associative,300} = unary_op_1('+'), + {non_associative,300} = unary_op_1('-'), + {non_associative,300} = unary_op_1('~~~'), + {non_associative,300} = unary_op_1('!'), + {non_associative,320} = unary_op_1('@'), + + error = unary_op_1(Config), + error = unary_op_1(abc), + error = unary_op_1(42), + + ok. + +unary_op_1(Vop@1) -> + %% If all optimizations are working as they should, there should + %% be no stack frame and all '=:=' tests should be coalesced into + %% a single select_val instruction. + + case Vop@1 =:= '&' of + true -> + {non_associative,30}; + false -> + case + case Vop@1 =:= '^' of + true -> + true; + false -> + case Vop@1 =:= 'not' of + true -> + true; + false -> + case Vop@1 =:= '+' of + true -> + true; + false -> + case Vop@1 =:= '-' of + true -> + true; + false -> + case Vop@1 =:= '~~~' of + true -> + true; + false -> + Vop@1 =:= '!' + end + end + end + end + end + of + true -> + {non_associative,300}; + false -> + case Vop@1 =:= '@' of + true -> + {non_associative,320}; + false -> + error + end + end + end. + id(I) -> I. |