aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/lib/compiler/test
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'lib/compiler/test')
-rw-r--r--lib/compiler/test/beam_jump_SUITE.erl47
-rw-r--r--lib/compiler/test/beam_validator_SUITE.erl19
-rw-r--r--lib/compiler/test/receive_SUITE.erl30
3 files changed, 80 insertions, 16 deletions
diff --git a/lib/compiler/test/beam_jump_SUITE.erl b/lib/compiler/test/beam_jump_SUITE.erl
index 759d884dc4..a456f31d79 100644
--- a/lib/compiler/test/beam_jump_SUITE.erl
+++ b/lib/compiler/test/beam_jump_SUITE.erl
@@ -79,12 +79,13 @@ checks(Wanted) ->
{catch case river() of sheet -> begin +Wanted, if "da" -> Wanted end end end, catch case river() of sheet -> begin + Wanted, if "da" -> Wanted end end end}.
unsafe_move_elimination(_Config) ->
- {{left,right,false},false} = unsafe_move_elimination(left, right, false),
- {{false,right,false},false} = unsafe_move_elimination(false, right, true),
- {{true,right,right},right} = unsafe_move_elimination(true, right, true),
+ {{left,right,false},false} = unsafe_move_elimination_1(left, right, false),
+ {{false,right,false},false} = unsafe_move_elimination_1(false, right, true),
+ {{true,right,right},right} = unsafe_move_elimination_1(true, right, true),
+ [ok = unsafe_move_elimination_2(I) || I <- lists:seq(0,16)],
ok.
-unsafe_move_elimination(Left, Right, Simple0) ->
+unsafe_move_elimination_1(Left, Right, Simple0) ->
id(1),
%% The move at label 29 would be removed by beam_jump, which is unsafe because
@@ -115,6 +116,44 @@ unsafe_move_elimination(Left, Right, Simple0) ->
end,
{id({Left,Right,Simple}),Simple}.
+unsafe_move_elimination_2(Int) ->
+ %% The type optimization pass would recognize that TagInt can only be
+ %% [0 .. 7], so the first 'case' would select_val over [0 .. 6] and swap
+ %% out the fail label with the block for 7.
+ %%
+ %% A later optimization would merge this block with 'expects_h' in the
+ %% second case, as the latter is only reachable from the former.
+ %%
+ %% ... but this broke down when the move elimination optimization didn't
+ %% take the fail label of the first select_val into account. This caused it
+ %% to believe that the only way to reach 'expects_h' was through the second
+ %% case when 'Tag' =:= 'h', which made it remove the move instruction
+ %% added in the first case, passing garbage to expects_h/2.
+ TagInt = Int band 2#111,
+ Tag = case TagInt of
+ 0 -> a;
+ 1 -> b;
+ 2 -> c;
+ 3 -> d;
+ 4 -> e;
+ 5 -> f;
+ 6 -> g;
+ 7 -> h
+ end,
+ case Tag of
+ g -> expects_g(TagInt, Tag);
+ h -> expects_h(TagInt, Tag);
+ _ -> Tag = id(Tag), ok
+ end.
+
+expects_g(6, Atom) ->
+ Atom = id(g),
+ ok.
+
+expects_h(7, Atom) ->
+ Atom = id(h),
+ ok.
+
-record(message2, {id, p1}).
-record(message3, {id, p1, p2}).
diff --git a/lib/compiler/test/beam_validator_SUITE.erl b/lib/compiler/test/beam_validator_SUITE.erl
index 2660bf222c..265da43f9d 100644
--- a/lib/compiler/test/beam_validator_SUITE.erl
+++ b/lib/compiler/test/beam_validator_SUITE.erl
@@ -107,13 +107,12 @@ xrange(Config) when is_list(Config) ->
Errors = do_val(xrange, Config),
[{{t,sum_1,2},
{{bif,'+',{f,0},[{x,-1},{x,1}],{x,0}},4,
- {uninitialized_reg,{x,-1}}}},
+ {bad_register,{x,-1}}}},
{{t,sum_2,2},
- {{bif,'+',{f,0},[{x,0},{x,1023}],{x,0}},4,
- {uninitialized_reg,{x,1023}}}},
+ {{bif,'+',{f,0},[{x,0},{x,1023}],{x,0}},4,limit}},
{{t,sum_3,2},
{{bif,'+',{f,0},[{x,0},{x,1}],{x,-1}},4,
- {invalid_store,{x,-1},number}}},
+ {bad_register,{x,-1}}}},
{{t,sum_4,2},
{{bif,'+',{f,0},[{x,0},{x,1}],{x,1023}},4,limit}}] = Errors,
ok.
@@ -122,15 +121,15 @@ yrange(Config) when is_list(Config) ->
Errors = do_val(yrange, Config),
[{{t,sum_1,2},
{{move,{x,1},{y,-1}},5,
- {invalid_store,{y,-1},term}}},
+ {bad_register,{y,-1}}}},
{{t,sum_2,2},
{{bif,'+',{f,0},[{x,0},{y,1024}],{x,0}},7,
- {uninitialized_reg,{y,1024}}}},
+ limit}},
{{t,sum_3,2},
{{move,{x,1},{y,1024}},5,limit}},
{{t,sum_4,2},
{{move,{x,1},{y,-1}},5,
- {invalid_store,{y,-1},term}}}] = Errors,
+ {bad_register,{y,-1}}}}] = Errors,
ok.
stack(Config) when is_list(Config) ->
@@ -178,7 +177,7 @@ unsafe_catch(Config) when is_list(Config) ->
Errors = do_val(unsafe_catch, Config),
[{{t,small,2},
{{bs_put_integer,{f,0},{integer,16},1,
- {field_flags,[unsigned,big]},{y,0}},
+ {field_flags,[unsigned,big]},{y,0}},
20,
{unassigned,{y,0}}}}] = Errors,
ok.
@@ -223,7 +222,7 @@ bad_catch_try(Config) when is_list(Config) ->
{{try_case,{y,1}},12,{invalid_tag,{y,1},term}}},
{{bad_catch_try,bad_6,1},
{{move,{integer,1},{y,1}},7,
- {invalid_store,{y,1},{integer,1}}}}] = Errors,
+ {invalid_store,{y,1}}}}] = Errors,
ok.
cons_guard(Config) when is_list(Config) ->
@@ -247,7 +246,7 @@ freg_range(Config) when is_list(Config) ->
{{t,sum_3,2},
{{bif,fadd,{f,0},[{fr,0},{fr,1}],{fr,-1}},
7,
- {bad_target,{fr,-1}}}},
+ {bad_register,{fr,-1}}}},
{{t,sum_4,2},
{{bif,fadd,{f,0},[{fr,0},{fr,1}],{fr,1024}},
7,
diff --git a/lib/compiler/test/receive_SUITE.erl b/lib/compiler/test/receive_SUITE.erl
index 12108445f0..0038eb1a4b 100644
--- a/lib/compiler/test/receive_SUITE.erl
+++ b/lib/compiler/test/receive_SUITE.erl
@@ -25,7 +25,8 @@
init_per_group/2,end_per_group/2,
init_per_testcase/2,end_per_testcase/2,
export/1,recv/1,coverage/1,otp_7980/1,ref_opt/1,
- wait/1,recv_in_try/1,double_recv/1,receive_var_zero/1]).
+ wait/1,recv_in_try/1,double_recv/1,receive_var_zero/1,
+ match_built_terms/1]).
-include_lib("common_test/include/ct.hrl").
@@ -45,7 +46,8 @@ all() ->
groups() ->
[{p,test_lib:parallel(),
[recv,coverage,otp_7980,ref_opt,export,wait,
- recv_in_try,double_recv,receive_var_zero]}].
+ recv_in_try,double_recv,receive_var_zero,
+ match_built_terms]}].
init_per_suite(Config) ->
@@ -400,5 +402,29 @@ receive_var_zero(Config) when is_list(Config) ->
zero() -> 0.
+%% ERL-862; the validator would explode when a term was constructed in a
+%% receive guard.
+
+-define(MATCH_BUILT_TERM(Ref, Expr),
+ (fun() ->
+ Ref = make_ref(),
+ A = id($a),
+ B = id($b),
+ Built = id(Expr),
+ self() ! {Ref, A, B},
+ receive
+ {Ref, A, B} when Expr =:= Built ->
+ ok
+ after 5000 ->
+ ct:fail("Failed to match message with term built in "
+ "receive guard.")
+ end
+ end)()).
+
+match_built_terms(Config) when is_list(Config) ->
+ ?MATCH_BUILT_TERM(Ref, [A, B]),
+ ?MATCH_BUILT_TERM(Ref, {A, B}),
+ ?MATCH_BUILT_TERM(Ref, <<A, B>>),
+ ?MATCH_BUILT_TERM(Ref, #{ 1 => A, 2 => B}).
id(I) -> I.