aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/lib/dialyzer/src/dialyzer_typesig.erl
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'lib/dialyzer/src/dialyzer_typesig.erl')
-rw-r--r--lib/dialyzer/src/dialyzer_typesig.erl113
1 files changed, 62 insertions, 51 deletions
diff --git a/lib/dialyzer/src/dialyzer_typesig.erl b/lib/dialyzer/src/dialyzer_typesig.erl
index a0a69cb2ea..c4d8f45447 100644
--- a/lib/dialyzer/src/dialyzer_typesig.erl
+++ b/lib/dialyzer/src/dialyzer_typesig.erl
@@ -96,10 +96,12 @@
-type typesig_funmap() :: #{type_var() => type_var()}.
--type prop_types() :: dict:dict(label(), erl_types:erl_type()).
+-type prop_types() :: orddict:orddict(label(), erl_types:erl_type()).
+-type dict_prop_types() :: dict:dict(label(), erl_types:erl_type()).
-record(state, {callgraph :: dialyzer_callgraph:callgraph()
| 'undefined',
+ cserver :: dialyzer_codeserver:codeserver(),
cs = [] :: [constr()],
cmap = maps:new() :: #{type_var() => constr()},
fun_map = maps:new() :: typesig_funmap(),
@@ -112,8 +114,8 @@
self_rec :: 'false' | erl_types:erl_type(),
plt :: dialyzer_plt:plt()
| 'undefined',
- prop_types = dict:new() :: prop_types(),
- records = maps:new() :: types(),
+ prop_types = dict:new() :: dict_prop_types(),
+ mod_records = [] :: [{module(), types()}],
scc = [] :: ordsets:ordset(type_var()),
mfas :: [mfa()],
solvers = [] :: [solver()]
@@ -138,9 +140,11 @@
-ifdef(DEBUG).
-define(debug(__String, __Args), io:format(__String, __Args)).
-define(mk_fun_var(Fun, Vars), mk_fun_var(?LINE, Fun, Vars)).
+-define(pp_map(S, M), pp_map(S, M)).
-else.
-define(debug(__String, __Args), ok).
-define(mk_fun_var(Fun, Vars), mk_fun_var(Fun, Vars)).
+-define(pp_map(S, M), ok).
-endif.
%% ============================================================================
@@ -177,15 +181,13 @@ analyze_scc(SCC, NextLabel, CallGraph, CServer, Plt, PropTypes, Solvers0) ->
State1 = new_state(SCC, NextLabel, CallGraph, CServer, Plt, PropTypes,
Solvers),
DefSet = add_def_list(maps:values(State1#state.name_map), sets:new()),
- ModRecs = [{M, dialyzer_codeserver:lookup_mod_records(M, CServer)} ||
- M <- lists:usort([M || {M, _, _} <- SCC])],
- State2 = traverse_scc(SCC, CServer, DefSet, ModRecs, State1),
+ State2 = traverse_scc(SCC, CServer, DefSet, State1),
State3 = state__finalize(State2),
Funs = state__scc(State3),
pp_constrs_scc(Funs, State3),
constraints_to_dot_scc(Funs, State3),
T = solve(Funs, State3),
- dict:from_list(maps:to_list(T)).
+ orddict:from_list(maps:to_list(T)).
solvers([]) -> [v2];
solvers(Solvers) -> Solvers.
@@ -196,15 +198,14 @@ solvers(Solvers) -> Solvers.
%%
%% ============================================================================
-traverse_scc([{M,_,_}=MFA|Left], Codeserver, DefSet, ModRecs, AccState) ->
+traverse_scc([{M,_,_}=MFA|Left], Codeserver, DefSet, AccState) ->
+ TmpState1 = state__set_module(AccState, M),
Def = dialyzer_codeserver:lookup_mfa_code(MFA, Codeserver),
- {M, Rec} = lists:keyfind(M, 1, ModRecs),
- TmpState1 = state__set_rec_dict(AccState, Rec),
DummyLetrec = cerl:c_letrec([Def], cerl:c_atom(foo)),
TmpState2 = state__new_constraint_context(TmpState1),
{NewAccState, _} = traverse(DummyLetrec, DefSet, TmpState2),
- traverse_scc(Left, Codeserver, DefSet, ModRecs, NewAccState);
-traverse_scc([], _Codeserver, _DefSet, _ModRecs, AccState) ->
+ traverse_scc(Left, Codeserver, DefSet, NewAccState);
+traverse_scc([], _Codeserver, _DefSet, AccState) ->
AccState.
traverse(Tree, DefinedVars, State) ->
@@ -470,12 +471,11 @@ traverse(Tree, DefinedVars, State) ->
true ->
%% Check if a record is constructed.
Arity = length(Fields),
- Records = State2#state.records,
- case lookup_record(Records, cerl:atom_val(Tag), Arity) of
- error -> {State2, TupleType};
- {ok, RecType} ->
- State3 = state__store_conj(TupleType, sub, RecType, State2),
- {State3, TupleType}
+ case lookup_record(State2, cerl:atom_val(Tag), Arity) of
+ {error, State3} -> {State3, TupleType};
+ {ok, RecType, State3} ->
+ State4 = state__store_conj(TupleType, sub, RecType, State3),
+ {State4, TupleType}
end;
false -> {State2, TupleType}
end;
@@ -1440,7 +1440,6 @@ get_bif_constr({erlang, is_record, 2}, Dst, [Var, Tag] = Args, _State) ->
mk_constraint(Var, sub, ArgV)]);
get_bif_constr({erlang, is_record, 3}, Dst, [Var, Tag, Arity] = Args, State) ->
%% TODO: Revise this to make it precise for Tag and Arity.
- Records = State#state.records,
ArgFun =
fun(Map) ->
case t_is_any_atom(true, lookup_type(Dst, Map)) of
@@ -1457,10 +1456,10 @@ get_bif_constr({erlang, is_record, 3}, Dst, [Var, Tag, Arity] = Args, State) ->
GenRecord = t_tuple([TagType|AnyElems]),
case t_atom_vals(TagType) of
[TagVal] ->
- case lookup_record(Records, TagVal, ArityVal - 1) of
- {ok, Type} ->
+ case lookup_record(State, TagVal, ArityVal - 1) of
+ {ok, Type, _NewState} ->
Type;
- error -> GenRecord
+ {error, _NewState} -> GenRecord
end;
_ -> GenRecord
end;
@@ -1917,8 +1916,8 @@ check_solutions([{S1,Map1,_Time1}|Maps], Fun, S, Map) ->
check_solutions(Maps, Fun, S1, Map1);
false ->
?debug("Constraint solvers do not agree on ~w\n", [Fun]),
- pp_map(atom_to_list(S), Map),
- pp_map(atom_to_list(S1), Map1),
+ ?pp_map(atom_to_list(S), Map),
+ ?pp_map(atom_to_list(S1), Map1),
io:format("A bug was found. Please report it, and use the option "
"`--solver v1' until the bug has been fixed.\n"),
throw(error)
@@ -1967,7 +1966,7 @@ v2_solve(#constraint_ref{id = Id}, Map, V2State) ->
v2_solve_reference(Id, Map, V2State0) ->
?debug("Checking ref to fun: ~tw\n", [debug_lookup_name(Id)]),
- pp_map("Map", Map),
+ ?pp_map("Map", Map),
pp_constr_data("solve_ref", V2State0),
Map1 = restore_local_map(V2State0, Id, Map),
State = V2State0#v2_state.state,
@@ -2023,7 +2022,7 @@ v2_solve_self_recursive(Cs, Map, Id, RecType0, V2State0) ->
Error
end;
{ok, NewMap, V2State, U} ->
- pp_map("recursive finished", NewMap),
+ ?pp_map("recursive finished", NewMap),
NewRecType = unsafe_lookup_type(Id, NewMap),
case is_equal(NewRecType, RecType0) of
true ->
@@ -2041,7 +2040,7 @@ enter_var_type(Var, Type, Map0) ->
v2_solve_disjunct(Disj, Map, V2State0) ->
#constraint_list{type = disj, id = _Id, list = Cs, masks = Masks} = Disj,
?debug("disjunct Id=~w~n", [_Id]),
- pp_map("Map", Map),
+ ?pp_map("Map", Map),
pp_constr_data("disjunct", V2State0),
case get_flags(V2State0, Disj) of
{V2State1, failed_list} -> {error, V2State1}; % cannot happen
@@ -2069,7 +2068,7 @@ v2_solve_disjunct(Disj, Map, V2State0) ->
U1 = [V || V <- U0,
var_occurs_everywhere(V, Masks, NotFailed)],
NewMap = join_maps(U1, MapL, Map),
- pp_map("NewMap", NewMap),
+ ?pp_map("NewMap", NewMap),
U = updated_vars_only(U1, Map, NewMap),
?debug("disjunct finished _Id=~w\n", [_Id]),
{ok, NewMap, V2State, U}
@@ -2092,7 +2091,7 @@ v2_solve_disj([I|Is], [C|Cs], I, Map0, V2State0, UL, MapL, Eval, Uneval,
{ok, Map, V2State1, U} ->
?debug("disj I=~w U=~w~n", [I, U]),
V2State = save_local_map(V2State1, Id, U, Map),
- pp_map("DMap", Map),
+ ?pp_map("DMap", Map),
v2_solve_disj(Is, Cs, I+1, Map0, V2State, [U|UL], [Map|MapL],
[I|Eval], Uneval, Failed0)
end;
@@ -2118,9 +2117,9 @@ save_local_map(#v2_state{constr_data = ConData}=V2State, Id, U, Map) ->
end,
?debug("save local map Id=~w:\n", [Id]),
Part = lists:ukeymerge(1, lists:keysort(1, Part0), Part1),
- pp_map("New Part", maps:from_list(Part0)),
- pp_map("Old Part", maps:from_list(Part1)),
- pp_map(" => Part", maps:from_list(Part)),
+ ?pp_map("New Part", maps:from_list(Part0)),
+ ?pp_map("Old Part", maps:from_list(Part1)),
+ ?pp_map(" => Part", maps:from_list(Part)),
V2State#v2_state{constr_data = maps:put(Id, {Part,[]}, ConData)}.
restore_local_map(#v2_state{constr_data = ConData}, Id, Map0) ->
@@ -2131,10 +2130,10 @@ restore_local_map(#v2_state{constr_data = ConData}, Id, Map0) ->
{ok, {Part0,U}} ->
Part = [KV || {K,_V} = KV <- Part0, not lists:member(K, U)],
?debug("restore local map Id=~w U=~w\n", [Id, U]),
- pp_map("Part", maps:from_list(Part)),
- pp_map("Map0", Map0),
+ ?pp_map("Part", maps:from_list(Part)),
+ ?pp_map("Map0", Map0),
Map = lists:foldl(fun({K,V}, D) -> maps:put(K, V, D) end, Map0, Part),
- pp_map("Map", Map),
+ ?pp_map("Map", Map),
Map
end.
@@ -2290,7 +2289,7 @@ pp_constr_data(_Tag, #v2_state{constr_data = D}) ->
case _PartU of
{_Part, _U} ->
io:format("Id: ~w Vars: ~w\n", [_Id, _U]),
- [pp_map("Part", maps:from_list(_Part)) || _Part =/= []];
+ [?pp_map("Part", maps:from_list(_Part)) || _Part =/= []];
failed ->
io:format("Id: ~w failed list\n", [_Id])
end
@@ -2390,7 +2389,7 @@ solve_self_recursive(Cs, Map, MapDict, Id, RecType0, State) ->
?debug("OldRecType ~ts\n", [format_type(RecType0)]),
RecType = t_limit(RecType0, ?TYPE_LIMIT),
Map1 = enter_type(RecVar, RecType, erase_type(t_var_name(Id), Map)),
- pp_map("Map1", Map1),
+ ?pp_map("Map1", Map1),
case solve_ref_or_list(Cs, Map1, MapDict, State) of
{error, _} = Error ->
case t_is_none(RecType0) of
@@ -2403,7 +2402,7 @@ solve_self_recursive(Cs, Map, MapDict, Id, RecType0, State) ->
Error
end;
{ok, NewMapDict, NewMap} ->
- pp_map("NewMap", NewMap),
+ ?pp_map("NewMap", NewMap),
NewRecType = unsafe_lookup_type(Id, NewMap),
case is_equal(NewRecType, RecType0) of
true ->
@@ -2702,18 +2701,13 @@ is_same(Key, Map1, Map2) ->
is_equal(Type1, Type2) ->
t_is_equal(Type1, Type2).
-pp_map(_S, _Map) ->
- ?debug("\t~s: ~tp\n",
- [_S, [{X, lists:flatten(format_type(Y))} ||
- {X, Y} <- lists:keysort(1, maps:to_list(_Map))]]).
-
%% ============================================================================
%%
%% The State.
%%
%% ============================================================================
-new_state(MFAs, NextLabel, CallGraph, CServer, Plt, PropTypes, Solvers) ->
+new_state(MFAs, NextLabel, CallGraph, CServer, Plt, PropTypes0, Solvers) ->
List_SCC =
[begin
{Var, Label} = dialyzer_codeserver:lookup_mfa_var_label(MFA, CServer),
@@ -2731,12 +2725,14 @@ new_state(MFAs, NextLabel, CallGraph, CServer, Plt, PropTypes, Solvers) ->
end;
_Many -> false
end,
+ PropTypes = dict:from_list(PropTypes0),
#state{callgraph = CallGraph, name_map = NameMap, next_label = NextLabel,
prop_types = PropTypes, plt = Plt, scc = ordsets:from_list(SCC),
- mfas = MFAs, self_rec = SelfRec, solvers = Solvers}.
+ mfas = MFAs, self_rec = SelfRec, solvers = Solvers,
+ cserver = CServer}.
-state__set_rec_dict(State, RecDict) ->
- State#state{records = RecDict}.
+state__set_module(State, Module) ->
+ State#state{module = Module}.
state__set_in_match(State, Bool) ->
State#state{in_match = Bool}.
@@ -2975,6 +2971,11 @@ mk_fun_var(Line, Fun, Types) ->
Deps = [t_var_name(Var) || Var <- t_collect_vars(t_product(Types))],
#fun_var{'fun' = Fun, deps = ordsets:from_list(Deps), origin = Line}.
+pp_map(S, Map) ->
+ ?debug("\t~s: ~p\n",
+ [S, [{X, lists:flatten(format_type(Y))} ||
+ {X, Y} <- lists:keysort(1, maps:to_list(Map))]]).
+
-else.
-spec mk_fun_var(fun((_) -> erl_types:erl_type()), [erl_types:erl_type()]) -> #fun_var{}.
@@ -3348,15 +3349,25 @@ fold_literal_maybe_match(Tree0, State) ->
true -> dialyzer_utils:refold_pattern(Tree1)
end.
-lookup_record(Records, Tag, Arity) ->
- case erl_types:lookup_record(Tag, Arity, Records) of
+lookup_record(State, Tag, Arity) ->
+ #state{module = M, mod_records = ModRecs, cserver = CServer} = State,
+ {State1, Rec} =
+ case lists:keyfind(M, 1, ModRecs) of
+ {M, Rec0} ->
+ {State, Rec0};
+ false ->
+ Rec0 = dialyzer_codeserver:lookup_mod_records(M, CServer),
+ NewModRecs = [{M, Rec0}|ModRecs],
+ {State#state{mod_records = NewModRecs}, Rec0}
+ end,
+ case erl_types:lookup_record(Tag, Arity, Rec) of
{ok, Fields} ->
RecType =
t_tuple([t_from_term(Tag)|
[FieldType || {_FieldName, _Abstr, FieldType} <- Fields]]),
- {ok, RecType};
+ {ok, RecType, State1};
error ->
- error
+ {error, State1}
end.
is_literal_record(Tree) ->