2 files changed, 45 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/lib/dialyzer/test/underspecs_SUITE_data/results/arr b/lib/dialyzer/test/underspecs_SUITE_data/results/arr
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..9497d12eec
--- /dev/null
+++ b/lib/dialyzer/test/underspecs_SUITE_data/results/arr
@@ -0,0 +1,4 @@
+
+arr.erl:14: Type specification arr:test2(array:array(T),non_neg_integer(),T) -> array:array(T) is a supertype of the success typing: arr:test2(array:array(_),pos_integer(),_) -> array:array(_)
+arr.erl:24: Type specification arr:test4(array:array(T),non_neg_integer(),_) -> array:array(T) is a supertype of the success typing: arr:test4(array:array(_),pos_integer(),_) -> array:array(_)
+arr.erl:29: Type specification arr:test5(array:array(T),non_neg_integer(),T) -> array:array(T) is a supertype of the success typing: arr:test5(array:array(_),non_neg_integer(),integer()) -> array:array(_)
diff --git a/lib/dialyzer/test/underspecs_SUITE_data/src/arr.erl b/lib/dialyzer/test/underspecs_SUITE_data/src/arr.erl
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..3b265ccec2
--- /dev/null
+++ b/lib/dialyzer/test/underspecs_SUITE_data/src/arr.erl
@@ -0,0 +1,41 @@
+-module(arr).
+
+%% http://erlang.org/pipermail/erlang-questions/2014-August/080445.html
+
+-define(A, array).
+
+-export([test/3, test2/3, test3/3, test4/3, test5/3, test6/3]).
+
+-spec test(?A:array(T), non_neg_integer(), T) -> ?A:array(T).
+
+test(Array, N, Value) ->
+    ?A:set(N, Value, Array).
+
+-spec test2(?A:array(T), non_neg_integer(), T) -> ?A:array(T).
+
+test2(Array, N, Value) when N > 0 ->
+    ?A:set(N, Value, Array).
+
+-spec test3(?A:array(T), non_neg_integer(), _) -> ?A:array(T).
+
+test3(Array, N, Value) ->
+    ?A:set(N, Value, Array).
+
+-spec test4(?A:array(T), non_neg_integer(), _) -> ?A:array(T).
+
+test4(Array, N, Value) when N > 0 ->
+    ?A:set(N, Value, Array).
+
+-spec test5(?A:array(T), non_neg_integer(), T) -> ?A:array(T).
+
+test5(Array, N, Value) when is_integer(Value) ->
+    ?A:set(N, Value, Array).
+
+%% One would ideally want a warning also for test6(), but the current
+%% analysis of parametrized opaque types is not strong enough to
+%% discover this.
+-spec test6(?A:array(integer()), non_neg_integer(), integer()) ->
+                   ?A:array(any()).
+
+test6(Array, N, Value) ->
+     ?A:set(N, Value, Array).