diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'lib/diameter/doc/src/notes.xml')
| -rw-r--r-- | lib/diameter/doc/src/notes.xml | 168 |
1 files changed, 160 insertions, 8 deletions
diff --git a/lib/diameter/doc/src/notes.xml b/lib/diameter/doc/src/notes.xml index 18c712ec3d..675ffcfd18 100644 --- a/lib/diameter/doc/src/notes.xml +++ b/lib/diameter/doc/src/notes.xml @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ -<?xml version="1.0" encoding="latin1" ?> +<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?> <!DOCTYPE chapter SYSTEM "chapter.dtd" [ <!ENTITY % also SYSTEM "seealso.ent" > <!ENTITY % here SYSTEM "seehere.ent" > @@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ <header> <copyright> <year>2011</year> -<year>2013</year> +<year>2014</year> <holder>Ericsson AB. All Rights Reserved.</holder> </copyright> <legalnotice> @@ -42,6 +42,164 @@ first.</p> <!-- ===================================================================== --> +<section><title>diameter 1.6</title> + + <section><title>Fixed Bugs and Malfunctions</title> + <list> + <item> + <p> + Add missing check at dictionary compilation.</p> + <p> + In particular, that an AVP defined as having type Grouped + in an @avp_types section has a corresponding definition + in a @grouped section.</p> + <p> + Own Id: OTP-11561</p> + </item> + <item> + <p> + Correct documentation on the setting of Origin-State-Id</p> + <p> + It was incorrectly stated that the AVP would be set in an + outgoing DPR/DPA.</p> + <p> + Own Id: OTP-11583</p> + </item> + <item> + <p> + Change interface for communicating outbound stream id to + diameter_sctp</p> + <p> + The module uses the transport_data field of record + diameter_packet to communicate the stream on which the an + incoming message is received and on which an outgoing + message should be sent, the previous interface being that + both are communicated as a tuple of the form {stream, + Id}. However, since diameter retains the value of an + incoming request's transport_data unless the + corresponding answer message specifies otherwise, the + behaviour in this case is to send an answer on the + outbound stream with the same identifier as the that of + the inbound stream on which the request was received. If + the inbound stream id is greater than or equal to the + number of outbound streams then this is guaranteed to + fail, causing the transport process in question to + terminate. There is no relationship between inbound and + outbound stream identifiers so diameter_sctp's imposition + of one is simply wrong.</p> + <p> + Outbound stream ids are now communicated with a different + tuple: {outstream, Id}, interpreted modulo the number of + outbound streams. Thus, retention of an inbound request's + transport_data has no effect on the selection of an + outbound stream.</p> + <p> + The change in interface is not strictly backwards + compatible because of the new atom for the outbound + stream. However, as there is currently no documented way + of obtaining the available number of outbound streams for + a peer connection, there is no way for a client to have + known the range of ids from which it could reliably have + chosen with the previous interface, so any setting of the + outbound stream has probably been unintentional. Not + explicitly specifying an outbound stream now results in a + round-robin selection.</p> + <p> + Thanks to Sharmila Pillai for reporting the problem.</p> + <p> + *** POTENTIAL INCOMPATIBILITY ***</p> + <p> + Own Id: OTP-11593</p> + </item> + <item> + <p> + Fix unicode path failure in diameter_make:codec/2.</p> + <p> + A dictionary path containing a unicode codepoint > 255 + caused the function to fail.</p> + <p> + Own Id: OTP-11655</p> + </item> + <item> + <p> + Fix 'accept' config to diameter_sctp.</p> + <p> + OTP-10893 added support for {accept, Match} tuples to + specify addresses or regexps that should be matched + against peer addresses to decide whether or not a newly + established association should be retained, but this + hasn't been functional in the SCTP case because of + missing support in inet(3).</p> + <p> + The display of both local and peer addresses in + diameter:service_info/2 output has also been corrected.</p> + <p> + Own Id: OTP-11661 Aux Id: OTP-10229 </p> + </item> + <item> + <p> + Be lenient with the M-bit in Grouped AVPs.</p> + <p> + RFC 6733 says this, in 4.4:</p> + <p> + <taglist><item><p><c>Receivers of a Grouped AVP that does + not have the 'M' (mandatory) bit set and one or more of + the encapsulated AVPs within the group has the 'M' + (mandatory) bit set MAY simply be ignored if the Grouped + AVP itself is unrecognized. The rule applies even if the + encapsulated AVP with its 'M' (mandatory) bit set is + further encapsulated within other sub-groups, i.e., other + Grouped AVPs embedded within the Grouped + AVP.</c></p></item></taglist></p> + <p> + The first sentence is mangled but take it to mean this:</p> + <p> + <taglist><item><p><c>An unrecognized AVP of type Grouped + that does not set the 'M' bit MAY be ignored even if one + of its encapsulated AVPs sets the 'M' + bit.</c></p></item></taglist></p> + <p> + This is a bit of a non-statement since if the AVP is + unrecognized then its type is unknown. We therefore don't + know that its data bytes contain encapsulated AVPs, so + can't but ignore any of those that set the M-bit. Doing + anything else when the type *is* known would be + inconsistent.</p> + <p> + OTP-11087 (R16B03) caused the M-bit on any unrecognized + AVP to be regarded as an error, unrecognized being taken + to mean "not explicitly defined as a member of its + container". (That is, an AVP that can't be packed into a + dedicated record field, which is slightly stronger than + "not defined".) This fixed the original intention for + top-level AVPs but broke the required leniency for + Grouped AVPs whose type is known. This leniency is now + restored.</p> + <p> + Note that dictionary files need to be recompiled for the + change to have effect.</p> + <p> + Thanks to Rory McKeown for reporting the problem.</p> + <p> + Own Id: OTP-11675 Aux Id: OTP-11087 </p> + </item> + <item> + <p> + Fix pick_peer case clause failure.</p> + <p> + In the case of {call_mutates_state, true} configuration + on the service in question, any peer selection that + failed to select a peer resulted in a case clause + failure. This was noticed in the case of a peer failover + in which an alternate peer wasn't available.</p> + <p> + Own Id: OTP-11789</p> + </item> + </list> + </section> + +</section> + <section><title>diameter 1.5</title> <section><title>Improvements and New Features</title> @@ -73,12 +231,6 @@ first.</p> <p> Own Id: OTP-11361</p> </item> - <item> - <p> - Fix silent make rules (Thanks to Anthony Ramine)</p> - <p> - Own Id: OTP-11514</p> - </item> </list> </section> |