aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/lib/hipe/test/basic_SUITE_data/basic_comparisons.erl
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'lib/hipe/test/basic_SUITE_data/basic_comparisons.erl')
-rw-r--r--lib/hipe/test/basic_SUITE_data/basic_comparisons.erl157
1 files changed, 157 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/lib/hipe/test/basic_SUITE_data/basic_comparisons.erl b/lib/hipe/test/basic_SUITE_data/basic_comparisons.erl
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000..8dab2cab1f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/lib/hipe/test/basic_SUITE_data/basic_comparisons.erl
@@ -0,0 +1,157 @@
+%%% -*- erlang-indent-level: 2 -*-
+%%%-------------------------------------------------------------------
+%%% Author: Kostis Sagonas
+%%%
+%%% Contains tests for correct execution of comparison operators.
+%%%-------------------------------------------------------------------
+-module(basic_comparisons).
+
+-export([test/0]).
+
+test() ->
+ Ns = [0, 0.0, 42, 42.0, gazonk],
+ T1F4 = [true, false, false, false, false],
+ T2F3 = [true, true, false, false, false],
+ F1T4 = [false, true, true, true, true],
+ F2T3 = [false, false, true, true, true],
+ %% tests for calls
+ T1F4 = [eq_exact_call(0, N) || N <- Ns],
+ F1T4 = [ne_exact_call(0, N) || N <- Ns],
+ T2F3 = [eq_call(0, N) || N <- Ns],
+ F2T3 = [ne_call(0, N) || N <- Ns],
+ %% tests for guards
+ T1F4 = [eq_exact_guard(0, N) || N <- Ns],
+ F1T4 = [ne_exact_guard(0, N) || N <- Ns],
+ T2F3 = [eq_guard(0, N) || N <- Ns],
+ F2T3 = [ne_guard(0, N) || N <- Ns],
+ %% some more tests
+ ok = test_against_zero(),
+ ok = test_against_other_terms(),
+ ok = test_sofs_func(),
+ ok.
+
+test_against_zero() ->
+ Xs = [0, 1, 0.0],
+ [true, false, false] = [is_zero_int(X) || X <- Xs],
+ [true, false, true] = [is_zero_num(X) || X <- Xs],
+ [false, true, true] = [is_nonzero_int(X) || X <- Xs],
+ [false, true, false] = [is_nonzero_num(X) || X <- Xs],
+ ok.
+
+test_against_other_terms() ->
+ TTT = {true, true, true},
+ FFF = {false, false, false},
+ TTT = {is_foo_exact(foo), is_foo_term1(foo), is_foo_term2(foo)},
+ FFF = {is_foo_exact(bar), is_foo_term1(bar), is_foo_term2(bar)},
+ FFF = {is_nonfoo_exact(foo), is_nonfoo_term1(foo), is_nonfoo_term2(foo)},
+ TTT = {is_nonfoo_exact(bar), is_nonfoo_term1(bar), is_nonfoo_term2(bar)},
+ Tup = {a, {42}, [c]},
+ TTT = {is_tuple_skel(Tup), is_tuple_exact(Tup), is_tuple_term(Tup)},
+ BNi = <<42>>,
+ TTT = {is_bin_exact(BNi), is_bin_term1(BNi), is_bin_term2(BNi)},
+ BNf = <<42/float>>,
+ FFF = {is_bin_exact(BNf), is_bin_term1(BNf), is_bin_term2(BNf)},
+ ok.
+
+test_sofs_func() ->
+ L = [0, 0.0],
+ ok = sofs_func(L, L, L).
+
+%%--------------------------------------------------------------------
+%% Test for comparison operators used in body calls
+
+eq_exact_call(X, Y) -> X =:= Y.
+
+ne_exact_call(X, Y) -> X =/= Y.
+
+eq_call(X, Y) -> X == Y.
+
+ne_call(X, Y) -> X /= Y.
+
+%%--------------------------------------------------------------------
+%% Tests for comparison operators used as guards
+
+eq_exact_guard(X, Y) when X =:= Y -> true;
+eq_exact_guard(_, _) -> false.
+
+ne_exact_guard(X, Y) when X =/= Y -> true;
+ne_exact_guard(_, _) -> false.
+
+eq_guard(X, Y) when X == Y -> true;
+eq_guard(_, _) -> false.
+
+ne_guard(X, Y) when X /= Y -> true;
+ne_guard(_, _) -> false.
+
+%%--------------------------------------------------------------------
+
+is_zero_int(N) when N =:= 0 -> true;
+is_zero_int(_) -> false.
+
+is_nonzero_int(N) when N =/= 0 -> true;
+is_nonzero_int(_) -> false.
+
+is_zero_num(N) when N == 0 -> true;
+is_zero_num(_) -> false.
+
+is_nonzero_num(N) when N /= 0 -> true;
+is_nonzero_num(_) -> false.
+
+%%--------------------------------------------------------------------
+%% There should not really be any difference in the generated code
+%% for the following three functions.
+
+is_foo_exact(A) when A =:= foo -> true;
+is_foo_exact(_) -> false.
+
+is_foo_term1(A) when A == foo -> true;
+is_foo_term1(_) -> false.
+
+is_foo_term2(A) when foo == A -> true;
+is_foo_term2(_) -> false.
+
+%%--------------------------------------------------------------------
+%% Same for these cases
+
+is_nonfoo_exact(A) when A =/= foo -> true;
+is_nonfoo_exact(_) -> false.
+
+is_nonfoo_term1(A) when A /= foo -> true;
+is_nonfoo_term1(_) -> false.
+
+is_nonfoo_term2(A) when foo /= A -> true;
+is_nonfoo_term2(_) -> false.
+
+%%--------------------------------------------------------------------
+
+is_tuple_skel({A,{B},[C]}) when is_atom(A), is_integer(B), is_atom(C) -> true;
+is_tuple_skel(T) when is_tuple(T) -> false.
+
+is_tuple_exact(T) when T =:= {a,{42},[c]} -> true;
+is_tuple_exact(T) when is_tuple(T) -> false.
+
+is_tuple_term(T) when T == {a,{42.0},[c]} -> true;
+is_tuple_term(T) when is_tuple(T) -> false.
+
+%%--------------------------------------------------------------------
+%% But for binaries the treatment has to be different, due to the need
+%% for construction of the binary in the guard.
+
+is_bin_exact(B) when B =:= <<42>> -> true;
+is_bin_exact(_) -> false.
+
+is_bin_term1(B) when B == <<42>> -> true;
+is_bin_term1(_) -> false.
+
+is_bin_term2(B) when <<42>> == B -> true;
+is_bin_term2(_) -> false.
+
+%%--------------------------------------------------------------------
+%% a test from sofs.erl which failed at some point
+
+sofs_func([X | Ts], X0, L) when X /= X0 ->
+ sofs_func(Ts, X, L);
+sofs_func([X | _Ts], X0, _L) when X == X0 ->
+ ok;
+sofs_func([], _X0, L) ->
+ L.