aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiffstats
path: root/lib/mnesia/src/mnesia_locker.erl
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'lib/mnesia/src/mnesia_locker.erl')
-rw-r--r--lib/mnesia/src/mnesia_locker.erl217
1 files changed, 99 insertions, 118 deletions
diff --git a/lib/mnesia/src/mnesia_locker.erl b/lib/mnesia/src/mnesia_locker.erl
index 0492d794f3..de4811f8e4 100644
--- a/lib/mnesia/src/mnesia_locker.erl
+++ b/lib/mnesia/src/mnesia_locker.erl
@@ -1,19 +1,19 @@
%%
%% %CopyrightBegin%
-%%
+%%
%% Copyright Ericsson AB 1996-2011. All Rights Reserved.
-%%
+%%
%% The contents of this file are subject to the Erlang Public License,
%% Version 1.1, (the "License"); you may not use this file except in
%% compliance with the License. You should have received a copy of the
%% Erlang Public License along with this software. If not, it can be
%% retrieved online at http://www.erlang.org/.
-%%
+%%
%% Software distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS"
%% basis, WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, either express or implied. See
%% the License for the specific language governing rights and limitations
%% under the License.
-%%
+%%
%% %CopyrightEnd%
%%
@@ -68,12 +68,12 @@
%% mnesia_held_locks: contain {Oid, Op, Tid} entries (bag)
-define(match_oid_held_locks(Oid), {Oid, '_', '_'}).
-%% mnesia_tid_locks: contain {Tid, Oid, Op} entries (bag)
+%% mnesia_tid_locks: contain {Tid, Oid, Op} entries (bag)
-define(match_oid_tid_locks(Tid), {Tid, '_', '_'}).
%% mnesia_sticky_locks: contain {Oid, Node} entries and {Tab, Node} entries (set)
-define(match_oid_sticky_locks(Oid),{Oid, '_'}).
%% mnesia_lock_queue: contain {queue, Oid, Tid, Op, ReplyTo, WaitForTid} entries (bag)
--define(match_oid_lock_queue(Oid), #queue{oid=Oid, tid='_', op = '_', pid = '_', lucky = '_'}).
+-define(match_oid_lock_queue(Oid), #queue{oid=Oid, tid='_', op = '_', pid = '_', lucky = '_'}).
%% mnesia_lock_counter: {{write, Tab}, Number} &&
%% {{read, Tab}, Number} entries (set)
@@ -83,11 +83,11 @@ start() ->
init(Parent) ->
register(?MODULE, self()),
process_flag(trap_exit, true),
- ?ets_new_table(mnesia_held_locks, [bag, private, named_table]),
+ ?ets_new_table(mnesia_held_locks, [bag, private, named_table]),
?ets_new_table(mnesia_tid_locks, [bag, private, named_table]),
?ets_new_table(mnesia_sticky_locks, [set, private, named_table]),
?ets_new_table(mnesia_lock_queue, [bag, private, named_table, {keypos, 2}]),
-
+
proc_lib:init_ack(Parent, {ok, self()}),
case ?catch_val(pid_sort_order) of
r9b_plain -> put(pid_sort_order, r9b_plain);
@@ -98,8 +98,8 @@ init(Parent) ->
val(Var) ->
case ?catch_val(Var) of
- {'EXIT', _ReASoN_} -> mnesia_lib:other_val(Var, _ReASoN_);
- _VaLuE_ -> _VaLuE_
+ {'EXIT', _ReASoN_} -> mnesia_lib:other_val(Var, _ReASoN_);
+ _VaLuE_ -> _VaLuE_
end.
reply(From, R) ->
@@ -111,10 +111,10 @@ l_request(Node, X, Store) ->
l_req_rec(Node, Store) ->
?ets_insert(Store, {nodes, Node}),
- receive
- {?MODULE, Node, Reply} ->
+ receive
+ {?MODULE, Node, Reply} ->
Reply;
- {mnesia_down, Node} ->
+ {mnesia_down, Node} ->
{not_granted, {node_not_running, Node}}
end.
@@ -128,10 +128,10 @@ send_release_tid(Nodes, Tid) ->
rpc:abcast(Nodes, ?MODULE, {self(), {sync_release_tid, Tid}}).
receive_release_tid_acc([Node | Nodes], Tid) ->
- receive
- {?MODULE, Node, {tid_released, Tid}} ->
+ receive
+ {?MODULE, Node, {tid_released, Tid}} ->
receive_release_tid_acc(Nodes, Tid);
- {mnesia_down, Node} ->
+ {mnesia_down, Node} ->
receive_release_tid_acc(Nodes, Tid)
end;
receive_release_tid_acc([], _Tid) ->
@@ -152,27 +152,27 @@ loop(State) ->
%% Really do a read, but get hold of a write lock
%% used by mnesia:wread(Oid).
-
+
{From, {read_write, Tid, Oid}} ->
try_sticky_lock(Tid, read_write, From, Oid),
loop(State);
-
+
%% Tid has somehow terminated, clear up everything
%% and pass locks on to queued processes.
%% This is the purpose of the mnesia_tid_locks table
-
+
{release_tid, Tid} ->
do_release_tid(Tid),
loop(State);
-
+
%% stick lock, first tries this to the where_to_read Node
{From, {test_set_sticky, Tid, {Tab, _} = Oid, Lock}} ->
case ?ets_lookup(mnesia_sticky_locks, Tab) of
- [] ->
+ [] ->
reply(From, not_stuck),
loop(State);
[{_,Node}] when Node == node() ->
- %% Lock is stuck here, see now if we can just set
+ %% Lock is stuck here, see now if we can just set
%% a regular write lock
try_lock(Tid, Lock, From, Oid),
loop(State);
@@ -188,7 +188,7 @@ loop(State) ->
?ets_insert(mnesia_sticky_locks, {Tab, N}),
loop(State);
- %% The caller which sends this message, must have first
+ %% The caller which sends this message, must have first
%% aquired a write lock on the entire table
{unstick, Tab} ->
?ets_delete(mnesia_sticky_locks, Tab),
@@ -205,14 +205,14 @@ loop(State) ->
[{_,N}] ->
Req = {From, {ix_read, Tid, Tab, IxKey, Pos}},
From ! {?MODULE, node(), {switch, N, Req}},
- loop(State)
+ loop(State)
end;
{From, {sync_release_tid, Tid}} ->
do_release_tid(Tid),
reply(From, {tid_released, Tid}),
loop(State);
-
+
{release_remote_non_pending, Node, Pending} ->
release_remote_non_pending(Node, Pending),
mnesia_monitor:mnesia_down(?MODULE, Node),
@@ -229,7 +229,7 @@ loop(State) ->
{get_table, From, LockTable} ->
From ! {LockTable, ?ets_match_object(LockTable, '_')},
loop(State);
-
+
Msg ->
error("~p got unexpected message: ~p~n", [?MODULE, Msg]),
loop(State)
@@ -271,8 +271,8 @@ try_lock(Tid, Op, SimpleOp, Lock, Pid, Oid) ->
{queue, Lucky} ->
?dbg("Queued ~p ~p ~p ~p ~n", [Tid, Oid, Lock, Lucky]),
%% Append to queue: Nice place for trace output
- ?ets_insert(mnesia_lock_queue,
- #queue{oid = Oid, tid = Tid, op = Op,
+ ?ets_insert(mnesia_lock_queue,
+ #queue{oid = Oid, tid = Tid, op = Op,
pid = Pid, lucky = Lucky}),
?ets_insert(mnesia_tid_locks, {Tid, Oid, {queued, Op}})
end.
@@ -315,12 +315,12 @@ grant_lock(Tid, write, Lock, Oid) ->
%% newer (higher tid) transactions may never wait on older ones,
%% 2) When releasing the tids from the queue always begin with youngest (high tid)
%% because of 1) it will avoid the deadlocks.
-%% 3) TabLocks is the problem :-) They should not starve and not deadlock
+%% 3) TabLocks is the problem :-) They should not starve and not deadlock
%% handle tablocks in queue as they had locks on unlocked records.
can_lock(Tid, read, {Tab, Key}, AlreadyQ) when Key /= ?ALL ->
%% The key is bound, no need for the other BIF
- Oid = {Tab, Key},
+ Oid = {Tab, Key},
ObjLocks = ?ets_match_object(mnesia_held_locks, {Oid, write, '_'}),
TabLocks = ?ets_match_object(mnesia_held_locks, {{Tab, ?ALL}, write, '_'}),
check_lock(Tid, Oid, ObjLocks, TabLocks, yes, AlreadyQ, read);
@@ -330,7 +330,7 @@ can_lock(Tid, read, Oid, AlreadyQ) -> % Whole tab
ObjLocks = ?ets_match_object(mnesia_held_locks, {{Tab, '_'}, write, '_'}),
check_lock(Tid, Oid, ObjLocks, [], yes, AlreadyQ, read);
-can_lock(Tid, write, {Tab, Key}, AlreadyQ) when Key /= ?ALL ->
+can_lock(Tid, write, {Tab, Key}, AlreadyQ) when Key /= ?ALL ->
Oid = {Tab, Key},
ObjLocks = ?ets_lookup(mnesia_held_locks, Oid),
TabLocks = ?ets_lookup(mnesia_held_locks, {Tab, ?ALL}),
@@ -348,22 +348,22 @@ check_lock(Tid, Oid, [Lock | Locks], TabLocks, X, AlreadyQ, Type) ->
check_lock(Tid, Oid, Locks, TabLocks, X, AlreadyQ, Type);
WaitForTid ->
Queue = allowed_to_be_queued(WaitForTid,Tid),
- if Queue == true ->
+ if Queue == true ->
check_lock(Tid, Oid, Locks, TabLocks, {queue, WaitForTid}, AlreadyQ, Type);
Tid#tid.pid == WaitForTid#tid.pid ->
dbg_out("Spurious lock conflict ~w ~w: ~w -> ~w~n",
- [Oid, Lock, Tid, WaitForTid]),
+ [Oid, Lock, Tid, WaitForTid]),
%% Test..
{Tab, _Key} = Oid,
- HaveQ = (ets:lookup(mnesia_lock_queue, Oid) /= [])
+ HaveQ = (ets:lookup(mnesia_lock_queue, Oid) /= [])
orelse (ets:lookup(mnesia_lock_queue,{Tab,?ALL}) /= []),
- if
- HaveQ ->
+ if
+ HaveQ ->
{no, WaitForTid};
- true ->
+ true ->
check_lock(Tid,Oid,Locks,TabLocks,{queue,WaitForTid},AlreadyQ,Type)
end;
- %%{no, WaitForTid}; Safe solution
+ %%{no, WaitForTid}; Safe solution
true ->
{no, WaitForTid}
end
@@ -373,7 +373,7 @@ check_lock(_, _, [], [], X, {queue, bad_luck}, _) ->
X; %% The queue should be correct already no need to check it again
check_lock(_, _, [], [], X = {queue, _Tid}, _AlreadyQ, _) ->
- X;
+ X;
check_lock(Tid, Oid, [], [], X, AlreadyQ, Type) ->
{Tab, Key} = Oid,
@@ -387,7 +387,7 @@ check_lock(Tid, Oid, [], [], X, AlreadyQ, Type) ->
%% If there is a queue on that object, read_lock shouldn't be granted
ObjLocks = ets:lookup(mnesia_lock_queue, Oid),
case max(ObjLocks) of
- empty ->
+ empty ->
check_queue(Tid, Tab, X, AlreadyQ);
ObjL ->
case allowed_to_be_queued(ObjL,Tid) of
@@ -407,12 +407,12 @@ check_lock(Tid, Oid, [], TabLocks, X, AlreadyQ, Type) ->
allowed_to_be_queued(WaitForTid, Tid) ->
case get(pid_sort_order) of
undefined -> WaitForTid > Tid;
- r9b_plain ->
+ r9b_plain ->
cmp_tid(true, WaitForTid, Tid) =:= 1;
- standard ->
+ standard ->
cmp_tid(false, WaitForTid, Tid) =:= 1
- end.
-
+ end.
+
%% Check queue for conflicting locks
%% Assume that all queued locks belongs to other tid's
@@ -421,25 +421,25 @@ check_queue(Tid, Tab, X, AlreadyQ) ->
Greatest = max(TabLocks),
case Greatest of
empty -> X;
- Tid -> X;
- WaitForTid ->
+ Tid -> X;
+ WaitForTid ->
case allowed_to_be_queued(WaitForTid,Tid) of
true ->
{queue, WaitForTid};
- false when AlreadyQ =:= {no, bad_luck} ->
+ false when AlreadyQ =:= {no, bad_luck} ->
{no, WaitForTid}
end
end.
sort_queue(QL) ->
case get(pid_sort_order) of
- undefined ->
+ undefined ->
lists:reverse(lists:keysort(#queue.tid, QL));
- r9b_plain ->
- lists:sort(fun(#queue{tid=X},#queue{tid=Y}) ->
+ r9b_plain ->
+ lists:sort(fun(#queue{tid=X},#queue{tid=Y}) ->
cmp_tid(true, X, Y) == 1
end, QL);
- standard ->
+ standard ->
lists:sort(fun(#queue{tid=X},#queue{tid=Y}) ->
cmp_tid(false, X, Y) == 1
end, QL)
@@ -466,12 +466,12 @@ set_read_lock_on_all_keys(Tid, From, Tab, IxKey, Pos) ->
{queue, Lucky} ->
?dbg("Queued ~p ~p ~p ~p ~n", [Tid, Oid, Lock, Lucky]),
%% Append to queue: Nice place for trace output
- ?ets_insert(mnesia_lock_queue,
- #queue{oid = Oid, tid = Tid, op = Op,
+ ?ets_insert(mnesia_lock_queue,
+ #queue{oid = Oid, tid = Tid, op = Op,
pid = From, lucky = Lucky}),
?ets_insert(mnesia_tid_locks, {Tid, Oid, {queued, Op}})
end.
-
+
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
%% Release of locks
@@ -530,20 +530,20 @@ release_lock({Tid, Oid, Op}) ->
rearrange_queue([{_Tid, {Tab, Key}, _} | Locks]) ->
if
- Key /= ?ALL->
- Queue =
- ets:lookup(mnesia_lock_queue, {Tab, ?ALL}) ++
+ Key /= ?ALL->
+ Queue =
+ ets:lookup(mnesia_lock_queue, {Tab, ?ALL}) ++
ets:lookup(mnesia_lock_queue, {Tab, Key}),
- case Queue of
- [] ->
+ case Queue of
+ [] ->
ok;
_ ->
Sorted = sort_queue(Queue),
try_waiters_obj(Sorted)
- end;
- true ->
+ end;
+ true ->
Pat = ?match_oid_lock_queue({Tab, '_'}),
- Queue = ?ets_match_object(mnesia_lock_queue, Pat),
+ Queue = ?ets_match_object(mnesia_lock_queue, Pat),
Sorted = sort_queue(Queue),
try_waiters_tab(Sorted)
end,
@@ -556,7 +556,7 @@ try_waiters_obj([W | Waiters]) ->
case try_waiter(W) of
queued ->
no;
- _ ->
+ _ ->
try_waiters_obj(Waiters)
end;
try_waiters_obj([]) ->
@@ -573,10 +573,10 @@ try_waiters_tab([W | Waiters]) ->
end;
Oid ->
case try_waiter(W) of
- queued ->
+ queued ->
Rest = key_delete_all(Oid, #queue.oid, Waiters),
try_waiters_tab(Rest);
- _ ->
+ _ ->
try_waiters_tab(Waiters)
end
end;
@@ -594,20 +594,20 @@ try_waiter(Oid, Op, SimpleOp, Lock, ReplyTo, Tid) ->
case can_lock(Tid, Lock, Oid, {queue, bad_luck}) of
yes ->
%% Delete from queue: Nice place for trace output
- ?ets_match_delete(mnesia_lock_queue,
+ ?ets_match_delete(mnesia_lock_queue,
#queue{oid=Oid, tid = Tid, op = Op,
pid = ReplyTo, lucky = '_'}),
- Reply = grant_lock(Tid, SimpleOp, Lock, Oid),
+ Reply = grant_lock(Tid, SimpleOp, Lock, Oid),
reply(ReplyTo,Reply),
locked;
{queue, _Why} ->
?dbg("Keep ~p ~p ~p ~p~n", [Tid, Oid, Lock, _Why]),
- queued; % Keep waiter in queue
+ queued; % Keep waiter in queue
{no, Lucky} ->
C = #cyclic{op = SimpleOp, lock = Lock, oid = Oid, lucky = Lucky},
verbose("** WARNING ** Restarted transaction, possible deadlock in lock queue ~w: cyclic = ~w~n",
[Tid, C]),
- ?ets_match_delete(mnesia_lock_queue,
+ ?ets_match_delete(mnesia_lock_queue,
#queue{oid=Oid, tid = Tid, op = Op,
pid = ReplyTo, lucky = '_'}),
Reply = {not_granted, C},
@@ -645,7 +645,7 @@ mnesia_down(N, Pending) ->
Pid ! {release_remote_non_pending, N, Pending}
end.
-%% Aquire a write lock, but do a read, used by
+%% Aquire a write lock, but do a read, used by
%% mnesia:wread/1
rwlock(Tid, Store, Oid) ->
@@ -657,9 +657,10 @@ rwlock(Tid, Store, Oid) ->
Lock = write,
case need_lock(Store, Tab, Key, Lock) of
yes ->
- {Ns, Majority} = w_nodes(Tab),
+ {Ns0, Majority} = w_nodes(Tab),
+ Ns = [Node|lists:delete(Node,Ns0)],
check_majority(Majority, Tab, Ns),
- Res = get_rwlocks_on_nodes(Ns, rwlock, Node, Store, Tid, Oid),
+ Res = get_rwlocks_on_nodes(Ns, make_ref(), Store, Tid, Oid),
?ets_insert(Store, {{locks, Tab, Key}, Lock}),
Res;
no ->
@@ -718,7 +719,7 @@ sticky_rwlock(Tid, Store, Oid) ->
sticky_lock(Tid, Store, Oid, read_write).
sticky_lock(Tid, Store, {Tab, Key} = Oid, Lock) ->
- N = val({Tab, where_to_read}),
+ N = val({Tab, where_to_read}),
if
node() == N ->
case need_lock(Store, Tab, Key, write) of
@@ -805,9 +806,9 @@ sticky_wlock_table(Tid, Store, Tab) ->
%% aquire a wlock on Oid
%% We store a {Tabname, write, Tid} in all locktables
%% on all nodes containing a copy of Tabname
-%% We also store an item {{locks, Tab, Key}, write} in the
+%% We also store an item {{locks, Tab, Key}, write} in the
%% local store when we have aquired the lock.
-%%
+%%
wlock(Tid, Store, Oid) ->
wlock(Tid, Store, Oid, _CheckMajority = true).
@@ -845,10 +846,10 @@ wlock_no_exist(Tid, Store, Tab, Ns) ->
need_lock(Store, Tab, Key, LockPattern) ->
TabL = ?ets_match_object(Store, {{locks, Tab, ?ALL}, LockPattern}),
- if
+ if
TabL == [] ->
KeyL = ?ets_match_object(Store, {{locks, Tab, Key}, LockPattern}),
- if
+ if
KeyL == [] ->
yes;
true ->
@@ -865,7 +866,7 @@ del_debug() ->
erase(mnesia_wlock_nodes).
%% We first send lock request to the local node if it is part of the lockers
-%% then the first sorted node then to the rest of the lockmanagers on all
+%% then the first sorted node then to the rest of the lockmanagers on all
%% nodes holding a copy of the table
get_wlocks_on_nodes([Node | Tail], Orig, Store, Request, Oid) ->
@@ -875,51 +876,31 @@ get_wlocks_on_nodes([Node | Tail], Orig, Store, Request, Oid) ->
case node() of
Node -> %% Local done try one more
get_wlocks_on_nodes(Tail, Orig, Store, Request, Oid);
- _ -> %% The first succeded cont with the rest
+ _ -> %% The first succeded cont with the rest
get_wlocks_on_nodes(Tail, Store, Request),
receive_wlocks(Tail, Orig, Store, Oid)
end;
-get_wlocks_on_nodes([], Orig, _Store, _Request, _Oid) ->
+get_wlocks_on_nodes([], Orig, _Store, _Request, _Oid) ->
Orig.
get_wlocks_on_nodes([Node | Tail], Store, Request) ->
{?MODULE, Node} ! Request,
?ets_insert(Store,{nodes, Node}),
get_wlocks_on_nodes(Tail, Store, Request);
-get_wlocks_on_nodes([], _, _) ->
+get_wlocks_on_nodes([], _, _) ->
ok.
-get_rwlocks_on_nodes([ReadNode|Tail], _Res, ReadNode, Store, Tid, Oid) ->
+get_rwlocks_on_nodes([ReadNode|Tail], Ref, Store, Tid, Oid) ->
Op = {self(), {read_write, Tid, Oid}},
{?MODULE, ReadNode} ! Op,
?ets_insert(Store, {nodes, ReadNode}),
- Res = receive_wlocks([ReadNode], undefined, Store, Oid),
- case node() of
- ReadNode ->
- get_rwlocks_on_nodes(Tail, Res, ReadNode, Store, Tid, Oid);
- _ ->
- get_wlocks_on_nodes(Tail, Store, {self(), {write, Tid, Oid}}),
- receive_wlocks(Tail, Res, Store, Oid)
+ case receive_wlocks([ReadNode], Ref, Store, Oid) of
+ Ref ->
+ get_rwlocks_on_nodes(Tail, Ref, Store, Tid, Oid);
+ Res ->
+ get_wlocks_on_nodes(Tail, Res, Store, {self(), {write, Tid, Oid}}, Oid)
end;
-get_rwlocks_on_nodes([Node | Tail], Res, ReadNode, Store, Tid, Oid) ->
- Op = {self(), {write, Tid, Oid}},
- {?MODULE, Node} ! Op,
- ?ets_insert(Store, {nodes, Node}),
- receive_wlocks([Node], undefined, Store, Oid),
- if node() == Node ->
- get_rwlocks_on_nodes(Tail, Res, ReadNode, Store, Tid, Oid);
- Res == rwlock -> %% Hmm
- Rest = lists:delete(ReadNode, Tail),
- Op2 = {self(), {read_write, Tid, Oid}},
- {?MODULE, ReadNode} ! Op2,
- ?ets_insert(Store, {nodes, ReadNode}),
- get_wlocks_on_nodes(Rest, Store, {self(), {write, Tid, Oid}}),
- receive_wlocks([ReadNode|Rest], undefined, Store, Oid);
- true ->
- get_wlocks_on_nodes(Tail, Store, {self(), {write, Tid, Oid}}),
- receive_wlocks(Tail, Res, Store, Oid)
- end;
-get_rwlocks_on_nodes([],Res,_,_,_,_) ->
+get_rwlocks_on_nodes([],Res,_,_,_) ->
Res.
receive_wlocks([], Res, _Store, _Oid) ->
@@ -944,8 +925,8 @@ receive_wlocks(Nodes = [This|Ns], Res, Store, Oid) ->
Tail = lists:delete(Node,Nodes),
Nonstuck = lists:delete(Sticky,Tail),
[?ets_insert(Store, {nodes, NSNode}) || NSNode <- Nonstuck],
- case lists:member(Sticky,Tail) of
- true ->
+ case lists:member(Sticky,Tail) of
+ true ->
sticky_flush(Nonstuck,Store),
receive_wlocks([Sticky], Res, Store, Oid);
false ->
@@ -957,7 +938,7 @@ receive_wlocks(Nodes = [This|Ns], Res, Store, Oid) ->
flush_remaining(Ns, This, Reason1)
end.
-sticky_flush([], _) ->
+sticky_flush([], _) ->
del_debug(),
ok;
sticky_flush(Ns=[Node | Tail], Store) ->
@@ -991,7 +972,7 @@ opt_lookup_in_client(lookup_in_client, Oid, Lock) ->
%% Table has been deleted from this node,
%% restart the transaction.
#cyclic{op = read, lock = Lock, oid = Oid, lucky = nowhere};
- Val ->
+ Val ->
Val
end;
opt_lookup_in_client(Val, _Oid, _Lock) ->
@@ -1000,8 +981,8 @@ opt_lookup_in_client(Val, _Oid, _Lock) ->
return_granted_or_nodes({_, ?ALL} , Nodes) -> Nodes;
return_granted_or_nodes({?GLOBAL, _}, Nodes) -> Nodes;
return_granted_or_nodes(_ , _Nodes) -> granted.
-
-%% We store a {Tab, read, From} item in the
+
+%% We store a {Tab, read, From} item in the
%% locks table on the node where we actually do pick up the object
%% and we also store an item {lock, Oid, read} in our local store
%% so that we can release any locks we hold when we commit.
@@ -1059,9 +1040,9 @@ rlock_get_reply(Node, Store, Oid, {granted, V}) ->
?ets_insert(Store, {{locks, Tab, Key}, read}),
?ets_insert(Store, {nodes, Node}),
case opt_lookup_in_client(V, Oid, read) of
- C = #cyclic{} ->
+ C = #cyclic{} ->
mnesia:abort(C);
- Val ->
+ Val ->
Val
end;
rlock_get_reply(Node, Store, Oid, granted) ->
@@ -1079,7 +1060,7 @@ rlock_get_reply(Node, Store, Tab, {granted, V, RealKeys}) ->
rlock_get_reply(_Node, _Store, _Oid, {not_granted, Reason}) ->
exit({aborted, Reason});
-rlock_get_reply(_Node, Store, Oid, {switch, N2, Req}) ->
+rlock_get_reply(_Node, Store, Oid, {switch, N2, Req}) ->
?ets_insert(Store, {nodes, N2}),
{?MODULE, N2} ! Req,
rlock_get_reply(N2, Store, Oid, l_req_rec(N2, Store)).
@@ -1095,7 +1076,7 @@ ixrlock(Tid, Store, Tab, IxKey, Pos) ->
%%% Old code
%% R = l_request(Node, {ix_read, Tid, Tab, IxKey, Pos}, Store),
%% rlock_get_reply(Node, Store, Tab, R)
-
+
case need_lock(Store, Tab, ?ALL, read) of
no when Node =:= node() ->
ix_read_res(Tab,IxKey,Pos);
generated by cgit v1.2.3 (git 2.25.1) at 2024-11-09 12:05:49 +0000