diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'lib/public_key/test/pkits_SUITE.erl')
| -rw-r--r-- | lib/public_key/test/pkits_SUITE.erl | 1472 |
1 files changed, 1104 insertions, 368 deletions
diff --git a/lib/public_key/test/pkits_SUITE.erl b/lib/public_key/test/pkits_SUITE.erl index 660af4e8ab..a325a975e9 100644 --- a/lib/public_key/test/pkits_SUITE.erl +++ b/lib/public_key/test/pkits_SUITE.erl @@ -26,7 +26,6 @@ -compile(export_all). -include_lib("public_key/include/public_key.hrl"). -%%-include("public_key.hrl"). -define(error(Format,Args), error(Format,Args,?FILE,?LINE)). -define(warning(Format,Args), warning(Format,Args,?FILE,?LINE)). @@ -42,18 +41,65 @@ -define(NIST5, "2.16.840.1.101.3.2.1.48.5"). -define(NIST6, "2.16.840.1.101.3.2.1.48.6"). +-record(verify_state, { + certs_db, + crl_info, + revoke_state}). %% -suite() -> [{ct_hooks,[ts_install_cth]}]. +suite() -> + [{ct_hooks,[ts_install_cth]}]. all() -> - [signature_verification, validity_periods, - verifying_name_chaining, - verifying_paths_with_self_issued_certificates, - verifying_basic_constraints, key_usage, - name_constraints, private_certificate_extensions]. + [{group, signature_verification}, + {group, validity_periods}, + {group, verifying_name_chaining}, + {group, verifying_paths_with_self_issued_certificates}, + %%{group, basic_certificate_revocation_tests}, + %%{group, delta_crls}, + %%{group, distribution_points}, + {group, verifying_basic_constraints}, + {group, key_usage}, + {group, name_constraints}, + {group, private_certificate_extensions}]. groups() -> - []. + [{signature_verification, [], [valid_rsa_signature, + invalid_rsa_signature, valid_dsa_signature, + invalid_dsa_signature]}, + {validity_periods, [], + [not_before_invalid, not_before_valid, not_after_invalid, not_after_valid]}, + {verifying_name_chaining, [], + [invalid_name_chain, whitespace_name_chain, capitalization_name_chain, + uid_name_chain, attrib_name_chain, string_name_chain]}, + {verifying_paths_with_self_issued_certificates, [], + [basic_valid, basic_invalid, crl_signing_valid, crl_signing_invalid]}, + %% {basic_certificate_revocation_tests, [], + %% [missing_CRL, revoked_CA, revoked_peer, invalid_CRL_signature, + %% invalid_CRL_issuer, invalid_CRL, valid_CRL, + %% unknown_CRL_extension, old_CRL, fresh_CRL, valid_serial, + %% invalid_serial, valid_seperate_keys, invalid_separate_keys]}, + %% {delta_crls, [], [delta_without_crl, valid_delta_crls, invalid_delta_crls]}, + %% {distribution_points, [], [valid_distribution_points, + %% valid_distribution_points_no_issuing_distribution_point, + %% invalid_distribution_points, valid_only_contains, + %% invalid_only_contains, valid_only_some_reasons, + %% invalid_only_some_reasons, valid_indirect_crl, + %% invalid_indirect_crl, valid_crl_issuer, invalid_crl_issuer]}, + {verifying_basic_constraints,[], + [missing_basic_constraints, valid_basic_constraint, invalid_path_constraints, + valid_path_constraints]}, + {key_usage, [], + [invalid_key_usage, valid_key_usage]}, + {name_constraints, [], + [valid_DN_name_constraints, invalid_DN_name_constraints, + valid_rfc822_name_constraints, + invalid_rfc822_name_constraints, valid_DN_and_rfc822_name_constraints, + invalid_DN_and_rfc822_name_constraints, valid_dns_name_constraints, + invalid_dns_name_constraints, valid_uri_name_constraints, + invalid_uri_name_constraints]}, + {private_certificate_extensions, [], + [unknown_critical_extension, unknown_not_critical_extension]} + ]. init_per_group(_GroupName, Config) -> Config. @@ -61,112 +107,706 @@ init_per_group(_GroupName, Config) -> end_per_group(_GroupName, Config) -> Config. +init_per_testcase(_Func, Config) -> + Datadir = proplists:get_value(data_dir, Config), + put(datadir, Datadir), + Config. + +end_per_testcase(_Func, Config) -> + Config. + +init_per_suite(Config) -> + {skip, "PKIX Conformance test certificates expired 14 of April 2011," + " new conformance test suite uses new format so skip until PKCS-12 support is implemented"}. + %% try crypto:start() of + %% ok -> + %% Config + %% catch _:_ -> + %% {skip, "Crypto did not start"} + %% end. + +end_per_suite(_Config) -> + application:stop(crypto). + +%%----------------------------------------------------------------------------- +valid_rsa_signature(doc) -> + ["Test rsa signatur verification"]; +valid_rsa_signature(suite) -> + []; +valid_rsa_signature(Config) when is_list(Config) -> + run([{ "4.1.1", "Valid Signatures Test1", ok}]). + +invalid_rsa_signature(doc) -> + ["Test rsa signatur verification"]; +invalid_rsa_signature(suite) -> + []; +invalid_rsa_signature(Config) when is_list(Config) -> + run([{ "4.1.2", "Invalid CA Signature Test2", {bad_cert,invalid_signature}}, + { "4.1.3", "Invalid EE Signature Test3", {bad_cert,invalid_signature}}]). + +valid_dsa_signature(doc) -> + ["Test dsa signatur verification"]; +valid_dsa_signature(suite) -> + []; +valid_dsa_signature(Config) when is_list(Config) -> + run([{ "4.1.4", "Valid DSA Signatures Test4", ok}, + { "4.1.5", "Valid DSA Parameter Inheritance Test5", ok}]). + +invalid_dsa_signature(doc) -> + ["Test dsa signatur verification"]; +invalid_dsa_signature(suite) -> + []; +invalid_dsa_signature(Config) when is_list(Config) -> + run([{ "4.1.6", "Invalid DSA Signature Test6",{bad_cert,invalid_signature}}]). +%%----------------------------------------------------------------------------- +not_before_invalid(doc) -> + [""]; +not_before_invalid(suite) -> + []; +not_before_invalid(Config) when is_list(Config) -> + run([{ "4.2.1", "Invalid CA notBefore Date Test1",{bad_cert, cert_expired}}, + { "4.2.2", "Invalid EE notBefore Date Test2",{bad_cert, cert_expired}}]). + +not_before_valid(doc) -> + [""]; +not_before_valid(suite) -> + []; +not_before_valid(Config) when is_list(Config) -> + run([{ "4.2.3", "Valid pre2000 UTC notBefore Date Test3", ok}, + { "4.2.4", "Valid GeneralizedTime notBefore Date Test4", ok}]). + +not_after_invalid(doc) -> + [""]; +not_after_invalid(suite) -> + []; +not_after_invalid(Config) when is_list(Config) -> + run([{ "4.2.5", "Invalid CA notAfter Date Test5", {bad_cert, cert_expired}}, + { "4.2.6", "Invalid EE notAfter Date Test6", {bad_cert, cert_expired}}, + { "4.2.7", "Invalid pre2000 UTC EE notAfter Date Test7",{bad_cert, cert_expired}}]). + +not_after_valid(doc) -> + [""]; +not_after_valid(suite) -> + []; +not_after_valid(Config) when is_list(Config) -> + run([{ "4.2.8", "Valid GeneralizedTime notAfter Date Test8", ok}]). +%%----------------------------------------------------------------------------- +invalid_name_chain(doc) -> + [""]; +invalid_name_chain(suite) -> + []; +invalid_name_chain(Config) when is_list(Config) -> + run([{ "4.3.1", "Invalid Name Chaining EE Test1", {bad_cert, invalid_issuer}}, + { "4.3.2", "Invalid Name Chaining Order Test2", {bad_cert, invalid_issuer}}]). + +whitespace_name_chain(doc) -> + [""]; +whitespace_name_chain(suite) -> + []; +whitespace_name_chain(Config) when is_list(Config) -> + run([{ "4.3.3", "Valid Name Chaining Whitespace Test3", ok}, + { "4.3.4", "Valid Name Chaining Whitespace Test4", ok}]). + +capitalization_name_chain(doc) -> + [""]; +capitalization_name_chain(suite) -> + []; +capitalization_name_chain(Config) when is_list(Config) -> + run([{ "4.3.5", "Valid Name Chaining Capitalization Test5",ok}]). + +uid_name_chain(doc) -> + [""]; +uid_name_chain(suite) -> + []; +uid_name_chain(Config) when is_list(Config) -> + run([{ "4.3.6", "Valid Name Chaining UIDs Test6",ok}]). + +attrib_name_chain(doc) -> + [""]; +attrib_name_chain(suite) -> + []; +attrib_name_chain(Config) when is_list(Config) -> + run([{ "4.3.7", "Valid RFC3280 Mandatory Attribute Types Test7", ok}, + { "4.3.8", "Valid RFC3280 Optional Attribute Types Test8", ok}]). + +string_name_chain(doc) -> + [""]; +string_name_chain(suite) -> + []; +string_name_chain(Config) when is_list(Config) -> + run([{ "4.3.9", "Valid UTF8String Encoded Names Test9", ok}, + { "4.3.10", "Valid Rollover from PrintableString to UTF8String Test10", ok}, + { "4.3.11", "Valid UTF8String Case Insensitive Match Test11", ok}]). + +%%----------------------------------------------------------------------------- + +basic_valid(doc) -> + [""]; +basic_valid(suite) -> + []; +basic_valid(Config) when is_list(Config) -> + run([{ "4.5.1", "Valid Basic Self-Issued Old With New Test1", ok}, + { "4.5.3", "Valid Basic Self-Issued New With Old Test3", ok}, + { "4.5.4", "Valid Basic Self-Issued New With Old Test4", ok} + ]). + +basic_invalid(doc) -> + [""]; +basic_invalid(suite) -> + []; +basic_invalid(Config) when is_list(Config) -> + run([{"4.5.2", "Invalid Basic Self-Issued Old With New Test2", + {bad_cert, {revoked, keyCompromise}}}, + {"4.5.5", "Invalid Basic Self-Issued New With Old Test5", + {bad_cert, {revoked, keyCompromise}}} + ]). + +crl_signing_valid(doc) -> + [""]; +crl_signing_valid(suite) -> + []; +crl_signing_valid(Config) when is_list(Config) -> + run([{ "4.5.6", "Valid Basic Self-Issued CRL Signing Key Test6", ok}]). + +crl_signing_invalid(doc) -> + [""]; +crl_signing_invalid(suite) -> + []; +crl_signing_invalid(Config) when is_list(Config) -> + run([{ "4.5.7", "Invalid Basic Self-Issued CRL Signing Key Test7", + {bad_cert, {revoked, keyCompromise}}}, + { "4.5.8", "Invalid Basic Self-Issued CRL Signing Key Test8", + {bad_cert, invalid_key_usage}} + ]). + +%%----------------------------------------------------------------------------- +missing_CRL(doc) -> + [""]; +missing_CRL(suite) -> + []; +missing_CRL(Config) when is_list(Config) -> + run([{ "4.4.1", "Missing CRL Test1",{bad_cert, + revocation_status_undetermined}}]). + +revoked_CA(doc) -> + [""]; +revoked_CA(suite) -> + []; +revoked_CA(Config) when is_list(Config) -> + run([{ "4.4.2", "Invalid Revoked CA Test2", {bad_cert, + {revoked, keyCompromise}}}]). + +revoked_peer(doc) -> + [""]; +revoked_peer(suite) -> + []; +revoked_peer(Config) when is_list(Config) -> + run([{ "4.4.3", "Invalid Revoked EE Test3", {bad_cert, + {revoked, keyCompromise}}}]). + +invalid_CRL_signature(doc) -> + [""]; +invalid_CRL_signature(suite) -> + []; +invalid_CRL_signature(Config) when is_list(Config) -> + run([{ "4.4.4", "Invalid Bad CRL Signature Test4", + {bad_cert, revocation_status_undetermined}}]). + +invalid_CRL_issuer(doc) -> + [""]; +invalid_CRL_issuer(suite) -> + []; +invalid_CRL_issuer(Config) when is_list(Config) -> + run({ "4.4.5", "Invalid Bad CRL Issuer Name Test5", + {bad_cert, revocation_status_undetermined}}). + +invalid_CRL(doc) -> + [""]; +invalid_CRL(suite) -> + []; +invalid_CRL(Config) when is_list(Config) -> + run([{ "4.4.6", "Invalid Wrong CRL Test6", + {bad_cert, revocation_status_undetermined}}]). + +valid_CRL(doc) -> + [""]; +valid_CRL(suite) -> + []; +valid_CRL(Config) when is_list(Config) -> + run([{ "4.4.7", "Valid Two CRLs Test7", ok}]). + +unknown_CRL_extension(doc) -> + [""]; +unknown_CRL_extension(suite) -> + []; +unknown_CRL_extension(Config) when is_list(Config) -> + run([{ "4.4.8", "Invalid Unknown CRL Entry Extension Test8", + {bad_cert, {revoked, keyCompromise}}}, + { "4.4.9", "Invalid Unknown CRL Extension Test9", + {bad_cert, {revoked, keyCompromise}}}, + { "4.4.10", "Invalid Unknown CRL Extension Test10", + {bad_cert, revocation_status_undetermined}}]). + +old_CRL(doc) -> + [""]; +old_CRL(suite) -> + []; +old_CRL(Config) when is_list(Config) -> + run([{ "4.4.11", "Invalid Old CRL nextUpdate Test11", + {bad_cert, revocation_status_undetermined}}, + { "4.4.12", "Invalid pre2000 CRL nextUpdate Test12", + {bad_cert, revocation_status_undetermined}}]). + +fresh_CRL(doc) -> + [""]; +fresh_CRL(suite) -> + []; +fresh_CRL(Config) when is_list(Config) -> + run([{ "4.4.13", "Valid GeneralizedTime CRL nextUpdate Test13", ok}]). + +valid_serial(doc) -> + [""]; +valid_serial(suite) -> + []; +valid_serial(Config) when is_list(Config) -> + run([ + { "4.4.14", "Valid Negative Serial Number Test14",ok}, + { "4.4.16", "Valid Long Serial Number Test16", ok}, + { "4.4.17", "Valid Long Serial Number Test17", ok} + ]). + +invalid_serial(doc) -> + [""]; +invalid_serial(suite) -> + []; +invalid_serial(Config) when is_list(Config) -> + run([{ "4.4.15", "Invalid Negative Serial Number Test15", + {bad_cert, {revoked, keyCompromise}}}, + { "4.4.18", "Invalid Long Serial Number Test18", + {bad_cert, {revoked, keyCompromise}}}]). + +valid_seperate_keys(doc) -> + [""]; +valid_seperate_keys(suite) -> + []; +valid_seperate_keys(Config) when is_list(Config) -> + run([{ "4.4.19", "Valid Separate Certificate and CRL Keys Test19", ok}]). + +invalid_separate_keys(doc) -> + [""]; +invalid_separate_keys(suite) -> + []; +invalid_separate_keys(Config) when is_list(Config) -> + run([{ "4.4.20", "Invalid Separate Certificate and CRL Keys Test20", + {bad_cert, {revoked, keyCompromise}}}, + { "4.4.21", "Invalid Separate Certificate and CRL Keys Test21", + {bad_cert, revocation_status_undetermined}} + ]). +%%----------------------------------------------------------------------------- +missing_basic_constraints(doc) -> + [""]; +missing_basic_constraints(suite) -> + []; +missing_basic_constraints(Config) when is_list(Config) -> + run([{ "4.6.1", "Invalid Missing basicConstraints Test1", + {bad_cert, missing_basic_constraint}}, + { "4.6.2", "Invalid cA False Test2", + {bad_cert, missing_basic_constraint}}, + { "4.6.3", "Invalid cA False Test3", + {bad_cert, missing_basic_constraint}}]). + +valid_basic_constraint(doc) -> + [""]; +valid_basic_constraint(suite) -> + []; +valid_basic_constraint(Config) when is_list(Config) -> + run([{"4.6.4", "Valid basicConstraints Not Critical Test4", ok}]). + +invalid_path_constraints(doc) -> + [""]; +invalid_path_constraints(suite) -> + []; +invalid_path_constraints(Config) when is_list(Config) -> + run([{ "4.6.5", "Invalid pathLenConstraint Test5", {bad_cert, max_path_length_reached}}, + { "4.6.6", "Invalid pathLenConstraint Test6", {bad_cert, max_path_length_reached}}, + { "4.6.9", "Invalid pathLenConstraint Test9", {bad_cert, max_path_length_reached}}, + { "4.6.10", "Invalid pathLenConstraint Test10", {bad_cert, max_path_length_reached}}, + { "4.6.11", "Invalid pathLenConstraint Test11", {bad_cert, max_path_length_reached}}, + { "4.6.12", "Invalid pathLenConstraint Test12", {bad_cert, max_path_length_reached}}, + { "4.6.16", "Invalid Self-Issued pathLenConstraint Test16", + {bad_cert, max_path_length_reached}}]). -signature_verification(doc) -> [""]; -signature_verification(suite) -> []; -signature_verification(Config) when is_list(Config) -> - run(signature_verification()). -validity_periods(doc) -> [""]; -validity_periods(suite) -> []; -validity_periods(Config) when is_list(Config) -> - run(validity_periods()). -verifying_name_chaining(doc) -> [""]; -verifying_name_chaining(suite) -> []; -verifying_name_chaining(Config) when is_list(Config) -> - run(verifying_name_chaining()). -basic_certificate_revocation_tests(doc) -> [""]; -basic_certificate_revocation_tests(suite) -> []; -basic_certificate_revocation_tests(Config) when is_list(Config) -> - run(basic_certificate_revocation_tests()). -verifying_paths_with_self_issued_certificates(doc) -> [""]; -verifying_paths_with_self_issued_certificates(suite) -> []; -verifying_paths_with_self_issued_certificates(Config) when is_list(Config) -> - run(verifying_paths_with_self_issued_certificates()). -verifying_basic_constraints(doc) -> [""]; -verifying_basic_constraints(suite) -> []; -verifying_basic_constraints(Config) when is_list(Config) -> - run(verifying_basic_constraints()). -key_usage(doc) -> [""]; -key_usage(suite) -> []; -key_usage(Config) when is_list(Config) -> - run(key_usage()). +valid_path_constraints(doc) -> + [""]; +valid_path_constraints(suite) -> + []; +valid_path_constraints(Config) when is_list(Config) -> + run([{ "4.6.7", "Valid pathLenConstraint Test7", ok}, + { "4.6.8", "Valid pathLenConstraint Test8", ok}, + { "4.6.13", "Valid pathLenConstraint Test13", ok}, + { "4.6.14", "Valid pathLenConstraint Test14", ok}, + { "4.6.15", "Valid Self-Issued pathLenConstraint Test15", ok}, + { "4.6.17", "Valid Self-Issued pathLenConstraint Test17", ok}]). + +%%----------------------------------------------------------------------------- +invalid_key_usage(doc) -> + [""]; +invalid_key_usage(suite) -> + []; +invalid_key_usage(Config) when is_list(Config) -> + run([{ "4.7.1", "Invalid keyUsage Critical keyCertSign False Test1", + {bad_cert,invalid_key_usage} }, + { "4.7.2", "Invalid keyUsage Not Critical keyCertSign False Test2", + {bad_cert,invalid_key_usage}}, + { "4.7.4", "Invalid keyUsage Critical cRLSign False Test4", + {bad_cert, revocation_status_undetermined}}, + { "4.7.5", "Invalid keyUsage Not Critical cRLSign False Test5", + {bad_cert, revocation_status_undetermined}} + ]). + +valid_key_usage(doc) -> + [""]; +valid_key_usage(suite) -> + []; +valid_key_usage(Config) when is_list(Config) -> + run([{ "4.7.3", "Valid keyUsage Not Critical Test3", ok}]). + +%%----------------------------------------------------------------------------- certificate_policies(doc) -> [""]; certificate_policies(suite) -> []; certificate_policies(Config) when is_list(Config) -> run(certificate_policies()). +%%----------------------------------------------------------------------------- require_explicit_policy(doc) -> [""]; require_explicit_policy(suite) -> []; require_explicit_policy(Config) when is_list(Config) -> run(require_explicit_policy()). +%%----------------------------------------------------------------------------- policy_mappings(doc) -> [""]; policy_mappings(suite) -> []; policy_mappings(Config) when is_list(Config) -> run(policy_mappings()). +%%----------------------------------------------------------------------------- inhibit_policy_mapping(doc) -> [""]; inhibit_policy_mapping(suite) -> []; inhibit_policy_mapping(Config) when is_list(Config) -> run(inhibit_policy_mapping()). +%%----------------------------------------------------------------------------- inhibit_any_policy(doc) -> [""]; inhibit_any_policy(suite) -> []; inhibit_any_policy(Config) when is_list(Config) -> run(inhibit_any_policy()). -name_constraints(doc) -> [""]; -name_constraints(suite) -> []; -name_constraints(Config) when is_list(Config) -> - run(name_constraints()). -distribution_points(doc) -> [""]; -distribution_points(suite) -> []; -distribution_points(Config) when is_list(Config) -> - run(distribution_points()). -delta_crls(doc) -> [""]; -delta_crls(suite) -> []; -delta_crls(Config) when is_list(Config) -> - run(delta_crls()). -private_certificate_extensions(doc) -> [""]; -private_certificate_extensions(suite) -> []; -private_certificate_extensions(Config) when is_list(Config) -> - run(private_certificate_extensions()). - -run() -> - Tests = - [signature_verification(), - validity_periods(), - verifying_name_chaining(), - %%basic_certificate_revocation_tests(), - verifying_paths_with_self_issued_certificates(), - verifying_basic_constraints(), - key_usage(), - %%certificate_policies(), - %%require_explicit_policy(), - %%policy_mappings(), - %%inhibit_policy_mapping(), - %%inhibit_any_policy(), - name_constraints(), - %distribution_points(), - %delta_crls(), - private_certificate_extensions() - ], - run(lists:append(Tests)). +%%----------------------------------------------------------------------------- + +valid_DN_name_constraints(doc) -> + [""]; +valid_DN_name_constraints(suite) -> + []; +valid_DN_name_constraints(Config) when is_list(Config) -> + run([{ "4.13.1", "Valid DN nameConstraints Test1", ok}, + { "4.13.4", "Valid DN nameConstraints Test4", ok}, + { "4.13.5", "Valid DN nameConstraints Test5", ok}, + { "4.13.6", "Valid DN nameConstraints Test6", ok}, + { "4.13.11", "Valid DN nameConstraints Test11", ok}, + { "4.13.14", "Valid DN nameConstraints Test14", ok}, + { "4.13.18", "Valid DN nameConstraints Test18", ok}, + { "4.13.19", "Valid Self-Issued DN nameConstraints Test19", ok}]). + +invalid_DN_name_constraints(doc) -> + [""]; +invalid_DN_name_constraints(suite) -> + []; +invalid_DN_name_constraints(Config) when is_list(Config) -> + run([{ "4.13.2", "Invalid DN nameConstraints Test2", {bad_cert, name_not_permitted}}, + { "4.13.3", "Invalid DN nameConstraints Test3", {bad_cert, name_not_permitted}}, + { "4.13.7", "Invalid DN nameConstraints Test7", {bad_cert, name_not_permitted}}, + { "4.13.8", "Invalid DN nameConstraints Test8", {bad_cert, name_not_permitted}}, + { "4.13.9", "Invalid DN nameConstraints Test9", {bad_cert, name_not_permitted}}, + { "4.13.10", "Invalid DN nameConstraints Test10",{bad_cert, name_not_permitted}}, + { "4.13.12", "Invalid DN nameConstraints Test12",{bad_cert, name_not_permitted}}, + { "4.13.13", "Invalid DN nameConstraints Test13",{bad_cert, name_not_permitted}}, + { "4.13.15", "Invalid DN nameConstraints Test15",{bad_cert, name_not_permitted}}, + { "4.13.16", "Invalid DN nameConstraints Test16",{bad_cert, name_not_permitted}}, + { "4.13.17", "Invalid DN nameConstraints Test17",{bad_cert, name_not_permitted}}, + { "4.13.20", "Invalid Self-Issued DN nameConstraints Test20", + {bad_cert, name_not_permitted}}]). + +valid_rfc822_name_constraints(doc) -> + [""]; +valid_rfc822_name_constraints(suite) -> + []; +valid_rfc822_name_constraints(Config) when is_list(Config) -> + run([{ "4.13.21", "Valid RFC822 nameConstraints Test21", ok}, + { "4.13.23", "Valid RFC822 nameConstraints Test23", ok}, + { "4.13.25", "Valid RFC822 nameConstraints Test25", ok}]). + + +invalid_rfc822_name_constraints(doc) -> + [""]; +invalid_rfc822_name_constraints(suite) -> + []; +invalid_rfc822_name_constraints(Config) when is_list(Config) -> + run([{ "4.13.22", "Invalid RFC822 nameConstraints Test22", + {bad_cert, name_not_permitted}}, + { "4.13.24", "Invalid RFC822 nameConstraints Test24", + {bad_cert, name_not_permitted}}, + { "4.13.26", "Invalid RFC822 nameConstraints Test26", + {bad_cert, name_not_permitted}}]). + +valid_DN_and_rfc822_name_constraints(doc) -> + [""]; +valid_DN_and_rfc822_name_constraints(suite) -> + []; +valid_DN_and_rfc822_name_constraints(Config) when is_list(Config) -> + run([{ "4.13.27", "Valid DN and RFC822 nameConstraints Test27", ok}]). + +invalid_DN_and_rfc822_name_constraints(doc) -> + [""]; +invalid_DN_and_rfc822_name_constraints(suite) -> + []; +invalid_DN_and_rfc822_name_constraints(Config) when is_list(Config) -> + run([{ "4.13.28", "Invalid DN and RFC822 nameConstraints Test28", + {bad_cert, name_not_permitted}}, + { "4.13.29", "Invalid DN and RFC822 nameConstraints Test29", + {bad_cert, name_not_permitted}}]). + +valid_dns_name_constraints(doc) -> + [""]; +valid_dns_name_constraints(suite) -> + []; +valid_dns_name_constraints(Config) when is_list(Config) -> + run([{ "4.13.30", "Valid DNS nameConstraints Test30", ok}, + { "4.13.32", "Valid DNS nameConstraints Test32", ok}]). + +invalid_dns_name_constraints(doc) -> + [""]; +invalid_dns_name_constraints(suite) -> + []; +invalid_dns_name_constraints(Config) when is_list(Config) -> + run([{ "4.13.31", "Invalid DNS nameConstraints Test31", {bad_cert, name_not_permitted}}, + { "4.13.33", "Invalid DNS nameConstraints Test33", {bad_cert, name_not_permitted}}, + { "4.13.38", "Invalid DNS nameConstraints Test38", {bad_cert, name_not_permitted}}]). + +valid_uri_name_constraints(doc) -> + [""]; +valid_uri_name_constraints(suite) -> + []; +valid_uri_name_constraints(Config) when is_list(Config) -> + run([{ "4.13.34", "Valid URI nameConstraints Test34", ok}, + { "4.13.36", "Valid URI nameConstraints Test36", ok}]). + +invalid_uri_name_constraints(doc) -> + [""]; +invalid_uri_name_constraints(suite) -> + []; +invalid_uri_name_constraints(Config) when is_list(Config) -> + run([{ "4.13.35", "Invalid URI nameConstraints Test35",{bad_cert, name_not_permitted}}, + { "4.13.37", "Invalid URI nameConstraints Test37",{bad_cert, name_not_permitted}}]). + +%%----------------------------------------------------------------------------- +delta_without_crl(doc) -> + [""]; +delta_without_crl(suite) -> + []; +delta_without_crl(Config) when is_list(Config) -> + run([{ "4.15.1", "Invalid deltaCRLIndicator No Base Test1",{bad_cert, + revocation_status_undetermined}}, + {"4.15.10", "Invalid delta-CRL Test10", {bad_cert, + revocation_status_undetermined}}]). + +valid_delta_crls(doc) -> + [""]; +valid_delta_crls(suite) -> + []; +valid_delta_crls(Config) when is_list(Config) -> + run([{ "4.15.2", "Valid delta-CRL Test2", ok}, + { "4.15.5", "Valid delta-CRL Test5", ok}, + { "4.15.7", "Valid delta-CRL Test7", ok}, + { "4.15.8", "Valid delta-CRL Test8", ok} + ]). + +invalid_delta_crls(doc) -> + [""]; +invalid_delta_crls(suite) -> + []; +invalid_delta_crls(Config) when is_list(Config) -> + run([{ "4.15.3", "Invalid delta-CRL Test3", {bad_cert,{revoked, keyCompromise}}}, + { "4.15.4", "Invalid delta-CRL Test4", {bad_cert,{revoked, keyCompromise}}}, + { "4.15.6", "Invalid delta-CRL Test6", {bad_cert,{revoked, keyCompromise}}}, + { "4.15.9", "Invalid delta-CRL Test9", {bad_cert,{revoked, keyCompromise}}}]). + +%%----------------------------------------------------------------------------- + +valid_distribution_points(doc) -> + [""]; +valid_distribution_points(suite) -> + []; +valid_distribution_points(Config) when is_list(Config) -> + run([{ "4.14.1", "Valid distributionPoint Test1", ok}, + { "4.14.4", "Valid distributionPoint Test4", ok}, + { "4.14.5", "Valid distributionPoint Test5", ok}, + { "4.14.7", "Valid distributionPoint Test7", ok} + ]). + +valid_distribution_points_no_issuing_distribution_point(doc) -> + [""]; +valid_distribution_points_no_issuing_distribution_point(suite) -> + []; +valid_distribution_points_no_issuing_distribution_point(Config) when is_list(Config) -> + run([{ "4.14.10", "Valid No issuingDistributionPoint Test10", ok} + ]). + +invalid_distribution_points(doc) -> + [""]; +invalid_distribution_points(suite) -> + []; +invalid_distribution_points(Config) when is_list(Config) -> + run([{ "4.14.2", "Invalid distributionPoint Test2", {bad_cert,{revoked, keyCompromise}}}, + { "4.14.3", "Invalid distributionPoint Test3", {bad_cert, + revocation_status_undetermined}}, + { "4.14.6", "Invalid distributionPoint Test6", {bad_cert,{revoked, keyCompromise}}}, + { "4.14.8", "Invalid distributionPoint Test8", {bad_cert, + revocation_status_undetermined}}, + { "4.14.9", "Invalid distributionPoint Test9", {bad_cert, + revocation_status_undetermined}} + ]). + +valid_only_contains(doc) -> + [""]; +valid_only_contains(suite) -> + []; +valid_only_contains(Config) when is_list(Config) -> + run([{ "4.14.13", "Valid onlyContainsCACerts CRL Test13", ok}]). + +invalid_only_contains(doc) -> + [""]; +invalid_only_contains(suite) -> + []; +invalid_only_contains(Config) when is_list(Config) -> + run([{ "4.14.11", "Invalid onlyContainsUserCerts CRL Test11", + {bad_cert, revocation_status_undetermined}}, + { "4.14.12", "Invalid onlyContainsCACerts CRL Test12", + {bad_cert, revocation_status_undetermined}}, + { "4.14.14", "Invalid onlyContainsAttributeCerts Test14", + {bad_cert, revocation_status_undetermined}} + ]). + +valid_only_some_reasons(doc) -> + [""]; +valid_only_some_reasons(suite) -> + []; +valid_only_some_reasons(Config) when is_list(Config) -> + run([{ "4.14.18", "Valid onlySomeReasons Test18", ok}, + { "4.14.19", "Valid onlySomeReasons Test19", ok} + ]). + +invalid_only_some_reasons(doc) -> + [""]; +invalid_only_some_reasons(suite) -> + []; +invalid_only_some_reasons(Config) when is_list(Config) -> + run([{ "4.14.15", "Invalid onlySomeReasons Test15", + {bad_cert,{revoked, keyCompromise}}}, + { "4.14.16", "Invalid onlySomeReasons Test16", + {bad_cert,{revoked, certificateHold}}}, + { "4.14.17", "Invalid onlySomeReasons Test17", + {bad_cert, revocation_status_undetermined}}, + { "4.14.20", "Invalid onlySomeReasons Test20", + {bad_cert,{revoked, keyCompromise}}}, + { "4.14.21", "Invalid onlySomeReasons Test21", + {bad_cert,{revoked, affiliationChanged}}} + ]). + +valid_indirect_crl(doc) -> + [""]; +valid_indirect_crl(suite) -> + []; +valid_indirect_crl(Config) when is_list(Config) -> + run([{ "4.14.22", "Valid IDP with indirectCRL Test22", ok}, + { "4.14.24", "Valid IDP with indirectCRL Test24", ok}, + { "4.14.25", "Valid IDP with indirectCRL Test25", ok} + ]). + +invalid_indirect_crl(doc) -> + [""]; +invalid_indirect_crl(suite) -> + []; +invalid_indirect_crl(Config) when is_list(Config) -> + run([{ "4.14.23", "Invalid IDP with indirectCRL Test23", + {bad_cert,{revoked, keyCompromise}}}, + { "4.14.26", "Invalid IDP with indirectCRL Test26", + {bad_cert, revocation_status_undetermined}} + ]). + +valid_crl_issuer(doc) -> + [""]; +valid_crl_issuer(suite) -> + []; +valid_crl_issuer(Config) when is_list(Config) -> + run([{ "4.14.28", "Valid cRLIssuer Test28", ok}%%, + %%{ "4.14.29", "Valid cRLIssuer Test29", ok}, + %%{ "4.14.33", "Valid cRLIssuer Test33", ok} + ]). + +invalid_crl_issuer(doc) -> + [""]; +invalid_crl_issuer(suite) -> + []; +invalid_crl_issuer(Config) when is_list(Config) -> + run([ + { "4.14.27", "Invalid cRLIssuer Test27", {bad_cert, revocation_status_undetermined}}, + { "4.14.31", "Invalid cRLIssuer Test31", {bad_cert,{revoked, keyCompromise}}}, + { "4.14.32", "Invalid cRLIssuer Test32", {bad_cert,{revoked, keyCompromise}}}, + { "4.14.34", "Invalid cRLIssuer Test34", {bad_cert,{revoked, keyCompromise}}}, + { "4.14.35", "Invalid cRLIssuer Test35", {bad_cert, revocation_status_undetermined}} + ]). + + +%%distribution_points() -> + %%{ "4.14", "Distribution Points" }, +%% [ + %% Although this test is valid it has a circular dependency. As a result + %% an attempt is made to reursively checks a CRL path and rejected due to + %% a CRL path validation error. PKITS notes suggest this test does not + %% need to be run due to this issue. +%% { "4.14.30", "Valid cRLIssuer Test30", 54 }]. + + +%%----------------------------------------------------------------------------- + +unknown_critical_extension(doc) -> + [""]; +unknown_critical_extension(suite) -> + []; +unknown_critical_extension(Config) when is_list(Config) -> + run([{ "4.16.2", "Invalid Unknown Critical Certificate Extension Test2", + {bad_cert,unknown_critical_extension}}]). + +unknown_not_critical_extension(doc) -> + [""]; +unknown_not_critical_extension(suite) -> + []; +unknown_not_critical_extension(Config) when is_list(Config) -> + run([{ "4.16.1", "Valid Unknown Not Critical Certificate Extension Test1", ok}]). + +%%----------------------------------------------------------------------------- run(Tests) -> File = file(?CERTS,"TrustAnchorRootCertificate.crt"), {ok, TA} = file:read_file(File), run(Tests, TA). run({Chap, Test, Result}, TA) -> - CertChain = sort_chain(read_certs(Test),TA, [], false), - try public_key:pkix_path_validation(TA, CertChain, []) of - {Result, _} -> ok; + CertChain = sort_chain(read_certs(Test),TA, [], false, Chap), + Options = path_validation_options(TA, Chap,Test), + try public_key:pkix_path_validation(TA, CertChain, Options) of + {Result, _} -> ok; {error,Result} when Result =/= ok -> ok; - {error,Error} when is_integer(Result) -> - ?warning(" ~p~n Got ~p expected ~p~n",[Test, Error, Result]); - {error,Error} when Result =/= ok -> - ?error(" minor ~p~n Got ~p expected ~p~n",[Test, Error, Result]); {error, Error} -> ?error(" ~p ~p~n Expected ~p got ~p ~n", [Chap, Test, Result, Error]), fail; - {ok, _} when Result =/= ok -> + {ok, _OK} when Result =/= ok -> ?error(" ~p ~p~n Expected ~p got ~p ~n", [Chap, Test, Result, ok]), fail catch Type:Reason -> @@ -181,14 +821,318 @@ run([Test|Rest],TA) -> run(Rest,TA); run([],_) -> ok. +path_validation_options(TA, Chap, Test) -> + case needs_crl_options(Chap) of + true -> + crl_options(TA, Test); + false -> + Fun = + fun(_,{bad_cert, _} = Reason, _) -> + {fail, Reason}; + (_,{extension, _}, UserState) -> + {unknown, UserState}; + (_, Valid, UserState) when Valid == valid; + Valid == valid_peer -> + {valid, UserState} + end, + [{verify_fun, {Fun, []}}] + end. + +needs_crl_options("4.4" ++ _) -> + true; +needs_crl_options("4.5" ++ _) -> + true; +needs_crl_options("4.7.4" ++ _) -> + true; +needs_crl_options("4.7.5" ++ _) -> + true; +needs_crl_options("4.14" ++ _) -> + true; +needs_crl_options("4.15" ++ _) -> + true; +needs_crl_options(_) -> + false. + +crl_options(TA, Test) -> + case read_crls(Test) of + [] -> + []; + CRLs -> + Fun = + fun(_,{bad_cert, _} = Reason, _) -> + {fail, Reason}; + (_,{extension, + #'Extension'{extnID = ?'id-ce-cRLDistributionPoints', + extnValue = Value}}, UserState0) -> + UserState = update_crls(Value, UserState0), + {valid, UserState}; + (_,{extension, _}, UserState) -> + {unknown, UserState}; + (OtpCert, Valid, UserState) when Valid == valid; + Valid == valid_peer -> + {ErlCerts, CRLs} = UserState#verify_state.crl_info, + CRLInfo0 = + crl_info(OtpCert, + ErlCerts,[{DerCRL, public_key:der_decode('CertificateList', + DerCRL)} || DerCRL <- CRLs], + []), + CRLInfo = lists:reverse(CRLInfo0), + Certs = UserState#verify_state.certs_db, + Fun = fun(DP, CRLtoValidate, Id, CertsDb) -> + trusted_cert_and_path(DP, CRLtoValidate, Id, CertsDb) + end, + Ignore = ignore_sign_test_when_building_path(Test), + case public_key:pkix_crls_validate(OtpCert, CRLInfo, + [{issuer_fun,{Fun, {Ignore, Certs}}}]) of + valid -> + {valid, UserState}; + Reason -> + {fail, Reason} + end + end, + + Certs = read_certs(Test), + ErlCerts = [public_key:pkix_decode_cert(Cert, otp) || Cert <- Certs], + + [{verify_fun, {Fun, #verify_state{certs_db = [TA| Certs], + crl_info = {ErlCerts, CRLs}}}}] + end. + +crl_info(_, _, [], Acc) -> + Acc; +crl_info(OtpCert, Certs, [{_, #'CertificateList'{tbsCertList = + #'TBSCertList'{issuer = Issuer, + crlExtensions = CRLExtensions}}} + = CRL | Rest], Acc) -> + OtpTBSCert = OtpCert#'OTPCertificate'.tbsCertificate, + Extensions = OtpTBSCert#'OTPTBSCertificate'.extensions, + ExtList = pubkey_cert:extensions_list(CRLExtensions), + DPs = case pubkey_cert:select_extension(?'id-ce-cRLDistributionPoints', Extensions) of + #'Extension'{extnValue = Value} -> + lists:map(fun(Point) -> pubkey_cert_records:transform(Point, decode) end, Value); + _ -> + case same_issuer(OtpCert, Issuer) of + true -> + [make_dp(ExtList, asn1_NOVALUE, Issuer)]; + false -> + [make_dp(ExtList, Issuer, ignore)] + end + end, + DPsCRLs = lists:map(fun(DP) -> {DP, CRL} end, DPs), + crl_info(OtpCert, Certs, Rest, DPsCRLs ++ Acc). + +ignore_sign_test_when_building_path("Invalid Bad CRL Signature Test4") -> + true; +ignore_sign_test_when_building_path(_) -> + false. + +same_issuer(OTPCert, Issuer) -> + DecIssuer = pubkey_cert_records:transform(Issuer, decode), + OTPTBSCert = OTPCert#'OTPCertificate'.tbsCertificate, + CertIssuer = OTPTBSCert#'OTPTBSCertificate'.issuer, + pubkey_cert:is_issuer(DecIssuer, CertIssuer). + +make_dp(Extensions, Issuer0, DpInfo) -> + {Issuer, Point} = mk_issuer_dp(Issuer0, DpInfo), + case pubkey_cert:select_extension('id-ce-cRLReason', Extensions) of + #'Extension'{extnValue = Reasons} -> + #'DistributionPoint'{cRLIssuer = Issuer, + reasons = Reasons, + distributionPoint = Point}; + _ -> + #'DistributionPoint'{cRLIssuer = Issuer, + reasons = [unspecified, keyCompromise, + cACompromise, affiliationChanged, superseded, + cessationOfOperation, certificateHold, + removeFromCRL, privilegeWithdrawn, aACompromise], + distributionPoint = Point} + end. + +mk_issuer_dp(asn1_NOVALUE, Issuer) -> + {asn1_NOVALUE, {fullName, [{directoryName, Issuer}]}}; +mk_issuer_dp(Issuer, _) -> + {[{directoryName, Issuer}], asn1_NOVALUE}. + +update_crls(_, State) -> + State. + +trusted_cert_and_path(DP, CRL, Id, {Ignore, CertsList}) -> + case crl_issuer(crl_issuer_name(DP), CRL, Id, CertsList, CertsList, Ignore) of + {ok, IssuerCert, DerIssuerCert} -> + Certs = [{public_key:pkix_decode_cert(Cert, otp), Cert} || Cert <- CertsList], + CertChain = build_chain(Certs, Certs, IssuerCert, Ignore, [DerIssuerCert]), + {ok, public_key:pkix_decode_cert(hd(CertChain), otp), CertChain}; + Other -> + Other + end. + +crl_issuer_name(#'DistributionPoint'{cRLIssuer = asn1_NOVALUE}) -> + undefined; +crl_issuer_name(#'DistributionPoint'{cRLIssuer = [{directoryName, Issuer}]}) -> + pubkey_cert_records:transform(Issuer, decode). + +build_chain([],_, _, _,Acc) -> + Acc; + +build_chain([{First, DerFirst}|Certs], All, Cert, Ignore, Acc) -> + case public_key:pkix_is_self_signed(Cert) andalso is_test_root(Cert) of + true -> + Acc; + false -> + case public_key:pkix_is_issuer(Cert, First) + %%andalso check_extension_cert_signer(First) + andalso is_signer(First, Cert, Ignore) + of + true -> + build_chain(All, All, First, Ignore, [DerFirst | Acc]); + false -> + build_chain(Certs, All, Cert, Ignore, Acc) + end + end. + +is_signer(_,_, true) -> + true; +is_signer(Signer, #'OTPCertificate'{} = Cert,_) -> + TBSCert = Signer#'OTPCertificate'.tbsCertificate, + PublicKeyInfo = TBSCert#'OTPTBSCertificate'.subjectPublicKeyInfo, + PublicKey = PublicKeyInfo#'OTPSubjectPublicKeyInfo'.subjectPublicKey, + AlgInfo = PublicKeyInfo#'OTPSubjectPublicKeyInfo'.algorithm, + PublicKeyParams = AlgInfo#'PublicKeyAlgorithm'.parameters, + try pubkey_cert:validate_signature(Cert, public_key:pkix_encode('OTPCertificate', + Cert, otp), + PublicKey, PublicKeyParams, true, ?DEFAULT_VERIFYFUN) of + true -> + true + catch + _:_ -> + false + end; +is_signer(Signer, #'CertificateList'{} = CRL, _) -> + TBSCert = Signer#'OTPCertificate'.tbsCertificate, + PublicKeyInfo = TBSCert#'OTPTBSCertificate'.subjectPublicKeyInfo, + PublicKey = PublicKeyInfo#'OTPSubjectPublicKeyInfo'.subjectPublicKey, + AlgInfo = PublicKeyInfo#'OTPSubjectPublicKeyInfo'.algorithm, + PublicKeyParams = AlgInfo#'PublicKeyAlgorithm'.parameters, + pubkey_crl:verify_crl_signature(CRL, public_key:pkix_encode('CertificateList', + CRL, plain), + PublicKey, PublicKeyParams). + +is_test_root(OtpCert) -> + TBSCert = OtpCert#'OTPCertificate'.tbsCertificate, + {rdnSequence, AtterList} = TBSCert#'OTPTBSCertificate'.issuer, + lists:member([{'AttributeTypeAndValue',{2,5,4,3},{printableString,"Trust Anchor"}}], + AtterList). + +check_extension_cert_signer(OtpCert) -> + TBSCert = OtpCert#'OTPCertificate'.tbsCertificate, + Extensions = TBSCert#'OTPTBSCertificate'.extensions, + case pubkey_cert:select_extension(?'id-ce-keyUsage', Extensions) of + #'Extension'{extnValue = KeyUse} -> + lists:member(keyCertSign, KeyUse); + _ -> + true + end. + +check_extension_crl_signer(OtpCert) -> + TBSCert = OtpCert#'OTPCertificate'.tbsCertificate, + Extensions = TBSCert#'OTPTBSCertificate'.extensions, + case pubkey_cert:select_extension(?'id-ce-keyUsage', Extensions) of + #'Extension'{extnValue = KeyUse} -> + lists:member(cRLSign, KeyUse); + _ -> + true + end. + +crl_issuer(undefined, CRL, issuer_not_found, _, CertsList, Ignore) -> + crl_issuer(CRL, CertsList, Ignore); + +crl_issuer(IssuerName, CRL, issuer_not_found, CertsList, CertsList, Ignore) -> + crl_issuer(IssuerName, CRL, IssuerName, CertsList, CertsList, Ignore); + +crl_issuer(undefined, CRL, Id, [Cert | Rest], All, false) -> + ErlCert = public_key:pkix_decode_cert(Cert, otp), + TBSCertificate = ErlCert#'OTPCertificate'.tbsCertificate, + SerialNumber = TBSCertificate#'OTPTBSCertificate'.serialNumber, + Issuer = public_key:pkix_normalize_name( + TBSCertificate#'OTPTBSCertificate'.subject), + Bool = is_signer(ErlCert, CRL, false), + case {SerialNumber, Issuer} of + Id when Bool == true -> + {ok, ErlCert, Cert}; + _ -> + crl_issuer(undefined, CRL, Id, Rest, All, false) + end; + +crl_issuer(IssuerName, CRL, Id, [Cert | Rest], All, false) -> + ErlCert = public_key:pkix_decode_cert(Cert, otp), + TBSCertificate = ErlCert#'OTPCertificate'.tbsCertificate, + SerialNumber = TBSCertificate#'OTPTBSCertificate'.serialNumber, + %%Issuer = public_key:pkix_normalize_name( + %% TBSCertificate#'OTPTBSCertificate'.subject), + Bool = is_signer(ErlCert, CRL, false), + case {SerialNumber, IssuerName} of + Id when Bool == true -> + {ok, ErlCert, Cert}; + {_, IssuerName} when Bool == true -> + {ok, ErlCert, Cert}; + _ -> + crl_issuer(IssuerName, CRL, Id, Rest, All, false) + end; + +crl_issuer(undefined, CRL, _, [], CertsList, Ignore) -> + crl_issuer(CRL, CertsList, Ignore); +crl_issuer(CRLName, CRL, _, [], CertsList, Ignore) -> + crl_issuer(CRLName, CRL, CertsList, Ignore). + + +crl_issuer(_, [],_) -> + {error, issuer_not_found}; +crl_issuer(CRL, [Cert | Rest], Ignore) -> + ErlCert = public_key:pkix_decode_cert(Cert, otp), + case public_key:pkix_is_issuer(CRL, ErlCert) andalso + check_extension_crl_signer(ErlCert) andalso + is_signer(ErlCert, CRL, Ignore) + of + true -> + {ok, ErlCert,Cert}; + false -> + crl_issuer(CRL, Rest, Ignore) + end. + +crl_issuer(_,_, [],_) -> + {error, issuer_not_found}; +crl_issuer(IssuerName, CRL, [Cert | Rest], Ignore) -> + ErlCert = public_key:pkix_decode_cert(Cert, otp), + TBSCertificate = ErlCert#'OTPCertificate'.tbsCertificate, + Issuer = public_key:pkix_normalize_name( + TBSCertificate#'OTPTBSCertificate'.subject), + + case + public_key:pkix_is_issuer(CRL, ErlCert) andalso + check_extension_crl_signer(ErlCert) andalso + is_signer(ErlCert, CRL, Ignore) + of + true -> + case pubkey_cert:is_issuer(Issuer, IssuerName) of + true -> + {ok, ErlCert,Cert}; + false -> + crl_issuer(IssuerName, CRL, Rest, Ignore) + end; + false -> + crl_issuer(IssuerName, CRL, Rest, Ignore) + end. read_certs(Test) -> File = test_file(Test), - %% io:format("Read ~p ",[File]), Ders = erl_make_certs:pem_to_der(File), - %% io:format("Ders ~p ~n",[length(Ders)]), [Cert || {'Certificate', Cert, not_encrypted} <- Ders]. +read_crls(Test) -> + File = test_file(Test), + Ders = erl_make_certs:pem_to_der(File), + [CRL || {'CertificateList', CRL, not_encrypted} <- Ders]. + test_file(Test) -> file(?CONV, lists:append(string:tokens(Test, " -")) ++ ".pem"). @@ -206,118 +1150,89 @@ file(Sub,File) -> end, AbsFile. -sort_chain([First|Certs], TA, Try, Found) -> +sort_chain(Certs, TA, Acc, Bool, Chap) when Chap == "4.5.3"-> + [CA, Entity, Self] = do_sort_chain(Certs, TA, Acc, Bool, Chap), + [CA, Self, Entity]; +sort_chain(Certs, TA, Acc, Bool, Chap) when Chap == "4.5.4"; + Chap == "4.5.5" -> + [CA, Entity, _Self] = do_sort_chain(Certs, TA, Acc, Bool, Chap), + [CA, Entity]; + +sort_chain(Certs, TA, Acc, Bool, Chap) when Chap == "4.14.24"; + Chap == "4.14.25"; + Chap == "4.14.26"; + Chap == "4.14.27"; + Chap == "4.14.31"; + Chap == "4.14.32"; + Chap == "4.14.33" -> + [_OtherCA, Entity, CA] = do_sort_chain(Certs, TA, Acc, Bool, Chap), + [CA, Entity]; + +sort_chain(Certs, TA, Acc, Bool, Chap) when Chap == "4.14.28"; + Chap == "4.14.29" -> + [CA, _OtherCA, Entity] = do_sort_chain(Certs, TA, Acc, Bool, Chap), + [CA, Entity]; + + +sort_chain(Certs, TA, Acc, Bool, Chap) when Chap == "4.14.33" -> + [Entity, CA, _OtherCA] = do_sort_chain(Certs, TA, Acc, Bool, Chap), + [CA, Entity]; + + +sort_chain(Certs, TA, Acc, Bool, Chap) -> + do_sort_chain(Certs, TA, Acc, Bool, Chap). + +do_sort_chain([First], TA, Try, Found, Chap) when Chap == "4.5.6"; + Chap == "4.5.7"; + Chap == "4.4.19"; + Chap == "4.4.20"; + Chap == "4.4.21"-> case public_key:pkix_is_issuer(First,TA) of true -> - [First|sort_chain(Certs,First,Try,true)]; + [First|do_sort_chain([],First,Try,true, Chap)]; false -> - sort_chain(Certs,TA,[First|Try],Found) + do_sort_chain([],TA,[First|Try],Found, Chap) end; -sort_chain([], _, [],_) -> []; -sort_chain([], Valid, Check, true) -> - sort_chain(lists:reverse(Check), Valid, [], false); -sort_chain([], _Valid, Check, false) -> +do_sort_chain([First|Certs], TA, Try, Found, Chap) when Chap == "4.5.6"; + Chap == "4.5.7"; + Chap == "4.4.19"; + Chap == "4.4.20"; + Chap == "4.4.21"-> +%% case check_extension_cert_signer(public_key:pkix_decode_cert(First, otp)) of +%% true -> + case public_key:pkix_is_issuer(First,TA) of + true -> + [First|do_sort_chain(Certs,First,Try,true, Chap)]; + false -> + do_sort_chain(Certs,TA,[First|Try],Found, Chap) + end; +%% false -> +%% do_sort_chain(Certs, TA, Try, Found, Chap) +%% end; + +do_sort_chain([First|Certs], TA, Try, Found, Chap) -> + case public_key:pkix_is_issuer(First,TA) of + true -> + [First|do_sort_chain(Certs,First,Try,true, Chap)]; + false -> + do_sort_chain(Certs,TA,[First|Try],Found, Chap) + end; + +do_sort_chain([], _, [],_, _) -> []; +do_sort_chain([], Valid, Check, true, Chap) -> + do_sort_chain(lists:reverse(Check), Valid, [], false, Chap); +do_sort_chain([], _Valid, Check, false, _) -> Check. -signature_verification() -> - %% "4.1", "Signature Verification" , - [{ "4.1.1", "Valid Signatures Test1", ok}, - { "4.1.2", "Invalid CA Signature Test2", {bad_cert,invalid_signature}}, - { "4.1.3", "Invalid EE Signature Test3", {bad_cert,invalid_signature}}, - { "4.1.4", "Valid DSA Signatures Test4", ok}, - { "4.1.5", "Valid DSA Parameter Inheritance Test5", ok}, - { "4.1.6", "Invalid DSA Signature Test6", {bad_cert,invalid_signature}}]. -validity_periods() -> - %% { "4.2", "Validity Periods" }, - [{ "4.2.1", "Invalid CA notBefore Date Test1", {bad_cert, cert_expired}}, - { "4.2.2", "Invalid EE notBefore Date Test2", {bad_cert, cert_expired}}, - { "4.2.3", "Valid pre2000 UTC notBefore Date Test3", ok}, - { "4.2.4", "Valid GeneralizedTime notBefore Date Test4", ok}, - { "4.2.5", "Invalid CA notAfter Date Test5", {bad_cert, cert_expired}}, - { "4.2.6", "Invalid EE notAfter Date Test6", {bad_cert, cert_expired}}, - { "4.2.7", "Invalid pre2000 UTC EE notAfter Date Test7", {bad_cert, cert_expired}}, - { "4.2.8", "Valid GeneralizedTime notAfter Date Test8", ok}]. -verifying_name_chaining() -> - %%{ "4.3", "Verifying Name Chaining" }, - [{ "4.3.1", "Invalid Name Chaining EE Test1", {bad_cert, invalid_issuer}}, - { "4.3.2", "Invalid Name Chaining Order Test2", {bad_cert, invalid_issuer}}, - { "4.3.3", "Valid Name Chaining Whitespace Test3", ok}, - { "4.3.4", "Valid Name Chaining Whitespace Test4", ok}, - { "4.3.5", "Valid Name Chaining Capitalization Test5", ok}, - { "4.3.6", "Valid Name Chaining UIDs Test6", ok}, - { "4.3.7", "Valid RFC3280 Mandatory Attribute Types Test7", ok}, - { "4.3.8", "Valid RFC3280 Optional Attribute Types Test8", ok}, - { "4.3.9", "Valid UTF8String Encoded Names Test9", ok}, - { "4.3.10", "Valid Rollover from PrintableString to UTF8String Test10", ok}, - { "4.3.11", "Valid UTF8String Case Insensitive Match Test11", ok}]. -basic_certificate_revocation_tests() -> - %%{ "4.4", "Basic Certificate Revocation Tests" }, - [{ "4.4.1", "Missing CRL Test1", 3 }, - { "4.4.2", "Invalid Revoked CA Test2", 23 }, - { "4.4.3", "Invalid Revoked EE Test3", 23 }, - { "4.4.4", "Invalid Bad CRL Signature Test4", 8 }, - { "4.4.5", "Invalid Bad CRL Issuer Name Test5", 3 }, - { "4.4.6", "Invalid Wrong CRL Test6", 3 }, - { "4.4.7", "Valid Two CRLs Test7", ok}, - - %% The test document suggests these should return certificate revoked... - %% Subsquent discussion has concluded they should not due to unhandle - %% critical CRL extensions. - { "4.4.8", "Invalid Unknown CRL Entry Extension Test8", 36 }, - { "4.4.9", "Invalid Unknown CRL Extension Test9", 36 }, - - { "4.4.10", "Invalid Unknown CRL Extension Test10", 36 }, - { "4.4.11", "Invalid Old CRL nextUpdate Test11", 12 }, - { "4.4.12", "Invalid pre2000 CRL nextUpdate Test12", 12 }, - { "4.4.13", "Valid GeneralizedTime CRL nextUpdate Test13", ok}, - { "4.4.14", "Valid Negative Serial Number Test14", ok}, - { "4.4.15", "Invalid Negative Serial Number Test15", 23 }, - { "4.4.16", "Valid Long Serial Number Test16", ok}, - { "4.4.17", "Valid Long Serial Number Test17", ok}, - { "4.4.18", "Invalid Long Serial Number Test18", 23 }, - { "4.4.19", "Valid Separate Certificate and CRL Keys Test19", ok}, - { "4.4.20", "Invalid Separate Certificate and CRL Keys Test20", 23 }, - - %% CRL path is revoked so get a CRL path validation error - { "4.4.21", "Invalid Separate Certificate and CRL Keys Test21", 54 }]. -verifying_paths_with_self_issued_certificates() -> - %%{ "4.5", "Verifying Paths with Self-Issued Certificates" }, - [{ "4.5.1", "Valid Basic Self-Issued Old With New Test1", ok}, - %%{ "4.5.2", "Invalid Basic Self-Issued Old With New Test2", 23 }, - %%{ "4.5.3", "Valid Basic Self-Issued New With Old Test3", ok}, - %%{ "4.5.4", "Valid Basic Self-Issued New With Old Test4", ok}, - { "4.5.5", "Invalid Basic Self-Issued New With Old Test5", 23 }, - %%{ "4.5.6", "Valid Basic Self-Issued CRL Signing Key Test6", ok}, - { "4.5.7", "Invalid Basic Self-Issued CRL Signing Key Test7", 23 }, - { "4.5.8", "Invalid Basic Self-Issued CRL Signing Key Test8", {bad_cert,invalid_key_usage} }]. -verifying_basic_constraints() -> - [%%{ "4.6", "Verifying Basic Constraints" }, - { "4.6.1", "Invalid Missing basicConstraints Test1", - {bad_cert, missing_basic_constraint} }, - { "4.6.2", "Invalid cA False Test2", {bad_cert, missing_basic_constraint}}, - { "4.6.3", "Invalid cA False Test3", {bad_cert, missing_basic_constraint}}, - { "4.6.4", "Valid basicConstraints Not Critical Test4", ok}, - { "4.6.5", "Invalid pathLenConstraint Test5", {bad_cert, max_path_length_reached}}, - { "4.6.6", "Invalid pathLenConstraint Test6", {bad_cert, max_path_length_reached}}, - { "4.6.7", "Valid pathLenConstraint Test7", ok}, - { "4.6.8", "Valid pathLenConstraint Test8", ok}, - { "4.6.9", "Invalid pathLenConstraint Test9", {bad_cert, max_path_length_reached}}, - { "4.6.10", "Invalid pathLenConstraint Test10", {bad_cert, max_path_length_reached}}, - { "4.6.11", "Invalid pathLenConstraint Test11", {bad_cert, max_path_length_reached}}, - { "4.6.12", "Invalid pathLenConstraint Test12", {bad_cert, max_path_length_reached}}, - { "4.6.13", "Valid pathLenConstraint Test13", ok}, - { "4.6.14", "Valid pathLenConstraint Test14", ok}, - { "4.6.15", "Valid Self-Issued pathLenConstraint Test15", ok}, - { "4.6.16", "Invalid Self-Issued pathLenConstraint Test16", {bad_cert, max_path_length_reached}}, - { "4.6.17", "Valid Self-Issued pathLenConstraint Test17", ok}]. -key_usage() -> - %%{ "4.7", "Key Usage" }, - [{ "4.7.1", "Invalid keyUsage Critical keyCertSign False Test1", {bad_cert,invalid_key_usage} }, - { "4.7.2", "Invalid keyUsage Not Critical keyCertSign False Test2", {bad_cert,invalid_key_usage} }, - { "4.7.3", "Valid keyUsage Not Critical Test3", ok} - %%,{ "4.7.4", "Invalid keyUsage Critical cRLSign False Test4", 35 } - %%,{ "4.7.5", "Invalid keyUsage Not Critical cRLSign False Test5", 35 } - ]. +error(Format, Args, File0, Line) -> + File = filename:basename(File0), + Pid = group_leader(), + Pid ! {failed, File, Line}, + io:format(Pid, "~s(~p): ERROR"++Format, [File,Line|Args]). + +warning(Format, Args, File0, Line) -> + File = filename:basename(File0), + io:format("~s(~p): Warning "++Format, [File,Line|Args]). %% Certificate policy tests need special handling. They can have several %% sub tests and we need to check the outputs are correct. @@ -425,182 +1340,3 @@ inhibit_any_policy() -> {"4.12.8", "Invalid Self-Issued inhibitAnyPolicy Test8", 43 }, {"4.12.9", "Valid Self-Issued inhibitAnyPolicy Test9", ok}, {"4.12.10", "Invalid Self-Issued inhibitAnyPolicy Test10", 43 }]. - -name_constraints() -> - %%{ "4.13", "Name Constraints" }, - [{ "4.13.1", "Valid DN nameConstraints Test1", ok}, - { "4.13.2", "Invalid DN nameConstraints Test2", {bad_cert, name_not_permitted}}, - { "4.13.3", "Invalid DN nameConstraints Test3", {bad_cert, name_not_permitted}}, - { "4.13.4", "Valid DN nameConstraints Test4", ok}, - { "4.13.5", "Valid DN nameConstraints Test5", ok}, - { "4.13.6", "Valid DN nameConstraints Test6", ok}, - { "4.13.7", "Invalid DN nameConstraints Test7", {bad_cert, name_not_permitted}}, - { "4.13.8", "Invalid DN nameConstraints Test8", {bad_cert, name_not_permitted}}, - { "4.13.9", "Invalid DN nameConstraints Test9", {bad_cert, name_not_permitted}}, - { "4.13.10", "Invalid DN nameConstraints Test10", {bad_cert, name_not_permitted}}, - { "4.13.11", "Valid DN nameConstraints Test11", ok}, - { "4.13.12", "Invalid DN nameConstraints Test12", {bad_cert, name_not_permitted}}, - { "4.13.13", "Invalid DN nameConstraints Test13", {bad_cert, name_not_permitted}}, - { "4.13.14", "Valid DN nameConstraints Test14", ok}, - { "4.13.15", "Invalid DN nameConstraints Test15", {bad_cert, name_not_permitted}}, - { "4.13.16", "Invalid DN nameConstraints Test16", {bad_cert, name_not_permitted}}, - { "4.13.17", "Invalid DN nameConstraints Test17", {bad_cert, name_not_permitted}}, - { "4.13.18", "Valid DN nameConstraints Test18", ok}, - { "4.13.19", "Valid Self-Issued DN nameConstraints Test19", ok}, - { "4.13.20", "Invalid Self-Issued DN nameConstraints Test20", {bad_cert, name_not_permitted} }, - { "4.13.21", "Valid RFC822 nameConstraints Test21", ok}, - { "4.13.22", "Invalid RFC822 nameConstraints Test22", {bad_cert, name_not_permitted} }, - { "4.13.23", "Valid RFC822 nameConstraints Test23", ok}, - { "4.13.24", "Invalid RFC822 nameConstraints Test24", {bad_cert, name_not_permitted} }, - { "4.13.25", "Valid RFC822 nameConstraints Test25", ok}, - { "4.13.26", "Invalid RFC822 nameConstraints Test26", {bad_cert, name_not_permitted}}, - { "4.13.27", "Valid DN and RFC822 nameConstraints Test27", ok}, - { "4.13.28", "Invalid DN and RFC822 nameConstraints Test28", {bad_cert, name_not_permitted} }, - { "4.13.29", "Invalid DN and RFC822 nameConstraints Test29", {bad_cert, name_not_permitted} }, - { "4.13.30", "Valid DNS nameConstraints Test30", ok}, - { "4.13.31", "Invalid DNS nameConstraints Test31", {bad_cert, name_not_permitted} }, - { "4.13.32", "Valid DNS nameConstraints Test32", ok}, - { "4.13.33", "Invalid DNS nameConstraints Test33", {bad_cert, name_not_permitted}}, - { "4.13.34", "Valid URI nameConstraints Test34", ok}, - { "4.13.35", "Invalid URI nameConstraints Test35", {bad_cert, name_not_permitted} }, - { "4.13.36", "Valid URI nameConstraints Test36", ok}, - { "4.13.37", "Invalid URI nameConstraints Test37", {bad_cert, name_not_permitted}}, - { "4.13.38", "Invalid DNS nameConstraints Test38", {bad_cert, name_not_permitted} }]. -distribution_points() -> - %%{ "4.14", "Distribution Points" }, - [{ "4.14.1", "Valid distributionPoint Test1", ok}, - { "4.14.2", "Invalid distributionPoint Test2", 23 }, - { "4.14.3", "Invalid distributionPoint Test3", 44 }, - { "4.14.4", "Valid distributionPoint Test4", ok}, - { "4.14.5", "Valid distributionPoint Test5", ok}, - { "4.14.6", "Invalid distributionPoint Test6", 23 }, - { "4.14.7", "Valid distributionPoint Test7", ok}, - { "4.14.8", "Invalid distributionPoint Test8", 44 }, - { "4.14.9", "Invalid distributionPoint Test9", 44 }, - { "4.14.10", "Valid No issuingDistributionPoint Test10", ok}, - { "4.14.11", "Invalid onlyContainsUserCerts CRL Test11", 44 }, - { "4.14.12", "Invalid onlyContainsCACerts CRL Test12", 44 }, - { "4.14.13", "Valid onlyContainsCACerts CRL Test13", ok}, - { "4.14.14", "Invalid onlyContainsAttributeCerts Test14", 44 }, - { "4.14.15", "Invalid onlySomeReasons Test15", 23 }, - { "4.14.16", "Invalid onlySomeReasons Test16", 23 }, - { "4.14.17", "Invalid onlySomeReasons Test17", 3 }, - { "4.14.18", "Valid onlySomeReasons Test18", ok}, - { "4.14.19", "Valid onlySomeReasons Test19", ok}, - { "4.14.20", "Invalid onlySomeReasons Test20", 23 }, - { "4.14.21", "Invalid onlySomeReasons Test21", 23 }, - { "4.14.22", "Valid IDP with indirectCRL Test22", ok}, - { "4.14.23", "Invalid IDP with indirectCRL Test23", 23 }, - { "4.14.24", "Valid IDP with indirectCRL Test24", ok}, - { "4.14.25", "Valid IDP with indirectCRL Test25", ok}, - { "4.14.26", "Invalid IDP with indirectCRL Test26", 44 }, - { "4.14.27", "Invalid cRLIssuer Test27", 3 }, - { "4.14.28", "Valid cRLIssuer Test28", ok}, - { "4.14.29", "Valid cRLIssuer Test29", ok}, - - %% Although this test is valid it has a circular dependency. As a result - %% an attempt is made to reursively checks a CRL path and rejected due to - %% a CRL path validation error. PKITS notes suggest this test does not - %% need to be run due to this issue. - { "4.14.30", "Valid cRLIssuer Test30", 54 }, - { "4.14.31", "Invalid cRLIssuer Test31", 23 }, - { "4.14.32", "Invalid cRLIssuer Test32", 23 }, - { "4.14.33", "Valid cRLIssuer Test33", ok}, - { "4.14.34", "Invalid cRLIssuer Test34", 23 }, - { "4.14.35", "Invalid cRLIssuer Test35", 44 }]. -delta_crls() -> - %%{ "4.15", "Delta-CRLs" }, - [{ "4.15.1", "Invalid deltaCRLIndicator No Base Test1", 3 }, - { "4.15.2", "Valid delta-CRL Test2", ok}, - { "4.15.3", "Invalid delta-CRL Test3", 23 }, - { "4.15.4", "Invalid delta-CRL Test4", 23 }, - { "4.15.5", "Valid delta-CRL Test5", ok}, - { "4.15.6", "Invalid delta-CRL Test6", 23 }, - { "4.15.7", "Valid delta-CRL Test7", ok}, - { "4.15.8", "Valid delta-CRL Test8", ok}, - { "4.15.9", "Invalid delta-CRL Test9", 23 }, - { "4.15.10", "Invalid delta-CRL Test10", 12 }]. -private_certificate_extensions() -> - %%{ "4.16", "Private Certificate Extensions" }, - [{ "4.16.1", "Valid Unknown Not Critical Certificate Extension Test1", ok}, - { "4.16.2", "Invalid Unknown Critical Certificate Extension Test2", - {bad_cert,unknown_critical_extension}}]. - - -convert() -> - Tests = [signature_verification(), - validity_periods(), - verifying_name_chaining(), - basic_certificate_revocation_tests(), - verifying_paths_with_self_issued_certificates(), - verifying_basic_constraints(), - key_usage(), - certificate_policies(), - require_explicit_policy(), - policy_mappings(), - inhibit_policy_mapping(), - inhibit_any_policy(), - name_constraints(), - distribution_points(), - delta_crls(), - private_certificate_extensions()], - [convert(Test) || Test <- lists:flatten(Tests)]. - -convert({_,Test,_}) -> - convert1(Test); -convert({_,Test,_,_,_,_,_}) -> - convert1(Test). - -convert1(Test) -> - FName = lists:append(string:tokens(Test, " -")), - File = filename:join(?MIME, "Signed" ++ FName ++ ".eml"), - io:format("Convert ~p~n",[File]), - {ok, Mail} = file:read_file(File), - Base64 = skip_lines(Mail), - %%io:format("~s",[Base64]), - Tmp = base64:mime_decode(Base64), - file:write_file("pkits/smime-pem/tmp-pkcs7.der", Tmp), - Cmd = "openssl pkcs7 -inform der -in pkits/smime-pem/tmp-pkcs7.der" - " -print_certs -out pkits/smime-pem/" ++ FName ++ ".pem", - case os:cmd(Cmd) of - "" -> ok; - Err -> - io:format("~s",[Err]), - erlang:error(bad_cmd) - end. - -skip_lines(<<"\r\n\r\n", Rest/binary>>) -> Rest; -skip_lines(<<"\n\n", Rest/binary>>) -> Rest; -skip_lines(<<_:8, Rest/binary>>) -> - skip_lines(Rest). - -init_per_testcase(_Func, Config) -> - Datadir = proplists:get_value(data_dir, Config), - put(datadir, Datadir), - Config. - -end_per_testcase(_Func, Config) -> - %% Nodes = select_nodes(all, Config, ?FILE, ?LINE), - %% rpc:multicall(Nodes, mnesia, lkill, []), - Config. - -init_per_suite(Config) -> - try crypto:start() of - ok -> - Config - catch _:_ -> - {skip, "Crypto did not start"} - end. - -end_per_suite(_Config) -> - application:stop(crypto). - -error(Format, Args, File0, Line) -> - File = filename:basename(File0), - Pid = group_leader(), - Pid ! {failed, File, Line}, - io:format(Pid, "~s(~p): ERROR"++Format, [File,Line|Args]). - -warning(Format, Args, File0, Line) -> - File = filename:basename(File0), - io:format("~s(~p): Warning "++Format, [File,Line|Args]). |